Repository navigation
DFBUGS-8403: [release-4.16] Bump go (stdlib) from 1.21.9 to 1.21.13 - #650
Conversation
Updated the following modules: - go (stdlib): 1.21.9 -> 1.21.13 (go.mod) Signed-off-by: Nikhil Ladha <nikhil.ladha@example.com>
|
@Nikhil-Ladha: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-8403](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-8403), which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
@Nikhil-Ladha: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-8403](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-8403). The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@leelavg any reason for closing the PR? |
|
@Nikhil-Ladha: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-8403](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-8403), which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
I was cleaning up some leftovers since we have GH action updating golang but that's doing upto 4.18, reopened. why do we need qe approval for patch version bump? |
Good question, ideally we shouldn't. |
|
Don't want to have more trackers & timelines, merging it as that issue wasn't serving any purpose if the d/s builder is already at .13, isn't it? |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: leelavg, Nikhil-Ladha The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@Nikhil-Ladha: [Jira Issue DFBUGS-8403](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-8403): All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: [Jira Issue DFBUGS-8403](https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/DFBUGS-8403) has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Changes
1.21.9→1.21.13(ingo.mod)