Skip to content

Implement support for 3rd party URI schemes #154

Description

@njgheorghita

What was wrong?

from #152

Allow 3rd party URIs to be registered and accepted. Bitbucket, gitlab, gists, .... ipfs-gateway uris (there can be more than one gateway, cloudflair has one). The EthPM spec is intentionally open about the definition of a content addressable URI and thus, there are tons of options out there for people to include the content hash in different URI schemes.

How can it be fixed?

Probably a similar mechanism to the eth-abi library with some kind of Registry implementation that allows new ones to be added with the library supporting the common use case with a default registry with the built-in URIs pre-registered.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions