Add Golioth startup and nonprofit credits

[sprangley3-gif]

What changed

Adds Golioth with one offer for qualified early-stage startups and nonprofits. Resolves #1559.

The startup credit amount and duration are unpublished, so the entry uses an unquantified benefit and manual eligibility. The ordinary $50 signup credit is excluded. No umbrella Program is invented. Prepared with AI assistance; the contributor personally added the DCO sign-off.

Sources

• https://golioth.io/pricing — startup/nonprofit credits, qualification and contact route.
• https://golioth.io/product — device-cloud services and confirmation that verified startups/nonprofits receive credits.

Validation and review status

• Reviewed diff: exactly one new Entity YAML, one offer, no unrelated changes; git diff --check passes.
• Exact pinned @sourcey/catalog-verifier 1.0.0 local validation passes for head 1ac5c0c using the signed context for PR1561. Package and trust-root digests match the repository pins. Using the real PR identity resolved the detached preflight problem.
• sourcey/validation and changed-closure CI passed, including DCO.
• sourcey/admission report requests revision for economics: the benefit description and unknown-consideration description are unsupported by its evaluator. Other reported fields are supported; no identity conflict is reported. This evidence review remains unresolved, and no merge or acceptance is claimed.

Certification

• I changed only allowed repository content and did not mix Entity YAML with other paths.
• Public sources substantiate every submitted factual value; Sourcey-written prose is a neutral summary, not a fabricated vendor quote. The evaluator's economics objection above remains for review.
• I did not author verification, provenance, freshness, or signature claims.
• My commit includes a Signed-off-by line.

[sprangley3-gif]

The admission report flags only economics. The pricing page explicitly says, “We offer credits to qualified early-stage startups and non-profits,” and the product page also confirms startup credits. Neither states a startup-specific amount or duration. I used an unquantified benefit and unknown consideration to avoid inventing terms. Could a maintainer clarify the supported representation for this offer, or confirm that unquantified credits are unsuitable? The generic $50 signup credit is deliberately excluded.

[auscaster]

Thanks for this contribution. We updated the record so every fact matches the vendor's current pages and it can pass admission:

• Kept as a named startup benefit with no published amount, in the same shape as the live Semgrep record.
• Benefit, consideration and eligibility reworded to the pricing page's sentence; access now describes the Contact us email link.
• Added profile.summary; rewrote profile text from the product page.

Admission re-runs automatically on this new commit.