docs: add Zulip chat channels to community page#132
Conversation
Add the Linux Foundation Zulip server channels for OpenMFP so community members know where to find us for discussions and support. Signed-off-by: Leidy Garzon <leidy.garzon@sap.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 55 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe community documentation adds a Zulip Chat section with channel purposes and private security-reporting guidance, and updates Stay Updated with Zulip engagement alongside GitHub Discussions. ChangesCommunity documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@documentation/community.md`:
- Around line 31-33: Update the security-policy link in the “Don't report
security issues in chat” section of community.md to use the same canonical
destination as README.md: openmfp/openmfp.org/security/policy. Keep the
surrounding guidance unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 0142927b-cb84-4753-9052-8bd879baaf08
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
documentation/community.md
Signed-off-by: Leidy Garzon <leidy.garzon@sap.com>
Summary
neonephos-openmfp-discussionandneonephos-openmfp-support)Follows the same pattern as the Platform Mesh chat page.
Test plan
Summary by CodeRabbit