Skip to content

Properly make use of Access-Control-Expose-Headers#1023

Merged
jviotti merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
access-control-expose-headers
Jun 6, 2026
Merged

Properly make use of Access-Control-Expose-Headers#1023
jviotti merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
access-control-expose-headers

Conversation

@jviotti

@jviotti jviotti commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Signed-off-by: Juan Cruz Viotti jv@jviotti.com

Signed-off-by: Juan Cruz Viotti <jv@jviotti.com>
@augmentcode

augmentcode Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request is abnormally large and would use a significant amount of tokens to review. If you still wish to review it, comment "augment review" and we will review it.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 138 files

Note: This PR contains a large number of files. cubic only reviews up to 100 files per PR, so some files may not have been reviewed. cubic prioritizes the most important files to review.
On a pro plan you can use ultrareview for larger PRs.

Re-trigger cubic

@jviotti jviotti merged commit 15dfc7c into main Jun 6, 2026
5 checks passed
@jviotti jviotti deleted the access-control-expose-headers branch June 6, 2026 16:19

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark Index (community)

Details
Benchmark suite Current: aeb9bad Previous: c0b1748 Ratio
Add one schema (0 existing) 409 ms 400 ms 1.02
Add one schema (100 existing) 29 ms 30 ms 0.97
Add one schema (1000 existing) 85 ms 90 ms 0.94
Add one schema (10000 existing) 756 ms 736 ms 1.03
Update one schema (1 existing) 21 ms 22 ms 0.95
Update one schema (101 existing) 30 ms 30 ms 1
Update one schema (1001 existing) 88 ms 90 ms 0.98
Update one schema (10001 existing) 762 ms 745 ms 1.02
Cached rebuild (1 existing) 6 ms 7 ms 0.86
Cached rebuild (101 existing) 8 ms 9 ms 0.89
Cached rebuild (1001 existing) 29 ms 32 ms 0.91
Cached rebuild (10001 existing) 263 ms 275 ms 0.96
Index 100 schemas 505 ms 540 ms 0.94
Index 1000 schemas 1443 ms 1578 ms 0.91
Index 10000 schemas 14531 ms 13587 ms 1.07
Index 10000 schemas (custom meta-schema) 152526 ms 135481 ms 1.13

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark Index (enterprise)

Details
Benchmark suite Current: aeb9bad Previous: c0b1748 Ratio
Add one schema (0 existing) 338 ms 385 ms 0.88
Add one schema (100 existing) 25 ms 34 ms 0.74
Add one schema (1000 existing) 72 ms 99 ms 0.73
Add one schema (10000 existing) 601 ms 760 ms 0.79
Update one schema (1 existing) 19 ms 26 ms 0.73
Update one schema (101 existing) 25 ms 34 ms 0.74
Update one schema (1001 existing) 74 ms 98 ms 0.76
Update one schema (10001 existing) 609 ms 765 ms 0.80
Cached rebuild (1 existing) 5 ms 8 ms 0.63
Cached rebuild (101 existing) 6 ms 11 ms 0.55
Cached rebuild (1001 existing) 19 ms 34 ms 0.56
Cached rebuild (10001 existing) 164 ms 277 ms 0.59
Index 100 schemas 556 ms 660 ms 0.84
Index 1000 schemas 1335 ms 1453 ms 0.92
Index 10000 schemas 11803 ms 13793 ms 0.86
Index 10000 schemas (custom meta-schema) 139280 ms 139352 ms 1.00

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant