From 18107a43fb3007b8f8487ebe435c8416e61052b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose Abreu <josearmandoabreu.85@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:34:57 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Adopt GitHub Spec Kit, retire OpenSpec active tooling

Installs Spec Kit for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot as the repo's
active spec-driven workflow, ratifies a project constitution derived
from AGENTS.md, and removes OpenSpec's now-superseded skills/prompts/
commands for both agents. openspec/ (specs + archived changes) is
left untouched as a frozen historical record. See LS-4126.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---
 .claude/commands/opsx/apply.md                | 181 ----
 .claude/commands/opsx/archive.md              | 223 -----
 .claude/commands/opsx/explore.md              | 181 ----
 .claude/commands/opsx/propose.md              | 119 ---
 .claude/commands/opsx/sync.md                 | 219 -----
 .claude/commands/opsx/update.md               |  86 --
 .claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md | 185 ----
 .../skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md   | 180 ----
 .claude/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md      | 296 -------
 .claude/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md      | 123 ---
 .claude/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md   | 223 -----
 .../skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md    |  90 --
 .claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md       | 262 ++++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md     | 386 +++++++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md       | 294 +++++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md  | 182 ++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md      | 279 ++++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md     | 229 +++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md          | 169 ++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md       | 348 ++++++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md         | 218 +++++
 .claude/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md | 112 +++
 .github/prompts/opsx-apply.prompt.md          | 177 ----
 .github/prompts/opsx-archive.prompt.md        | 219 -----
 .github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md        | 177 ----
 .github/prompts/opsx-propose.prompt.md        | 115 ---
 .github/prompts/opsx-sync.prompt.md           | 215 -----
 .github/prompts/opsx-update.prompt.md         |  82 --
 .github/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md | 185 ----
 .../skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md   | 180 ----
 .github/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md      | 296 -------
 .github/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md      | 123 ---
 .github/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md   | 223 -----
 .../skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md    |  90 --
 .github/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md       | 259 ++++++
 .github/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md     | 383 +++++++++
 .github/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md       | 291 +++++++
 .github/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md  | 179 ++++
 .github/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md      | 277 ++++++
 .github/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md     | 226 +++++
 .github/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md          | 166 ++++
 .github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md       | 345 ++++++++
 .github/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md         | 215 +++++
 .github/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md | 109 +++
 .specify/.gitignore                           |   9 +
 .specify/init-options.json                    |   9 +
 .specify/integration.json                     |  15 +
 .specify/integrations/claude.manifest.json    |  17 +
 .specify/integrations/copilot.manifest.json   |  17 +
 .specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json   |  19 +
 .specify/memory/.constitution-template.json   |   4 +
 .specify/memory/constitution.md               | 119 +++
 .../powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1        | 185 ++++
 .specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1        | 796 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1 | 328 ++++++++
 .../scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1   |  38 +
 .specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1    |  88 ++
 .specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1   |  93 ++
 .specify/templates/checklist-template.md      |  45 +
 .specify/templates/constitution-template.md   |  50 ++
 .specify/templates/plan-template.md           | 113 +++
 .specify/templates/spec-template.md           | 131 +++
 .specify/templates/tasks-template.md          | 252 ++++++
 .specify/workflows/speckit/workflow.yml       |  74 ++
 .specify/workflows/workflow-registry.json     |  13 +
 AGENTS.md                                     |  47 +-
 CHANGELOG.md                                  |   2 +
 67 files changed, 7385 insertions(+), 4196 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 .claude/commands/opsx/apply.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/commands/opsx/archive.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/commands/opsx/explore.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/commands/opsx/propose.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/commands/opsx/sync.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/commands/opsx/update.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .claude/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .claude/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/prompts/opsx-apply.prompt.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/prompts/opsx-archive.prompt.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/prompts/opsx-propose.prompt.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/prompts/opsx-sync.prompt.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/prompts/opsx-update.prompt.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md
 delete mode 100644 .github/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .github/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/.gitignore
 create mode 100644 .specify/init-options.json
 create mode 100644 .specify/integration.json
 create mode 100644 .specify/integrations/claude.manifest.json
 create mode 100644 .specify/integrations/copilot.manifest.json
 create mode 100644 .specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json
 create mode 100644 .specify/memory/.constitution-template.json
 create mode 100644 .specify/memory/constitution.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1
 create mode 100644 .specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
 create mode 100644 .specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1
 create mode 100644 .specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1
 create mode 100644 .specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1
 create mode 100644 .specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1
 create mode 100644 .specify/templates/checklist-template.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/templates/constitution-template.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/templates/plan-template.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/templates/spec-template.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/templates/tasks-template.md
 create mode 100644 .specify/workflows/speckit/workflow.yml
 create mode 100644 .specify/workflows/workflow-registry.json

diff --git a/.claude/commands/opsx/apply.md b/.claude/commands/opsx/apply.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 85630e8..0000000
--- a/.claude/commands/opsx/apply.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "OPSX: Apply"
-description: "Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)"
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-category: "Workflow"
-tags: ["workflow", "artifacts", "experimental"]
----
-
-Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., `/opsx:apply add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:apply <other>`).
-
-2. **Check status to understand the schema**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints
-   - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
-3. **Get apply instructions**
-
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   This returns:
-   - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema)
-   - Progress (total, complete, remaining)
-   - Task list with status
-   - Dynamic instruction based on current state
-   - Optional `context`: current required project instruction input from the selected root
-   - Optional `operationGuidance`: current advisory guidance for apply
-
-   **Handle states:**
-   - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using `/opsx:continue` (if it is not installed, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to see the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` for how to create it)
-   - If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive
-   - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
-
-   Treat `context` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
-   apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
-   Treat `operationGuidance` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
-   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
-   workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
-   progress, `contextFiles`, and the built-in `instruction`. They are not
-   evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
-   not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
-   instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
-   conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
-   conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
-   These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-4. **Read context files**
-
-   Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.
-   The files depend on the schema being used:
-   - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
-   - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
-
-   Do not copy `context` or `operationGuidance` verbatim into implementation
-   files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.
-
-5. **Show current progress**
-
-   Display:
-   - Schema being used
-   - Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - Remaining tasks overview
-   - Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
-6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
-
-   For each pending task:
-   - Show which task is being worked on
-   - Make the code changes required
-   - Keep changes minimal and focused
-   - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
-   - Continue to next task
-
-   **Pause if:**
-   - Task is unclear → ask for clarification
-   - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
-   - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
-   - User interrupts
-
-7. **On completion or pause, show status**
-
-   Display:
-   - Tasks completed this session
-   - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - If all done: suggest archive
-   - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
-
-**Output During Implementation**
-
-```
-## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
-
-Working on task 3/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-
-Working on task 4/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-```
-
-**Output On Completion**
-
-```
-## Implementation Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
-
-### Completed This Session
-- [x] Task 1
-- [x] Task 2
-...
-
-All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx:archive`.
-```
-
-**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**
-
-```
-## Implementation Paused
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
-
-### Issue Encountered
-<description of the issue>
-
-**Options:**
-1. <option 1>
-2. <option 2>
-3. Other approach
-
-What would you like to do?
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
-- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
-- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
-- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
-- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
-- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
-- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
-- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
-- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
-- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
-- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
-- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
-
-**Fluid Workflow Integration**
-
-This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
-
-- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
-- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
diff --git a/.claude/commands/opsx/archive.md b/.claude/commands/opsx/archive.md
deleted file mode 100644
index a9a7b96..0000000
--- a/.claude/commands/opsx/archive.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,223 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "OPSX: Archive"
-description: "Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow"
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-category: "Workflow"
-tags: ["workflow", "archive", "experimental"]
----
-
-Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx:archive` (e.g., `/opsx:archive add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show only active changes (not already archived).
-   Include the schema used for each change if available.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:archive <other>`).
-
-   **Load current archive inputs before the existing archive checks:**
-
-   After resolving the selected change and planning root, run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions archive --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Keep the same selected-root flags on this command. This lookup is advisory and
-   optional: it only supplies extra prompt inputs, so it must never block archiving.
-   If it exits non-zero or returns invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that
-   does not support this command yet — continue the archive workflow with no
-   context and no operation guidance. Do not report an error and do not stop.
-
-   A successful response may omit both optional fields. Treat `context` as a
-   required prompt-level input: read and consider it, and apply relevant project
-   facts, conventions, and constraints. Treat `operationGuidance` as optional
-   additive advice: read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are
-   applicable and compatible with the built-in archive workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from built-in steps, explicit user choices, resolved
-   paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one of those
-   controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If
-   guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not follow it
-   and explain why. Do not infer replacement paths, skipped prompts, or flags from
-   either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, change artifacts,
-   or archive summaries unless the user separately asks for it. These are
-   prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-2. **Check artifact completion status**
-
-   Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion.
-
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context
-   - `artifacts`: List of artifacts with their status (`done`, `skipped`, or other)
-
-   **If any artifacts are neither `done` nor `skipped`** (skipped artifacts satisfy the requirement - the change declares skip_specs):
-   - Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
-   - Prompt user for confirmation to continue
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-3. **Check task completion status**
-
-   Read the tasks file (typically `tasks.md`) to check for incomplete tasks.
-
-   Count tasks marked with `- [ ]` (incomplete) vs `- [x]` (complete).
-
-   **If incomplete tasks found:**
-   - Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
-   - Prompt user for confirmation to continue
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-   **If no tasks file exists:** Proceed without task-related warning.
-
-4. **Assess delta spec sync state**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from status JSON as the only
-   delta-spec source. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, proceed without a sync prompt and do not infer
-   delta specs from other artifacts.
-
-   **If delta specs exist:**
-   - Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (use the store-aware `planningHome.root` from step 2, not a hardcoded repo path)
-   - Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
-   - Show a combined summary before prompting
-
-   **Prompt options:**
-   - If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
-   - If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
-
-   Route on the answer:
-   - "Cancel" — stop, do not archive
-   - "Archive without syncing" or "Archive now" — proceed to archive
-   - "Sync now" or "Sync anyway" — sync, then verify (below)
-   - Anything else — ask again rather than archiving
-
-   Before a selected sync writes any main spec, run
-   `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json` once with the same
-   selected-root flags. Require a zero exit status and valid artifact-instruction
-   JSON. If the lookup fails or returns invalid JSON, report the error and stop
-   before writing any main spec or moving the change. A valid response with omitted
-   `rules` is the no-rules case. Apply returned `rules` only to the content and
-   form of main specs produced by this merge; do not use them as archive guidance,
-   change CLI behavior, or copy the rule text into any output file.
-
-   Then run the `/opsx:sync` workflow inline (agent-driven intelligent merge) for change '<name>', passing the delta spec analysis and the fetched specs-rule snapshot from above, and wait for it to finish. The inline sync must reuse that snapshot without fetching `specs` instructions again. Do not delegate it to a background task — step 5 would move `changeRoot` out from under a sync that is still reading it, leaving the change archived and the main specs never updated. If your agent can only run it by delegation, delegate synchronously and wait for the result.
-
-   Then re-run the comparison from the top of this step against every capability that has a delta spec in `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` — not only the ones the sync reports it touched. A successful sync leaves nothing left to apply, so each capability must now read as already synced:
-   - ADDED requirements present
-   - MODIFIED requirements carrying the scenario and description changes named in the delta, with their other scenarios intact
-   - REMOVED requirements gone
-   - RENAMED requirements present under the new name and absent under the old one
-
-   If the sync failed, or any capability does not match, report what differs and stop — do not archive. Nothing has moved and `changeRoot` is intact, so the user can fix the mismatch or re-run the sync and start the archive again.
-
-5. **Perform the archive**
-
-   Create an `archive` directory under `planningHome.changesDir` if it doesn't exist:
-   ```bash
-   mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
-   ```
-
-   Generate the target name: use the change name as-is when it already starts with a `YYYY-MM-DD-` prefix; otherwise prepend the current date as `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>`. Never stack a second date (same rule as `openspec archive`).
-
-   **Check if target already exists:**
-   - If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
-   - If no: Move `changeRoot` to the archive directory
-
-   ```bash
-   mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/<target-name>"
-   ```
-
-6. **Display summary**
-
-   Show archive completion summary including:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema that was used
-   - Archive location
-   - Spec sync status (synced / sync skipped / no delta specs)
-   - Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** ✓ Synced to main specs
-
-All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
-```
-
-**Output On Success (No Delta Specs)**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** No delta specs
-
-All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
-```
-
-**Output On Success With Warnings**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete (with warnings)
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** Sync skipped (user chose to skip)
-
-**Warnings:**
-- Archived with 2 incomplete artifacts
-- Archived with 3 incomplete tasks
-- Delta spec sync was skipped (user chose to skip)
-
-Review the archive if this was not intentional.
-```
-
-**Output On Error (Archive Exists)**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Failed
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Target:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-
-Target archive directory already exists.
-
-**Options:**
-1. Rename the existing archive
-2. Delete the existing archive if it's a duplicate
-3. Wait until a different date to archive
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Announce the selected change; prompt for selection when it is ambiguous
-- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
-- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
-- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
-- Show clear summary of what happened
-- If sync is requested, run the `/opsx:sync` workflow inline (agent-driven)
-- Never archive while a spec sync is still in flight — run the sync inline and verify the main specs before moving `changeRoot`
-- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
-- Apply relevant runtime context and report conflicts; operation guidance remains advisory
-- Consider every guidance entry and explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Existing CLI checks, resolved paths, prompts, and command contracts are unchanged
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never operation guidance
-- Never copy runtime context, operation guidance, or artifact-rule text verbatim into output files
diff --git a/.claude/commands/opsx/explore.md b/.claude/commands/opsx/explore.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 9ad9cc9..0000000
--- a/.claude/commands/opsx/explore.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "OPSX: Explore"
-description: "Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements"
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-category: "Workflow"
-tags: ["workflow", "explore", "experimental", "thinking"]
----
-
-Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
-
-**IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing.** You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
-
-**This is a stance, not a workflow.** There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: The argument after `/opsx:explore` is whatever the user wants to think about. Could be:
-- A vague idea: "real-time collaboration"
-- A specific problem: "the auth system is getting unwieldy"
-- A change name: "add-dark-mode" (to explore in context of that change)
-- A comparison: "postgres vs sqlite for this"
-- Nothing (just enter explore mode)
-
----
-
-## The Stance
-
-- **Curious, not prescriptive** - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
-- **Open threads, not interrogations** - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
-- **Visual** - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
-- **Adaptive** - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
-- **Patient** - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
-- **Grounded** - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
-
----
-
-## What You Might Do
-
-Depending on what the user brings, you might:
-
-**Explore the problem space**
-- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
-- Challenge assumptions
-- Reframe the problem
-- Find analogies
-
-**Investigate the codebase**
-- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
-- Find integration points
-- Identify patterns already in use
-- Surface hidden complexity
-
-**Compare options**
-- Brainstorm multiple approaches
-- Build comparison tables
-- Sketch tradeoffs
-- Recommend a path (if asked)
-
-**Visualize**
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│     Use ASCII diagrams liberally        │
-├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
-│                                         │
-│      ┌────────┐         ┌────────┐      │
-│      │ State  │────────▶│ State  │      │
-│      │   A    │         │   B    │      │
-│      └────────┘         └────────┘      │
-│                                         │
-│   System diagrams, state machines,      │
-│   data flows, architecture sketches,    │
-│   dependency graphs, comparison tables  │
-│                                         │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-**Surface risks and unknowns**
-- Identify what could go wrong
-- Find gaps in understanding
-- Suggest spikes or investigations
-
----
-
-## OpenSpec Awareness
-
-You have full context of the OpenSpec system. Use it naturally, don't force it.
-
-### Check for context
-
-At the start, quickly check what exists:
-```bash
-openspec list --json
-```
-
-This tells you:
-- If there are active changes
-- Their names, schemas, and status
-- What the user might be working on
-
-Then read the project's own context from the resolved root - `<root.path>/openspec/config.yaml` (or `config.yml`). Use the `root.path` returned above, and skip this if neither file exists:
-- `context`: project background - tech stack, conventions, constraints
-- `rules`: keyed by artifact id - the entries for an artifact apply only when you write that artifact
-
-Ground your thinking in these. They are constraints for you to follow, not content to reproduce: do NOT copy them into the conversation or into any artifact you create.
-
-If the user mentioned a specific change name, read its artifacts for context.
-
-### When no change exists
-
-Think freely. When insights crystallize, you might offer:
-
-- "This feels solid enough to start a change. Want me to create a proposal?"
-- Or keep exploring - no pressure to formalize
-
-### When a change exists
-
-If the user mentions a change or you detect one is relevant:
-
-1. **Resolve and read existing artifacts for context**
-   - Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`.
-   - Use `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext` from the status JSON.
-   - Read existing files from `artifactPaths.<artifact>.existingOutputPaths`.
-
-2. **Reference them naturally in conversation**
-   - "Your design mentions using Redis, but we just realized SQLite fits better..."
-   - "The proposal scopes this to premium users, but we're now thinking everyone..."
-
-3. **Offer to capture when decisions are made**
-
-    | Insight Type               | Where to Capture               |
-    |----------------------------|--------------------------------|
-    | New requirement discovered | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Requirement changed        | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Design decision made       | `design.md`                  |
-    | Scope changed              | `proposal.md`                |
-    | New work identified        | `tasks.md`                   |
-    | Assumption invalidated     | Relevant artifact              |
-
-   Example offers:
-   - "That's a design decision. Capture it in design.md?"
-   - "This is a new requirement. Add it to specs?"
-   - "This changes scope. Update the proposal?"
-
-4. **The user decides** - Offer and move on. Don't pressure. Don't auto-capture.
-
----
-
-## What You Don't Have To Do
-
-- Follow a script
-- Ask the same questions every time
-- Produce a specific artifact
-- Reach a conclusion
-- Stay on topic if a tangent is valuable
-- Be brief (this is thinking time)
-
----
-
-## Ending Discovery
-
-There's no required ending. Discovery might:
-
-- **Flow into a proposal**: "Ready to start? I can create a change proposal."
-- **Result in artifact updates**: "Updated design.md with these decisions"
-- **Just provide clarity**: User has what they need, moves on
-- **Continue later**: "We can pick this up anytime"
-
-When things crystallize, you might offer a summary - but it's optional. Sometimes the thinking IS the value.
-
----
-
-## Guardrails
-
-- **Don't implement** - Never write code or implement features. Creating OpenSpec artifacts is fine, writing application code is not.
-- **Don't fake understanding** - If something is unclear, dig deeper
-- **Don't rush** - Discovery is thinking time, not task time
-- **Don't force structure** - Let patterns emerge naturally
-- **Don't auto-capture** - Offer to save insights, don't just do it
-- **Do visualize** - A good diagram is worth many paragraphs
-- **Do explore the codebase** - Ground discussions in reality
-- **Do question assumptions** - Including the user's and your own
diff --git a/.claude/commands/opsx/propose.md b/.claude/commands/opsx/propose.md
deleted file mode 100644
index cca65d2..0000000
--- a/.claude/commands/opsx/propose.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "OPSX: Propose"
-description: "Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step"
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-category: "Workflow"
-tags: ["workflow", "artifacts", "experimental"]
----
-
-Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
-
-I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
-- proposal.md (what & why)
-- `specs/<capability>/spec.md` (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)
-- design.md (how)
-- tasks.md (implementation steps)
-
-When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply
-
----
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: The argument after `/opsx:propose` is the change name (kebab-case), OR a description of what the user wants to build.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **If no input provided, ask what they want to build**
-
-   Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
-   > "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
-
-   From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → `add-user-auth`).
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
-2. **Create the change directory**
-   ```bash
-   openspec new change "<name>"
-   ```
-   This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with `.openspec.yaml`.
-
-3. **Get the artifact build order**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to get:
-   - `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., `["tasks"]`)
-   - `artifacts`: list of all artifacts, each with its `status` and its `requires` edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-4. **Create every artifact in the required set**
-
-   Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
-
-   Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
-
-   a. **For each artifact that is `ready` (dependencies satisfied)**:
-      - Get instructions:
-        ```bash
-        openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-        ```
-      - The instructions JSON includes:
-        - `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `template`: The structure to use for your output file
-        - `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
-        - `skipped`/`warning`: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
-        - `resolvedOutputPath`: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
-        - `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
-      - Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
-      - If the `instruction` field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at `resolvedOutputPath`
-      - Otherwise create the artifact file using `template` as the structure and write it to `resolvedOutputPath`. If `resolvedOutputPath` is a glob, follow `instruction` to choose the concrete file path
-      - Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
-      - Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"
-
-   b. **Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just `apply.requires`)**
-      - After creating each artifact, re-run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`
-      - The required set is `applyRequires` plus every artifact reachable from those by following the `requires` edges in `status --json` - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
-      - `status` is file-existence only, so an `applyRequires` artifact reading `done` does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing `tasks.md` early marks `tasks` done while `specs` was never written. Use each artifact's `requires` edges, not its `status`, to build the required set: a `done` artifact still lists what it depends on
-      - An artifact already reading `status: "skipped"` is satisfied: the change declares `skip_specs` in `.openspec.yaml`, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
-      - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
-      - Skip one only when `status` already reports it `skipped`, or when its own `instruction` says it is conditional: run `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` and skip only if its `instruction` field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's `design.md` qualifies; `specs` qualifies only via the `skipped` status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
-      - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still `blocked` only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
-      - Stop when every artifact in the required set is `done`, `skipped`, or was deliberately skipped
-
-   c. **If an artifact requires user input** (unclear context):
-      - Ask the user to clarify
-      - Then continue with creation
-
-5. **Show final status**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>"
-   ```
-
-**Output**
-
-After completing all artifacts, summarize:
-- Change name and location
-- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
-- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
-- Prompt: "Run `/opsx:apply` to start implementing."
-
-**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
-
-- Follow the `instruction` field from `openspec instructions` for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
-- If the `instruction` field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly
-- The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
-- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
-- Use `template` as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
-- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
-  - Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
-  - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in `apply.requires`
-- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
-- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
-- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
-- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
diff --git a/.claude/commands/opsx/sync.md b/.claude/commands/opsx/sync.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 54851b6..0000000
--- a/.claude/commands/opsx/sync.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,219 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "OPSX: Sync"
-description: "Sync delta specs from a change to main specs"
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-category: "Workflow"
-tags: ["workflow", "specs", "experimental"]
----
-
-Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
-
-This is an **agent-driven** operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx:sync` (e.g., `/opsx:sync add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show changes that have delta specs (under `specs/` directory).
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:sync <other>`).
-
-2. **Resolve change context**
-
-   Run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   The JSON includes `planningHome.root`. Main specs live under `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/` — use that (store-aware) root for every main-spec path below, not a hardcoded repo path. When a store is selected it points at the store, not the current repository.
-
-3. **Find delta specs**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from the status JSON as the
-   only source of delta spec paths. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, report that there are no delta specs to sync,
-   do not infer them from other artifacts, and stop without requesting artifact
-   instructions or writing a main spec.
-
-   Sync every path in `existingOutputPaths` unless the caller narrowed the set.
-   A caller narrows it by naming an explicit list of delta spec paths to sync —
-   archive does this inline, and a user can too ("only sync the billing delta").
-   Then sync only the named paths and leave the remaining delta specs untouched:
-   bulk archive excludes a delta whose implementation it could not find, and
-   syncing it anyway would write a main spec the caller deliberately withheld.
-   Carry that narrowed selection through step 4; never widen it back to the full
-   list. If a named path is not in `existingOutputPaths`, do not sync it —
-   report it and stop, rather than dropping it silently. If the named list is
-   empty, report that there is nothing to sync and stop without writing a main
-   spec.
-
-   Each delta spec file contains sections like:
-   - `## ADDED Requirements` - New requirements to add
-   - `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changes to existing requirements
-   - `## REMOVED Requirements` - Requirements to remove
-   - `## RENAMED Requirements` - Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
-
-   If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
-
-4. **For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs**
-
-   Before the first main-spec write, obtain one current specs-rule snapshot:
-   - If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from
-     `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json`, reuse it and do not
-     fetch the same instructions again.
-   - Otherwise run that command once now with the same selected-root flags.
-   - If the direct lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction
-     JSON, report the error and stop before writing any main spec. Do not treat the
-     failure as an absent rule set.
-   - A valid response with omitted `rules` means no artifact rules are configured
-     and the existing semantic merge continues.
-
-   Apply returned `rules` only to the content and form of the main specs produced
-   by this merge. Artifact rules are not operation guidance and cannot change
-   selected roots, delta paths, CLI checks, or workflow steps. Use their text as
-   constraints without copying it verbatim into a main spec or summary.
-
-   For each capability delta spec path selected in step 3 — the full `existingOutputPaths` list, or the narrowed subset when a caller supplied one (these may belong to a selected store, not the repo):
-
-   a. **Read the delta spec** to understand the intended changes
-
-   b. **Read the main spec** at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (may not exist yet)
-
-   c. **Apply changes intelligently**:
-
-      **ADDED Requirements:**
-      - If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
-      - If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
-
-      **MODIFIED Requirements:**
-      - Find the requirement in main spec
-      - Apply the changes - this can be:
-        - Adding new scenarios (don't need to copy existing ones)
-        - Modifying existing scenarios
-        - Changing the requirement description
-      - Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
-
-      **REMOVED Requirements:**
-      - Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
-
-      **RENAMED Requirements:**
-      - Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
-
-      **`## Purpose` in the delta:**
-      - The main spec already has one and it is authoritative - leave it alone
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does; it warns and moves on)
-
-   d. **Create new main spec** if capability doesn't exist yet:
-      - Create `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
-      - Add Purpose section: copy the delta's `## Purpose` body verbatim when it has one
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does); only write a brief TBD placeholder when it does not
-      - Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
-      - Follow the **Main Spec Format Reference** below
-
-5. **Show summary**
-
-   After applying all changes, summarize:
-   - Which capabilities were updated
-   - What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
-   - Any new main spec left with a TBD Purpose placeholder, so it gets written
-     now rather than lingering
-
-**Delta Spec Format Reference**
-
-```markdown
-## Purpose
-
-Only on a delta that introduces a brand-new capability. Seeds the new main spec.
-
-## ADDED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-
-## MODIFIED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Existing Feature
-#### Scenario: New scenario to add
-- **WHEN** user does A
-- **THEN** system does B
-
-## REMOVED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
-
-## RENAMED Requirements
-
-- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
-- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`
-```
-
-**Main Spec Format Reference**
-
-Main specs are what the delta merges INTO. They must never contain delta operation headers (`## ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED Requirements`) - after syncing, every requirement lives under a single `## Requirements` section:
-
-```markdown
-# <capability> Specification
-
-## Purpose
-Short description of what this capability does and why it exists.
-
-## Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-```
-
-**Key Principle: Intelligent Merging**
-
-Unlike programmatic merging, you can apply **partial updates**:
-- To add a scenario, just include that scenario under MODIFIED - don't copy existing scenarios
-- The delta represents *intent*, not a wholesale replacement
-- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Specs Synced: <change-name>
-
-Updated main specs:
-
-**<capability-1>**:
-- Added requirement: "New Feature"
-- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
-
-**<capability-2>**:
-- Created new spec file
-- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
-
-Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
-- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
-- Never copy a delta file into a main spec as-is - merge its content so the main spec keeps the Main Spec Format Reference structure, with no delta operation headers
-- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
-- Show what you're changing as you go
-- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result
-- Use only `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths`; never infer delta specs from unrelated artifacts
-- Honor a caller-supplied subset of `existingOutputPaths`; never widen it back to the full list
-- Fetch specs instructions once for direct sync, or reuse the archive-supplied snapshot inline
-- Stop before every main-spec write on a non-zero or invalid JSON specs-instruction response
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never copied into output files
diff --git a/.claude/commands/opsx/update.md b/.claude/commands/opsx/update.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 624ba19..0000000
--- a/.claude/commands/opsx/update.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "OPSX: Update"
-description: "Update a change - revise existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent (Experimental)"
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-category: "Workflow"
-tags: ["workflow", "artifacts", "experimental"]
----
-
-Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx:update` (e.g., `/opsx:update add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema (from `schema` field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
-   - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
-   - How recently it was modified (from `lastModified` field)
-
-   Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:update <other>`).
-
-2. **Get the change's artifacts**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `artifacts`: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
-   - `isComplete`: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-   The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
-
-   The files to edit are `artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths` - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. `specs/**/*.md`). Do NOT write to `resolvedOutputPath`: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
-
-3. **Understand the request**
-   - If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
-   - If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
-
-4. **Read and reconcile**
-   - Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
-   - Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
-   - Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
-   - Revise only files that already exist (`existingOutputPaths`). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to `/opsx:continue` to create them.
-   - If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
-
-5. **Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time**
-   - Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
-   - If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
-   - When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
-     ```bash
-     openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-     ```
-
-6. **Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)**
-   - Artifacts still missing -> suggest `/opsx:continue` to create them.
-   - Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest `/opsx:apply` to carry the delta into code.
-   - Everything done and implemented -> suggest `/opsx:archive`.
-
-**Output**
-
-After each invocation, show:
-- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
-- Anything deferred to `/opsx:continue` (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
-- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to `/opsx:apply`.
-- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by `openspec status`; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
-- Edit only the concrete files in `existingOutputPaths`; never write to a glob `resolvedOutputPath`.
-- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is `/opsx:continue`'s job.
-- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
-- If the request changes the change's *intent* rather than refining it, recommend starting fresh with `/opsx:new` (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic).
-- `/opsx:continue` and `/opsx:new` may not be installed (core profile). When suggesting one that is unavailable, point to the CLI instead: `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` shows the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` explains how to create it.
diff --git a/.claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index df07419..0000000
--- a/.claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,185 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-apply-change
-description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:apply <other>`).
-
-2. **Check status to understand the schema**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints
-   - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
-3. **Get apply instructions**
-
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   This returns:
-   - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
-   - Progress (total, complete, remaining)
-   - Task list with status
-   - Dynamic instruction based on current state
-   - Optional `context`: current required project instruction input from the selected root
-   - Optional `operationGuidance`: current advisory guidance for apply
-
-   **Handle states:**
-   - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change (if it is not installed, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to see the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` for how to create it)
-   - If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive
-   - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
-
-   Treat `context` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
-   apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
-   Treat `operationGuidance` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
-   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
-   workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
-   progress, `contextFiles`, and the built-in `instruction`. They are not
-   evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
-   not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
-   instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
-   conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
-   conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
-   These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-4. **Read context files**
-
-   Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.
-   The files depend on the schema being used:
-   - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
-   - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
-
-   Do not copy `context` or `operationGuidance` verbatim into implementation
-   files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.
-
-5. **Show current progress**
-
-   Display:
-   - Schema being used
-   - Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - Remaining tasks overview
-   - Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
-6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
-
-   For each pending task:
-   - Show which task is being worked on
-   - Make the code changes required
-   - Keep changes minimal and focused
-   - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
-   - Continue to next task
-
-   **Pause if:**
-   - Task is unclear → ask for clarification
-   - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
-   - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
-   - User interrupts
-
-7. **On completion or pause, show status**
-
-   Display:
-   - Tasks completed this session
-   - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - If all done: suggest archive
-   - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
-
-**Output During Implementation**
-
-```
-## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
-
-Working on task 3/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-
-Working on task 4/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-```
-
-**Output On Completion**
-
-```
-## Implementation Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
-
-### Completed This Session
-- [x] Task 1
-- [x] Task 2
-...
-
-All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.
-```
-
-**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**
-
-```
-## Implementation Paused
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
-
-### Issue Encountered
-<description of the issue>
-
-**Options:**
-1. <option 1>
-2. <option 2>
-3. Other approach
-
-What would you like to do?
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
-- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
-- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
-- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
-- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
-- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
-- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
-- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
-- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
-- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
-- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
-- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
-
-**Fluid Workflow Integration**
-
-This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
-
-- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
-- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
diff --git a/.claude/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 3a2543a..0000000
--- a/.claude/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-archive-change
-description: Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show only active changes (not already archived).
-   Include the schema used for each change if available.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:archive <other>`).
-
-   **Load current archive inputs before the existing archive checks:**
-
-   After resolving the selected change and planning root, run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions archive --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Keep the same selected-root flags on this command. This lookup is advisory and
-   optional: it only supplies extra prompt inputs, so it must never block archiving.
-   If it exits non-zero or returns invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that
-   does not support this command yet — continue the archive workflow with no
-   context and no operation guidance. Do not report an error and do not stop.
-
-   A successful response may omit both optional fields. Treat `context` as a
-   required prompt-level input: read and consider it, and apply relevant project
-   facts, conventions, and constraints. Treat `operationGuidance` as optional
-   additive advice: read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are
-   applicable and compatible with the built-in archive workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from built-in steps, explicit user choices, resolved
-   paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one of those
-   controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If
-   guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not follow it
-   and explain why. Do not infer replacement paths, skipped prompts, or flags from
-   either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, change artifacts,
-   or archive summaries unless the user separately asks for it. These are
-   prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-2. **Check artifact completion status**
-
-   Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion.
-
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context
-   - `artifacts`: List of artifacts with their status (`done`, `skipped`, or other)
-
-   **If any artifacts are neither `done` nor `skipped`** (skipped artifacts satisfy the requirement - the change declares skip_specs):
-   - Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
-   - Ask the user to confirm they want to proceed
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-3. **Check task completion status**
-
-   Read the tasks file (typically `tasks.md`) to check for incomplete tasks.
-
-   Count tasks marked with `- [ ]` (incomplete) vs `- [x]` (complete).
-
-   **If incomplete tasks found:**
-   - Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
-   - Ask the user to confirm they want to proceed
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-   **If no tasks file exists:** Proceed without task-related warning.
-
-4. **Assess delta spec sync state**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from status JSON as the only
-   delta-spec source. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, proceed without a sync prompt and do not infer
-   delta specs from other artifacts.
-
-   **If delta specs exist:**
-   - Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (use the store-aware `planningHome.root` from step 2, not a hardcoded repo path)
-   - Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
-   - Show a combined summary before prompting
-
-   **Prompt options:**
-   - If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
-   - If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
-
-   Route on the answer:
-   - "Cancel" — stop, do not archive
-   - "Archive without syncing" or "Archive now" — proceed to archive
-   - "Sync now" or "Sync anyway" — sync, then verify (below)
-   - Anything else — ask again rather than archiving
-
-   Before a selected sync writes any main spec, run
-   `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json` once with the same
-   selected-root flags. Require a zero exit status and valid artifact-instruction
-   JSON. If the lookup fails or returns invalid JSON, report the error and stop
-   before writing any main spec or moving the change. A valid response with omitted
-   `rules` is the no-rules case. Apply returned `rules` only to the content and
-   form of main specs produced by this merge; do not use them as archive guidance,
-   change CLI behavior, or copy the rule text into any output file.
-
-   Then run the `openspec-sync-specs` workflow inline (agent-driven intelligent merge) for change '<name>', passing the delta spec analysis and the fetched specs-rule snapshot from above, and wait for it to finish. The inline sync must reuse that snapshot without fetching `specs` instructions again. Do not delegate it to a background task — step 5 would move `changeRoot` out from under a sync that is still reading it, leaving the change archived and the main specs never updated. If your agent can only run it by delegation, delegate synchronously and wait for the result.
-
-   Then re-run the comparison from the top of this step against every capability that has a delta spec in `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` — not only the ones the sync reports it touched. A successful sync leaves nothing left to apply, so each capability must now read as already synced:
-   - ADDED requirements present
-   - MODIFIED requirements carrying the scenario and description changes named in the delta, with their other scenarios intact
-   - REMOVED requirements gone
-   - RENAMED requirements present under the new name and absent under the old one
-
-   If the sync failed, or any capability does not match, report what differs and stop — do not archive. Nothing has moved and `changeRoot` is intact, so the user can fix the mismatch or re-run the sync and start the archive again.
-
-5. **Perform the archive**
-
-   Create an `archive` directory under `planningHome.changesDir` if it doesn't exist:
-   ```bash
-   mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
-   ```
-
-   Generate the target name: use the change name as-is when it already starts with a `YYYY-MM-DD-` prefix; otherwise prepend the current date as `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>`. Never stack a second date (same rule as `openspec archive`).
-
-   **Check if target already exists:**
-   - If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
-   - If no: Move `changeRoot` to the archive directory
-
-   ```bash
-   mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/<target-name>"
-   ```
-
-6. **Display summary**
-
-   Show archive completion summary including:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema that was used
-   - Archive location
-   - Whether specs were synced (if applicable)
-   - Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** <"✓ Synced to main specs" only if the step 4 verification passed; otherwise "No delta specs" or "Sync skipped">
-
-<"All artifacts complete. All tasks complete." — or, if archived with warnings, list them instead (e.g. "Archived with 2 incomplete tasks")>
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Announce the selected change; prompt for selection when it is ambiguous
-- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
-- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
-- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
-- Show clear summary of what happened
-- If sync is requested, run the `openspec-sync-specs` workflow inline (agent-driven)
-- Never archive while a spec sync is still in flight — run the sync inline and verify the main specs before moving `changeRoot`
-- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
-- Apply relevant runtime context and report conflicts; operation guidance remains advisory
-- Consider every guidance entry and explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Existing CLI checks, resolved paths, prompts, and command contracts are unchanged
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never operation guidance
-- Never copy runtime context, operation guidance, or artifact-rule text verbatim into output files
diff --git a/.claude/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index f291753..0000000
--- a/.claude/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,296 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-explore
-description: Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
-
-**IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing.** You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
-
-**This is a stance, not a workflow.** There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
----
-
-## The Stance
-
-- **Curious, not prescriptive** - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
-- **Open threads, not interrogations** - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
-- **Visual** - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
-- **Adaptive** - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
-- **Patient** - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
-- **Grounded** - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
-
----
-
-## What You Might Do
-
-Depending on what the user brings, you might:
-
-**Explore the problem space**
-- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
-- Challenge assumptions
-- Reframe the problem
-- Find analogies
-
-**Investigate the codebase**
-- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
-- Find integration points
-- Identify patterns already in use
-- Surface hidden complexity
-
-**Compare options**
-- Brainstorm multiple approaches
-- Build comparison tables
-- Sketch tradeoffs
-- Recommend a path (if asked)
-
-**Visualize**
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│     Use ASCII diagrams liberally        │
-├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
-│                                         │
-│      ┌────────┐         ┌────────┐      │
-│      │ State  │────────▶│ State  │      │
-│      │   A    │         │   B    │      │
-│      └────────┘         └────────┘      │
-│                                         │
-│   System diagrams, state machines,      │
-│   data flows, architecture sketches,    │
-│   dependency graphs, comparison tables  │
-│                                         │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-**Surface risks and unknowns**
-- Identify what could go wrong
-- Find gaps in understanding
-- Suggest spikes or investigations
-
----
-
-## OpenSpec Awareness
-
-You have full context of the OpenSpec system. Use it naturally, don't force it.
-
-### Check for context
-
-At the start, quickly check what exists:
-```bash
-openspec list --json
-```
-
-This tells you:
-- If there are active changes
-- Their names, schemas, and status
-- What the user might be working on
-
-Then read the project's own context from the resolved root - `<root.path>/openspec/config.yaml` (or `config.yml`). Use the `root.path` returned above, and skip this if neither file exists:
-- `context`: project background - tech stack, conventions, constraints
-- `rules`: keyed by artifact id - the entries for an artifact apply only when you write that artifact
-
-Ground your thinking in these. They are constraints for you to follow, not content to reproduce: do NOT copy them into the conversation or into any artifact you create.
-
-### When no change exists
-
-Think freely. When insights crystallize, you might offer:
-
-- "This feels solid enough to start a change. Want me to create a proposal?"
-- Or keep exploring - no pressure to formalize
-
-### When a change exists
-
-If the user mentions a change or you detect one is relevant:
-
-1. **Resolve and read existing artifacts for context**
-   - Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`.
-   - Use `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext` from the status JSON.
-   - Read existing files from `artifactPaths.<artifact>.existingOutputPaths`.
-
-2. **Reference them naturally in conversation**
-   - "Your design mentions using Redis, but we just realized SQLite fits better..."
-   - "The proposal scopes this to premium users, but we're now thinking everyone..."
-
-3. **Offer to capture when decisions are made**
-
-    | Insight Type               | Where to Capture               |
-    |----------------------------|--------------------------------|
-    | New requirement discovered | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Requirement changed        | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Design decision made       | `design.md`                  |
-    | Scope changed              | `proposal.md`                |
-    | New work identified        | `tasks.md`                   |
-    | Assumption invalidated     | Relevant artifact              |
-
-   Example offers:
-   - "That's a design decision. Capture it in design.md?"
-   - "This is a new requirement. Add it to specs?"
-   - "This changes scope. Update the proposal?"
-
-4. **The user decides** - Offer and move on. Don't pressure. Don't auto-capture.
-
----
-
-## What You Don't Have To Do
-
-- Follow a script
-- Ask the same questions every time
-- Produce a specific artifact
-- Reach a conclusion
-- Stay on topic if a tangent is valuable
-- Be brief (this is thinking time)
-
----
-
-## Handling Different Entry Points
-
-**User brings a vague idea:**
-```
-User: I'm thinking about adding real-time collaboration
-
-You: Real-time collab is a big space. Let me think about this...
-
-      COLLABORATION SPECTRUM
-      ════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-      Awareness          Coordination         Sync
-          │                   │                 │
-          ▼                   ▼                 ▼
-      ┌────────┐         ┌────────┐        ┌────────┐
-      │Presence│         │Cursors │        │  CRDT  │
-      │  "3    │         │ Multi  │        │Conflict│
-      │online" │         │ select │        │  free  │
-      └────────┘         └────────┘        └────────┘
-          │                   │                 │
-       trivial            moderate           complex
-
-      Where's your head at?
-```
-
-**User brings a specific problem:**
-```
-User: The auth system is a mess
-
-You: [reads codebase]
-
-     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-     │              CURRENT AUTH FLOW              │
-     └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-                        │
-          ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
-          ▼             ▼             ▼
-     ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐
-     │ Google  │  │  GitHub │  │  Email  │
-     │  OAuth  │  │  OAuth  │  │  Magic  │
-     └────┬────┘  └────┬────┘  └────┬────┘
-          │             │             │
-          └─────────────┼─────────────┘
-                        ▼
-                  ┌───────────┐
-                  │  Session  │
-                  └─────┬─────┘
-                        │
-                        ▼
-                  ┌───────────┐
-                  │   Perms   │
-                  └───────────┘
-
-     I see three tangles. Which one's burning?
-```
-
-**User is stuck mid-implementation:**
-```
-User: /opsx:explore add-auth-system
-      The OAuth integration is more complex than expected
-
-You: [reads change artifacts]
-
-     You're on task 4: "Implement OAuth flow"
-
-     Let me trace what's involved...
-
-     [draws diagram, explores options, suggests paths]
-
-     Want to update the design to reflect this?
-     Or add a spike task to investigate?
-```
-
-**User wants to compare options:**
-```
-User: Should we use Postgres or SQLite?
-
-You: Generic answer is boring. What's the context?
-
-User: A CLI tool that tracks local dev environments
-
-You: That changes everything.
-
-     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-     │          CLI TOOL DATA STORAGE                  │
-     └─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
-     Key constraints:
-     • No daemon running
-     • Must work offline
-     • Single user
-
-                  SQLite          Postgres
-     Deployment   embedded ✓      needs server ✗
-     Offline      yes ✓           no ✗
-     Single file  yes ✓           no ✗
-
-     SQLite. Not even close.
-
-     Unless... is there a sync component?
-```
-
----
-
-## Ending Discovery
-
-There's no required ending. Discovery might:
-
-- **Flow into a proposal**: "Ready to start? I can create a change proposal."
