[variant] Add missing variant in ID generation

[gnalh]

Also address xcresult not supporting variants

[trunk-io]

😎 Merged successfully - details.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.10%. Comparing base (6654b79) to head (9b91704).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cli/src/context.rs	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
context/src/junit/parser.rs	96.10%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #809      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.79%   73.10%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          72       72              
  Lines       15960    16024      +64     
==========================================
+ Hits        11618    11715      +97     
+ Misses       4342     4309      -33     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cmillar-trunk]

We have a generate_info_id_variant_wrapper in the same file as gen_info_id that should encapsulate this logic.

[gnalh]

Will update

[mb1206]

seems good to me! this would be something that would only affect new tests right? or would it regenerate ids for existing tests?

[gnalh]

seems good to me! this would be something that would only affect new tests right? or would it regenerate ids for existing tests?

These are the same IDs that are already being used in the ETL, we just haven't flipped the switch yet to use these internal.bin files yet.