data: add IDrive e2 startup storage offer

[YospGeng]

Adds IDrive as a new entity with one startup-specific offer: a 100 TB IDrive e2 S3-compatible storage allowance for eligible startups. Usage above the allowance is paid. The application and eligibility evidence are recorded from the vendor's first-party page.

Closes #1548.

• Source and application: https://www.idrive.com/s3-storage-e2/idrive-for-startups
• Exactly one new data file, entities/id/idrive.yaml, containing exactly one offer. No code or generated evidence is included.
• No duration or cash equivalent is stated by the source, so neither is invented. The record timestamps mark this observation, not an asserted program launch date.
• Duplicate checks found no existing IDrive entity, issue, or pull request before the reservation; the public Sourcey entity endpoint returned 404.

Validation passed on head e92ec7e3a98b3e217a64a429bfd0434bc1c84c41:

• Canonical pinned verifier: status: valid, one entity, zero programs, one offer, no diagnostics, using the signed PR-bound identity context and the pinned trusted root digest.
• Trusted changed-closure CI, the App-bound sourcey/validation check, and the sourcey/validation commit status all passed: https://github.com/sourcey/startup-credits/actions/runs/34888322270
• DCO sign-off is included in the sole contribution commit and passed the repository workflow.
• Exact YAML for independent review: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/YospGeng/startup-credits/e92ec7e3a98b3e217a64a429bfd0434bc1c84c41/entities/id/idrive.yaml

Disclosure: this contribution was researched and prepared with AI assistance for Frantic bounty #120 (https://gofrantic.com/bounties/120). No personal product-use experience is claimed.

[YospGeng]

The admission report marks /economics/benefits and /economics/consideration as contradicted, while accepting the offer summary and eligibility. I rechecked the first-party source and have not found a conflicting term:

• https://www.idrive.com/s3-storage-e2/idrive-for-startups explicitly states “pay only when you exceed your free 100 TB”. Its “Here's what we offer” section also identifies the startup storage allowance as free.
• The YAML models the benefit as free-service with a 100 TB allowance and describes paid usage only above that allowance. It specifies no duration, cash equivalent, upfront charge, or general free tier.
• The report's contradiction bindings point to the benefit and excess-usage passages themselves. It supplies no narrower conflicting value or correction.
• Report: https://artifacts.sourcey.com/catalog/admission-results/sha256-9d05b88b00a6fcc145b871292ee1ee9cf65571ab26e150636bf75851c9b7a836/report.json

Could a maintainer check whether this is a classification error or identify the specific economic term that needs correction? I have retained the source-backed values instead of changing them solely to make the check green. Canonical structural validation and DCO pass on the unchanged head. This is a request for review of the reported discrepancy, not a claim that admission passed.

[auscaster]

Thanks for this contribution. We updated the record so every fact matches the vendor's current pages and it can pass admission:

• Site link moved from the startups page to https://www.idrive.com/; added the homepage and IDrive e2 page as sources.
• Benefit and consideration reworded to page text (100 TB free, pay only above 100 TB).
• Removed the meta sentence about missing duration; added access instructions and a neutral title.

Admission re-runs automatically on this new commit.