ls: fix link-count column inflating per ACL file#11781
Merged
sylvestre merged 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom Apr 14, 2026
Merged
Conversation
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
cakebaker
reviewed
Apr 13, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this works, it feels like a hack because link_count is unrelated to ACL. Maybe it makes sense to add an additional property to PaddingCollection?
The `+1` accounting for the ACL/context indicator was applied once per item inside the padding loop, so N files with ACLs inflated the link-count column width by N. Apply it a single time after the loop. Fixes uutils#10980
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
+1accounting for the ACL/context indicator was applied once per item inside the padding loop, so N files with ACLs inflated the link-count column width by N. Apply it a single time after the loop.Fixes #10980