Skip to content

[Testing] Fixed Test case failure in PR 38782- Candidate - 1 - #38843

Merged
kubaflo merged 12 commits into
dotnet:inflight/candidatefrom
NafeelaNazhir:candidate-failures-1
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

kubaflo merged 12 commits into
dotnet:inflight/candidatefrom
NafeelaNazhir:candidate-failures-1

Conversation

@NafeelaNazhir

@NafeelaNazhir NafeelaNazhir commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR addresses the test failures that occurred in the inflight/candidate branch: #38782, and includes updates to improve rendering and test stability across platforms.

This PR adds and updates the expected baseline images for all platforms so the tests validate the current intended output.
Fixes: #38782

It also updates the iOS ScrollView safe-area test to compare the content size with the viewport after UIKit applies the adjusted content inset.

Images

  • DataTrigger_ButtonDisabled
  • Issue37440EmptyAutoSizeEditorDoesNotSnapToMaximumHeight
  • ItemsWrapGridWithDefaultWidth
  • LabelNotTruncatedWithMaxLines
  • LabelsShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterItemsSourceIsReplaced
  • NoScrollbarsTest
  • RtlCollectionViewShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterLandscapeRotation
  • ScrollViewShouldRenderWithinBounds
  • ShadowsDontRespectControlShape
  • VerifyBindableLayoutWithBasicItemTemplate
  • VerifyBindableLayoutWithGridItemTemplate
  • VerifyBindableLayoutWithItemTemplateSelector
  • VerifyBindableLayoutWithItemsSourceNone
  • VerifyBindableLayoutWithItemsSourceObservableCollection
  • VerifyCarouselViewKeepScrollOffsetAdd
  • VerifyModelItemsObservableCollectionWhenMultipleModePreSelection
  • VerifyModelItemsObservableCollectionWhenSingleModePreSelection
  • ScrollViewGradientBackground
  • ScrollViewWithoutGradientBackground
  • TitleBar_Window
  • TitleBar_Icon_WithTrailingContentAndLeadingContent
  • TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithTitleAndSubtitle
  • TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithSearchBar
  • TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithGrid
  • TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithHorizontalStackLayout
  • TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithBackgroundColor

@NafeelaNazhir
NafeelaNazhir deployed to copilot-pat-pool September 24, 2026 11:57 — with GitHub Actions Active
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

@NafeelaNazhir
NafeelaNazhir deployed to copilot-pat-pool September 24, 2026 11:57 — with GitHub Actions Active
@NafeelaNazhir
NafeelaNazhir deployed to copilot-pat-pool September 24, 2026 11:57 — with GitHub Actions Active
@NafeelaNazhir
NafeelaNazhir deployed to copilot-pat-pool September 24, 2026 12:00 — with GitHub Actions Active
@Ahamed-Ali Ahamed-Ali added community ✨ Community Contribution partner/syncfusion Issues / PR's with Syncfusion collaboration labels Sep 24, 2026
@NafeelaNazhir
NafeelaNazhir deployed to copilot-pat-pool September 24, 2026 12:01 — with GitHub Actions Active
@NafeelaNazhir
NafeelaNazhir deployed to copilot-pat-pool September 24, 2026 12:01 — with GitHub Actions Active
@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR label Sep 24, 2026
@kubaflo

kubaflo commented Sep 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

🔍 /review started

AzDO build 15446248 is running for ios.

The s/agent-review-in-progress label stays on this PR while the run is active. The final recommendation and outcome labels are posted only after Gate, expert review, and Deep UI tests finish.

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

MauiBot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@kubaflo

kubaflo commented Sep 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR label Sep 25, 2026
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

🔍 /review started

AzDO build 15460953 is running for ios.

The s/agent-review-in-progress label stays on this PR while the run is active. The final recommendation and outcome labels are posted only after Gate, expert review, and Deep UI tests finish.

MauiBot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@MauiBot MauiBot removed the s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR label Sep 25, 2026
@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@kubaflo

kubaflo commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR label Oct 8, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

🔍 /review started

AzDO build 15608594 is running for ios.

The s/agent-review-in-progress label stays on this PR while the run is active. The final recommendation and outcome labels are posted only after Gate, expert review, and Deep UI tests finish.

