Trae/solo agent g3vg5 r

[jeo-ch]

Summary

Feature Quality Contract

• Changed surface:
• Tests added or updated:
• Coverage evidence:
• E2E / live-model evidence:
• Known risk / rollback:

Verification

• I ran the relevant local checks, or explained why they do not apply.
• I added or updated same-area tests for every production behavior change.
• I ran bun run verify for code changes, including the coverage gate.
• New or changed executable production lines meet the changed-line coverage threshold, or the blocker/maintainer override is documented.
• I attached or summarized the quality report path, JUnit/log artifact path, and pass/fail/skip counts.
• I ran E2E/live smoke for cross-boundary, provider/runtime, desktop chat, agent-loop, native, or release changes, or documented the blocker.

Risk

• This PR does not touch CLI core paths, or it has maintainer approval for allow-cli-core-change.
• Production code changes include matching tests, or have maintainer approval for allow-missing-tests.
• Coverage baseline/threshold changes have maintainer approval for allow-coverage-baseline-change.
• Quarantined tests still have owners, exit criteria, and unexpired review windows.
• Provider/runtime changes were covered by mock contract tests, and live smoke was run or explicitly deferred.

@dosubot review this PR for changed-area risk, missing tests, docs impact, desktop startup risk, and CLI core impact.

[github-actions]

PR quality triage

Changed areas: area:cli-core, area:desktop, area:docs, area:server

CLI core policy: Blocked by policy until a maintainer applies allow-cli-core-change and approves the PR.

Missing-test policy: Blocked by policy until a maintainer applies allow-missing-tests or matching tests are added.

Coverage baseline policy: No coverage-baseline policy block detected.

CLI core files:

• src/tools/BashTool/pathValidation.ts
• src/utils/config.ts
• src/utils/i18n/index.ts
• src/utils/i18n/locales/en.ts
• src/utils/i18n/locales/zh_CN.ts
• src/utils/i18n/locales/zh_TW.ts
• src/utils/permissions/filesystem.ts
• src/utils/secureStorage/index.ts
• src/utils/secureStorage/libsecretStorage.ts
• src/utils/secureStorage/plainTextStorage.ts

Coverage policy files:

• none

Expected checks:

• change-policy
• desktop-checks
• server-checks
• desktop-native-checks
• docs-checks
• coverage-checks

Test coverage signals:

• BLOCKING unless allow-missing-tests is applied: Desktop product files changed without a desktop test file in the PR.
• BLOCKING unless allow-missing-tests is applied: Server product files changed without a server test file in the PR.
• BLOCKING unless allow-missing-tests is applied: Agent/runtime product files changed without a tools/utils test file in the PR.
• Agent/model runtime path changed: use mock/request-shape tests in PR and maintainer live-model smoke before release.

Risk notes:

• Desktop state/API layer changed: verify store persistence, WebSocket behavior, and startup errors.
• Provider/search behavior changed: PR gate uses mock tests; live-provider tests stay maintainer-only.
• CI/policy changed: inspect workflow behavior itself, not just application tests.

Hard merge gates still come from GitHub Actions, not AI review.

Dosu handoff: Dosu can be used as the AI reviewer for risk explanation, missing-test prompts, and maintainer Q&A. If it does not comment automatically from the PR template, ask:

@dosubot review this PR for changed-area risk, missing tests, docs impact, desktop startup risk, and CLI core impact.

[dosubot]

Hi @jeo-ch! I'm Dosu and I'm helping the Relakkes's Org team.

I appreciate the request, but I'm not able to perform traditional code reviews — that includes assessing PRs for bugs, design issues, risk analysis, missing tests, or security concerns.

Here's what I can help with instead:

• Researching affected code areas — if you point me to specific files or modules changed in this PR, I can look up how they work, their dependencies, and related documentation.
• Answering questions about the codebase, architecture, or past discussions related to the changes.
• Suggesting or updating documentation if this PR introduces behavior that should be documented.

Would any of those be helpful for this PR?

---