Skip to content

TE-16.3: Accept valid alternate outerIP for test-4 backup route#5609

Draft
karthikeya-remilla wants to merge 2 commits into
openconfig:mainfrom
b4firex:te-16.3-cisco
Draft

TE-16.3: Accept valid alternate outerIP for test-4 backup route#5609
karthikeya-remilla wants to merge 2 commits into
openconfig:mainfrom
b4firex:te-16.3-cisco

Conversation

@karthikeya-remilla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Modified validateTrafficEncap to accept gribiIPv4EntryVRF2225 as a valid outer IP alternative whenever it expects gribiIPv4EntryVRF2222, since both are completely valid encapsulations for that port under Test-4's backup route.

@karthikeya-remilla karthikeya-remilla requested a review from a team as a code owner June 23, 2026 09:03
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the traffic encapsulation validation logic to support an alternate outer IP address for the Test-4 backup route, ensuring that both valid encapsulation paths are correctly recognized during testing.

Highlights

  • Validation Logic Update: Updated the validateTrafficEncap function to accept gribiIPv4EntryVRF2225 as a valid alternative to gribiIPv4EntryVRF2222 for the Test-4 backup route.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the traffic encapsulation validation in encap_frr_with_reencap_vrf_test.go to allow an alternative outer destination IP (gribiIPv4EntryVRF2225) for the TE-16.3 backup case. The reviewer suggested simplifying the boolean logic for checking the allowed outer destination IP and improving the error message to more accurately reflect that the outer destination IP is incorrect rather than stating the packets are not encapsulated.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@karthikeya-remilla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Moving to draft till bug discussion for TE-16.3 is resolved offline.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants