Repository navigation
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kyle Eckhart <kgeckhart@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Optionally allow
gzipandzstdcompression while Senders and Receivers still MUST supportsnappy.RW2 with snappy sends roughly 1.8x the bytes of OTLP with gzip. gzip or zstd closes that gap and still costs less CPU than OTLP (encode, decode benchmarks).
The 2.0 proposal held off on new compressions over receiver-side CPU cost. Keeping
gzipandzstda SHOULD for Receivers leaves that choice with them. I'm not sure if we should update the proposal if we merge this?Related to: prometheus/prometheus#13366