fix filesystem namespaceStore creation

[Soundarya189r]

Description

Updated the filter to allow only PVCs that are:
Bound
ReadWriteMany
Filesystem volume mode

The reason for this change is to make sure users can select only Filesystem PVCs for creating a Filesystem NamespaceStore.

---

Change Type

Please select all applicable options:

• Feature
• [✅ ] Bug Fix
• Improvement
• Refactor
• Tests

---

Component / Area Impacted

Please select all applicable options:

• [✅ ] ODF
• FDF
• Client
• MCO
• Fusion Access (SAN Storage)
• CNSA (Remote Mount)
• E2E Test

---

Screenshots / Recordings

Screenshots

---

Testing

Please select the type of tests included:

• Unit Tests
• E2E Tests
• No Tests Required (with justification below)

---

Additional Notes

[openshift-ci-robot]

@Soundarya189r: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-6755](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-6755), which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ukurundw@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Description

Updated the filter to allow only PVCs that are:
Bound
ReadWriteMany
Filesystem volume mode

The reason for this change is to make sure users can select only Filesystem PVCs for creating a Filesystem NamespaceStore.

Change Type

Please select all applicable options:

• Feature
• [✅ ] Bug Fix
• Improvement
• Refactor
• Tests

---

Component / Area Impacted

Please select all applicable options:

• [✅ ] ODF
• FDF
• Client
• MCO
• Fusion Access (SAN Storage)
• CNSA (Remote Mount)
• E2E Test

---

Screenshots / Recordings

Screenshots

---

Testing

Please select the type of tests included:

• Unit Tests
• E2E Tests
• No Tests Required (with justification below)

---

Additional Notes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 53 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 998bf46a-b012-4287-8e5f-58ea2aa318d5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2412cf6 and 1cc1852.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/odf/components/namespace-store/namespace-store-form.tsx

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Soundarya189r]

/test odf-console-e2e-aws

[openshift-ci-robot]

@Soundarya189r: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-6755](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-6755), which is valid.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ukurundw@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Description

Updated the filter to allow only PVCs that are:
Bound
ReadWriteMany
Filesystem volume mode

The reason for this change is to make sure users can select only Filesystem PVCs for creating a Filesystem NamespaceStore.

---

Change Type

Please select all applicable options:

• Feature
• [✅ ] Bug Fix
• Improvement
• Refactor
• Tests

---

Component / Area Impacted

Please select all applicable options:

• [✅ ] ODF
• FDF
• Client
• MCO
• Fusion Access (SAN Storage)
• CNSA (Remote Mount)
• E2E Test

---

Screenshots / Recordings

Screenshots

---

Testing

Please select the type of tests included:

• Unit Tests
• E2E Tests
• No Tests Required (with justification below)

---

Additional Notes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[SanjalKatiyar]

/retitle fix filesystem namespaceStore creation

[openshift-ci-robot]

@Soundarya189r: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Description

Updated the filter to allow only PVCs that are:
Bound
ReadWriteMany
Filesystem volume mode

The reason for this change is to make sure users can select only Filesystem PVCs for creating a Filesystem NamespaceStore.

---

Change Type

Please select all applicable options:

• Feature
• [✅ ] Bug Fix
• Improvement
• Refactor
• Tests

---

Component / Area Impacted

Please select all applicable options:

• [✅ ] ODF
• FDF
• Client
• MCO
• Fusion Access (SAN Storage)
• CNSA (Remote Mount)
• E2E Test

---

Screenshots / Recordings

Screenshots

---

Testing

Please select the type of tests included:

• Unit Tests
• E2E Tests
• No Tests Required (with justification below)

---

Additional Notes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[SanjalKatiyar]

Is this confirmed by NooBaa team ??

[Soundarya189r]

Is this confirmed by NooBaa team ??

yeah, please check

https://ibm-systems-storage.slack.com/archives/C07J40ABRD2/p1786464642005809?thread_ts=1786441462.331849&cid=C07J40ABRD2

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: SanjalKatiyar, Soundarya189r

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• packages/odf/OWNERS [SanjalKatiyar]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[SanjalKatiyar]

/cherry-pick release-5.0

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@SanjalKatiyar: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-5.0 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Soundarya189r]

/test odf-console-e2e-aws

[Soundarya189r]

/test odf-console-e2e-aws

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@SanjalKatiyar: new pull request created: #3119

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-5.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Soundarya189r]

/jira backport release-4.22

[openshift-ci-robot]

@Soundarya189r: The following backport issues have been created:

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.22

Details

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #3131

Details

In response to this:

@Soundarya189r: The following backport issues have been created:

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.22

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Soundarya189r]

/cherrypick release-4.22-compatibility

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@Soundarya189r: new pull request created: #3132

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.22-compatibility

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.