house-keeping

[jarjk]

fixes #5

adds readme, fish mock client, .env.example, very-very basic home-page

takes some weight off #4

[jarjk]

TODOs:

• should we add dx check to ci?
• ci should make use of Makefile
• add check, format option to Makefile

[csboo]

Thanks for the work you put into this!

I mostly agree with the changes, good stuff..

I would remove the agents file as said before merging.

[csboo]

I'm not sure about the fish client either,
I don't know fish scripts that well, but it surely needs at least fish to be able to be ran, which nothing else needs.

i wouldn't suppose changing it to anything else though.

Surely the best solution would be to write a proper seeder into the backend itself with a feature maybe.

For now it is fine, but I'm not sure if it should be merged into main since it doesn't have much to do with the project.

What do you think about this? @jarjk

[jarjk]

I'm not sure about the fish client either, I don't know fish scripts that well, but it surely needs at least fish to be able to be ran, which nothing else needs.

i wouldn't suppose changing it to anything else though.

Surely the best solution would be to write a proper seeder into the backend itself with a feature maybe.

For now it is fine, but I'm not sure if it should be merged into main since it doesn't have much to do with the project.

What do you think about this? @jarjk

"For now it is fine, but I'm not sure if it should be merged into main since it doesn't have much to do with the project."

what's the "for now" in here? while the PR is in draft, or what? on the other hand, it enables you to use the project in it's current state, which means it does have something to do with it

it's definitely useful to have some kind of a client to be able to set up the server properly before having an actual client

I agree fish isn't the most useful language here, I'd though it's good for reference, python would actually make sense here I think (windows support, availability, ...)

building an actual client in rust without #22 is painful and definitely not worth the time

what do you say? I'll vibe a python client to see how bad it is though

[csboo]

"for now" is until we find a better solution, and (as you yourself answered) that would involve many things like #22 ...

[csboo]

it enables you to use the project in it's current state, which means it does have something to do with it

its not the fish script that enables you to use the project, at the very least nothing stops you to run curls by hand and you dont even need fish for it, and its even cross platform

it's definitely useful to have some kind of a client to be able to set up the server properly before having an actual client

yeah but thats already wip, while there isnt an actual client that does that, this could stay in an issue and be just copy pasted there as a basic solution or sth

I agree fish isn't the most useful language here, I'd though it's good for reference, python would actually make sense here I think (windows support, availability, ...)

i dont think that would make much of a difference, who used windows anyways

[jarjk]

i see, that clears things up

[csboo]

Look quite nice!
Great changes