Skip to content

test: upgrade validation and timestamp coverage - #28

Merged
lidavidm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
quack-upgrade/validation
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

lidavidm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
quack-upgrade/validation

Conversation

@lidavidm

@lidavidm lidavidm commented Sep 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Classify ingest create and append conflicts using the error codes returned through Quack.

Assisted-by: GPT-6 Astra codex@openai.com

@lidavidm
lidavidm added this pull request to stack #30 September 15, 2026 06:12
@lidavidm
lidavidm removed this pull request from stack #30 September 15, 2026 06:13
@lidavidm
lidavidm added this pull request to stack #32 September 15, 2026 06:13

@lidavidm lidavidm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an automated review by GPT-6 Astra. Suggestions may not be correct and should be independently verified.

Summary: Upgrades validation dependencies, adds DuckDB-specific timestamp cases, classifies ingest create/schema conflicts as ALREADY_EXISTS, and removes an obsolete execute-schema skip.

Assessment: Likely suitable to merge after live validation passes. No actionable correctness issues found in this layer. All 20 timestamp cases matched their expected Arrow results against local DuckDB 1.5.5. Live ingest behavior was inspected but not exercised because the local Quack fixture was unavailable.

Base automatically changed from quack-upgrade/dev-tools to main September 15, 2026 06:44
Classify ingest create and append conflicts using the error codes returned through Quack.

Assisted-by: GPT-6 Astra <codex@openai.com>
@lidavidm
lidavidm force-pushed the quack-upgrade/validation branch from 7e535db to 94e819c Compare September 15, 2026 06:44
@lidavidm
lidavidm merged commit 172be00 into main Sep 15, 2026
6 checks passed
@lidavidm
lidavidm deleted the quack-upgrade/validation branch September 15, 2026 07:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant