Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Literal fields currently accept equal values of different types:
Literal[1]acceptsTrue,1.0, and anIntEnummember whose value is 1;Literal[True]accepts the integer 1.Require both matching types and equal values when validating a literal, as specified by PEP 586. Seven regression cases cover booleans, integers, floats, and integer enums, with correctly typed values as controls. Includes a changelog entry.
Validation: all seven regressions fail before the change; 210 tests pass on Python 3.10 and 3.13 (including the benchmark suite on 3.13). Black, mypy, and pylint checks pass. Pylint prints existing obsolete configuration warnings, identical to the base revision.