operator,storage-operator: bump operator-sdk to v1.42.2#5000
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
LGTM |
eg-ayoub
force-pushed
the
improvement/bump-rockylinux-9.8
branch
from
7d5327b to
0b83b2d
Compare
eg-ayoub
force-pushed
the
improvement/bump-operator-sdk-1.42.2
branch
from
c77fbb3 to
1dfc298
Compare
Contributor
|
LGTM |
anthony-treuillier-scality
previously approved these changes
Jun 24, 2026
g-carre
previously approved these changes
Jun 25, 2026
eg-ayoub
force-pushed
the
improvement/bump-rockylinux-9.8
branch
from
0b83b2d to
e815165
Compare
eg-ayoub
force-pushed
the
improvement/bump-operator-sdk-1.42.2
branch
from
1dfc298 to
e329892
Compare
Contributor
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
LGTM |
python3 tools/upgrade-operator-sdk/upgrade.py --operator-dir operator --config-dir tools/upgrade-operator-sdk/operator Scaffold realigned with operator-sdk v1.42.2 and k8s.io dependencies pinned to v0.33.13. Go toolchain stays at 1.24.13 and controller-runtime at v0.21.0, matching what kubebuilder v4.6.0 (bundled with operator-sdk v1.42.2) scaffolds. Refs: MK8S-237, MK8S-224 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
python3 tools/upgrade-operator-sdk/upgrade.py --operator-dir storage-operator --config-dir tools/upgrade-operator-sdk/storage-operator Scaffold realigned with operator-sdk v1.42.2 and k8s.io dependencies pinned to v0.33.13. Go toolchain stays at 1.24.13 and controller-runtime at v0.21.0, matching what kubebuilder v4.6.0 (bundled with operator-sdk v1.42.2) scaffolds. Refs: MK8S-237, MK8S-224 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
eg-ayoub
force-pushed
the
improvement/bump-rockylinux-9.8
branch
from
e815165 to
9832496
Compare
eg-ayoub
force-pushed
the
improvement/bump-operator-sdk-1.42.2
branch
from
e329892 to
59f94f5
Compare
Contributor
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
LGTM |
Base automatically changed from
improvement/bump-rockylinux-9.8
to
development/134.0
June 29, 2026 13:19
bert-e
dismissed stale reviews from g-carre and anthony-treuillier-scality
The base branch was changed.
Contributor
Hello eg-ayoub,My role is to assist you with the merge of this Available options
Available commands
Status report is not available. |
Contributor
Waiting for approvalThe following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list: |
Contributor
Author
|
/approve |
Contributor
Waiting for approvalThe following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list: The following options are set: approve |
anthony-treuillier-scality
approved these changes
Jun 29, 2026
TeddyAndrieux
approved these changes
Jun 29, 2026
Contributor
|
I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
The following branches have NOT changed:
Please check the status of the associated issue None. Goodbye eg-ayoub. The following options are set: approve |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Component: operator, storage-operator
Context:
Tracks MK8S-237 (operator-sdk + Go bump) and MK8S-224 (k8s.io libraries bump).
Summary:
Realign both
operatorandstorage-operatorscaffolds with operator-sdk v1.42.2 using theupgrade-operator-sdktool, in two separate commits (one per operator).operator_sdk_versionk8s_libsgo_toolchaincontroller-runtimeGo toolchain and controller-runtime are intentionally not bumped: operator-sdk v1.42.2 still bundles
kubebuilder/v4 v4.6.0, which scaffoldsgo 1.24.0andcontroller-runtime v0.21.0. We follow the operator-sdk's scaffold to avoid drift.For the same reason, only the
k8s.io/{api,apimachinery,client-go}patch (v0.33.10 → v0.33.13) is taken in scope of MK8S-224 here. The full move to k8s.io v0.34.x will be done in a follow-up once operator-sdk picks up a newer kubebuilder (currently v0.21.0controller-runtimeis not compatible with k8s.io v0.34.x).Acceptance criteria:
make testpasses for both operators (verified locally).make metalk8sregenerates manifests without diff churn (verified).