MauiBot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@MauiBot MauiBot added s/agent-approved AI agent recommends approval - PR fix is correct and optimal and removed s/agent-review-incomplete AI review did not complete all expected phases s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR labels Oct 8, 2026
@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@vishnumenon2684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run maui-pr-uitests , maui-pr-devicetests

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
Successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR label Oct 8, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

🔍 /review started

AzDO build 15611931 is running for windows.

The s/agent-review-in-progress label stays on this PR while the run is active. The final recommendation and outcome labels are posted only after Gate, expert review, and Deep UI tests finish.

@MauiBot MauiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Review Summary

@NafeelaNazhir — new AI review results are available based on commit 7d76bff.

Gate No Tests Confidence Low Platform Windows


🗂️ Review Sessions — click to expand
🚦 Gate — Test Before & After Fix

Gate Result: ⚠️ SKIPPED

No tests were detected in this PR.

Recommendation: Add tests to verify the fix using the write-tests-agent.


📋 Pre-Flight — Context & Validation

Pre-Flight Context

Scope: Context gathering only for draft PR #38843 at head 7d76bff03375f8e4ac1e78812484f615b7d7dfc0, targeting inflight/candidate. This is not an exhaustive code review or a recommendation.

Reported problem

The author reports that the .NET 10 SR12 candidate PR #38782 exposed cross-platform device/UI test failures caused by expected rendering no longer matching existing screenshot baselines. #38782 is a large candidate snapshot, so the underlying product changes responsible for each rendering difference were not isolated by this PR.

A prior CI analysis for an earlier #38843 commit (6381ac8) specifically attributed seven Windows TitleBar screenshot failures to this PR’s removal of vertical margins. That analysis also reported unrelated or unresolved device-test crashes and other UI mismatches. Subsequent commits resaved images, including the Windows baselines, but validation of the current head was still pending when queried.

Submitted changes and mechanism

GitHub reports 41 changed files: 39 PNG baselines and two C# files, with no shipping framework source changed.

  • ScrollViewTests.iOS.cs: modifies the existing ContentSizeExpandsToViewport device test. With SafeAreaEdges.Container, it now compares the native UIScrollView.ContentSize directly against AdjustedContentInset.InsetRect(Bounds).Size. Previously it manually inset ContentSize using SafeAreaInsets before comparison. Height and width assertions remain.
  • TitleBarViewModel.cs: changes the test-host leading Image and trailing ImageButton margins from uniform 10 to Thickness(10, 0), retaining horizontal margins while removing top and bottom margins. This deliberately changes rendered TitleBar test output.
  • Screenshot baselines:
    • Android, 6 files: one Issue37440... baseline is moved from generic android to android-notch-36; existing RTL CollectionView, max-lines Label, and two ScrollView gradient baselines are refreshed; a LabelsShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterItemsSourceIsReplaced baseline is added.
    • Mac, 6 files: refreshes ItemsWrapGrid, NoScrollbars, Shadows, and two CollectionView preselection baselines; adds the replaced-items-source Label baseline.
    • Windows, 15 files: refreshes DataTrigger, seven TitleBar variants, five BindableLayout variants, and one CarouselView baseline; adds the replaced-items-source Label baseline.
    • iOS, 12 files: the same six baselines are added/refreshed in both ios and ios-26: replaced-items-source Label, NoScrollbars, ScrollView bounds, Shadows, and two CollectionView preselection cases.

The binary patch records only that the PNGs differ; it does not expose the pixel-level changes or establish that each new image represents intended output.

Platform-sensitive paths

  • ScrollViewTests.iOS.cs uses UIKit and, by repository suffix convention, is relevant to both iOS and Mac Catalyst builds.
  • Its changed test depends on nonzero safe-area/adjusted content insets, including system bars, notch, or home-indicator conditions.
  • ScrollViewShouldRenderWithinBounds is declared only for Android and iOS; this PR refreshes its generic and iOS 26 baselines, but no Android baseline for that test.
  • TitleBar screenshot tests compile on Windows and Mac Catalyst. The margin change affects shared host-app construction, while this PR updates seven Windows TitleBar baselines and no Mac TitleBar baselines. Whether Mac rendering is unaffected or requires corresponding baselines is not established.
  • Android baselines distinguish generic rendering from the android-notch-36 profile; moving Issue37440... changes which environment supplies that expectation.
  • iOS maintains both generic and ios-26 expectations, so both image sets require independent validation.
  • Mac snapshots are under TestCases.Mac.Tests; Windows snapshots are under TestCases.WinUI.Tests.

