Skip to content

🔧 Resolve version_gem dependency conflict for kettle-jem selftest - #24

Merged
pboling merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/selftest-version-gem-conflict
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

pboling merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/selftest-version-gem-conflict

Conversation

@pboling

@pboling pboling commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

The templating workflow fails on main since #23 (which brought kettle-jem 7.1.28 via the bundle updates):

Kettle::Jem::Error: direct dependencies also declared by templated modular Gemfiles:
version_gem (kettle-test.gemspec vs gemfiles/modular/runtime_heads.gemfile).

kettle-jem's selftest now requires every such overlap to be recorded in dependency_conflicts.resolve, and kettle-test's list was empty.

Fix

Record version_gem with action: keep_both, exactly as the kettle-jem template recommends: the gemspec declares the released runtime contract, while runtime_heads.gemfile intentionally tracks version_gem's main branch. Verified locally with bundle exec rake kettle:jem:selftest (templating bundle).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01P8aveNcdgPobyMrq8DkD9r

kettle-jem 7.1.28's selftest refuses a direct dependency that a templated
modular Gemfile also declares unless dependency_conflicts records an intentional
action, so the templating workflow failed on main: version_gem is declared by
the gemspec and by gemfiles/modular/runtime_heads.gemfile (which tracks
version_gem's main branch). Keep both, as the kettle-jem template recommends.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01P8aveNcdgPobyMrq8DkD9r
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Health
kettle-test 97% 100% ➖
Summary 97% (92 / 95) 100% (2 / 2) ➖

Minimum allowed line rate is 92%

@pboling
pboling merged commit b090e41 into main Sep 13, 2026
35 checks passed
@pboling
pboling deleted the fix/selftest-version-gem-conflict branch September 13, 2026 22:16
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report for CI Build 34786222388

Coverage remained the same at 96.907%

Details

  • Coverage remained the same as the base build.
  • Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
  • No coverage regressions found.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

No coverage regressions found.


Coverage Stats

Coverage Status
Relevant Lines: 95
Covered Lines: 92
Line Coverage: 96.84%
Relevant Branches: 2
Covered Branches: 2
Branch Coverage: 100.0%
Branches in Coverage %: Yes
Coverage Strength: 48.07 hits per line

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants