Repository navigation
Bug: parse_wheel_filenames accepts wheel filenames with unsorted compressed tag sets #909
Description
Hello packaging maintainers!
I'm filing this as a bug report for some observed behavior.
TL;DR: parse_wheel_filename appears to allow compressed tag sets (defined in PEP 425) to appear in any order, while the PEP and living spec both require the order to be "sorted" (my emphasis below):
To allow for compact filenames of bdists that work with more than one compatibility tag triple, each tag in a filename can instead be a ‘.’-separated, sorted, set of tags. For example, pip, a pure-Python package that is written to run under Python 2 and 3 with the same source code, could distribute a bdist with the tag py2.py3-none-any.
(Permalinks: https://peps.python.org/pep-0425/#compressed-tag-sets and https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/platform-compatibility-tags/#compressed-tag-sets)
This can be seen by using parse_wheel_filename to parse a wheel whose compressed tags are out of order:
from packaging.utils import parse_wheel_filename
name = "pyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl"
parse_wheel_filename(name) Actual behavior
The above call yields:
('pyvirtualcam', <Version('0.13.0')>, (), frozenset({<cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64 @ 4370315200>, <cp310-cp310-manylinux2014_x86_64 @ 4370315520>}))
Expected behavior
I expected the above the raise a (subclass of) ValueError, since the compressed tag set appears in the wrong order in the wheel's filename.
The right order would be: pyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl.
Additional context
This was noticed due to an interaction of a few different components in pypi/warehouse#18128:
- A user built a wheel (named
pyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp310-cp310-linux_x86_64.whl); - They called
auditwheel repairon the wheel, which re-tagged it aspyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl). This tag ordering is incorrect per PEP 425, and is being tracked againstauditwheelwith Compressed tag sets are not sorted when rewriting wheel filename. auditwheel#583; packagingdoesn't warn or fail with the new wheel distribution name, per this bug report;pypi-attestationsthen "ultranormalized" the wheel name for signing purposes, fixing it up topyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl- Finally, the end user attempted to retrieve their provenance metadata via https://pypi.org/integrity/pyvirtualcam/0.13.0/pyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp310-cp310-manylinux2014_x86_64.manylinux_2_17_x86_64.whl/provenance and were confused when it wasn't present (since it's actually present at https://pypi.org/integrity/pyvirtualcam/0.13.0/pyvirtualcam-0.13.0-cp39-cp39-manylinux_2_17_x86_64.manylinux2014_x86_64.whl/provenance)
TL;DR: multiple components behaved in slightly different ways here, resulting in maximum confusion:
auditwheel repairproduced an incorrect tag ordering;packagingsilently honored that incorrect tag ordering, causing PyPI to also honor it;pypi-attestationsattempted to "fix" it per PEP 425, leading to a correct tag ordering but one that confused the user (since all other components used the invalid-but-accepted one). This last part has been fixed with fix: remove ultranormalization of distribution filenames pypi/pypi-attestations#124
See also #873 for a related (but different) issue in wheel filename parsing 🙂
CC @di for viz
Activity
brettcannon commentedon Jun 20, 2025
I don't know if I forgot about this or always glossed over the fact. 😅
This would probably require updating:
packaging/src/packaging/tags.py
Lines 104 to 117 in 14b83e1
fix(utils): validate compressed tag set sort order per PEP 425 (closes …
dstufft commentedon Apr 7, 2026
Do we know how many wheels on PyPI are affected by this? While this is technically a bug fix, it's a bug fix that is a breaking change and we probably want to consider what the impact of fixing this bug is.
henryiii commentedon Apr 7, 2026
Basically every manylinux wheel for something like a couple years? I forget exactly when the bug was fixed, but it used to be that auditwheel produced multiple tags in the wrong order.
dstufft commentedon Apr 7, 2026
Then we probably can't enforce this in any API that consumers (like pip) are going to use? That would break a ton of wheels?
We could enforce it in PyPI though.
henryiii commentedon Apr 8, 2026
Yes. PyPI already started enforcing normalized sdist names, so this would be similar.
I think this would make sense in #1113 as either always-chose or opt-out (IIRC I might have already added it there), but it should be opt-in for any of the legacy APIs.
There are at least 370,069 wheels uploaded to PyPI (out of the 1,023,6875 wheels I checked with a compressed tag set) that have unsorted compressed tags.
Copilot CLI gpt-5-mini prompt
Script generated
Missing newlines.
henryiii commentedon Apr 8, 2026
#1150 adds opt-in validation. I'd like to go with that for 26.1 unless there are objections!
fix(utils): validate compressed tag set sort order per PEP 425 (closes …
fix(utils): validate compressed tag set sort order per PEP 425 (closes …
feat: option to validate compressed tag set sort order in `parse_whee…