Validation requirements

The supplied Gate result is skipped because no tests were detected. It must not be interpreted as evidence that tests passed: the PR modifies an existing device-test assertion and many UI-test expectations, but adds no new test method.

For the requested Windows validation lane, the current head needs the Windows UI screenshot suite covering the 15 changed baselines, especially the seven TitleBar cases affected directly by the margin change. Generated images should be compared with the submitted baselines to distinguish intentional layout changes from incidental font, scaling, antialiasing, device, or timing differences.

Complete cross-platform validation additionally requires:

  • Android runs for the generic and android-notch-36 baseline profiles.
  • iOS runs for generic and iOS 26 baselines, plus ContentSizeExpandsToViewport on a configuration where adjusted safe-area insets are meaningful.
  • Mac Catalyst verification for the six changed Mac baselines, the iOS-suffixed device test, and the shared TitleBar margin behavior.
  • Confirmation that the newly added LabelsShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterItemsSourceIsReplaced expectations correspond to an existing executed test on every represented platform.
  • Evidence that each broad baseline refresh comes from the canonical CI configuration and reflects intended candidate output rather than environmental drift.

At the current head, GitHub’s combined status was pending. The latest comments show maui-pr-uitests and maui-pr-devicetests reruns started after the final image refresh, and a separate Windows expert-review build started; no completed result for those current-head runs was available in the retrieved context.

Remaining uncertainties

  • The exact rendering cause and intended pixel difference for each of the 39 binary files remain unknown.
  • The linked candidate PR contains hundreds of files; its underlying functional changes were not reviewed here, so attribution beyond the reported failures is unknown.
  • Available code search did not locate the declaration of LabelsShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterItemsSourceIsReplaced on the indexed branches; this is unavailable context, not evidence that the test is absent.
  • It is unknown whether the shared TitleBar margin change intentionally applies to Mac Catalyst without Mac TitleBar baseline updates.
  • The current inflight/candidate head reported by #38782 differs from #38843’s recorded base SHA, so final behavior after integrating with the latest candidate state is not established.
  • Current-head rerun outcomes, pixel-diff artifacts, device configurations, and failure logs were not yet available.

🔬 Code Review — Deep Analysis

Code Review — PR #38843

Independent Assessment

What this changes: The submitted change updates test infrastructure rather than shipping framework code: it refreshes 39 cross-platform screenshot baselines, removes vertical margins from the shared TitleBar test-host leading/trailing images, and changes the iOS/Mac Catalyst ScrollView safe-area assertion to compare native content size with the adjusted viewport.

Inferred motivation: The candidate branch changed rendered output and UIKit safe-area behavior, so the PR aligns existing visual and device-test expectations with that candidate output.

Reconciliation with PR Narrative

Author claims: The PR addresses failures exposed by #38782 by refreshing expected images across platforms and correcting the iOS ScrollView viewport comparison.

Agreement/disagreement: The submitted diff supports those claims. The expert review found no concrete line-level correctness defect, but binary baseline replacement alone cannot establish that every pixel change is intentional.

Prior Review Reconciliation

No unresolved prior error-level finding was validated against the submitted head. The earlier Windows TitleBar failures described in the trusted context predated the final baseline refresh.

Blast Radius Assessment

  • Runs for all instances: The C# changes run only in test code, but the shared TitleBar host change affects every corresponding Windows and Mac Catalyst TitleBar screenshot case.
  • Startup impact: No shipping application startup impact.
  • Static/shared state: No new static or shared state.
  • Platform scope: ScrollViewTests.iOS.cs compiles for both iOS and Mac Catalyst; the baseline changes span Android, iOS, Mac Catalyst, and Windows.

CI Status

  • Required-check result: Undetermined for the submitted head; the trusted context recorded current-head reruns as pending.
  • Gate result: SKIPPED — no tests detected.
  • Classification: Neither the pending checks nor the skipped Gate provide passing validation evidence.
  • Action taken: Confidence is capped at low. Gate verification was not rerun, as required by the caller.

