feat(lab4): juice-shop SBOM + Grype/Trivy comparison + sign-ready att…#11
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal
Generate an SBOM of the Juice Shop image with Syft, scan it with Grype, compare against Trivy's all-in-one approach, and produce a signed-ready CycloneDX SBOM for Lab 8.
Changes
juice-shop.cdx.json(CycloneDX 1.5) andjuice-shop.spdx.jsonusing Syft.juice-shop-attestation.jsonwrapped in an in-toto v1 envelope for future Cosign attestation.submissions/lab4.mdwith vulnerability analysis and Trivy vs Grype tool comparison.Testing
fd58bdc9745416afce8184ee0666278a436574633ea7880365153a63bfd418b0) for the in-toto subject block.Checklist