feat: allow variable in requireApiVersion - #169
Open
superle3 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
Author
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
superle3
force-pushed
the
feat/allow_variable_requireApiVersion
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 18, 2026 17:37
4099afc to
a403558
Compare
allow the use of a constant string variable for requireApiVersion if that variables value is known. this does allow one to cast the variable to the right version but as the function is checked by name, that should fall under obfuscation.
superle3
force-pushed
the
feat/allow_variable_requireApiVersion
branch
from
June 18, 2026 17:38
a403558 to
8e424e5
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
allow the use of a constant string variable for requireApiVersion if that variables value is known. this does allow one to cast the variable to the right version but as the function is checked by name, that should fall under obfuscation.