Findings

The expert reviewer wrote a validated empty JSON array to inline-findings.json; no concrete actionable source defect survived its dimension review.

The remaining concern is evidentiary rather than a line-level defect: 39 binary expectations cannot be judged for fidelity from the Git patch, and the supplied Gate did not execute the affected screenshot/device tests.

Failure-Mode Probing

  • Shared TitleBar host change on Mac Catalyst without corresponding Mac TitleBar baseline updates: no failure was established, but the supplied evidence does not show that the Mac cases ran or remained unchanged.
  • iOS/Mac Catalyst adjusted-inset assertion with nonzero safe-area insets: the new comparison is coherent with the adjusted viewport, but no completed current-head device-test result was supplied.
  • Broad screenshot refresh under a different scale, font, antialiasing, device, or timing environment: the patch cannot distinguish environmental drift from intended rendering; canonical UI-test artifacts are required.

External Output Contract

Not applicable.

Verdict: NEEDS_DISCUSSION

Confidence: low

Summary: The one permitted expert pass found no blocking code defect and produced no inline findings. Approval is nevertheless unsupported because the Gate was skipped and the submitted binary baselines and platform-sensitive test changes lack completed, isolated validation evidence.

Refinement Threshold

Not met. There is no concrete actionable expert finding or source/test-backed unresolved mechanism to justify a pr-plus-reviewer patch.


🛠️ Try-Fix — Analysis & Comparison

Alternative generation: not requested

Evidence-first mode intentionally omits routine Try-Fix attempts. This is not a failed
attempt, a completed alternative search, or evidence that alternatives have no value.
The expert review may still produce one evidence-backed PR refinement.


📝 PR Finalize — Recommended Title & Description

Assessment: ✏️ Recommend updating — the current title is vague and the description omits the shared TitleBar margin change and the precise cross-platform baseline scope.

Recommended title

[All Platforms] UI tests: Refresh candidate baselines and iOS ScrollView assertion

Recommended description

### Description of Change

This PR addresses test failures exposed by the inflight candidate PR https://github.com/dotnet/maui/pull/38782 and aligns the affected test expectations with the candidate output.

The submitted changes:

- Add or refresh 39 expected screenshot baseline files across Android, iOS, Mac Catalyst, and Windows.
- Move `Issue37440EmptyAutoSizeEditorDoesNotSnapToMaximumHeight` from the generic Android baseline set to the `android-notch-36` profile.
- Update the shared TitleBar test-host leading `Image` and trailing `ImageButton` margins from uniform `10` to `Thickness(10, 0)`, retaining horizontal spacing while removing vertical spacing.
- Update the iOS/Mac Catalyst `ContentSizeExpandsToViewport` ScrollView device test to compare `ContentSize` directly with the viewport after UIKit applies `AdjustedContentInset`.

#### Updated image cases

- DataTrigger_ButtonDisabled
- Issue37440EmptyAutoSizeEditorDoesNotSnapToMaximumHeight
- ItemsWrapGridWithDefaultWidth
- LabelNotTruncatedWithMaxLines
- LabelsShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterItemsSourceIsReplaced
- NoScrollbarsTest
- RtlCollectionViewShouldNotBeTruncatedAfterLandscapeRotation
- ScrollViewShouldRenderWithinBounds
- ShadowsDontRespectControlShape
- VerifyBindableLayoutWithBasicItemTemplate
- VerifyBindableLayoutWithGridItemTemplate
- VerifyBindableLayoutWithItemTemplateSelector
- VerifyBindableLayoutWithItemsSourceNone
- VerifyBindableLayoutWithItemsSourceObservableCollection
- VerifyCarouselViewKeepScrollOffsetAdd
- VerifyModelItemsObservableCollectionWhenMultipleModePreSelection
- VerifyModelItemsObservableCollectionWhenSingleModePreSelection
- ScrollViewGradientBackground
- ScrollViewWithoutGradientBackground
- TitleBar_Window
- TitleBar_Icon_WithTrailingContentAndLeadingContent
- TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithTitleAndSubtitle
- TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithSearchBar
- TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithGrid
- TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithHorizontalStackLayout
- TitleBar_TrailingContentAndLeadingContent_WithBackgroundColor

### Issues Fixed

Related candidate PR: https://github.com/dotnet/maui/pull/38782

🏁 Report — Final Recommendation

⚠️ Final Recommendation: REQUEST CHANGES

Phase Status

Phase Status Notes
Pre-Flight ✅ COMPLETE Trusted read-only context consumed for submitted head 7d76bff03375f8e4ac1e78812484f615b7d7dfc0
Code Review NEEDS_DISCUSSION (low) One expert pass completed; 0 validated inline findings, but required validation evidence is missing
Gate ⚠️ SKIPPED No tests detected; this is not a passing result
Try-Fix NOT REQUESTED Evidence-first mode intentionally omitted routine alternative generation
Refinement NOT GENERATED Expert evidence did not meet the threshold for a pr-plus-reviewer patch
Report ✅ COMPLETE Raw PR assessed as the sole real candidate

Code Review and Candidate Comparison

Candidate Implementation Expert Findings Validation Ranking
pr Submitted test-only change: 39 screenshot baselines, shared TitleBar test-host margins, and iOS/Mac Catalyst ScrollView assertion No concrete actionable defect survived expert validation Gate skipped; current-head platform reruns and binary fidelity were not demonstrated in the supplied evidence 1

Alternative generation: not requested. No try-fix-N candidates were created. No pr-plus-reviewer candidate was implemented because the expert review did not identify a concrete actionable defect or source/test-backed unresolved behavioral mechanism.

Selected Fix: PR — it is the only implemented candidate and the expert pass found no line-level defect. Selection does not establish merge readiness: the skipped Gate independently prevents approval, and the broad binary baseline refresh remains unvalidated.

Summary

Request changes pending isolated current-head validation of the affected Windows UI screenshot cases and the relevant cross-platform screenshot/device-test lanes. The submitted implementation is narrowly scoped to tests and has no validated inline code defect, but neither artifact presence nor a skipped Gate proves that the 39 replacement images are canonical or that the platform-sensitive assertion behaves correctly.

Root Cause

The candidate branch changed rendered output relative to existing UI-test expectations, and UIKit applies safe-area adjustments through AdjustedContentInset, making the prior ScrollView comparison stale. The submitted evidence does not isolate the product-side cause of each image delta, so attribution for the full baseline set remains uncertain.

Fix Quality

The source changes are focused: TitleBar test content retains horizontal margins while removing vertical margins, and the ScrollView test compares content size with the adjusted viewport. The expert reviewer produced a valid empty inline-findings.json. However, the fix changes expectations rather than proving the expected output; approval requires completed canonical runs for the affected Windows baselines and applicable Android, iOS, and Mac Catalyst paths, including meaningful safe-area coverage.


📱 UI Tests — Button,Label,Layout

Detected UI test categories: Button,Label,Layout

❌ Deep UI tests — 401 passed, 2 failed, 8 skipped across 3 categories on platform-pool agent (replaces in-process counts above).

🧪 UI Test Execution Results (deep, platform pool)

Category Tests Snapshot diffs
Button 100/103 (2 ❌, 1 skipped) 2 diff PNGs
Label 115/118 (3 skipped) ✓ —
Layout 186/190 (4 skipped) ✓ —
🔍 AI analysis of failures — PR-related vs unrelated

🔍 AI-generated triage (GitHub Copilot CLI) — a heuristic judgement of whether each deep UI test failure is connected to this PR's changes. Verify before relying on it.

Likely unrelated: the failures appear pre-existing, flaky, or infrastructure.

  • ● Unrelated — Windows Button visual snapshots (2 tests): both are baseline-image mismatches, while the PR changes neither Button rendering code nor these Windows Button baselines; its shared source edit is confined to TitleBar test content, and the iOS-only test change cannot affect Windows.

Strongest signal: the PR updates several Windows baselines, but neither failing Button baseline is among them.

❌ Button — 2 failed tests
VerifyButton_ImageWithShadow
VisualTestUtils.VisualTestFailedException : 
Snapshot different than baseline: VerifyButton_ImageWithShadow.png (0.60% difference)
If the correct baseline has changed (this isn't a a bug), then update the baseline image.
See test attachment or download the build artifacts to get the new snapshot file.

