Repository navigation
omarchy-settings-dev: ship the platform guard on aarch64 only - #691
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Sep 28, 2026
maralcbr
marked this pull request as draft
September 28, 2026 03:40
Collaborator
Author
maralcbr
force-pushed
the
settings/platform-guard-aarch64-only
branch
from
September 28, 2026 03:40
e4e41fd to
a5bfaba
Compare
maralcbr
changed the title
maralcbr
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 28, 2026 03:40
No platform package is built for x86_64 and pacman refuses another architecture's package there, so x86 transactions gain nothing from the guard. The x86 HOOKS baseline keeps the busybox line without a detector, so the detector copy goes too. omarchy-settings gets the same change in #638.
maralcbr
force-pushed
the
settings/platform-guard-aarch64-only
branch
from
September 28, 2026 03:40
a5bfaba to
7f77d82
Compare
maralcbr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2026
No platform package is built for x86_64, so an x86 machine has nothing to guard. The check that 00-omarchy-hooks.conf has its detector copy follows it: without the copy, x86_64 keeps the busybox line it would have anyway, and leaving the check unscoped would fail every x86_64 build from a source that asks omarchy-hw-platform. Taken from #691, which keeps the -dev recipe.
1 task
spencerbull
pushed a commit
to jacob-vincent-mink/omarchy-pkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2026
The guard and its detector copy now ship on aarch64 only (omacom#691), so the check that 00-omarchy-hooks.conf has its detector failed every x86_64 build from a source that carries the HOOKS baseline. x86_64 keeps the busybox line without a detector. Same scoping as omarchy-settings in omacom#638.
2 of 3 tasks
jethrojones
pushed a commit
to jethrojones/omarchy-pkgs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2026
…e sources omacom#638 gave omarchy-settings this and -dev was never ported, so edge, the only channel aarch64 machines are qualified for, still stripped zram, oomd, zswap, the sysctl tuning and USB autosuspend there: on Snapdragon, migration 1790328426 installs zram-generator, finds no dev-zram0.swap and completes without zram. A source with default/settings-runtime-profile now gets the same files, backup and optdepends on aarch64 as on x86_64, Thunderbolt drop-in included, and its HOOKS files ship as they are. Older sources, including the current quattro pin, keep today's aarch64 package. The platform guard and its detector check stay aarch64-only (omacom#691, omacom#694). The keyboard backlight unit first-run enables ships whenever the source has it, as in omarchy-settings. tests/settings-runtime-profile.sh now runs both recipes. pkgrel 5 so the recipe change builds; the payload from the current pin is unchanged.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
CARCHisaarch64. pkgrel 2 → 3.Follows review of omacom/omarchy#13362, which treats a missing guard on x86 as expected.
Test plan
/usr/share/libalpm/{hooks,scripts}/files and the x86_64 package doesn't