Add spec/ + source/ + explanatory docs from canon migration#1
Merged
Conversation
Imports adapter protocol, if-doubt simulation, and dogfooding source files from the legacy engine repo. Canon kept single-file (logline.receipt.v0 only); these artifacts are proposed-behavior the engine implements, pending promotion to canon per LIP. Added: - spec/logline.adapter.v0 + adapter-declaration.v0 + adapter-conformance.v0 + adapter-declaration.v0.schema.json (LIP-0004/0005/0006) - spec/logline.if-doubt.v0 + if-doubt-simulation.v0 + if-doubt-grammar.v0 (LIP-0002) - source/*.logline (canon described in its own language; dogfooding) - docs/canon-vs-runtime.md, evidence-model.md, if-doubt-package-notes.md (explanatory, non-normative) - spec/README.md and source/README.md explaining boundaries Grammar (logline.grammar.v0 EBNF) is held back: planned to live with the constitutional-runtime crate in the Minilab workspace. canon defines | conformance proves | engine implements | governance evolves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Imports adapter protocol, if-doubt simulation, and supporting docs from the legacy
LogLine-Foundation/engine(pre-migration) repo. Canon stays single-file (logline.receipt.v0); these artifacts live inspec/here as proposed-behavior the engine implements, pending promotion to canon per LIP.Files added
spec/logline.adapter.v0spec/adapter-protocol.mdspec/logline.adapter-declaration.v0+.schema.jsonspec/adapter-declaration-*spec/logline.adapter-conformance.v0spec/adapter-conformance.mdspec/logline.if-doubt.v0spec/if-doubt-canon-addendum.mdspec/logline.if-doubt-simulation.v0spec/if-doubt-simulation.mdspec/logline.if-doubt-grammar.v0spec/if-doubt-grammar.ebnfsource/*.loglinesource/docs/canon-vs-runtime.mddocs/docs/evidence-model.mddocs/docs/if-doubt-package-notes.mddocs/spec/README.md,source/README.mdWhat is intentionally NOT here
logline.grammar.v0(EBNF for the LogLine language proper) — held back to live with theconstitutional-runtimecrate in the Minilab workspace, where it is consumed by the IR layer.logline.canon.v0+.schema.json(language canon, 9-slot lifecycle, route_kinds, status_lifecycle, law, prohibition) — same hold reasoning.Doctrine
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code