More info: https://aka.ms/visual-test-workflow
at Microsoft.Maui.TestCases.Tests.UITest.VerifyScreenshot(String name, Nullable`1 retryDelay, Nullable`1 retryTimeout, Int32 cropLeft, Int32 cropRight, Int32 cropTop, Int32 cropBottom, Double tolerance, Boolean includeTitleBar) in /_/src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/UITest.cs:line 299
   at Microsoft.Maui.TestCases.Tests.ButtonFeatureTests.VerifyButton_ImageWithShadow() in /_/src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/FeatureMatrix/ButtonFeatureTests.cs:line 684
   at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(ObjectHandleOnStack target, Void** arguments, ObjectHandleOnStack sig, BOOL isConstructor, ObjectHandleOnStack resu
...
VerifyButton_ContentLayoutRightWithImage
VisualTestUtils.VisualTestFailedException : 
Snapshot different than baseline: VerifyButton_ContentLayoutRightWithImage.png (1.76% difference)
If the correct baseline has changed (this isn't a a bug), then update the baseline image.
See test attachment or download the build artifacts to get the new snapshot file.

More info: https://aka.ms/visual-test-workflow
at Microsoft.Maui.TestCases.Tests.UITest.VerifyScreenshot(String name, Nullable`1 retryDelay, Nullable`1 retryTimeout, Int32 cropLeft, Int32 cropRight, Int32 cropTop, Int32 cropBottom, Double tolerance, Boolean includeTitleBar) in /_/src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/UITest.cs:line 299
   at Microsoft.Maui.TestCases.Tests.ButtonFeatureTests.VerifyButton_ContentLayoutRightWithImage() in /_/src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/FeatureMatrix/ButtonFeatureTests.cs:line 564
   at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(ObjectHandleOnStack target, Void** arguments, ObjectHandleOnStack sig, BOOL isConstructor, 
...

📎 Download drop-deep-uitests artifact (TRX + snapshot diffs)


🧭 Next Steps — review latest findings

No alternative fix was selected for this run. Review the session findings and CI results before merging.

@MauiBot MauiBot added s/agent-changes-requested AI agent recommends changes - found a better alternative or issues and removed s/agent-approved AI agent recommends approval - PR fix is correct and optimal s/agent-review-in-progress AI review is currently running for this PR labels Oct 8, 2026
@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@kubaflo

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tests Failure Analysis

@NafeelaNazhir — test-failure analysis for commit 7d76bff.

Scope CI failures Commit 7d76bff


🧪 CI Analysis — click to expand
📊 maui-pr

No failures found.


🧪 maui-pr-devicetests
  • 🟡 Needs human investigation — Parsed XAML can use x:Array: iOS, MacCatalyst. The TypeExtension missing-constructor error matches target evidence, but historical platform/OS mapping is absent.
  • 🟡 Needs human investigation — Windows LoopedVisibleCollectionOverrideDoesNotEnterRealizationRetry. Same high-range assertion on target; packaging/runtime comparability remains unverified.
  • 🟡 Needs human investigation — Android crashes: CoreCLR, Mono. No named outcomes; compare crash stacks.
  • 🟡 Needs human investigation — iOS crashes: OS 15, OS 26. Partial outcomes cannot establish causality.
  • 🟡 Needs human investigation — MacCatalyst crashes: OS 15, OS 26. Partial outcomes cannot establish causality.

🧪 maui-pr-uitests

🧭 Follow-up — actions and refresh

Next action: Restore complete results and variant metadata; compare crash stacks and snapshots against equivalent target runs.

Maintainers: comment /review tests to refresh this report.

@sheiksyedm
sheiksyedm marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2026 10:33
@sheiksyedm
sheiksyedm requested a review from kubaflo October 9, 2026 10:33
@kubaflo
kubaflo merged commit 29eb037 into dotnet:inflight/candidate Oct 9, 2026
184 of 202 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the .NET 10 SR12 milestone Oct 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community ✨ Community Contribution partner/syncfusion Issues / PR's with Syncfusion collaboration s/agent-changes-requested AI agent recommends changes - found a better alternative or issues s/agent-reviewed PR was reviewed by AI agent workflow (full 4-phase review)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants