You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Decide and implement the current architecture for bounded Core public-coverage admission under real CPU, heap, event-loop, and store pressure, with authenticated evidence that proves the policy is active in production.
This preserves the product requirements from #2013, #2015, #2014, and #2016 without rebasing their obsolete scheduler/lifecycle implementation.
Design decision first
Current canary has an RFC64 public-catalog/native-receiver architecture that did not exist when the M1 Core coverage scheduler was written. Before implementation, decide whether automatic role-wide Core coverage is still desired, or whether adaptive admission belongs only to current catalog/bootstrap/recovery owners.
The issue must not create a second scheduler beside the current admission stack.
Outcome
Decide and implement the current architecture for bounded Core public-coverage admission under real CPU, heap, event-loop, and store pressure, with authenticated evidence that proves the policy is active in production.
This preserves the product requirements from #2013, #2015, #2014, and #2016 without rebasing their obsolete scheduler/lifecycle implementation.
Design decision first
Current canary has an RFC64 public-catalog/native-receiver architecture that did not exist when the M1 Core coverage scheduler was written. Before implementation, decide whether automatic role-wide Core coverage is still desired, or whether adaptive admission belongs only to current catalog/bootstrap/recovery owners.
The issue must not create a second scheduler beside the current admission stack.
Related current work:
Requirements
Acceptance criteria
Provenance