fix: don't checkout in generate-tool-inventory#1377
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR refactors the generate-tool-inventory composite GitHub Action to stop performing its own repository checkout, and instead moves responsibility for making the allowlist/tool-inventory file available to the calling workflow, improving action reusability and avoiding redundant checkouts.
Changes:
- Removed the internal
actions/checkoutstep from thegenerate-tool-inventorycomposite action and updated it to use the input path directly forALLOWLIST. - Updated the reusable build/push workflow to conditionally
checkoutonly the requested tool inventory allowlist file (via sparse checkout) before running the action.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
.github/workflows/wc-build-push.yml |
Adds a conditional sparse checkout step so the allowlist file exists before invoking the tool-inventory action. |
.github/actions/generate-tool-inventory/action.yml |
Removes internal checkout logic and switches ALLOWLIST to reference the provided input path directly. |
✅
|
| Descriptor | Linter | Files | Fixed | Errors | Warnings | Elapsed time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ ACTION | actionlint | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0.7s | |
| ✅ DOCKERFILE | hadolint | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.46s | |
| ✅ JSON | npm-package-json-lint | yes | no | no | 0.54s | |
| ✅ JSON | prettier | 44 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.78s |
| ✅ JSON | v8r | 44 | 0 | 0 | 18.08s | |
| ✅ MARKDOWN | markdownlint | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3s |
| ✅ MARKDOWN | markdown-table-formatter | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.28s |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | betterleaks | yes | no | no | 1.6s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | checkov | yes | no | no | 28.49s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | gitleaks | yes | no | no | 1.9s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | git_diff | yes | no | no | 0.02s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | grype | yes | no | no | 70.49s | |
| osv-scanner | yes | 1 | no | 1.03s | ||
| ✅ REPOSITORY | secretlint | yes | no | no | 2.31s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | syft | yes | no | no | 2.94s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | trivy | yes | no | no | 12.5s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | trivy-sbom | yes | no | no | 2.11s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | trufflehog | yes | no | no | 4.09s | |
| lychee | 115 | 1 | 0 | 11.43s | ||
| ✅ YAML | prettier | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.35s |
| ✅ YAML | v8r | 35 | 0 | 0 | 15.88s | |
| ✅ YAML | yamllint | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1.45s |
Detailed Issues
⚠️ SPELL / lychee - 1 error
📝 Summary
---------------------
🔍 Total..........154
🔗 Unique.........126
✅ Successful.....148
⏳ Timeouts.........0
🔀 Redirected......19
👻 Excluded.........0
❓ Unknown..........0
🚫 Errors...........1
⛔ Unsupported......1
Errors in .github/TOOL_VERSION_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
[403] https://developer.arm.com/downloads/-/arm-gnu-toolchain-downloads (at 38:7) | Rejected status code: 403 Forbidden
Hint: Followed 19 redirects. You might want to consider replacing redirecting URLs with the resolved URLs. Use verbose mode (`-v`/`-vv`) to see redirection details.
Hint: You can configure accepted/rejected response codes with `-a` or `--accept`
⚠️ REPOSITORY / osv-scanner - 1 error
Scanning dir .
Starting filesystem walk for root: /
Scanned .devcontainer/cpp/requirements.txt file and found 20 packages
Scanned .devcontainer/docs/requirements.txt file and found 14 packages
Scanned test/embedded-rust/workspace/cortex-m/Cargo.lock file and found 20 packages
Scanned test/embedded-rust/workspace/cortex-mf/Cargo.lock file and found 20 packages
Scanned test/rust/workspace/cargo/Cargo.lock file and found 1 package
Scanned test/rust/workspace/clippy/Cargo.lock file and found 1 package
Scanned test/rust/workspace/test/Cargo.lock file and found 1 package
Scanned package-lock.json file and found 73 packages
End status: 105 dirs visited, 341 inodes visited, 8 Extract calls, 21.295215ms elapsed, 21.295446ms wall time
Total 2 packages affected by 2 known vulnerabilities (0 Critical, 0 High, 0 Medium, 0 Low, 2 Unknown) from 1 ecosystem.
0 vulnerabilities can be fixed.
+-----------------------------------+------+-----------+------------+---------+---------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| OSV URL | CVSS | ECOSYSTEM | PACKAGE | VERSION | FIXED VERSION | SOURCE |
+-----------------------------------+------+-----------+------------+---------+---------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| https://osv.dev/RUSTSEC-2026-0110 | | crates.io | bare-metal | 0.2.5 | -- | test/embedded-rust/workspace/cortex-m/Cargo.lock |
| https://osv.dev/RUSTSEC-2026-0110 | | crates.io | bare-metal | 0.2.5 | -- | test/embedded-rust/workspace/cortex-mf/Cargo.lock |
+-----------------------------------+------+-----------+------------+---------+---------------+---------------------------------------------------+
Notices
📣 MegaLinter 9.5.0 is out! Discover the new features and security recommendations in the release announcement. (Skip this info by defining SECURITY_SUGGESTIONS: false)
See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts
You could have the same capabilities but better runtime performances if you use a MegaLinter flavor:
- oxsecurity/megalinter/flavors/salesforce@v9.6.0 (57 linters)
- oxsecurity/megalinter/flavors/javascript@v9.6.0 (63 linters)
Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)
- Documentation: Custom Flavors
- Command:
npx mega-linter-runner@9.6.0 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters ACTION_ACTIONLINT,DOCKERFILE_HADOLINT,JSON_V8R,JSON_PRETTIER,JSON_NPM_PACKAGE_JSON_LINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWN_TABLE_FORMATTER,REPOSITORY_CHECKOV,REPOSITORY_GIT_DIFF,REPOSITORY_GITLEAKS,REPOSITORY_BETTERLEAKS,REPOSITORY_GRYPE,REPOSITORY_OSV_SCANNER,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,REPOSITORY_SYFT,REPOSITORY_TRIVY,REPOSITORY_TRIVY_SBOM,REPOSITORY_TRUFFLEHOG,SPELL_LYCHEE,YAML_PRETTIER,YAML_YAMLLINT,YAML_V8R

Show us your support by starring ⭐ the repository
📦 Container Size AnalysisNote Comparing 📈 Size Comparison Table
|
📦 Container Size AnalysisNote Comparing 📈 Size Comparison Table
|
📦 Container Size AnalysisNote Comparing 📈 Size Comparison Table
|
📦 Container Size AnalysisNote Comparing 📈 Size Comparison Table
|
📦 Container Size AnalysisNote Comparing 📈 Size Comparison Table
|
📦 Container Size AnalysisNote Comparing 📈 Size Comparison Table
|
|
Pull Request Report (#1377)Static measures
Time related measures
Status check related measures
|



🚀 Hey, I have created a Pull Request
Description of changes
This pull request updates the way the allowlist file is handled in the
generate-tool-inventoryGitHub Action and its usage in the workflow. The main change is moving the responsibility for checking out the allowlist/tool-inventory file from the action itself to the workflow, resulting in a simpler and more flexible action.Workflow and Action Refactoring:
ALLOWLISTenvironment variable in the action now directly references the input path, since the workflow ensures the file is present.✔️ Checklist