-- **Result in artifact updates**: "Updated design.md with these decisions"
-- **Just provide clarity**: User has what they need, moves on
-- **Continue later**: "We can pick this up anytime"
-
-When it feels like things are crystallizing, you might summarize:
-
-```
-## What We Figured Out
-
-**The problem**: [crystallized understanding]
-
-**The approach**: [if one emerged]
-
-**Open questions**: [if any remain]
-
-**Next steps** (if ready):
-- Create a change proposal
-- Keep exploring: just keep talking
-```
-
-But this summary is optional. Sometimes the thinking IS the value.
-
----
-
-## Guardrails
-
-- **Don't implement** - Never write code or implement features. Creating OpenSpec artifacts is fine, writing application code is not.
-- **Don't fake understanding** - If something is unclear, dig deeper
-- **Don't rush** - Discovery is thinking time, not task time
-- **Don't force structure** - Let patterns emerge naturally
-- **Don't auto-capture** - Offer to save insights, don't just do it
-- **Do visualize** - A good diagram is worth many paragraphs
-- **Do explore the codebase** - Ground discussions in reality
-- **Do question assumptions** - Including the user's and your own
diff --git a/.claude/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 27ab22e..0000000
--- a/.claude/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,123 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-propose
-description: Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
-
-I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
-- proposal.md (what & why)
-- `specs/<capability>/spec.md` (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)
-- design.md (how)
-- tasks.md (implementation steps)
-
-When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply
-
----
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build**
-
-   Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
-   > "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
-
-   From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → `add-user-auth`).
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
-2. **Create the change directory**
-   ```bash
-   openspec new change "<name>"
-   ```
-   This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with `.openspec.yaml`.
-
-3. **Get the artifact build order**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to get:
-   - `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., `["tasks"]`)
-   - `artifacts`: list of all artifacts, each with its `status` and its `requires` edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-4. **Create every artifact in the required set**
-
-   Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
-
-   Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
-
-   a. **For each artifact that is `ready` (dependencies satisfied)**:
-      - Get instructions:
-        ```bash
-        openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-        ```
-      - The instructions JSON includes:
-        - `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `template`: The structure to use for your output file
-        - `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
-        - `skipped`/`warning`: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
-        - `resolvedOutputPath`: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
-        - `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
-      - Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
-      - If the `instruction` field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at `resolvedOutputPath`
-      - Otherwise create the artifact file using `template` as the structure and write it to `resolvedOutputPath`. If `resolvedOutputPath` is a glob, follow `instruction` to choose the concrete file path
-      - Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
-      - Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"
-
-   b. **Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just `apply.requires`)**
-      - After creating each artifact, re-run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`
-      - The required set is `applyRequires` plus every artifact reachable from those by following the `requires` edges in `status --json` - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
-      - `status` is file-existence only, so an `applyRequires` artifact reading `done` does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing `tasks.md` early marks `tasks` done while `specs` was never written. Use each artifact's `requires` edges, not its `status`, to build the required set: a `done` artifact still lists what it depends on
-      - An artifact already reading `status: "skipped"` is satisfied: the change declares `skip_specs` in `.openspec.yaml`, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
-      - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
-      - Skip one only when `status` already reports it `skipped`, or when its own `instruction` says it is conditional: run `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` and skip only if its `instruction` field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's `design.md` qualifies; `specs` qualifies only via the `skipped` status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
-      - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still `blocked` only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
-      - Stop when every artifact in the required set is `done`, `skipped`, or was deliberately skipped
-
-   c. **If an artifact requires user input** (unclear context):
-      - Ask the user to clarify
-      - Then continue with creation
-
-5. **Show final status**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>"
-   ```
-
-**Output**
-
-After completing all artifacts, summarize:
-- Change name and location
-- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
-- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
-- Prompt: "Run `/opsx:apply` or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."
-
-**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
-
-- Follow the `instruction` field from `openspec instructions` for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
-- If the `instruction` field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly
-- The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
-- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
-- Use `template` as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
-- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
-  - Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
-  - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in `apply.requires`
-- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
-- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
-- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
-- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
diff --git a/.claude/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index f274beb..0000000
--- a/.claude/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,223 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-sync-specs
-description: Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
-
-This is an **agent-driven** operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show changes that have delta specs (under `specs/` directory).
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:sync <other>`).
-
-2. **Resolve change context**
-
-   Run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   The JSON includes `planningHome.root`. Main specs live under `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/` — use that (store-aware) root for every main-spec path below, not a hardcoded repo path. When a store is selected it points at the store, not the current repository.
-
-3. **Find delta specs**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from the status JSON as the
-   only source of delta spec paths. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, report that there are no delta specs to sync,
-   do not infer them from other artifacts, and stop without requesting artifact
-   instructions or writing a main spec.
-
-   Sync every path in `existingOutputPaths` unless the caller narrowed the set.
-   A caller narrows it by naming an explicit list of delta spec paths to sync —
-   archive does this inline, and a user can too ("only sync the billing delta").
-   Then sync only the named paths and leave the remaining delta specs untouched:
-   bulk archive excludes a delta whose implementation it could not find, and
-   syncing it anyway would write a main spec the caller deliberately withheld.
-   Carry that narrowed selection through step 4; never widen it back to the full
-   list. If a named path is not in `existingOutputPaths`, do not sync it —
-   report it and stop, rather than dropping it silently. If the named list is
-   empty, report that there is nothing to sync and stop without writing a main
-   spec.
-
-   Each delta spec file contains sections like:
-   - `## ADDED Requirements` - New requirements to add
-   - `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changes to existing requirements
-   - `## REMOVED Requirements` - Requirements to remove
-   - `## RENAMED Requirements` - Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
-
-   If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
-
-4. **For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs**
-
-   Before the first main-spec write, obtain one current specs-rule snapshot:
-   - If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from
-     `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json`, reuse it and do not
-     fetch the same instructions again.
-   - Otherwise run that command once now with the same selected-root flags.
-   - If the direct lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction
-     JSON, report the error and stop before writing any main spec. Do not treat the
-     failure as an absent rule set.
-   - A valid response with omitted `rules` means no artifact rules are configured
-     and the existing semantic merge continues.
-
-   Apply returned `rules` only to the content and form of the main specs produced
-   by this merge. Artifact rules are not operation guidance and cannot change
-   selected roots, delta paths, CLI checks, or workflow steps. Use their text as
-   constraints without copying it verbatim into a main spec or summary.
-
-   For each capability delta spec path selected in step 3 — the full `existingOutputPaths` list, or the narrowed subset when a caller supplied one (these may belong to a selected store, not the repo):
-
-   a. **Read the delta spec** to understand the intended changes
-
-   b. **Read the main spec** at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (may not exist yet)
-
-   c. **Apply changes intelligently**:
-
-      **ADDED Requirements:**
-      - If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
-      - If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
-
-      **MODIFIED Requirements:**
-      - Find the requirement in main spec
-      - Apply the changes - this can be:
-        - Adding new scenarios (don't need to copy existing ones)
-        - Modifying existing scenarios
-        - Changing the requirement description
-      - Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
-
-      **REMOVED Requirements:**
-      - Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
-
-      **RENAMED Requirements:**
-      - Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
-
-      **`## Purpose` in the delta:**
-      - The main spec already has one and it is authoritative - leave it alone
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does; it warns and moves on)
-
-   d. **Create new main spec** if capability doesn't exist yet:
-      - Create `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
-      - Add Purpose section: copy the delta's `## Purpose` body verbatim when it has one
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does); only write a brief TBD placeholder when it does not
-      - Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
-      - Follow the **Main Spec Format Reference** below
-
-5. **Show summary**
-
-   After applying all changes, summarize:
-   - Which capabilities were updated
-   - What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
-   - Any new main spec left with a TBD Purpose placeholder, so it gets written
-     now rather than lingering
-
-**Delta Spec Format Reference**
-
-```markdown
-## Purpose
-
-Only on a delta that introduces a brand-new capability. Seeds the new main spec.
-
-## ADDED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-
-## MODIFIED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Existing Feature
-#### Scenario: New scenario to add
-- **WHEN** user does A
-- **THEN** system does B
-
-## REMOVED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
-
-## RENAMED Requirements
-
-- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
-- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`
-```
-
-**Main Spec Format Reference**
-
-Main specs are what the delta merges INTO. They must never contain delta operation headers (`## ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED Requirements`) - after syncing, every requirement lives under a single `## Requirements` section:
-
-```markdown
-# <capability> Specification
-
-## Purpose
-Short description of what this capability does and why it exists.
-
-## Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-```
-
-**Key Principle: Intelligent Merging**
-
-Unlike programmatic merging, you can apply **partial updates**:
-- To add a scenario, just include that scenario under MODIFIED - don't copy existing scenarios
-- The delta represents *intent*, not a wholesale replacement
-- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Specs Synced: <change-name>
-
-Updated main specs:
-
-**<capability-1>**:
-- Added requirement: "New Feature"
-- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
-
-**<capability-2>**:
-- Created new spec file
-- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
-
-Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
-- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
-- Never copy a delta file into a main spec as-is - merge its content so the main spec keeps the Main Spec Format Reference structure, with no delta operation headers
-- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
-- Show what you're changing as you go
-- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result
-- Use only `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths`; never infer delta specs from unrelated artifacts
-- Honor a caller-supplied subset of `existingOutputPaths`; never widen it back to the full list
-- Fetch specs instructions once for direct sync, or reuse the archive-supplied snapshot inline
-- Stop before every main-spec write on a non-zero or invalid JSON specs-instruction response
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never copied into output files
diff --git a/.claude/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 08c5845..0000000
--- a/.claude/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-update-change
-description: Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema (from `schema` field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
-   - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
-   - How recently it was modified (from `lastModified` field)
-
-   Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:update <other>`).
-
-2. **Get the change's artifacts**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `artifacts`: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
-   - `isComplete`: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-   The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
-
-   The files to edit are `artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths` - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. `specs/**/*.md`). Do NOT write to `resolvedOutputPath`: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
-
-3. **Understand the request**
-   - If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
-   - If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
-
-4. **Read and reconcile**
-   - Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
-   - Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
-   - Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
-   - Revise only files that already exist (`existingOutputPaths`). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to `/opsx:continue` to create them.
-   - If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
-
-5. **Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time**
-   - Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
-   - If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
-   - When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
-     ```bash
-     openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-     ```
-
-6. **Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)**
-   - Artifacts still missing -> suggest `/opsx:continue` to create them.
-   - Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest `/opsx:apply` to carry the delta into code.
-   - Everything done and implemented -> suggest `/opsx:archive`.
-
-**Output**
-
-After each invocation, show:
-- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
-- Anything deferred to `/opsx:continue` (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
-- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to `/opsx:apply`.
-- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by `openspec status`; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
-- Edit only the concrete files in `existingOutputPaths`; never write to a glob `resolvedOutputPath`.
-- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is `/opsx:continue`'s job.
-- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
-- If the request changes the change's *intent* rather than refining it, recommend starting fresh with `/opsx:new` (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic).
-- `/opsx:continue` and `/opsx:new` may not be installed (core profile). When suggesting one that is unavailable, point to the CLI instead: `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` shows the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` explains how to create it.
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..218081f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-analyze"
+description: "Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation."
+argument-hint: "Optional focus areas for analysis"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/analyze.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before analysis)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_analyze` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Goal
+
+Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/speckit-tasks` has successfully produced a complete `tasks.md`.
+
+## Operating Constraints
+
+**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
+
+**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is **non-negotiable** within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside `/speckit-analyze`.
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
+
+Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireSpec -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
+
+- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
+- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
+- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
+
+Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command).
+For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
+
+Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
+
+**From spec.md:**
+
+- Overview/Context
+- Functional Requirements
+- Success Criteria (measurable outcomes — e.g., performance, security, availability, user success, business impact)
+- User Stories
+- Edge Cases (if present)
+
+**From plan.md:**
+
+- Architecture/stack choices
+- Data Model references
+- Phases
+- Technical constraints
+
+**From tasks.md:**
+
+- Task IDs
+- Descriptions
+- Phase grouping
+- Parallel markers [P]
+- Referenced file paths
+
+**From constitution:**
+
+- Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for principle validation
+
+### 3. Build Semantic Models
+
+Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
+
+- **Requirements inventory**: For each Functional Requirement (FR-###) and Success Criterion (SC-###), record a stable key. Use the explicit FR-/SC- identifier as the primary key when present, and optionally also derive an imperative-phrase slug for readability (e.g., "User can upload file" → `user-can-upload-file`). Include only Success Criteria items that require buildable work (e.g., load-testing infrastructure, security audit tooling), and exclude post-launch outcome metrics and business KPIs (e.g., "Reduce support tickets by 50%").
+- **User story/action inventory**: Discrete user actions with acceptance criteria
+- **Task coverage mapping**: Map each task to one or more requirements or stories (inference by keyword / explicit reference patterns like IDs or key phrases)
+- **Constitution rule set**: Extract principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
+
+### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
+
+Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
+
+#### A. Duplication Detection
+
+- Identify near-duplicate requirements
+- Mark lower-quality phrasing for consolidation
+
+#### B. Ambiguity Detection
+
+- Flag vague adjectives (fast, scalable, secure, intuitive, robust) lacking measurable criteria
+- Flag unresolved placeholders (TODO, TKTK, ???, `<placeholder>`, etc.)
+
+#### C. Underspecification
+
+- Requirements with verbs but missing object or measurable outcome
+- User stories missing acceptance criteria alignment
+- Tasks referencing files or components not defined in spec/plan
+
+#### D. Constitution Alignment
+
+- Any requirement or plan element conflicting with a MUST principle
+- Missing mandated sections or quality gates from constitution
+
+#### E. Coverage Gaps
+
+- Requirements with zero associated tasks
+- Tasks with no mapped requirement/story
+- Success Criteria requiring buildable work (performance, security, availability) not reflected in tasks
+
+#### F. Inconsistency
+
+- Terminology drift (same concept named differently across files)
+- Data entities referenced in plan but absent in spec (or vice versa)
+- Task ordering contradictions (e.g., integration tasks before foundational setup tasks without dependency note)
+- Conflicting requirements (e.g., one requires Next.js while other specifies Vue)
+
+### 5. Severity Assignment
+
+Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
+
+- **CRITICAL**: Violates constitution MUST, missing core spec artifact, or requirement with zero coverage that blocks baseline functionality
+- **HIGH**: Duplicate or conflicting requirement, ambiguous security/performance attribute, untestable acceptance criterion
+- **MEDIUM**: Terminology drift, missing non-functional task coverage, underspecified edge case
+- **LOW**: Style/wording improvements, minor redundancy not affecting execution order
+
+### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
+
+Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
+
+## Specification Analysis Report
+
+| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
+| A1 | Duplication | HIGH | spec.md:L120-134 | Two similar requirements ... | Merge phrasing; keep clearer version |
+
+(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by category initial.)
+
+**Coverage Summary Table:**
+
+| Requirement Key | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
+|-----------------|-----------|----------|-------|
+
+**Constitution Alignment Issues:** (if any)
+
+**Unmapped Tasks:** (if any)
+
+**Metrics:**
+
+- Total Requirements
+- Total Tasks
+- Coverage % (requirements with >=1 task)
+- Ambiguity Count
+- Duplication Count
+- Critical Issues Count
+
+### 7. Provide Next Actions
+
+At end of report, output a concise Next Actions block:
+
+- If CRITICAL issues exist: Recommend resolving before `/speckit-implement`
+- If only LOW/MEDIUM: User may proceed, but provide improvement suggestions
+- Provide explicit command suggestions: e.g., "Run /speckit-specify with refinement", "Run /speckit-plan to adjust architecture", "Manually edit tasks.md to add coverage for 'performance-metrics'"
+
+### 8. Offer Remediation
+
+Ask the user: "Would you like me to suggest concrete remediation edits for the top N issues?" (Do NOT apply them automatically.)
+
+### 9. Check for extension hooks
+
+After reporting, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_analyze` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Operating Principles
+
+### Context Efficiency
+
+- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings, not exhaustive documentation
+- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally; don't dump all content into analysis
+- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
+- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes should produce consistent IDs and counts
+
+### Analysis Guidelines
+
+- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
+- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
+- **Prioritize constitution violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
+- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances, not generic patterns)
+- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
+
+## Context
+
+$ARGUMENTS
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f8e6b75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-checklist"
+description: "Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements."
+argument-hint: "Domain or focus area for the checklist"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/checklist.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
+
+**CRITICAL CONCEPT**: Checklists are **UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING** - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
+
+**NOT for verification/testing**:
+
+- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
+- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
+- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
+- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
+
+**FOR requirements quality validation**:
+
+- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
+- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
+- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
+- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
+- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
+
+**Metaphor**: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
+
+**Ownership and checkbox lifecycle**:
+
+- Custom checklists generated by this command are reviewer-owned requirements-quality review artifacts.
+- `[x]` means the reviewer determined the requirements-quality criterion is satisfied.
+- `[x]` does NOT mean implementation work is complete.
+- This command generates or appends checklist items; it MUST NOT mark generated items `[x]`.
+- An agent may assist with evaluating items only when explicitly asked by the reviewer.
+- `checklists/requirements.md` is a separate built-in spec-quality checklist maintained by `/speckit-specify` and `/speckit-clarify`; do not treat that exception as applying to custom checklists generated here.
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before checklist generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_checklist` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Execution Steps.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -Template checklist-template` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR, AVAILABLE_DOCS list, and TEMPLATE_CONTENT.
+   - All file paths must be absolute.
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+
+3. **Clarify intent (dynamic)**: Derive up to THREE initial contextual clarifying questions (no pre-baked catalog). They MUST:
+   - Be generated from the user's phrasing + extracted signals from spec/plan/tasks
+   - Only ask about information that materially changes checklist content
+   - Be skipped individually if already unambiguous in `$ARGUMENTS`
+   - Prefer precision over breadth
+
+   Generation algorithm:
+   1. Extract signals: feature domain keywords (e.g., auth, latency, UX, API), risk indicators ("critical", "must", "compliance"), stakeholder hints ("QA", "review", "security team"), and explicit deliverables ("a11y", "rollback", "contracts").
+   2. Cluster signals into candidate focus areas (max 4) ranked by relevance.
+   3. Identify probable audience & timing (author, reviewer, QA, release) if not explicit.
+   4. Detect missing dimensions: scope breadth, depth/rigor, risk emphasis, exclusion boundaries, measurable acceptance criteria.
+   5. Formulate questions chosen from these archetypes:
+      - Scope refinement (e.g., "Should this include integration touchpoints with X and Y or stay limited to local module correctness?")
+      - Risk prioritization (e.g., "Which of these potential risk areas should receive mandatory gating checks?")
+      - Depth calibration (e.g., "Is this a lightweight pre-commit sanity list or a formal release gate?")
+      - Audience framing (e.g., "Will this be used by the author only or peers during PR review?")
+      - Boundary exclusion (e.g., "Should we explicitly exclude performance tuning items this round?")
+      - Scenario class gap (e.g., "No recovery flows detected—are rollback / partial failure paths in scope?")
+
+   Question formatting rules:
+   - If presenting options, generate a compact table with columns: Option | Candidate | Why It Matters
+   - Limit to A–E options maximum; omit table if a free-form answer is clearer
+   - Never ask the user to restate what they already said
+   - Avoid speculative categories (no hallucination). If uncertain, ask explicitly: "Confirm whether X belongs in scope."
+
+   Defaults when interaction impossible:
+   - Depth: Standard
+   - Audience: Reviewer (PR) if code-related; Author otherwise
+   - Focus: Top 2 relevance clusters
+
+   Output the questions (label Q1/Q2/Q3). After answers: if ≥2 scenario classes (Alternate / Exception / Recovery / Non-Functional domain) remain unclear, you MAY ask up to TWO more targeted follow‑ups (Q4/Q5) with a one-line justification each (e.g., "Unresolved recovery path risk"). Do not exceed five total questions. Skip escalation if user explicitly declines more.
+
+4. **Understand user request**: Combine `$ARGUMENTS` + clarifying answers:
+   - Derive checklist theme (e.g., security, review, deploy, ux)
+   - Consolidate explicit must-have items mentioned by user
+   - Map focus selections to category scaffolding
+   - Infer any missing context from spec/plan/tasks (do NOT hallucinate)
+
+5. **Load feature context**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - spec.md: Feature requirements and scope
+   - plan.md (if exists): Technical details, dependencies
+   - tasks.md (if exists): Implementation tasks
+
+   **Context Loading Strategy**:
+   - Load only necessary portions relevant to active focus areas (avoid full-file dumping)
+   - Prefer summarizing long sections into concise scenario/requirement bullets
+   - Use progressive disclosure: add follow-on retrieval only if gaps detected
+   - If source docs are large, generate interim summary items instead of embedding raw text
+
+6. **Generate checklist** - Use TEMPLATE_CONTENT as the structural template and create "Unit Tests for Requirements":
+   - Create `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/` directory if it doesn't exist
+   - Generate unique checklist filename:
+     - Use short, descriptive name based on domain (e.g., `ux.md`, `api.md`, `security.md`)
+     - Format: `[domain].md`
+   - File handling behavior:
+     - If file does NOT exist: Create new file and number items starting from CHK001
+     - If file exists: Append new items to existing file, continuing from the last CHK ID (e.g., if last item is CHK015, start new items at CHK016)
+   - Never delete or replace existing checklist content - always preserve and append
+   - Leave every newly generated item unchecked (`[ ]`); checkbox state belongs to the reviewer
+
+   **CORE PRINCIPLE - Test the Requirements, Not the Implementation**:
+   Every checklist item MUST evaluate the REQUIREMENTS THEMSELVES for:
+   - **Completeness**: Are all necessary requirements present?
+   - **Clarity**: Are requirements unambiguous and specific?
+   - **Consistency**: Do requirements align with each other?
+   - **Measurability**: Can requirements be objectively verified?
+   - **Coverage**: Are all scenarios/edge cases addressed?
+
+   **Category Structure** - Group items by requirement quality dimensions:
+   - **Requirement Completeness** (Are all necessary requirements documented?)
+   - **Requirement Clarity** (Are requirements specific and unambiguous?)
+   - **Requirement Consistency** (Do requirements align without conflicts?)
+   - **Acceptance Criteria Quality** (Are success criteria measurable?)
+   - **Scenario Coverage** (Are all flows/cases addressed?)
+   - **Edge Case Coverage** (Are boundary conditions defined?)
+   - **Non-Functional Requirements** (Performance, Security, Accessibility, etc. - are they specified?)
+   - **Dependencies & Assumptions** (Are they documented and validated?)
+   - **Ambiguities & Conflicts** (What needs clarification?)
+
+   **HOW TO WRITE CHECKLIST ITEMS - "Unit Tests for English"**:
+
+   ❌ **WRONG** (Testing implementation):
+   - "Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards"
+   - "Test hover states work on desktop"
+   - "Confirm logo click navigates home"
+
+   ✅ **CORRECT** (Testing requirements quality):
+   - "Are the exact number and layout of featured episodes specified?" [Completeness]
+   - "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" [Clarity]
+   - "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" [Consistency]
+   - "Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for all interactive UI?" [Coverage]
+   - "Is the fallback behavior specified when logo image fails to load?" [Edge Cases]
+   - "Are loading states defined for asynchronous episode data?" [Completeness]
+   - "Does the spec define visual hierarchy for competing UI elements?" [Clarity]
+
+   **ITEM STRUCTURE**:
+   Each item should follow this pattern:
+   - Question format asking about requirement quality
+   - Focus on what's WRITTEN (or not written) in the spec/plan
+   - Include quality dimension in brackets [Completeness/Clarity/Consistency/etc.]
+   - Reference spec section `[Spec §X.Y]` when checking existing requirements
+   - Use `[Gap]` marker when checking for missing requirements
+
+   **EXAMPLES BY QUALITY DIMENSION**:
+
+   Completeness:
+   - "Are error handling requirements defined for all API failure modes? [Gap]"
+   - "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Completeness]"
+   - "Are mobile breakpoint requirements defined for responsive layouts? [Gap]"
+
+   Clarity:
+   - "Is 'fast loading' quantified with specific timing thresholds? [Clarity, Spec §NFR-2]"
+   - "Are 'related episodes' selection criteria explicitly defined? [Clarity, Spec §FR-5]"
+   - "Is 'prominent' defined with measurable visual properties? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-4]"
+
+   Consistency:
+   - "Do navigation requirements align across all pages? [Consistency, Spec §FR-10]"
+   - "Are card component requirements consistent between landing and detail pages? [Consistency]"
+
+   Coverage:
+   - "Are requirements defined for zero-state scenarios (no episodes)? [Coverage, Edge Case]"
+   - "Are concurrent user interaction scenarios addressed? [Coverage, Gap]"
+   - "Are requirements specified for partial data loading failures? [Coverage, Exception Flow]"
+
+   Measurability:
+   - "Are visual hierarchy requirements measurable/testable? [Acceptance Criteria, Spec §FR-1]"
+   - "Can 'balanced visual weight' be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §FR-2]"
+
+   **Scenario Classification & Coverage** (Requirements Quality Focus):
+   - Check if requirements exist for: Primary, Alternate, Exception/Error, Recovery, Non-Functional scenarios
+   - For each scenario class, ask: "Are [scenario type] requirements complete, clear, and consistent?"
+   - If scenario class missing: "Are [scenario type] requirements intentionally excluded or missing? [Gap]"
+   - Include resilience/rollback when state mutation occurs: "Are rollback requirements defined for migration failures? [Gap]"
+
+   **Traceability Requirements**:
+   - MINIMUM: ≥80% of items MUST include at least one traceability reference
+   - Each item should reference: spec section `[Spec §X.Y]`, or use markers: `[Gap]`, `[Ambiguity]`, `[Conflict]`, `[Assumption]`
+   - If no ID system exists: "Is a requirement & acceptance criteria ID scheme established? [Traceability]"
+
+   **Surface & Resolve Issues** (Requirements Quality Problems):
+   Ask questions about the requirements themselves:
+   - Ambiguities: "Is the term 'fast' quantified with specific metrics? [Ambiguity, Spec §NFR-1]"
+   - Conflicts: "Do navigation requirements conflict between §FR-10 and §FR-10a? [Conflict]"
+   - Assumptions: "Is the assumption of 'always available podcast API' validated? [Assumption]"
+   - Dependencies: "Are external podcast API requirements documented? [Dependency, Gap]"
+   - Missing definitions: "Is 'visual hierarchy' defined with measurable criteria? [Gap]"
+
+   **Content Consolidation**:
+   - Soft cap: If raw candidate items > 40, prioritize by risk/impact
+   - Merge near-duplicates checking the same requirement aspect
+   - If >5 low-impact edge cases, create one item: "Are edge cases X, Y, Z addressed in requirements? [Coverage]"
+
+   **🚫 ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED** - These make it an implementation test, not a requirements test:
+   - ❌ Any item starting with "Verify", "Test", "Confirm", "Check" + implementation behavior
+   - ❌ References to code execution, user actions, system behavior
+   - ❌ "Displays correctly", "works properly", "functions as expected"
+   - ❌ "Click", "navigate", "render", "load", "execute"
+   - ❌ Test cases, test plans, QA procedures
+   - ❌ Implementation details (frameworks, APIs, algorithms)
+
+   **✅ REQUIRED PATTERNS** - These test requirements quality:
+   - ✅ "Are [requirement type] defined/specified/documented for [scenario]?"
+   - ✅ "Is [vague term] quantified/clarified with specific criteria?"
+   - ✅ "Are requirements consistent between [section A] and [section B]?"
+   - ✅ "Can [requirement] be objectively measured/verified?"
+   - ✅ "Are [edge cases/scenarios] addressed in requirements?"
+   - ✅ "Does the spec define [missing aspect]?"
+
+7. **Structure Reference**: Generate the checklist following the canonical template in `.specify/templates/checklist-template.md` for title, meta section, category headings, ownership note, notes section, and ID formatting. If template is unavailable, use: H1 title, purpose/created meta lines, an ownership note explaining that `[x]` means reviewer approval of requirements quality, `##` category sections containing `- [ ] CHK### <requirement item>` lines with globally incrementing IDs starting at CHK001, and notes that `/speckit-implement` reads checklist state but does not modify markers.
+
+8. **Report**: Output full path to checklist file, item count, and summarize whether the run created a new file or appended to an existing one. Summarize:
+   - Focus areas selected
+   - Depth level
+   - Actor/timing
+   - Any explicit user-specified must-have items incorporated
+
+**Important**: Each `/speckit-checklist` command invocation uses a short, descriptive checklist filename and either creates a new file or appends to an existing one. This allows:
+
+- Multiple checklists of different types (e.g., `ux.md`, `test.md`, `security.md`)
+- Simple, memorable filenames that indicate checklist purpose
+- Easy identification and navigation in the `checklists/` folder
+
+To avoid clutter, use descriptive types and clean up obsolete checklists when done.
+
+## Example Checklist Types & Sample Items
+
+**UX Requirements Quality:** `ux.md`
+
+Sample items (testing the requirements, NOT the implementation):
+
+- "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined with measurable criteria? [Clarity, Spec §FR-1]"
+- "Is the number and positioning of UI elements explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-1]"
+- "Are interaction state requirements (hover, focus, active) consistently defined? [Consistency]"
+- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Coverage, Gap]"
+- "Is fallback behavior defined when images fail to load? [Edge Case, Gap]"
+- "Can 'prominent display' be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-4]"
+
+**API Requirements Quality:** `api.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are error response formats specified for all failure scenarios? [Completeness]"
+- "Are rate limiting requirements quantified with specific thresholds? [Clarity]"
+- "Are authentication requirements consistent across all endpoints? [Consistency]"
+- "Are retry/timeout requirements defined for external dependencies? [Coverage, Gap]"
+- "Is versioning strategy documented in requirements? [Gap]"
+
+**Performance Requirements Quality:** `performance.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are performance requirements quantified with specific metrics? [Clarity]"
+- "Are performance targets defined for all critical user journeys? [Coverage]"
+- "Are performance requirements under different load conditions specified? [Completeness]"
+- "Can performance requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability]"
+- "Are degradation requirements defined for high-load scenarios? [Edge Case, Gap]"
+
+**Security Requirements Quality:** `security.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are authentication requirements specified for all protected resources? [Coverage]"
+- "Are data protection requirements defined for sensitive information? [Completeness]"
+- "Is the threat model documented and requirements aligned to it? [Traceability]"
+- "Are security requirements consistent with compliance obligations? [Consistency]"
+- "Are security failure/breach response requirements defined? [Gap, Exception Flow]"
+
+## Anti-Examples: What NOT To Do
+
+**❌ WRONG - These test implementation, not requirements:**
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] CHK001 - Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards [Spec §FR-001]
+- [ ] CHK002 - Test hover states work correctly on desktop [Spec §FR-003]
+- [ ] CHK003 - Confirm logo click navigates to home page [Spec §FR-010]
+- [ ] CHK004 - Check that related episodes section shows 3-5 items [Spec §FR-005]
+```
+
+**✅ CORRECT - These test requirements quality:**
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] CHK001 - Are the number and layout of featured episodes explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001]
+- [ ] CHK002 - Are hover state requirements consistently defined for all interactive elements? [Consistency, Spec §FR-003]
+- [ ] CHK003 - Are navigation requirements clear for all clickable brand elements? [Clarity, Spec §FR-010]
+- [ ] CHK004 - Is the selection criteria for related episodes documented? [Gap, Spec §FR-005]
+- [ ] CHK005 - Are loading state requirements defined for asynchronous episode data? [Gap]
+- [ ] CHK006 - Can "visual hierarchy" requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-001]
+```
+
+**Key Differences:**
+
+- Wrong: Tests if the system works correctly
+- Correct: Tests if the requirements are written correctly
+- Wrong: Verification of behavior
+- Correct: Validation of requirement quality
+- Wrong: "Does it do X?"
+- Correct: "Is X clearly specified?"
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after checklist generation)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_checklist` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8901dd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-clarify"
+description: "Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec."
+argument-hint: "Optional areas to clarify in the spec"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/clarify.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before clarification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_clarify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly in the spec file.
+
+Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking `/speckit-plan`. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
+
+Execution steps:
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -PathsOnly` from repo root **once** (combined `--json --paths-only` mode / `-Json -PathsOnly`). Parse minimal JSON payload fields:
+   - `FEATURE_DIR`
+   - `FEATURE_SPEC`
+   - (Optionally capture `IMPL_PLAN`, `TASKS` for future chained flows.)
+   - If JSON parsing fails, abort and instruct user to re-run `/speckit-specify` or verify feature branch environment.
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+
+3. Load the current spec file. Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
+
+   Functional Scope & Behavior:
+   - Core user goals & success criteria
+   - Explicit out-of-scope declarations
+   - User roles / personas differentiation
+
+   Domain & Data Model:
+   - Entities, attributes, relationships
+   - Identity & uniqueness rules
+   - Lifecycle/state transitions
+   - Data volume / scale assumptions
+
+   Interaction & UX Flow:
+   - Critical user journeys / sequences
+   - Error/empty/loading states
+   - Accessibility or localization notes
+
+   Non-Functional Quality Attributes:
+   - Performance (latency, throughput targets)
+   - Scalability (horizontal/vertical, limits)
+   - Reliability & availability (uptime, recovery expectations)
+   - Observability (logging, metrics, tracing signals)
+   - Security & privacy (authN/Z, data protection, threat assumptions)
+   - Compliance / regulatory constraints (if any)
+
+   Integration & External Dependencies:
+   - External services/APIs and failure modes
+   - Data import/export formats
+   - Protocol/versioning assumptions
+
+   Edge Cases & Failure Handling:
+   - Negative scenarios
+   - Rate limiting / throttling
+   - Conflict resolution (e.g., concurrent edits)
+
+   Constraints & Tradeoffs:
+   - Technical constraints (language, storage, hosting)
+   - Explicit tradeoffs or rejected alternatives
+
+   Terminology & Consistency:
+   - Canonical glossary terms
+   - Avoided synonyms / deprecated terms
+
+   Completion Signals:
+   - Acceptance criteria testability
+   - Measurable Definition of Done style indicators
+
+   Misc / Placeholders:
+   - TODO markers / unresolved decisions
+   - Ambiguous adjectives ("robust", "intuitive") lacking quantification
+
+   For each category with Partial or Missing status, add a candidate question opportunity unless:
+   - Clarification would not materially change implementation or validation strategy
+   - Information is better deferred to planning phase (note internally)
+
+4. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
+    - Maximum of 5 total questions across the whole session.
+    - Each question must be answerable with EITHER:
+       - A short multiple‑choice selection (2–5 distinct, mutually exclusive options), OR
+       - A one-word / short‑phrase answer (explicitly constrain: "Answer in <=5 words").
+    - Only include questions whose answers materially impact architecture, data modeling, task decomposition, test design, UX behavior, operational readiness, or compliance validation.
+    - Ensure category coverage balance: attempt to cover the highest impact unresolved categories first; avoid asking two low-impact questions when a single high-impact area (e.g., security posture) is unresolved.
+    - Exclude questions already answered, trivial stylistic preferences, or plan-level execution details (unless blocking correctness).
+    - Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk or prevent misaligned acceptance tests.
+    - If more than 5 categories remain unresolved, select the top 5 by (Impact * Uncertainty) heuristic.
+
+5. Sequential questioning loop (interactive):
+    - Present EXACTLY ONE question at a time.
+    - **Question writing quality (applies to every question, MC or short-answer):**
+       - Lead with `**Question:**` followed by a full interrogative that ends with `?`. The question text before the `?` must make sense on its own.
+       - NEVER use a topic label, section heading, or requirement id as the question itself. For example, `Acceptance device/runtime matrix (FR-023)` is INVALID — it is a label, not a question.
+       - After the `?`, the only permitted suffix is an optional parenthesized requirement/question id. Exact format: `**Question:** <interrogative>?` or `**Question:** <interrogative>? (FR-023)`. Never put the id before the `?`, and never use the id (alone or with a topic label) as the whole prompt.
+       - Immediately after the question line, add one plain-language "Why it matters" sentence (the stake for acceptance or shipping) before the recommendation/options.
+       - Use everyday wording; introduce jargon only if defined in the same sentence. Self-check: a reader who does not know Spec Kit must be able to answer from the Question line alone. Terse is fine; cryptic labels are not.
+    - For multiple‑choice questions:
+       - **Analyze all options** and determine the **most suitable option** based on:
+          - Best practices for the project type
+          - Common patterns in similar implementations
+          - Risk reduction (security, performance, maintainability)
+          - Alignment with any explicit project goals or constraints visible in the spec
+       - Present your **recommended option prominently** at the top with clear reasoning (1-2 sentences explaining why this is the best choice).
+       - Format as: `**Recommended:** Option [X] - <reasoning>`
+       - Then render all options as a Markdown table:
+
+       | Option | Description |
+       |--------|-------------|
+       | A | <Option A description> |
+       | B | <Option B description> |
+       | C | <Option C description> (add D/E as needed up to 5) |
+       | Short | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words) (Include only if free-form alternative is appropriate) |
+
+       - After the table, add: `You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.`
+    - For short‑answer style (no meaningful discrete options):
+       - Provide your **suggested answer** based on best practices and context.
+       - Format as: `**Suggested:** <your proposed answer> - <brief reasoning>`
+       - Then output: `Format: Short answer (<=5 words). You can accept the suggestion by saying "yes" or "suggested", or provide your own answer.`
+    - After the user answers:
+       - If the user replies with "yes", "recommended", or "suggested", use your previously stated recommendation/suggestion as the answer.
+       - Otherwise, validate the answer maps to one option or fits the <=5 word constraint.
+       - If ambiguous, ask for a quick disambiguation (count still belongs to same question; do not advance).
+       - Once satisfactory, record it in working memory (do not yet write to disk) and move to the next queued question.
+    - Stop asking further questions when:
+       - All critical ambiguities resolved early (remaining queued items become unnecessary), OR
+       - User signals completion ("done", "good", "no more"), OR
+       - You reach 5 asked questions.
+    - Never reveal future queued questions in advance.
+    - If no valid questions exist at start, immediately report no critical ambiguities.
+
+6. Integration after EACH accepted answer (incremental update approach):
+    - Maintain in-memory representation of the spec (loaded once at start) plus the raw file contents.
+    - For the first integrated answer in this session:
+       - Ensure a `## Clarifications` section exists (create it just after the highest-level contextual/overview section per the spec template if missing).
+       - Under it, create (if not present) a `### Session YYYY-MM-DD` subheading for today.
+    - Append a bullet line immediately after acceptance: `- Q: <question> → A: <final answer>`.
+    - Then immediately apply the clarification to the most appropriate section(s):
+       - Functional ambiguity → Update or add a bullet in Functional Requirements.
+       - User interaction / actor distinction → Update User Stories or Actors subsection (if present) with clarified role, constraint, or scenario.
+       - Data shape / entities → Update Data Model (add fields, types, relationships) preserving ordering; note added constraints succinctly.
+       - Non-functional constraint → Add/modify measurable criteria in Success Criteria > Measurable Outcomes (convert vague adjective to metric or explicit target).
+       - Edge case / negative flow → Add a new bullet under Edge Cases / Error Handling (or create such subsection if template provides placeholder for it).
+       - Terminology conflict → Normalize term across spec; retain original only if necessary by adding `(formerly referred to as "X")` once.
+    - If the clarification invalidates an earlier ambiguous statement, replace that statement instead of duplicating; leave no obsolete contradictory text.
+    - Save the spec file AFTER each integration to minimize risk of context loss (atomic overwrite).
+    - Preserve formatting: do not reorder unrelated sections; keep heading hierarchy intact.
+    - Keep each inserted clarification minimal and testable (avoid narrative drift).
+
+7. Validation (performed after EACH write plus final pass):
+   - Clarifications session contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer (no duplicates).
+   - Total asked (accepted) questions ≤ 5.
+   - Updated sections contain no lingering vague placeholders the new answer was meant to resolve.
+   - No contradictory earlier statement remains (scan for now-invalid alternative choices removed).
+   - Markdown structure valid; only allowed new headings: `## Clarifications`, `### Session YYYY-MM-DD`.
+   - Terminology consistency: same canonical term used across all updated sections.
+
+8. Write the updated spec back to `FEATURE_SPEC`.
+
+9. **Re-validate Spec Quality Checklist** (if it exists):
+   - Check if `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` exists.
+   - If it does NOT exist, skip this step silently.
+   - If it exists:
+     1. Read the checklist file.
+     2. Identify all GitHub task-list checkbox lines — lines matching `- [ ]`, `- [x]`, or `- [X]` (case-insensitive, tolerant of leading whitespace for nested items) outside of code fences. Ignore all other content (headings, notes, non-checkbox bullets, metadata).
+     3. For each checkbox line, record its current marker state (checked or unchecked) and item text into a before-snapshot list.
+     4. Re-evaluate each checkbox item against the **updated** spec (the version just saved in step 7).
+     5. For each checkbox item, update only if the checked/unchecked state actually changes:
+        - If the item now passes and was unchecked: change `[ ]` to `[x]`.
+        - If the item now fails and was checked: change `[x]`/`[X]` to `[ ]`.
+        - If the state is unchanged: leave the marker as-is (preserve existing case to avoid cosmetic diffs).
+     6. Save the updated checklist file. **Only toggle the `[ ]`/`[x]` marker portion of checkbox lines whose state changed.** All other file content — headings, metadata, notes, line ordering, whitespace — must remain unchanged to avoid noisy diffs.
+     7. Compare the before-snapshot with the current state to compute three lists for the Completion Report:
+        - **Newly passing**: items that changed from unchecked to checked.
+        - **Regressions**: items that changed from checked to unchecked.
+        - **Still unchecked**: items that remain unchecked.
+     8. Record the before/after pass counts as checked/total checkbox items (e.g., "12/16 → 15/16 items passing").
+
+Behavior rules:
+
+- If no meaningful ambiguities found (or all potential questions would be low-impact), respond: "No critical ambiguities detected worth formal clarification." and suggest proceeding.
+- If spec file missing, instruct user to run `/speckit-specify` first (do not create a new spec here).
+- Never exceed 5 total asked questions (clarification retries for a single question do not count as new questions).
+- Avoid speculative tech stack questions unless the absence blocks functional clarity.
+- Respect user early termination signals ("stop", "done", "proceed").
+- If no questions asked due to full coverage, output a compact coverage summary (all categories Clear) then suggest advancing.
+- If quota reached with unresolved high-impact categories remaining, explicitly flag them under Deferred with rationale.
+
+Context for prioritization: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_clarify`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_clarify` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Report completion (after questioning loop ends or early termination):
+- Number of questions asked & answered.
+- Path to updated spec.
+- Sections touched (list names).
+- Spec quality checklist status (if `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` was re-validated): show before/after pass counts (e.g., "Spec Quality Checklist: 12/16 → 15/16 items passing") and list any items that changed state — both newly checked (unchecked → checked) and any regressions (checked → unchecked). If any items remain unchecked, list them as areas needing attention.
+- Coverage summary table listing each taxonomy category with Status: Resolved (was Partial/Missing and addressed), Deferred (exceeds question quota or better suited for planning), Clear (already sufficient), Outstanding (still Partial/Missing but low impact).
+- If any Outstanding or Deferred remain, recommend whether to proceed to `/speckit-plan` or run `/speckit-clarify` again later post-plan.
+- Suggested next command.
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] Spec ambiguities identified and clarifications integrated into spec file
+- [ ] Spec quality checklist re-validated against updated spec (if `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` exists)
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with questions answered, sections touched, checklist status, and coverage summary
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..505c092
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-constitution"
+description: "Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs."
+argument-hint: "Principles or values for the project constitution"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/constitution.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Scope Guard
+
+This command's own work is limited to updating the project constitution itself. Dependent templates
+and commands read the constitution at runtime and are not modified here.
+
+- Classify every part of the user input as either constitution content or a separate,
+  non-governance intent.
+- If the input includes feature implementation, code generation, refactoring, building, or
+  deployment requests, you **MUST NOT** execute them. Extract them as deferred intents instead.
+- You **MUST NOT** create, modify, or delete application source files, feature routes,
+  components, tests, deployment files, or other artifacts unrelated to the constitution
+  workflow.
+- If it is unclear whether an instruction is constitution content, ask for clarification before
+  making changes.
+- After completing the constitution update, include a `Next Actions` section for each deferred
+  intent. List the original intent and suggest the appropriate follow-up Spec Kit command, such
+  as `/speckit-specify`, without invoking it.
+- If there are no non-governance intents, omit the `Next Actions` section.
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before constitution update)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_constitution` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. The active
+constitution scaffold is resolved at command time from `constitution-template` through the Spec Kit
+preset/template resolution stack.
+
+Follow this execution flow:
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1 constitution-template -Json` from the repository root and parse `TEMPLATE_CONTENT` as the active template.
+   - The shared resolver applies project overrides, composing preset layers, and extension layers
+     before the core template fallback. It MUST succeed before continuing.
+   - If it fails, stop and report the resolution error; do not continue with only one contributing
+     template layer.
+   - If `.specify/memory/constitution.md` exists, load it as the source of current project-specific
+     values and amendments. Preserve information that is still applicable when applying the newly
+     resolved scaffold.
+   - If it does not exist, use the resolved template as the initial document.
+   - Do not write back to any versioned template layer.
+   - Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
+   **IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
+
+2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
+   - If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
+   - Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
+   - For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
+   - `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
+     - MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
+     - MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
+     - PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
+   - If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
+
+3. Draft the updated constitution content using the resolved template as the required structure:
+   - Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
+   - Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
+   - Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing non‑negotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
+   - Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
+
+4. Produce a Sync Impact Report as an HTML comment at the top of the constitution file after update.
+   This report is temporary scratch material for human review of the amendment, not governance
+   content; it is expected to be removed before the amended constitution file is committed.
+   - Version change: old → new
+   - List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
+   - Added sections
+   - Removed sections
+   - Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
+
+5. Validation before final output:
+   - No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
+   - Version line matches report.
+   - Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
+   - Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
+
+6. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
+
+7. Output a final summary to the user with:
+   - New version and bump rationale.
+   - Any TODO placeholders or deferred items requiring manual follow-up.
+   - Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
+   - A `Next Actions` section for any deferred non-governance intents.
+
+Formatting & Style Requirements:
+
+- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
+- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
+- Keep a single blank line between sections.
+- Avoid trailing whitespace.
+
+If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
+
+If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
+
+Write only `.specify/memory/constitution.md`; do not create or modify template source files.
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after constitution update)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_constitution` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..91258c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-converge"
+description: "Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/converge.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before convergence)**:
+
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_converge` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Goal
+
+Close the gap between what a feature's specification, plan, and tasks call for and what the
+codebase currently implements. Read `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` as the **sole
+source of intent** (with the constitution as governing constraints), assess the current
+state of the code, determine which requirements, acceptance criteria, plan decisions, and
+existing tasks are unmet, incomplete, or only partially satisfied, and **append each piece
+of remaining work as a new, traceable task** at the bottom of `tasks.md` so that
+`/speckit-implement` can complete it. This command MUST run only after
+`/speckit-implement` has run on the current `tasks.md`, and after `/speckit-tasks` has produced a complete `tasks.md`.
+
+This is **not** a diff tool and does **not** track changes. It assesses the present state
+of the code relative to the feature's artifacts — no git, no branch comparison, no history.
+
+## Operating Constraints
+
+**APPEND-ONLY, NEVER REWRITE**: The command's **only** write is appending a new
+`## Phase N: Convergence` section to `tasks.md`. It MUST NOT:
+
+- modify `spec.md` or `plan.md` in any way;
+- rewrite, renumber, reorder, or delete any existing task (including tasks from a prior
+  Convergence phase);
+- modify, create, or delete any application code — completing the appended tasks is the
+  job of `/speckit-implement`.
+
+When the codebase already satisfies everything, the command MUST leave `tasks.md`
+**byte-for-byte unchanged** (no empty Convergence header) and report a clean result.
+
+**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is
+**non-negotiable**. Code that violates a MUST principle is the highest-severity finding and
+produces a corresponding remediation task. If the constitution is an unfilled template,
+skip constitution checks gracefully rather than failing.
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### 1. Initialize Convergence Context
+
+Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireSpec -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
+
+- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
+- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
+- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
+- CONSTITUTION = `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (if present)
+If `spec.md`, `plan.md`, or `tasks.md` is missing, STOP with a clear, actionable message naming the
+prerequisite command to run (`/speckit-specify` for a missing spec, `/speckit-plan` for a missing plan,
+`/speckit-tasks` for missing tasks). Do not produce partial output.
+For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
+
+Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
+
+**From spec.md:**
+
+- Functional Requirements (FR-###)
+- Success Criteria (SC-###) — include only items requiring buildable work; exclude
+  post-launch outcome metrics and business KPIs
+- User Stories and their Acceptance Scenarios
+- Edge Cases (if present)
+
+**From plan.md:**
+
+- Architecture/stack choices and technical decisions
+- Data Model references
+- Phases and named touch-points (files/components the plan says will be created or edited)
+- Technical constraints
+
+**From tasks.md:**
+
+- Task IDs (to compute the next ID and next phase number)
+- Descriptions, phase grouping, and referenced file paths
+
+**From constitution (if not an unfilled template):**
+
+- Principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
+
+### 3. Build the Intent Inventory
+
+Create an internal model (do not echo raw artifacts):
+
+- **Requirements inventory**: one stable key per FR-### / SC-### / user-story acceptance
+  scenario (e.g. `US1/AC2`), plus the plan decisions and constitution principles that
+  impose buildable obligations.
+- **Code-scope map**: from the file paths named in `plan.md` and `tasks.md`, plus a keyword
+  search for the concepts each requirement describes, derive the set of source files and
+  components in scope for assessment. Bound the assessment to these — do **not** infer
+  scope beyond what the artifacts define.
+
+### 4. Assess the Codebase and Classify Findings
+
+For each item in the intent inventory, inspect the current code in scope and produce a
+`Finding` only where there is a gap. Classify every finding by **gap type**:
+
+- **`missing`**: the required work is absent from the code entirely.
+- **`partial`**: the work exists but does not yet fully satisfy the requirement /
+  acceptance criterion / plan decision.
+- **`contradicts`**: the code does something that conflicts with stated intent or a
+  constitution MUST principle.
+- **`unrequested`**: the code contains work not called for by the spec, plan, or tasks
+  (surfaced for awareness — converge does **not** delete code, it only appends a task to
+  review/justify or remove it).
+
+Each `Finding` records: a stable id, the `source-ref` it traces to, the `gap-type`, a
+severity, and a short human-readable description with the evidence (the file/area observed).
+
+**Edge cases:**
+
+- **Little or no code yet**: treat the entire specified scope as `missing` remaining work
+  rather than failing.
+- **Nothing remains**: produce zero findings and follow the converged branch in Step 7.
+
+### 5. Assign Severity
+
+- **CRITICAL**: violates a constitution MUST principle, or a `missing`/`contradicts` gap
+  that blocks baseline functionality of a P1 user story.
+- **HIGH**: a `missing` or `partial` gap on a core functional requirement or acceptance
+  criterion.
+- **MEDIUM**: a `partial` gap on a secondary requirement, or an `unrequested` addition with
+  unclear justification.
+- **LOW**: minor partial gaps, polish, or low-risk `unrequested` additions.
+
+### 6. Present the In-Session Findings Summary
+
+Before appending anything, output a compact, severity-graded summary (no file writes yet):
+
+## Convergence Findings
+
+| ID | Gap Type | Severity | Source | Evidence | Remaining Work |
+|----|----------|----------|--------|----------|----------------|
+| F1 | missing  | HIGH     | FR-008 | Example: no append-only guard detected in path/to/module.py when writing tasks.md | Add append-only enforcement |
+
+**Summary metrics:**
+
+- Requirements / acceptance criteria checked
+- Plan decisions checked
+- Constitution principles checked (or "skipped — template")
+- Findings by gap type (missing / partial / contradicts / unrequested)
+- Findings by severity
+
+### 7. Append Convergence Tasks (or report converged)
+
+**If there are one or more actionable findings** (`tasks_appended` outcome):
+
+Append to the **end** of `tasks.md`, per the append contract:
+
+1. Scan all existing task IDs; let `M` be the maximum. Determine the next phase number `N`
+   (highest existing phase + 1).
+2. Write a single new section header `## Phase N: Convergence`.
+3. Emit one checklist item per actionable finding, ordered CRITICAL/HIGH first, assigning
+   zero-padded IDs `T{M+1:03d}, T{M+2:03d}, …`:
+
+   ```markdown
+   - [ ] T042 <imperative description> per <source-ref> (<gap-type>)
+   ```
+
+   `<source-ref>` traces the task to its origin: e.g. `FR-003`, `SC-002`,
+   `US1/AC2`, `plan: storage decision`, `Constitution II`.
+
+   `<gap-type>` is one of `missing`, `partial`, `contradicts`, `unrequested`.
+
+   Constitution-violation tasks MUST be emitted first and described as
+   `CRITICAL`.
+4. Never reuse or renumber existing IDs. If a prior Convergence phase exists, add a new,
+   separately-numbered one below it — do not touch the old one.
+
+**If there are no actionable findings** (`converged` outcome):
+
+- Do **not** modify `tasks.md` at all — no empty phase header.
+- Report: **"✅ Converged — the implementation satisfies the spec, plan, and tasks."**
+- Include the summary counts of what was checked.
+
+### 8. Provide Next Actions (Handoff)
+
+- On `tasks_appended`: state how many tasks were appended under which phase, and recommend
+  running `/speckit-implement` to complete them; note that a follow-up converge
+  run will find fewer or no remaining items.
+- On `converged`: recommend proceeding to review / opening a PR. No further implement pass
+  is needed for this feature's specified scope.
+
+### 9. Check for extension hooks
+
+After producing the result, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_converge` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- Report the convergence outcome (`converged` or `tasks_appended`) in-session before listing
+  any hooks, so users can decide whether to run optional follow-up commands.
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b720f4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-implement"
+description: "Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md"
+argument-hint: "Optional implementation guidance or task filter"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/implement.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before implementation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_implement` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Check checklists status** (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
+   - Treat checklist markers as a read-only gate: scan checkbox state, report status, and ask before proceeding when needed; do NOT modify checklist files or markers
+   - `checklists/requirements.md` is the built-in spec-quality checklist maintained by `/speckit-specify` and `/speckit-clarify`; custom checklists generated by `/speckit-checklist` are reviewer-owned requirements-quality review artifacts
+   - For custom checklists, `[x]` means the reviewer determined the requirements-quality criterion is satisfied; it does NOT mean implementation work is complete
+   - Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
+   - For each checklist, count:
+     - Total items: All lines matching `- [ ]` or `- [X]` or `- [x]`
+     - Checked items: Lines matching `- [X]` or `- [x]`
+     - Unchecked items: Lines matching `- [ ]`
+   - Create a status table:
+
+     ```text
+     | Checklist | Total | Checked | Unchecked | Status |
+     |-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
+     | ux.md     | 12    | 12      | 0         | ✓ PASS |
+     | test.md   | 8     | 5       | 3         | ✗ FAIL |
+     | security.md | 6   | 6       | 0         | ✓ PASS |
+     ```
+
+   - Calculate overall status:
+     - **PASS**: All checklists have 0 unchecked items
+     - **FAIL**: One or more checklists have unchecked items
+
+   - **If any checklist has unchecked items**:
+     - Display the table with unchecked item counts
+     - **STOP** and ask: "Some checklists have unchecked items. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
+     - Wait for user response before continuing
+     - If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
+     - If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
+
+   - **If all checklists are checked**:
+     - Display the table showing all checklists passed
+     - Automatically proceed to step 3
+
+3. Load and analyze the implementation context:
+   - **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
+   - **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read .specify/memory/constitution.md for governance constraints
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
+
+4. **Project Setup Verification**:
+   - **REQUIRED**: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:
+
+   **Detection & Creation Logic**:
+   - Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):
+
+     ```sh
+     git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null
+     ```
+
+   - Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore
+   - Check if .eslintrc* exists → create/verify .eslintignore
+   - Check if eslint.config.* exists → ensure the config's `ignores` entries cover required patterns
+   - Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore
+   - Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)
+   - Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore
+   - Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore
+
+   **If ignore file already exists**: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only
+   **If ignore file missing**: Create with full pattern set for detected technology
+
+   **Common Patterns by Technology** (from plan.md tech stack):
+   - **Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Python**: `__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`, `.venv/`, `venv/`, `dist/`, `*.egg-info/`
+   - **Java**: `target/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `.gradle/`, `build/`
+   - **C#/.NET**: `bin/`, `obj/`, `*.user`, `*.suo`, `packages/`
+   - **Go**: `*.exe`, `*.test`, `vendor/`, `*.out`
+   - **Ruby**: `.bundle/`, `log/`, `tmp/`, `*.gem`, `vendor/bundle/`
+   - **PHP**: `vendor/`, `*.log`, `*.cache`, `*.env`
+   - **Rust**: `target/`, `debug/`, `release/`, `*.rs.bk`, `*.rlib`, `*.prof*`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Kotlin**: `build/`, `out/`, `.gradle/`, `.idea/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `*.iml`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **C++**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.so`, `*.a`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **C**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.a`, `*.so`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `autom4te.cache/`, `config.status`, `config.log`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Swift**: `.build/`, `DerivedData/`, `*.swiftpm/`, `Packages/`
+   - **R**: `.Rproj.user/`, `.Rhistory`, `.RData`, `.Ruserdata`, `*.Rproj`, `packrat/`, `renv/`
+   - **Universal**: `.DS_Store`, `Thumbs.db`, `*.tmp`, `*.swp`, `.vscode/`, `.idea/`
+
+   **Tool-Specific Patterns**:
+   - **Docker**: `node_modules/`, `.git/`, `Dockerfile*`, `.dockerignore`, `*.log*`, `.env*`, `coverage/`
+   - **ESLint**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `*.min.js`
+   - **Prettier**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `package-lock.json`, `yarn.lock`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`
+   - **Terraform**: `.terraform/`, `*.tfstate*`, `*.tfvars`, `.terraform.lock.hcl`
+   - **Kubernetes/k8s**: `*.secret.yaml`, `secrets/`, `.kube/`, `kubeconfig*`, `*.key`, `*.crt`
+
+5. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
+   - **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
+   - **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
+   - **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
+   - **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
+
+6. Execute implementation following the task plan:
+   - **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
+   - **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
+   - **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
+   - **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
+   - **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
+
+7. Implementation execution rules:
+   - **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
+   - **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
+   - **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
+   - **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
+   - **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
+
+8. Progress tracking and error handling:
+   - Report progress after each completed task
+   - Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
+   - For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
+   - Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
+   - Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
+   - **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
+
+9. Completion validation:
+   - Verify all required tasks are completed
+   - Check that implemented features match the original specification
+   - Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
+   - Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
+
+Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/speckit-tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_implement`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_implement` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Report final status with summary of completed work.
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] All tasks in tasks.md completed and marked `[X]`
+- [ ] Implementation validated against specification, plan, and test coverage
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with summary of completed work
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca5ea6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-plan"
+description: "Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts."
+argument-hint: "Optional guidance for the planning phase"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/plan.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before planning)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_plan` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1 -Json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, FEATURE_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
+
+3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
+   - Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
+   - Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
+   - Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
+   - Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
+   - Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
+   - Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_plan`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_plan` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Command ends after Phase 1 design. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
+
+## Phases
+
+### Phase 0: Outline & Research
+
+1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
+   - For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
+   - For each dependency → best practices task
+   - For each integration → patterns task
+
+2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
+
+   ```text
+   For each unknown in Technical Context:
+     Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
+   For each technology choice:
+     Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
+   ```
+
+3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
+   - Decision: [what was chosen]
+   - Rationale: [why chosen]
+   - Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
+
+**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
+
+### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
+
+**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
+
+1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
+   - Entity name, fields, relationships
+   - Validation rules from requirements
+   - State transitions if applicable
+
+2. **Define interface contracts** (if project has external interfaces) → `/contracts/`:
+   - Identify what interfaces the project exposes to users or other systems
+   - Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
+   - Examples: public APIs for libraries, command schemas for CLI tools, endpoints for web services, grammars for parsers, UI contracts for applications
+   - Skip if project is purely internal (build scripts, one-off tools, etc.)
+
+3. **Create quickstart validation guide** → `quickstart.md`:
+   - Document runnable validation scenarios that prove the feature works end-to-end
+   - Include prerequisites, setup commands, test/run commands, and expected outcomes
+   - Use links or references to contracts and data model details instead of duplicating them
+   - Do not include full implementation code, model/service/controller bodies, migrations, or complete test suites
+   - Keep this artifact as a validation/run guide; implementation details belong in `tasks.md` and the implementation phase
+
+**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md
+
+## Key rules
+
+- Use absolute paths for filesystem operations; use project-relative paths for references in documentation
+- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] Plan workflow executed and design artifacts generated
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with branch, plan path, and generated artifacts
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..25daab1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-specify"
+description: "Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description."
+argument-hint: "Describe the feature you want to specify"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/specify.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before specification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_specify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+The text the user typed after `/speckit-specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
+
+Given that feature description, do this:
+
+1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the feature:
+   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
+   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
+   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
+   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
+   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
+   - Examples:
+     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
+     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
+     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
+     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
+
+2. **Branch creation** (optional, via hook):
+
+   If a `before_specify` hook ran successfully in the Pre-Execution Checks above, it will have created/switched to a git branch and output JSON containing `BRANCH_NAME` and `FEATURE_NUM`. Note these values for reference, but the branch name does **not** dictate the spec directory name.
+
+   If the user explicitly provided `GIT_BRANCH_NAME`, pass it through to the hook so the branch script uses the exact value as the branch name (bypassing all prefix/suffix generation).
+
+3. **Create the spec feature directory**:
+
+   Specs live under the default `specs/` directory unless the user explicitly provides `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
+
+   **Resolution order for `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`**:
+   1. If the user explicitly provided `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` (e.g., via environment variable, argument, or configuration), use it as-is
+   2. Otherwise, auto-generate it under `specs/`:
+      - Check `.specify/init-options.json` for `feature_numbering` (preferred) or `branch_numbering` (deprecated, migration only — will be removed in a future release)
+      - If `"timestamp"`: prefix is `YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` (current timestamp)
+      - If `"sequential"` or absent: prefix is `NNN` (next available 3-digit number after scanning existing directories in `specs/`)
+      - Construct the directory name: `<prefix>-<short-name>` (e.g., `003-user-auth` or `20260319-143022-user-auth`)
+      - Set `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` to `specs/<directory-name>`
+      - If `branch_numbering` was used (and `feature_numbering` was absent), emit a one-line warning: "⚠️ `branch_numbering` in init-options.json is deprecated. Rename to `feature_numbering`."
+
+   **Create the directory and spec file**:
+   - `mkdir -p SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`
+   - Resolve the active `spec-template` through the Spec Kit preset/template resolution stack (equivalent to `specify preset resolve spec-template`)
+   - Copy the resolved `spec-template` file to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md` as the starting point
+   - Set `SPEC_FILE` to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md`
+   - Persist the resolved path to `.specify/feature.json`:
+     ```json
+     {
+       "feature_directory": "<resolved feature dir>"
+     }
+     ```
+     Write the actual resolved directory path value (for example, `specs/003-user-auth`), not the literal string `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
+     This allows downstream commands (`/speckit-plan`, `/speckit-tasks`, etc.) to locate the feature directory without relying on git branch name conventions.
+
+   **IMPORTANT**:
+   - You must only create one feature per `/speckit-specify` invocation
+   - The spec directory name and the git branch name are independent — they may be the same but that is the user's choice
+   - The spec directory and file are always created by this command, never by the hook
+
+4. Load the resolved active `spec-template` file to understand required sections.
+
+5. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+
+6. Follow this execution flow:
+    1. Parse user description from arguments
+       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
+    2. Extract key concepts from description
+       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
+    3. For unclear aspects:
+       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
+       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
+         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
+         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
+         - No reasonable default exists
+       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
+       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
+       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
+    5. Generate Functional Requirements
+       Each requirement must be testable
+       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
+    6. Define Success Criteria
+       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
+       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
+       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
+    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
+    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
+
+7. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
+
+8. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
+
+   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
+
+      ```markdown
+      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+      **Created**: [DATE]
+      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
+
+      ## Content Quality
+
+      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
+      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
+
+      ## Requirement Completeness
+
+      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
+      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
+      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
+      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+
+      ## Feature Readiness
+
+      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
+      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
+
+      ## Notes
+
+      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`
+      ```
+
+   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
+      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
+      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
+
+   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
+
+      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to the Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks section
+
+      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
+        1. List the failing items and specific issues
+        2. Update the spec to address each issue
+        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
+        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
+
+      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
+        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
+        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
+        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
+
+           ```markdown
+           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
+
+           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
+
+           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
+
+           **Suggested Answers**:
+
+           | Option | Answer | Implications |
+           |--------|--------|--------------|
+           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
+
+           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
+           ```
+
+        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
+           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
+           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
+           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
+           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
+        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
+        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
+        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
+        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
+        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
+
+   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_specify`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_specify` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Report completion to the user with:
+- `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` — the feature directory path
+- `SPEC_FILE` — the spec file path
+- Checklist results summary
+- Readiness for the next phase (`/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`)
+
+**NOTE:** Branch creation is handled by the `before_specify` hook (git extension). Spec directory and file creation are always handled by this core command.
+
+## Quick Guidelines
+
+- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
+- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
+- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
+- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
+
+### Section Requirements
+
+- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
+- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
+- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
+
+### For AI Generation
+
+When creating this spec from a user prompt:
+
+1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
+2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
+3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
+   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
+   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
+   - Lack any reasonable default
+4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
+6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
+   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
+   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
+   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
+
+**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
+
+- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
+- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
+- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
+- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
+- Integration patterns: Use project-appropriate patterns (REST/GraphQL for web services, function calls for libraries, CLI args for tools, etc.)
+
+### Success Criteria Guidelines
+
+Success criteria must be:
+
+1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
+2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
+3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
+4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
+
+**Good examples**:
+
+- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
+- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
+- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
+- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
+
+**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
+
+- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
+- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
+- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
+- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] Specification written to `SPEC_FILE` and validated against quality checklist
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with feature directory, spec file path, and checklist results
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4993eb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-tasks"
+description: "Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts."
+argument-hint: "Optional task generation constraints"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/tasks.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_tasks` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1 -Json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR, TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT, TASKS_TEMPLATE, and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. `FEATURE_DIR` and `TASKS_TEMPLATE` must be absolute paths when provided. `AVAILABLE_DOCS` is a list of document names/relative paths available under `FEATURE_DIR` (for example `research.md` or `contracts/`). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
+   - **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints
+   - Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
+
+3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
+   - Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
+   - Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
+   - If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
+   - If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
+   - If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
+   - Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
+   - Create parallel execution examples per user story
+   - Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
+
+4. **Generate tasks.md**: Use TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT (from the JSON output above) as the structure. For compatibility with older setup scripts that omit TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT, read TASKS_TEMPLATE instead. Fill with:
+   - Correct feature name from plan.md
+   - Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
+   - Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
+   - Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
+   - Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
+   - Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
+   - All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Clear file paths for each task
+   - Dependencies section showing story completion order
+   - Parallel execution examples per story
+   - Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_tasks`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_tasks` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
+- Total task count
+- Task count per user story
+- Parallel opportunities identified
+- Independent test criteria for each story
+- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
+- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
+
+Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
+
+The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
+
+## Task Generation Rules
+
+**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
+
+**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
+
+### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
+
+Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
+
+```text
+- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
+```
+
+**Format Components**:
+
+1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
+2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
+3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
+4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
+   - Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
+   - Setup phase: NO story label
+   - Foundational phase: NO story label
+   - User Story phases: MUST have story label
+   - Polish phase: NO story label
+5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
+
+**Examples**:
+
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
+- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
+
+### Task Organization
+
+1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
+   - Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
+   - Map all related components to their story:
+     - Models needed for that story
+     - Services needed for that story
+     - Interfaces/UI needed for that story
+     - If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
+   - Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
+
+2. **From Contracts**:
+   - Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
+   - If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
+
+3. **From Data Model**:
+   - Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
+   - If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
+   - Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
+   - For each field with constraints in data-model.md (max length, nullable/required, enum values, validation rules), quote the constraint verbatim in the task description so it is not left to implementation-time discretion
+
+4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
+   - Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
+   - Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
+   - Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
+
+### Phase Structure
+
+- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
+- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
+- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
+  - Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
+  - Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
+- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] tasks.md generated with all phases, task IDs, and file paths
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with task count, story breakdown, and MVP scope
diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ec800a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-taskstoissues"
+description: "Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts."
+argument-hint: "Optional filter or label for GitHub issues"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/taskstoissues.md"
+user-invocable: true
+disable-model-invocation: false
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_taskstoissues` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+1. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
+1. Get the Git remote by running:
+
+```bash
+git config --get remote.origin.url
+```
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
+
+1. **Fetch existing issues for deduplication**: Before creating anything, build the set of task IDs you are about to process from `tasks.md` (each is a `T` followed by **at least** three digits, e.g. `T001` — `/speckit-converge` assigns new IDs with `T{M+1:03d}`, which is a floor rather than a cap, so once a file has more than 999 tasks the IDs are four digits or longer). Then use the GitHub MCP server's `list_issues` tool to look for issues that already cover those IDs. Do not pass a `state` value, since omitting it makes the tool return both open and closed issues. Request `perPage: 100` to keep the number of calls down, and since the tool uses cursor-based pagination, request pages with the `after` parameter (using the `endCursor` from the previous response). For each issue title, match it against the task ID pattern `\bT\d{3,}\b` (the `{3,}` accepts four-digit and longer IDs — with `\d{3}` a title containing `T1000` would not match at all, because the trailing `\b` cannot fall between two digits, so that task would be silently neither deduplicated nor created; word boundaries still stop a token like `ST001` from matching, and force the whole digit run to be consumed so `T100` can never match inside `T1000`; this also recognises titles written as `T001 ...`, `T001: ...` or `[T001] ...`) and, when it matches one of your task IDs, mark that ID as already having an issue. Stop paginating as soon as every task ID has been matched, or when there are no more pages, so you do not keep fetching the whole repository's issue history once all task IDs are accounted for. This bounds the number of calls on repos with large issue histories and still prevents duplicates when the command is re-run after `tasks.md` is regenerated or the skill is re-invoked.
+1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote. Task lines in `tasks.md` start with a markdown checkbox, so first strip the leading `- [ ]` (and any `[P]` / `[US#]` markers) to recover the task ID and its description. Create the issue with a single canonical title of the form `T001: <description>`, with the ID written once followed by the task description (for example, the line `- [ ] T001 Create project structure` becomes the title `T001: Create project structure`).
+   - **Skip** any task whose ID is already present in the set of existing issues from the previous step, and report it (for example, `T001 already has an issue, skipping`).
+   - Only create issues for tasks that do not yet have a matching issue.
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_taskstoissues` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.github/prompts/opsx-apply.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/opsx-apply.prompt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 1b18962..0000000
--- a/.github/prompts/opsx-apply.prompt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,177 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)"
----
-
-Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., `/opsx-apply add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-apply <other>`).
-
-2. **Check status to understand the schema**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints
-   - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
-3. **Get apply instructions**
-
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   This returns:
-   - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema)
-   - Progress (total, complete, remaining)
-   - Task list with status
-   - Dynamic instruction based on current state
-   - Optional `context`: current required project instruction input from the selected root
-   - Optional `operationGuidance`: current advisory guidance for apply
-
-   **Handle states:**
-   - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using `/opsx-continue` (if it is not installed, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to see the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` for how to create it)
-   - If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive
-   - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
-
-   Treat `context` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
-   apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
-   Treat `operationGuidance` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
-   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
-   workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
-   progress, `contextFiles`, and the built-in `instruction`. They are not
-   evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
-   not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
-   instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
-   conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
-   conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
-   These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-4. **Read context files**
-
-   Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.
-   The files depend on the schema being used:
-   - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
-   - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
-
-   Do not copy `context` or `operationGuidance` verbatim into implementation
-   files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.
-
-5. **Show current progress**
-
-   Display:
-   - Schema being used
-   - Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - Remaining tasks overview
-   - Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
-6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
-
-   For each pending task:
-   - Show which task is being worked on
-   - Make the code changes required
-   - Keep changes minimal and focused
-   - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
-   - Continue to next task
-
-   **Pause if:**
-   - Task is unclear → ask for clarification
-   - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
-   - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
-   - User interrupts
-
-7. **On completion or pause, show status**
-
-   Display:
-   - Tasks completed this session
-   - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - If all done: suggest archive
-   - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
-
-**Output During Implementation**
-
-```
-## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
-
-Working on task 3/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-
-Working on task 4/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-```
-
-**Output On Completion**
-
-```
-## Implementation Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
-
-### Completed This Session
-- [x] Task 1
-- [x] Task 2
-...
-
-All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx-archive`.
-```
-
-**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**
-
-```
-## Implementation Paused
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
-
-### Issue Encountered
-<description of the issue>
-
-**Options:**
-1. <option 1>
-2. <option 2>
-3. Other approach
-
-What would you like to do?
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
-- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
-- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
-- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
-- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
-- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
-- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
-- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
-- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
-- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
-- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
-- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
-
-**Fluid Workflow Integration**
-
-This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
-
-- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
-- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
diff --git a/.github/prompts/opsx-archive.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/opsx-archive.prompt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 235c884..0000000
--- a/.github/prompts/opsx-archive.prompt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,219 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow"
----
-
-Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx-archive` (e.g., `/opsx-archive add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show only active changes (not already archived).
-   Include the schema used for each change if available.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-archive <other>`).
-
-   **Load current archive inputs before the existing archive checks:**
-
-   After resolving the selected change and planning root, run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions archive --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Keep the same selected-root flags on this command. This lookup is advisory and
-   optional: it only supplies extra prompt inputs, so it must never block archiving.
-   If it exits non-zero or returns invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that
-   does not support this command yet — continue the archive workflow with no
-   context and no operation guidance. Do not report an error and do not stop.
-
-   A successful response may omit both optional fields. Treat `context` as a
-   required prompt-level input: read and consider it, and apply relevant project
-   facts, conventions, and constraints. Treat `operationGuidance` as optional
-   additive advice: read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are
-   applicable and compatible with the built-in archive workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from built-in steps, explicit user choices, resolved
-   paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one of those
-   controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If
-   guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not follow it
-   and explain why. Do not infer replacement paths, skipped prompts, or flags from
-   either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, change artifacts,
-   or archive summaries unless the user separately asks for it. These are
-   prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-2. **Check artifact completion status**
-
-   Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion.
-
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context
-   - `artifacts`: List of artifacts with their status (`done`, `skipped`, or other)
-
-   **If any artifacts are neither `done` nor `skipped`** (skipped artifacts satisfy the requirement - the change declares skip_specs):
-   - Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
-   - Prompt user for confirmation to continue
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-3. **Check task completion status**
-
-   Read the tasks file (typically `tasks.md`) to check for incomplete tasks.
-
-   Count tasks marked with `- [ ]` (incomplete) vs `- [x]` (complete).
-
-   **If incomplete tasks found:**
-   - Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
-   - Prompt user for confirmation to continue
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-   **If no tasks file exists:** Proceed without task-related warning.
-
-4. **Assess delta spec sync state**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from status JSON as the only
-   delta-spec source. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, proceed without a sync prompt and do not infer
-   delta specs from other artifacts.
-
-   **If delta specs exist:**
-   - Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (use the store-aware `planningHome.root` from step 2, not a hardcoded repo path)
-   - Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
-   - Show a combined summary before prompting
-
-   **Prompt options:**
-   - If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
-   - If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
-
-   Route on the answer:
-   - "Cancel" — stop, do not archive
-   - "Archive without syncing" or "Archive now" — proceed to archive
-   - "Sync now" or "Sync anyway" — sync, then verify (below)
-   - Anything else — ask again rather than archiving
-
-   Before a selected sync writes any main spec, run
-   `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json` once with the same
-   selected-root flags. Require a zero exit status and valid artifact-instruction
-   JSON. If the lookup fails or returns invalid JSON, report the error and stop
-   before writing any main spec or moving the change. A valid response with omitted
-   `rules` is the no-rules case. Apply returned `rules` only to the content and
-   form of main specs produced by this merge; do not use them as archive guidance,
-   change CLI behavior, or copy the rule text into any output file.
-
-   Then run the `/opsx-sync` workflow inline (agent-driven intelligent merge) for change '<name>', passing the delta spec analysis and the fetched specs-rule snapshot from above, and wait for it to finish. The inline sync must reuse that snapshot without fetching `specs` instructions again. Do not delegate it to a background task — step 5 would move `changeRoot` out from under a sync that is still reading it, leaving the change archived and the main specs never updated. If your agent can only run it by delegation, delegate synchronously and wait for the result.
-
-   Then re-run the comparison from the top of this step against every capability that has a delta spec in `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` — not only the ones the sync reports it touched. A successful sync leaves nothing left to apply, so each capability must now read as already synced:
-   - ADDED requirements present
-   - MODIFIED requirements carrying the scenario and description changes named in the delta, with their other scenarios intact
-   - REMOVED requirements gone
-   - RENAMED requirements present under the new name and absent under the old one
-
-   If the sync failed, or any capability does not match, report what differs and stop — do not archive. Nothing has moved and `changeRoot` is intact, so the user can fix the mismatch or re-run the sync and start the archive again.
-
-5. **Perform the archive**
-
-   Create an `archive` directory under `planningHome.changesDir` if it doesn't exist:
-   ```bash
-   mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
-   ```
-
-   Generate the target name: use the change name as-is when it already starts with a `YYYY-MM-DD-` prefix; otherwise prepend the current date as `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>`. Never stack a second date (same rule as `openspec archive`).
-
-   **Check if target already exists:**
-   - If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
-   - If no: Move `changeRoot` to the archive directory
-
-   ```bash
-   mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/<target-name>"
-   ```
-
-6. **Display summary**
-
-   Show archive completion summary including:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema that was used
-   - Archive location
-   - Spec sync status (synced / sync skipped / no delta specs)
-   - Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** ✓ Synced to main specs
-
-All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
-```
-
-**Output On Success (No Delta Specs)**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** No delta specs
-
-All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
-```
-
-**Output On Success With Warnings**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete (with warnings)
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** Sync skipped (user chose to skip)
-
-**Warnings:**
-- Archived with 2 incomplete artifacts
-- Archived with 3 incomplete tasks
-- Delta spec sync was skipped (user chose to skip)
-
-Review the archive if this was not intentional.
-```
-
-**Output On Error (Archive Exists)**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Failed
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Target:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-
-Target archive directory already exists.
-
-**Options:**
-1. Rename the existing archive
-2. Delete the existing archive if it's a duplicate
-3. Wait until a different date to archive
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Announce the selected change; prompt for selection when it is ambiguous
-- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
-- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
-- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
-- Show clear summary of what happened
-- If sync is requested, run the `/opsx-sync` workflow inline (agent-driven)
-- Never archive while a spec sync is still in flight — run the sync inline and verify the main specs before moving `changeRoot`
-- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
-- Apply relevant runtime context and report conflicts; operation guidance remains advisory
-- Consider every guidance entry and explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Existing CLI checks, resolved paths, prompts, and command contracts are unchanged
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never operation guidance
-- Never copy runtime context, operation guidance, or artifact-rule text verbatim into output files
diff --git a/.github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index e4653fc..0000000
--- a/.github/prompts/opsx-explore.prompt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,177 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements"
----
-
-Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
-
-**IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing.** You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
-
-**This is a stance, not a workflow.** There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: The argument after `/opsx-explore` is whatever the user wants to think about. Could be:
-- A vague idea: "real-time collaboration"
-- A specific problem: "the auth system is getting unwieldy"
-- A change name: "add-dark-mode" (to explore in context of that change)
-- A comparison: "postgres vs sqlite for this"
-- Nothing (just enter explore mode)
-
----
-
-## The Stance
-
-- **Curious, not prescriptive** - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
-- **Open threads, not interrogations** - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
-- **Visual** - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
-- **Adaptive** - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
-- **Patient** - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
-- **Grounded** - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
-
----
-
-## What You Might Do
-
-Depending on what the user brings, you might:
-
-**Explore the problem space**
-- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
-- Challenge assumptions
-- Reframe the problem
-- Find analogies
-
-**Investigate the codebase**
-- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
-- Find integration points
-- Identify patterns already in use
-- Surface hidden complexity
-
-**Compare options**
-- Brainstorm multiple approaches
-- Build comparison tables
-- Sketch tradeoffs
-- Recommend a path (if asked)
-
-**Visualize**
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│     Use ASCII diagrams liberally        │
-├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
-│                                         │
-│      ┌────────┐         ┌────────┐      │
-│      │ State  │────────▶│ State  │      │
-│      │   A    │         │   B    │      │
-│      └────────┘         └────────┘      │
-│                                         │
-│   System diagrams, state machines,      │
-│   data flows, architecture sketches,    │
-│   dependency graphs, comparison tables  │
-│                                         │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-**Surface risks and unknowns**
-- Identify what could go wrong
-- Find gaps in understanding
-- Suggest spikes or investigations
-
----
-
-## OpenSpec Awareness
-
-You have full context of the OpenSpec system. Use it naturally, don't force it.
-
-### Check for context
-
-At the start, quickly check what exists:
-```bash
-openspec list --json
-```
-
-This tells you:
-- If there are active changes
-- Their names, schemas, and status
-- What the user might be working on
-
-Then read the project's own context from the resolved root - `<root.path>/openspec/config.yaml` (or `config.yml`). Use the `root.path` returned above, and skip this if neither file exists:
-- `context`: project background - tech stack, conventions, constraints
-- `rules`: keyed by artifact id - the entries for an artifact apply only when you write that artifact
-
-Ground your thinking in these. They are constraints for you to follow, not content to reproduce: do NOT copy them into the conversation or into any artifact you create.
-
-If the user mentioned a specific change name, read its artifacts for context.
-
-### When no change exists
-
-Think freely. When insights crystallize, you might offer:
-
-- "This feels solid enough to start a change. Want me to create a proposal?"
-- Or keep exploring - no pressure to formalize
-
-### When a change exists
-
-If the user mentions a change or you detect one is relevant:
-
-1. **Resolve and read existing artifacts for context**
-   - Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`.
-   - Use `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext` from the status JSON.
-   - Read existing files from `artifactPaths.<artifact>.existingOutputPaths`.
-
-2. **Reference them naturally in conversation**
-   - "Your design mentions using Redis, but we just realized SQLite fits better..."
-   - "The proposal scopes this to premium users, but we're now thinking everyone..."
-
-3. **Offer to capture when decisions are made**
-
-    | Insight Type               | Where to Capture               |
-    |----------------------------|--------------------------------|
-    | New requirement discovered | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Requirement changed        | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Design decision made       | `design.md`                  |
-    | Scope changed              | `proposal.md`                |
-    | New work identified        | `tasks.md`                   |
-    | Assumption invalidated     | Relevant artifact              |
-
-   Example offers:
-   - "That's a design decision. Capture it in design.md?"
-   - "This is a new requirement. Add it to specs?"
-   - "This changes scope. Update the proposal?"
-
-4. **The user decides** - Offer and move on. Don't pressure. Don't auto-capture.
-
----
-
-## What You Don't Have To Do
-
-- Follow a script
-- Ask the same questions every time
-- Produce a specific artifact
-- Reach a conclusion
-- Stay on topic if a tangent is valuable
-- Be brief (this is thinking time)
-
----
-
-## Ending Discovery
-
-There's no required ending. Discovery might:
-
-- **Flow into a proposal**: "Ready to start? I can create a change proposal."
-- **Result in artifact updates**: "Updated design.md with these decisions"
-- **Just provide clarity**: User has what they need, moves on
-- **Continue later**: "We can pick this up anytime"
-
-When things crystallize, you might offer a summary - but it's optional. Sometimes the thinking IS the value.
-
----
-
-## Guardrails
-
-- **Don't implement** - Never write code or implement features. Creating OpenSpec artifacts is fine, writing application code is not.
-- **Don't fake understanding** - If something is unclear, dig deeper
-- **Don't rush** - Discovery is thinking time, not task time
-- **Don't force structure** - Let patterns emerge naturally
-- **Don't auto-capture** - Offer to save insights, don't just do it
-- **Do visualize** - A good diagram is worth many paragraphs
-- **Do explore the codebase** - Ground discussions in reality
-- **Do question assumptions** - Including the user's and your own
diff --git a/.github/prompts/opsx-propose.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/opsx-propose.prompt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 3e46bdb..0000000
--- a/.github/prompts/opsx-propose.prompt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,115 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step"
----
-
-Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
-
-I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
-- proposal.md (what & why)
-- `specs/<capability>/spec.md` (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)
-- design.md (how)
-- tasks.md (implementation steps)
-
-When ready to implement, run /opsx-apply
-
----
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: The argument after `/opsx-propose` is the change name (kebab-case), OR a description of what the user wants to build.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **If no input provided, ask what they want to build**
-
-   Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
-   > "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
-
-   From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → `add-user-auth`).
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
-2. **Create the change directory**
-   ```bash
-   openspec new change "<name>"
-   ```
-   This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with `.openspec.yaml`.
-
-3. **Get the artifact build order**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to get:
-   - `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., `["tasks"]`)
-   - `artifacts`: list of all artifacts, each with its `status` and its `requires` edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-4. **Create every artifact in the required set**
-
-   Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
-
-   Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
-
-   a. **For each artifact that is `ready` (dependencies satisfied)**:
-      - Get instructions:
-        ```bash
-        openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-        ```
-      - The instructions JSON includes:
-        - `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `template`: The structure to use for your output file
-        - `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
-        - `skipped`/`warning`: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
-        - `resolvedOutputPath`: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
-        - `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
-      - Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
-      - If the `instruction` field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at `resolvedOutputPath`
-      - Otherwise create the artifact file using `template` as the structure and write it to `resolvedOutputPath`. If `resolvedOutputPath` is a glob, follow `instruction` to choose the concrete file path
-      - Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
-      - Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"
-
-   b. **Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just `apply.requires`)**
-      - After creating each artifact, re-run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`
-      - The required set is `applyRequires` plus every artifact reachable from those by following the `requires` edges in `status --json` - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
-      - `status` is file-existence only, so an `applyRequires` artifact reading `done` does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing `tasks.md` early marks `tasks` done while `specs` was never written. Use each artifact's `requires` edges, not its `status`, to build the required set: a `done` artifact still lists what it depends on
-      - An artifact already reading `status: "skipped"` is satisfied: the change declares `skip_specs` in `.openspec.yaml`, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
-      - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
-      - Skip one only when `status` already reports it `skipped`, or when its own `instruction` says it is conditional: run `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` and skip only if its `instruction` field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's `design.md` qualifies; `specs` qualifies only via the `skipped` status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
-      - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still `blocked` only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
-      - Stop when every artifact in the required set is `done`, `skipped`, or was deliberately skipped
-
-   c. **If an artifact requires user input** (unclear context):
-      - Ask the user to clarify
-      - Then continue with creation
-
-5. **Show final status**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>"
-   ```
-
-**Output**
-
-After completing all artifacts, summarize:
-- Change name and location
-- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
-- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
-- Prompt: "Run `/opsx-apply` to start implementing."
-
-**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
-
-- Follow the `instruction` field from `openspec instructions` for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
-- If the `instruction` field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly
-- The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
-- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
-- Use `template` as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
-- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
-  - Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
-  - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in `apply.requires`
-- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
-- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
-- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
-- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
diff --git a/.github/prompts/opsx-sync.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/opsx-sync.prompt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 521328e..0000000
--- a/.github/prompts/opsx-sync.prompt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,215 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Sync delta specs from a change to main specs"
----
-
-Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
-
-This is an **agent-driven** operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx-sync` (e.g., `/opsx-sync add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show changes that have delta specs (under `specs/` directory).
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-sync <other>`).
-
-2. **Resolve change context**
-
-   Run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   The JSON includes `planningHome.root`. Main specs live under `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/` — use that (store-aware) root for every main-spec path below, not a hardcoded repo path. When a store is selected it points at the store, not the current repository.
-
-3. **Find delta specs**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from the status JSON as the
-   only source of delta spec paths. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, report that there are no delta specs to sync,
-   do not infer them from other artifacts, and stop without requesting artifact
-   instructions or writing a main spec.
-
-   Sync every path in `existingOutputPaths` unless the caller narrowed the set.
-   A caller narrows it by naming an explicit list of delta spec paths to sync —
-   archive does this inline, and a user can too ("only sync the billing delta").
-   Then sync only the named paths and leave the remaining delta specs untouched:
-   bulk archive excludes a delta whose implementation it could not find, and
-   syncing it anyway would write a main spec the caller deliberately withheld.
-   Carry that narrowed selection through step 4; never widen it back to the full
-   list. If a named path is not in `existingOutputPaths`, do not sync it —
-   report it and stop, rather than dropping it silently. If the named list is
-   empty, report that there is nothing to sync and stop without writing a main
-   spec.
-
-   Each delta spec file contains sections like:
-   - `## ADDED Requirements` - New requirements to add
-   - `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changes to existing requirements
-   - `## REMOVED Requirements` - Requirements to remove
-   - `## RENAMED Requirements` - Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
-
-   If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
-
-4. **For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs**
-
-   Before the first main-spec write, obtain one current specs-rule snapshot:
-   - If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from
-     `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json`, reuse it and do not
-     fetch the same instructions again.
-   - Otherwise run that command once now with the same selected-root flags.
-   - If the direct lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction
-     JSON, report the error and stop before writing any main spec. Do not treat the
-     failure as an absent rule set.
-   - A valid response with omitted `rules` means no artifact rules are configured
-     and the existing semantic merge continues.
-
-   Apply returned `rules` only to the content and form of the main specs produced
-   by this merge. Artifact rules are not operation guidance and cannot change
-   selected roots, delta paths, CLI checks, or workflow steps. Use their text as
-   constraints without copying it verbatim into a main spec or summary.
-
-   For each capability delta spec path selected in step 3 — the full `existingOutputPaths` list, or the narrowed subset when a caller supplied one (these may belong to a selected store, not the repo):
-
-   a. **Read the delta spec** to understand the intended changes
-
-   b. **Read the main spec** at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (may not exist yet)
-
-   c. **Apply changes intelligently**:
-
-      **ADDED Requirements:**
-      - If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
-      - If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
-
-      **MODIFIED Requirements:**
-      - Find the requirement in main spec
-      - Apply the changes - this can be:
-        - Adding new scenarios (don't need to copy existing ones)
-        - Modifying existing scenarios
-        - Changing the requirement description
-      - Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
-
-      **REMOVED Requirements:**
-      - Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
-
-      **RENAMED Requirements:**
-      - Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
-
-      **`## Purpose` in the delta:**
-      - The main spec already has one and it is authoritative - leave it alone
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does; it warns and moves on)
-
-   d. **Create new main spec** if capability doesn't exist yet:
-      - Create `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
-      - Add Purpose section: copy the delta's `## Purpose` body verbatim when it has one
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does); only write a brief TBD placeholder when it does not
-      - Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
-      - Follow the **Main Spec Format Reference** below
-
-5. **Show summary**
-
-   After applying all changes, summarize:
-   - Which capabilities were updated
-   - What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
-   - Any new main spec left with a TBD Purpose placeholder, so it gets written
-     now rather than lingering
-
-**Delta Spec Format Reference**
-
-```markdown
-## Purpose
-
-Only on a delta that introduces a brand-new capability. Seeds the new main spec.
-
-## ADDED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-
-## MODIFIED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Existing Feature
-#### Scenario: New scenario to add
-- **WHEN** user does A
-- **THEN** system does B
-
-## REMOVED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
-
-## RENAMED Requirements
-
-- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
-- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`
-```
-
-**Main Spec Format Reference**
-
-Main specs are what the delta merges INTO. They must never contain delta operation headers (`## ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED Requirements`) - after syncing, every requirement lives under a single `## Requirements` section:
-
-```markdown
-# <capability> Specification
-
-## Purpose
-Short description of what this capability does and why it exists.
-
-## Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-```
-
-**Key Principle: Intelligent Merging**
-
-Unlike programmatic merging, you can apply **partial updates**:
-- To add a scenario, just include that scenario under MODIFIED - don't copy existing scenarios
-- The delta represents *intent*, not a wholesale replacement
-- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Specs Synced: <change-name>
-
-Updated main specs:
-
-**<capability-1>**:
-- Added requirement: "New Feature"
-- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
-
-**<capability-2>**:
-- Created new spec file
-- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
-
-Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
-- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
-- Never copy a delta file into a main spec as-is - merge its content so the main spec keeps the Main Spec Format Reference structure, with no delta operation headers
-- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
-- Show what you're changing as you go
-- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result
-- Use only `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths`; never infer delta specs from unrelated artifacts
-- Honor a caller-supplied subset of `existingOutputPaths`; never widen it back to the full list
-- Fetch specs instructions once for direct sync, or reuse the archive-supplied snapshot inline
-- Stop before every main-spec write on a non-zero or invalid JSON specs-instruction response
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never copied into output files
diff --git a/.github/prompts/opsx-update.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/opsx-update.prompt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 6464ae7..0000000
--- a/.github/prompts/opsx-update.prompt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "Update a change - revise existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent (Experimental)"
----
-
-Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx-update` (e.g., `/opsx-update add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema (from `schema` field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
-   - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
-   - How recently it was modified (from `lastModified` field)
-
-   Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-update <other>`).
-
-2. **Get the change's artifacts**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `artifacts`: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
-   - `isComplete`: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-   The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
-
-   The files to edit are `artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths` - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. `specs/**/*.md`). Do NOT write to `resolvedOutputPath`: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
-
-3. **Understand the request**
-   - If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
-   - If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
-
-4. **Read and reconcile**
-   - Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
-   - Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
-   - Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
-   - Revise only files that already exist (`existingOutputPaths`). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to `/opsx-continue` to create them.
-   - If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
-
-5. **Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time**
-   - Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
-   - If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
-   - When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
-     ```bash
-     openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-     ```
-
-6. **Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)**
-   - Artifacts still missing -> suggest `/opsx-continue` to create them.
-   - Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest `/opsx-apply` to carry the delta into code.
-   - Everything done and implemented -> suggest `/opsx-archive`.
-
-**Output**
-
-After each invocation, show:
-- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
-- Anything deferred to `/opsx-continue` (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
-- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to `/opsx-apply`.
-- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by `openspec status`; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
-- Edit only the concrete files in `existingOutputPaths`; never write to a glob `resolvedOutputPath`.
-- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is `/opsx-continue`'s job.
-- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
-- If the request changes the change's *intent* rather than refining it, recommend starting fresh with `/opsx-new` (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic).
-- `/opsx-continue` and `/opsx-new` may not be installed (core profile). When suggesting one that is unavailable, point to the CLI instead: `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` shows the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` explains how to create it.
diff --git a/.github/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 79bac47..0000000
--- a/.github/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,185 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-apply-change
-description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-apply <other>`).
-
-2. **Check status to understand the schema**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints
-   - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
-3. **Get apply instructions**
-
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   This returns:
-   - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
-   - Progress (total, complete, remaining)
-   - Task list with status
-   - Dynamic instruction based on current state
-   - Optional `context`: current required project instruction input from the selected root
-   - Optional `operationGuidance`: current advisory guidance for apply
-
-   **Handle states:**
-   - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change (if it is not installed, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to see the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` for how to create it)
-   - If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive
-   - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
-
-   Treat `context` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
-   apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
-   Treat `operationGuidance` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
-   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
-   workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
-   progress, `contextFiles`, and the built-in `instruction`. They are not
-   evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
-   not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
-   instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
-   conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
-   conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
-   These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-4. **Read context files**
-
-   Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.
-   The files depend on the schema being used:
-   - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
-   - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
-
-   Do not copy `context` or `operationGuidance` verbatim into implementation
-   files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.
-
-5. **Show current progress**
-
-   Display:
-   - Schema being used
-   - Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - Remaining tasks overview
-   - Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
-6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
-
-   For each pending task:
-   - Show which task is being worked on
-   - Make the code changes required
-   - Keep changes minimal and focused
-   - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
-   - Continue to next task
-
-   **Pause if:**
-   - Task is unclear → ask for clarification
-   - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
-   - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
-   - User interrupts
-
-7. **On completion or pause, show status**
-
-   Display:
-   - Tasks completed this session
-   - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
-   - If all done: suggest archive
-   - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
-
-**Output During Implementation**
-
-```
-## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
-
-Working on task 3/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-
-Working on task 4/7: <task description>
-[...implementation happening...]
-✓ Task complete
-```
-
-**Output On Completion**
-
-```
-## Implementation Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
-
-### Completed This Session
-- [x] Task 1
-- [x] Task 2
-...
-
-All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.
-```
-
-**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**
-
-```
-## Implementation Paused
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
-
-### Issue Encountered
-<description of the issue>
-
-**Options:**
-1. <option 1>
-2. <option 2>
-3. Other approach
-
-What would you like to do?
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
-- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
-- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
-- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
-- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
-- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
-- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
-- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
-- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
-- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
-- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
-- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
-
-**Fluid Workflow Integration**
-
-This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
-
-- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
-- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
diff --git a/.github/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 32699d1..0000000
--- a/.github/skills/openspec-archive-change/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-archive-change
-description: Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show only active changes (not already archived).
-   Include the schema used for each change if available.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-archive <other>`).
-
-   **Load current archive inputs before the existing archive checks:**
-
-   After resolving the selected change and planning root, run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec instructions archive --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Keep the same selected-root flags on this command. This lookup is advisory and
-   optional: it only supplies extra prompt inputs, so it must never block archiving.
-   If it exits non-zero or returns invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that
-   does not support this command yet — continue the archive workflow with no
-   context and no operation guidance. Do not report an error and do not stop.
-
-   A successful response may omit both optional fields. Treat `context` as a
-   required prompt-level input: read and consider it, and apply relevant project
-   facts, conventions, and constraints. Treat `operationGuidance` as optional
-   additive advice: read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are
-   applicable and compatible with the built-in archive workflow.
-
-   Keep both fields separate from built-in steps, explicit user choices, resolved
-   paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one of those
-   controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If
-   guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not follow it
-   and explain why. Do not infer replacement paths, skipped prompts, or flags from
-   either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, change artifacts,
-   or archive summaries unless the user separately asks for it. These are
-   prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
-
-2. **Check artifact completion status**
-
-   Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion.
-
-   Parse the JSON to understand:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow being used
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context
-   - `artifacts`: List of artifacts with their status (`done`, `skipped`, or other)
-
-   **If any artifacts are neither `done` nor `skipped`** (skipped artifacts satisfy the requirement - the change declares skip_specs):
-   - Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
-   - Ask the user to confirm they want to proceed
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-3. **Check task completion status**
-
-   Read the tasks file (typically `tasks.md`) to check for incomplete tasks.
-
-   Count tasks marked with `- [ ]` (incomplete) vs `- [x]` (complete).
-
-   **If incomplete tasks found:**
-   - Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
-   - Ask the user to confirm they want to proceed
-   - Proceed if user confirms
-
-   **If no tasks file exists:** Proceed without task-related warning.
-
-4. **Assess delta spec sync state**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from status JSON as the only
-   delta-spec source. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, proceed without a sync prompt and do not infer
-   delta specs from other artifacts.
-
-   **If delta specs exist:**
-   - Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (use the store-aware `planningHome.root` from step 2, not a hardcoded repo path)
-   - Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
-   - Show a combined summary before prompting
-
-   **Prompt options:**
-   - If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
-   - If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
-
-   Route on the answer:
-   - "Cancel" — stop, do not archive
-   - "Archive without syncing" or "Archive now" — proceed to archive
-   - "Sync now" or "Sync anyway" — sync, then verify (below)
-   - Anything else — ask again rather than archiving
-
-   Before a selected sync writes any main spec, run
-   `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json` once with the same
-   selected-root flags. Require a zero exit status and valid artifact-instruction
-   JSON. If the lookup fails or returns invalid JSON, report the error and stop
-   before writing any main spec or moving the change. A valid response with omitted
-   `rules` is the no-rules case. Apply returned `rules` only to the content and
-   form of main specs produced by this merge; do not use them as archive guidance,
-   change CLI behavior, or copy the rule text into any output file.
-
-   Then run the `openspec-sync-specs` workflow inline (agent-driven intelligent merge) for change '<name>', passing the delta spec analysis and the fetched specs-rule snapshot from above, and wait for it to finish. The inline sync must reuse that snapshot without fetching `specs` instructions again. Do not delegate it to a background task — step 5 would move `changeRoot` out from under a sync that is still reading it, leaving the change archived and the main specs never updated. If your agent can only run it by delegation, delegate synchronously and wait for the result.
-
-   Then re-run the comparison from the top of this step against every capability that has a delta spec in `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` — not only the ones the sync reports it touched. A successful sync leaves nothing left to apply, so each capability must now read as already synced:
-   - ADDED requirements present
-   - MODIFIED requirements carrying the scenario and description changes named in the delta, with their other scenarios intact
-   - REMOVED requirements gone
-   - RENAMED requirements present under the new name and absent under the old one
-
-   If the sync failed, or any capability does not match, report what differs and stop — do not archive. Nothing has moved and `changeRoot` is intact, so the user can fix the mismatch or re-run the sync and start the archive again.
-
-5. **Perform the archive**
-
-   Create an `archive` directory under `planningHome.changesDir` if it doesn't exist:
-   ```bash
-   mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
-   ```
-
-   Generate the target name: use the change name as-is when it already starts with a `YYYY-MM-DD-` prefix; otherwise prepend the current date as `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>`. Never stack a second date (same rule as `openspec archive`).
-
-   **Check if target already exists:**
-   - If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
-   - If no: Move `changeRoot` to the archive directory
-
-   ```bash
-   mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/<target-name>"
-   ```
-
-6. **Display summary**
-
-   Show archive completion summary including:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema that was used
-   - Archive location
-   - Whether specs were synced (if applicable)
-   - Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Archive Complete
-
-**Change:** <change-name>
-**Schema:** <schema-name>
-**Archived to:** the archive path derived from `planningHome.changesDir`/<target-name>/
-**Specs:** <"✓ Synced to main specs" only if the step 4 verification passed; otherwise "No delta specs" or "Sync skipped">
-
-<"All artifacts complete. All tasks complete." — or, if archived with warnings, list them instead (e.g. "Archived with 2 incomplete tasks")>
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Announce the selected change; prompt for selection when it is ambiguous
-- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
-- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
-- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
-- Show clear summary of what happened
-- If sync is requested, run the `openspec-sync-specs` workflow inline (agent-driven)
-- Never archive while a spec sync is still in flight — run the sync inline and verify the main specs before moving `changeRoot`
-- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
-- Apply relevant runtime context and report conflicts; operation guidance remains advisory
-- Consider every guidance entry and explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
-- Existing CLI checks, resolved paths, prompts, and command contracts are unchanged
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never operation guidance
-- Never copy runtime context, operation guidance, or artifact-rule text verbatim into output files
diff --git a/.github/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 86afbd5..0000000
--- a/.github/skills/openspec-explore/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,296 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-explore
-description: Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
-
-**IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing.** You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
-
-**This is a stance, not a workflow.** There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
----
-
-## The Stance
-
-- **Curious, not prescriptive** - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
-- **Open threads, not interrogations** - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
-- **Visual** - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
-- **Adaptive** - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
-- **Patient** - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
-- **Grounded** - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
-
----
-
-## What You Might Do
-
-Depending on what the user brings, you might:
-
-**Explore the problem space**
-- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
-- Challenge assumptions
-- Reframe the problem
-- Find analogies
-
-**Investigate the codebase**
-- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
-- Find integration points
-- Identify patterns already in use
-- Surface hidden complexity
-
-**Compare options**
-- Brainstorm multiple approaches
-- Build comparison tables
-- Sketch tradeoffs
-- Recommend a path (if asked)
-
-**Visualize**
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│     Use ASCII diagrams liberally        │
-├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
-│                                         │
-│      ┌────────┐         ┌────────┐      │
-│      │ State  │────────▶│ State  │      │
-│      │   A    │         │   B    │      │
-│      └────────┘         └────────┘      │
-│                                         │
-│   System diagrams, state machines,      │
-│   data flows, architecture sketches,    │
-│   dependency graphs, comparison tables  │
-│                                         │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-**Surface risks and unknowns**
-- Identify what could go wrong
-- Find gaps in understanding
-- Suggest spikes or investigations
-
----
-
-## OpenSpec Awareness
-
-You have full context of the OpenSpec system. Use it naturally, don't force it.
-
-### Check for context
-
-At the start, quickly check what exists:
-```bash
-openspec list --json
-```
-
-This tells you:
-- If there are active changes
-- Their names, schemas, and status
-- What the user might be working on
-
-Then read the project's own context from the resolved root - `<root.path>/openspec/config.yaml` (or `config.yml`). Use the `root.path` returned above, and skip this if neither file exists:
-- `context`: project background - tech stack, conventions, constraints
-- `rules`: keyed by artifact id - the entries for an artifact apply only when you write that artifact
-
-Ground your thinking in these. They are constraints for you to follow, not content to reproduce: do NOT copy them into the conversation or into any artifact you create.
-
-### When no change exists
-
-Think freely. When insights crystallize, you might offer:
-
-- "This feels solid enough to start a change. Want me to create a proposal?"
-- Or keep exploring - no pressure to formalize
-
-### When a change exists
-
-If the user mentions a change or you detect one is relevant:
-
-1. **Resolve and read existing artifacts for context**
-   - Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`.
-   - Use `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext` from the status JSON.
-   - Read existing files from `artifactPaths.<artifact>.existingOutputPaths`.
-
-2. **Reference them naturally in conversation**
-   - "Your design mentions using Redis, but we just realized SQLite fits better..."
-   - "The proposal scopes this to premium users, but we're now thinking everyone..."
-
-3. **Offer to capture when decisions are made**
-
-    | Insight Type               | Where to Capture               |
-    |----------------------------|--------------------------------|
-    | New requirement discovered | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Requirement changed        | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
-    | Design decision made       | `design.md`                  |
-    | Scope changed              | `proposal.md`                |
-    | New work identified        | `tasks.md`                   |
-    | Assumption invalidated     | Relevant artifact              |
-
-   Example offers:
-   - "That's a design decision. Capture it in design.md?"
-   - "This is a new requirement. Add it to specs?"
-   - "This changes scope. Update the proposal?"
-
-4. **The user decides** - Offer and move on. Don't pressure. Don't auto-capture.
-
----
-
-## What You Don't Have To Do
-
-- Follow a script
-- Ask the same questions every time
-- Produce a specific artifact
-- Reach a conclusion
-- Stay on topic if a tangent is valuable
-- Be brief (this is thinking time)
-
----
-
-## Handling Different Entry Points
-
-**User brings a vague idea:**
-```
-User: I'm thinking about adding real-time collaboration
-
-You: Real-time collab is a big space. Let me think about this...
-
-      COLLABORATION SPECTRUM
-      ════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-      Awareness          Coordination         Sync
-          │                   │                 │
-          ▼                   ▼                 ▼
-      ┌────────┐         ┌────────┐        ┌────────┐
-      │Presence│         │Cursors │        │  CRDT  │
-      │  "3    │         │ Multi  │        │Conflict│
-      │online" │         │ select │        │  free  │
-      └────────┘         └────────┘        └────────┘
-          │                   │                 │
-       trivial            moderate           complex
-
-      Where's your head at?
-```
-
-**User brings a specific problem:**
-```
-User: The auth system is a mess
-
-You: [reads codebase]
-
-     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-     │              CURRENT AUTH FLOW              │
-     └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-                        │
-          ┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
-          ▼             ▼             ▼
-     ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐
-     │ Google  │  │  GitHub │  │  Email  │
-     │  OAuth  │  │  OAuth  │  │  Magic  │
-     └────┬────┘  └────┬────┘  └────┬────┘
-          │             │             │
-          └─────────────┼─────────────┘
-                        ▼
-                  ┌───────────┐
-                  │  Session  │
-                  └─────┬─────┘
-                        │
-                        ▼
-                  ┌───────────┐
-                  │   Perms   │
-                  └───────────┘
-
-     I see three tangles. Which one's burning?
-```
-
-**User is stuck mid-implementation:**
-```
-User: /opsx-explore add-auth-system
-      The OAuth integration is more complex than expected
-
-You: [reads change artifacts]
-
-     You're on task 4: "Implement OAuth flow"
-
-     Let me trace what's involved...
-
-     [draws diagram, explores options, suggests paths]
-
-     Want to update the design to reflect this?
-     Or add a spike task to investigate?
-```
-
-**User wants to compare options:**
-```
-User: Should we use Postgres or SQLite?
-
-You: Generic answer is boring. What's the context?
-
-User: A CLI tool that tracks local dev environments
-
-You: That changes everything.
-
-     ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-     │          CLI TOOL DATA STORAGE                  │
-     └─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
-     Key constraints:
-     • No daemon running
-     • Must work offline
-     • Single user
-
-                  SQLite          Postgres
-     Deployment   embedded ✓      needs server ✗
-     Offline      yes ✓           no ✗
-     Single file  yes ✓           no ✗
-
-     SQLite. Not even close.
-
-     Unless... is there a sync component?
-```
-
----
-
-## Ending Discovery
-
-There's no required ending. Discovery might:
-
-- **Flow into a proposal**: "Ready to start? I can create a change proposal."
-- **Result in artifact updates**: "Updated design.md with these decisions"
-- **Just provide clarity**: User has what they need, moves on
-- **Continue later**: "We can pick this up anytime"
-
-When it feels like things are crystallizing, you might summarize:
-
-```
-## What We Figured Out
-
-**The problem**: [crystallized understanding]
-
-**The approach**: [if one emerged]
-
-**Open questions**: [if any remain]
-
-**Next steps** (if ready):
-- Create a change proposal
-- Keep exploring: just keep talking
-```
-
-But this summary is optional. Sometimes the thinking IS the value.
-
----
-
-## Guardrails
-
-- **Don't implement** - Never write code or implement features. Creating OpenSpec artifacts is fine, writing application code is not.
-- **Don't fake understanding** - If something is unclear, dig deeper
-- **Don't rush** - Discovery is thinking time, not task time
-- **Don't force structure** - Let patterns emerge naturally
-- **Don't auto-capture** - Offer to save insights, don't just do it
-- **Do visualize** - A good diagram is worth many paragraphs
-- **Do explore the codebase** - Ground discussions in reality
-- **Do question assumptions** - Including the user's and your own
diff --git a/.github/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 244aa6e..0000000
--- a/.github/skills/openspec-propose/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,123 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-propose
-description: Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
-
-I'll create a change with the artifacts your schema defines. With the default spec-driven schema that is:
-- proposal.md (what & why)
-- `specs/<capability>/spec.md` (what the system must do - a delta, not the main spec)
-- design.md (how)
-- tasks.md (implementation steps)
-
-When ready to implement, run /opsx-apply
-
----
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build**
-
-   Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
-   > "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
-
-   From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → `add-user-auth`).
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
-2. **Create the change directory**
-   ```bash
-   openspec new change "<name>"
-   ```
-   This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI with `.openspec.yaml`.
-
-3. **Get the artifact build order**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to get:
-   - `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., `["tasks"]`)
-   - `artifacts`: list of all artifacts, each with its `status` and its `requires` edges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-4. **Create every artifact in the required set**
-
-   Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
-
-   Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
-
-   a. **For each artifact that is `ready` (dependencies satisfied)**:
-      - Get instructions:
-        ```bash
-        openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-        ```
-      - The instructions JSON includes:
-        - `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
-        - `template`: The structure to use for your output file
-        - `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
-        - `skipped`/`warning`: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifact
-        - `resolvedOutputPath`: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifact
-        - `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
-      - Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
-      - If the `instruction` field delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists at `resolvedOutputPath`
-      - Otherwise create the artifact file using `template` as the structure and write it to `resolvedOutputPath`. If `resolvedOutputPath` is a glob, follow `instruction` to choose the concrete file path
-      - Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
-      - Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"
-
-   b. **Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just `apply.requires`)**
-      - After creating each artifact, re-run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`
-      - The required set is `applyRequires` plus every artifact reachable from those by following the `requires` edges in `status --json` - walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone
-      - `status` is file-existence only, so an `applyRequires` artifact reading `done` does NOT mean its dependencies exist - writing `tasks.md` early marks `tasks` done while `specs` was never written. Use each artifact's `requires` edges, not its `status`, to build the required set: a `done` artifact still lists what it depends on
-      - An artifact already reading `status: "skipped"` is satisfied: the change declares `skip_specs` in `.openspec.yaml`, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one
-      - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
-      - Skip one only when `status` already reports it `skipped`, or when its own `instruction` says it is conditional: run `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` and skip only if its `instruction` field marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven's `design.md` qualifies; `specs` qualifies only via the `skipped` status above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it
-      - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still `blocked` only because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway
-      - Stop when every artifact in the required set is `done`, `skipped`, or was deliberately skipped
-
-   c. **If an artifact requires user input** (unclear context):
-      - Ask the user to clarify
-      - Then continue with creation
-
-5. **Show final status**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>"
-   ```
-
-**Output**
-
-After completing all artifacts, summarize:
-- Change name and location
-- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions, plus any conditional artifact you skipped and why
-- What's ready: "All artifacts needed for implementation are ready."
-- Prompt: "Run `/opsx-apply` or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."
-
-**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
-
-- Follow the `instruction` field from `openspec instructions` for each artifact type - it is the authoritative guidance, even for familiar artifact names
-- If the `instruction` field directs you to use a specific skill or command to create the artifact, invoke it instead of writing the artifact directly
-- The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
-- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
-- Use `template` as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
-- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
-  - Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
-  - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Create every artifact the apply phase transitively depends on, not just the ids listed in `apply.requires`
-- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one - re-read from disk, not from conversation memory (files may have changed since you last saw them)
-- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
-- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
-- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
diff --git a/.github/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 22ec9fd..0000000
--- a/.github/skills/openspec-sync-specs/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,223 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-sync-specs
-description: Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
-
-This is an **agent-driven** operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, show changes that have delta specs (under `specs/` directory).
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-sync <other>`).
-
-2. **Resolve change context**
-
-   Run:
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-
-   The JSON includes `planningHome.root`. Main specs live under `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/` — use that (store-aware) root for every main-spec path below, not a hardcoded repo path. When a store is selected it points at the store, not the current repository.
-
-3. **Find delta specs**
-
-   Use `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths` from the status JSON as the
-   only source of delta spec paths. If the `specs` entry is missing or
-   `existingOutputPaths` is empty, report that there are no delta specs to sync,
-   do not infer them from other artifacts, and stop without requesting artifact
-   instructions or writing a main spec.
-
-   Sync every path in `existingOutputPaths` unless the caller narrowed the set.
-   A caller narrows it by naming an explicit list of delta spec paths to sync —
-   archive does this inline, and a user can too ("only sync the billing delta").
-   Then sync only the named paths and leave the remaining delta specs untouched:
-   bulk archive excludes a delta whose implementation it could not find, and
-   syncing it anyway would write a main spec the caller deliberately withheld.
-   Carry that narrowed selection through step 4; never widen it back to the full
-   list. If a named path is not in `existingOutputPaths`, do not sync it —
-   report it and stop, rather than dropping it silently. If the named list is
-   empty, report that there is nothing to sync and stop without writing a main
-   spec.
-
-   Each delta spec file contains sections like:
-   - `## ADDED Requirements` - New requirements to add
-   - `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changes to existing requirements
-   - `## REMOVED Requirements` - Requirements to remove
-   - `## RENAMED Requirements` - Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
-
-   If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
-
-4. **For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs**
-
-   Before the first main-spec write, obtain one current specs-rule snapshot:
-   - If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from
-     `openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json`, reuse it and do not
-     fetch the same instructions again.
-   - Otherwise run that command once now with the same selected-root flags.
-   - If the direct lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction
-     JSON, report the error and stop before writing any main spec. Do not treat the
-     failure as an absent rule set.
-   - A valid response with omitted `rules` means no artifact rules are configured
-     and the existing semantic merge continues.
-
-   Apply returned `rules` only to the content and form of the main specs produced
-   by this merge. Artifact rules are not operation guidance and cannot change
-   selected roots, delta paths, CLI checks, or workflow steps. Use their text as
-   constraints without copying it verbatim into a main spec or summary.
-
-   For each capability delta spec path selected in step 3 — the full `existingOutputPaths` list, or the narrowed subset when a caller supplied one (these may belong to a selected store, not the repo):
-
-   a. **Read the delta spec** to understand the intended changes
-
-   b. **Read the main spec** at `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (may not exist yet)
-
-   c. **Apply changes intelligently**:
-
-      **ADDED Requirements:**
-      - If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
-      - If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
-
-      **MODIFIED Requirements:**
-      - Find the requirement in main spec
-      - Apply the changes - this can be:
-        - Adding new scenarios (don't need to copy existing ones)
-        - Modifying existing scenarios
-        - Changing the requirement description
-      - Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
-
-      **REMOVED Requirements:**
-      - Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
-
-      **RENAMED Requirements:**
-      - Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
-
-      **`## Purpose` in the delta:**
-      - The main spec already has one and it is authoritative - leave it alone
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does; it warns and moves on)
-
-   d. **Create new main spec** if capability doesn't exist yet:
-      - Create `<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
-      - Add Purpose section: copy the delta's `## Purpose` body verbatim when it has one
-        (this is what `openspec archive` does); only write a brief TBD placeholder when it does not
-      - Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
-      - Follow the **Main Spec Format Reference** below
-
-5. **Show summary**
-
-   After applying all changes, summarize:
-   - Which capabilities were updated
-   - What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
-   - Any new main spec left with a TBD Purpose placeholder, so it gets written
-     now rather than lingering
-
-**Delta Spec Format Reference**
-
-```markdown
-## Purpose
-
-Only on a delta that introduces a brand-new capability. Seeds the new main spec.
-
-## ADDED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-
-## MODIFIED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Existing Feature
-#### Scenario: New scenario to add
-- **WHEN** user does A
-- **THEN** system does B
-
-## REMOVED Requirements
-
-### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
-
-## RENAMED Requirements
-
-- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
-- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`
-```
-
-**Main Spec Format Reference**
-
-Main specs are what the delta merges INTO. They must never contain delta operation headers (`## ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED Requirements`) - after syncing, every requirement lives under a single `## Requirements` section:
-
-```markdown
-# <capability> Specification
-
-## Purpose
-Short description of what this capability does and why it exists.
-
-## Requirements
-
-### Requirement: New Feature
-The system SHALL do something new.
-
-#### Scenario: Basic case
-- **WHEN** user does X
-- **THEN** system does Y
-```
-
-**Key Principle: Intelligent Merging**
-
-Unlike programmatic merging, you can apply **partial updates**:
-- To add a scenario, just include that scenario under MODIFIED - don't copy existing scenarios
-- The delta represents *intent*, not a wholesale replacement
-- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-```markdown
-## Specs Synced: <change-name>
-
-Updated main specs:
-
-**<capability-1>**:
-- Added requirement: "New Feature"
-- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
-
-**<capability-2>**:
-- Created new spec file
-- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
-
-Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.
-```
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
-- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
-- Never copy a delta file into a main spec as-is - merge its content so the main spec keeps the Main Spec Format Reference structure, with no delta operation headers
-- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
-- Show what you're changing as you go
-- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result
-- Use only `artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths`; never infer delta specs from unrelated artifacts
-- Honor a caller-supplied subset of `existingOutputPaths`; never widen it back to the full list
-- Fetch specs instructions once for direct sync, or reuse the archive-supplied snapshot inline
-- Stop before every main-spec write on a non-zero or invalid JSON specs-instruction response
-- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never copied into output files
diff --git a/.github/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 3745bf1..0000000
--- a/.github/skills/openspec-update-change/SKILL.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
----
-name: openspec-update-change
-description: Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
-allowed-tools: Bash(openspec:*)
-license: MIT
-compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
-metadata:
-  author: openspec
-  version: "1.0"
-  generatedBy: "1.7.0"
----
-
-Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
-
-**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
-
-**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Select the change**
-
-   If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
-   - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
-   - Auto-select if only one active change exists
-   - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
-
-   When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
-   - Change name
-   - Schema (from `schema` field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
-   - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
-   - How recently it was modified (from `lastModified` field)
-
-   Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
-
-   Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx-update <other>`).
-
-2. **Get the change's artifacts**
-   ```bash
-   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
-   - `schemaName`: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
-   - `artifacts`: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
-   - `isComplete`: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
-   - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
-   The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
-
-   The files to edit are `artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths` - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. `specs/**/*.md`). Do NOT write to `resolvedOutputPath`: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
-
-3. **Understand the request**
-   - If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
-   - If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
-
-4. **Read and reconcile**
-   - Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
-   - Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
-   - Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
-   - Revise only files that already exist (`existingOutputPaths`). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to `/opsx-continue` to create them.
-   - If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
-
-5. **Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time**
-   - Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
-   - If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
-   - When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
-     ```bash
-     openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
-     ```
-
-6. **Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)**
-   - Artifacts still missing -> suggest `/opsx-continue` to create them.
-   - Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest `/opsx-apply` to carry the delta into code.
-   - Everything done and implemented -> suggest `/opsx-archive`.
-
-**Output**
-
-After each invocation, show:
-- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
-- Anything deferred to `/opsx-continue` (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
-- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to `/opsx-apply`.
-- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by `openspec status`; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
-- Edit only the concrete files in `existingOutputPaths`; never write to a glob `resolvedOutputPath`.
-- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is `/opsx-continue`'s job.
-- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
-- If the request changes the change's *intent* rather than refining it, recommend starting fresh with `/opsx-new` (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic).
-- `/opsx-continue` and `/opsx-new` may not be installed (core profile). When suggesting one that is unavailable, point to the CLI instead: `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` shows the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` explains how to create it.
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4711013
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-analyze"
+description: "Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/analyze.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before analysis)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_analyze` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Goal
+
+Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/speckit-tasks` has successfully produced a complete `tasks.md`.
+
+## Operating Constraints
+
+**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
+
+**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is **non-negotiable** within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside `/speckit-analyze`.
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
+
+Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireSpec -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
+
+- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
+- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
+- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
+
+Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command).
+For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
+
+Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
+
+**From spec.md:**
+
+- Overview/Context
+- Functional Requirements
+- Success Criteria (measurable outcomes — e.g., performance, security, availability, user success, business impact)
+- User Stories
+- Edge Cases (if present)
+
+**From plan.md:**
+
+- Architecture/stack choices
+- Data Model references
+- Phases
+- Technical constraints
+
+**From tasks.md:**
+
+- Task IDs
+- Descriptions
+- Phase grouping
+- Parallel markers [P]
+- Referenced file paths
+
+**From constitution:**
+
+- Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for principle validation
+
+### 3. Build Semantic Models
+
+Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
+
+- **Requirements inventory**: For each Functional Requirement (FR-###) and Success Criterion (SC-###), record a stable key. Use the explicit FR-/SC- identifier as the primary key when present, and optionally also derive an imperative-phrase slug for readability (e.g., "User can upload file" → `user-can-upload-file`). Include only Success Criteria items that require buildable work (e.g., load-testing infrastructure, security audit tooling), and exclude post-launch outcome metrics and business KPIs (e.g., "Reduce support tickets by 50%").
+- **User story/action inventory**: Discrete user actions with acceptance criteria
+- **Task coverage mapping**: Map each task to one or more requirements or stories (inference by keyword / explicit reference patterns like IDs or key phrases)
+- **Constitution rule set**: Extract principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
+
+### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
+
+Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
+
+#### A. Duplication Detection
+
+- Identify near-duplicate requirements
+- Mark lower-quality phrasing for consolidation
+
+#### B. Ambiguity Detection
+
+- Flag vague adjectives (fast, scalable, secure, intuitive, robust) lacking measurable criteria
+- Flag unresolved placeholders (TODO, TKTK, ???, `<placeholder>`, etc.)
+
+#### C. Underspecification
+
+- Requirements with verbs but missing object or measurable outcome
+- User stories missing acceptance criteria alignment
+- Tasks referencing files or components not defined in spec/plan
+
+#### D. Constitution Alignment
+
+- Any requirement or plan element conflicting with a MUST principle
+- Missing mandated sections or quality gates from constitution
+
+#### E. Coverage Gaps
+
+- Requirements with zero associated tasks
+- Tasks with no mapped requirement/story
+- Success Criteria requiring buildable work (performance, security, availability) not reflected in tasks
+
+#### F. Inconsistency
+
+- Terminology drift (same concept named differently across files)
+- Data entities referenced in plan but absent in spec (or vice versa)
+- Task ordering contradictions (e.g., integration tasks before foundational setup tasks without dependency note)
+- Conflicting requirements (e.g., one requires Next.js while other specifies Vue)
+
+### 5. Severity Assignment
+
+Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
+
+- **CRITICAL**: Violates constitution MUST, missing core spec artifact, or requirement with zero coverage that blocks baseline functionality
+- **HIGH**: Duplicate or conflicting requirement, ambiguous security/performance attribute, untestable acceptance criterion
+- **MEDIUM**: Terminology drift, missing non-functional task coverage, underspecified edge case
+- **LOW**: Style/wording improvements, minor redundancy not affecting execution order
+
+### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
+
+Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
+
+## Specification Analysis Report
+
+| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
+|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
+| A1 | Duplication | HIGH | spec.md:L120-134 | Two similar requirements ... | Merge phrasing; keep clearer version |
+
+(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by category initial.)
+
+**Coverage Summary Table:**
+
+| Requirement Key | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
+|-----------------|-----------|----------|-------|
+
+**Constitution Alignment Issues:** (if any)
+
+**Unmapped Tasks:** (if any)
+
+**Metrics:**
+
+- Total Requirements
+- Total Tasks
+- Coverage % (requirements with >=1 task)
+- Ambiguity Count
+- Duplication Count
+- Critical Issues Count
+
+### 7. Provide Next Actions
+
+At end of report, output a concise Next Actions block:
+
+- If CRITICAL issues exist: Recommend resolving before `/speckit-implement`
+- If only LOW/MEDIUM: User may proceed, but provide improvement suggestions
+- Provide explicit command suggestions: e.g., "Run /speckit-specify with refinement", "Run /speckit-plan to adjust architecture", "Manually edit tasks.md to add coverage for 'performance-metrics'"
+
+### 8. Offer Remediation
+
+Ask the user: "Would you like me to suggest concrete remediation edits for the top N issues?" (Do NOT apply them automatically.)
+
+### 9. Check for extension hooks
+
+After reporting, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_analyze` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Operating Principles
+
+### Context Efficiency
+
+- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings, not exhaustive documentation
+- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally; don't dump all content into analysis
+- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
+- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes should produce consistent IDs and counts
+
+### Analysis Guidelines
+
+- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
+- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
+- **Prioritize constitution violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
+- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances, not generic patterns)
+- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
+
+## Context
+
+$ARGUMENTS
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f5d7eae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,383 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-checklist"
+description: "Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/checklist.md"
+---
+
+
+## Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
+
+**CRITICAL CONCEPT**: Checklists are **UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING** - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
+
+**NOT for verification/testing**:
+
+- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
+- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
+- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
+- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
+
+**FOR requirements quality validation**:
+
+- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
+- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
+- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
+- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
+- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
+
+**Metaphor**: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
+
+**Ownership and checkbox lifecycle**:
+
+- Custom checklists generated by this command are reviewer-owned requirements-quality review artifacts.
+- `[x]` means the reviewer determined the requirements-quality criterion is satisfied.
+- `[x]` does NOT mean implementation work is complete.
+- This command generates or appends checklist items; it MUST NOT mark generated items `[x]`.
+- An agent may assist with evaluating items only when explicitly asked by the reviewer.
+- `checklists/requirements.md` is a separate built-in spec-quality checklist maintained by `/speckit-specify` and `/speckit-clarify`; do not treat that exception as applying to custom checklists generated here.
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before checklist generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_checklist` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Execution Steps.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -Template checklist-template` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR, AVAILABLE_DOCS list, and TEMPLATE_CONTENT.
+   - All file paths must be absolute.
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+
+3. **Clarify intent (dynamic)**: Derive up to THREE initial contextual clarifying questions (no pre-baked catalog). They MUST:
+   - Be generated from the user's phrasing + extracted signals from spec/plan/tasks
+   - Only ask about information that materially changes checklist content
+   - Be skipped individually if already unambiguous in `$ARGUMENTS`
+   - Prefer precision over breadth
+
+   Generation algorithm:
+   1. Extract signals: feature domain keywords (e.g., auth, latency, UX, API), risk indicators ("critical", "must", "compliance"), stakeholder hints ("QA", "review", "security team"), and explicit deliverables ("a11y", "rollback", "contracts").
+   2. Cluster signals into candidate focus areas (max 4) ranked by relevance.
+   3. Identify probable audience & timing (author, reviewer, QA, release) if not explicit.
+   4. Detect missing dimensions: scope breadth, depth/rigor, risk emphasis, exclusion boundaries, measurable acceptance criteria.
+   5. Formulate questions chosen from these archetypes:
+      - Scope refinement (e.g., "Should this include integration touchpoints with X and Y or stay limited to local module correctness?")
+      - Risk prioritization (e.g., "Which of these potential risk areas should receive mandatory gating checks?")
+      - Depth calibration (e.g., "Is this a lightweight pre-commit sanity list or a formal release gate?")
+      - Audience framing (e.g., "Will this be used by the author only or peers during PR review?")
+      - Boundary exclusion (e.g., "Should we explicitly exclude performance tuning items this round?")
+      - Scenario class gap (e.g., "No recovery flows detected—are rollback / partial failure paths in scope?")
+
+   Question formatting rules:
+   - If presenting options, generate a compact table with columns: Option | Candidate | Why It Matters
+   - Limit to A–E options maximum; omit table if a free-form answer is clearer
+   - Never ask the user to restate what they already said
+   - Avoid speculative categories (no hallucination). If uncertain, ask explicitly: "Confirm whether X belongs in scope."
+
+   Defaults when interaction impossible:
+   - Depth: Standard
+   - Audience: Reviewer (PR) if code-related; Author otherwise
+   - Focus: Top 2 relevance clusters
+
+   Output the questions (label Q1/Q2/Q3). After answers: if ≥2 scenario classes (Alternate / Exception / Recovery / Non-Functional domain) remain unclear, you MAY ask up to TWO more targeted follow‑ups (Q4/Q5) with a one-line justification each (e.g., "Unresolved recovery path risk"). Do not exceed five total questions. Skip escalation if user explicitly declines more.
+
+4. **Understand user request**: Combine `$ARGUMENTS` + clarifying answers:
+   - Derive checklist theme (e.g., security, review, deploy, ux)
+   - Consolidate explicit must-have items mentioned by user
+   - Map focus selections to category scaffolding
+   - Infer any missing context from spec/plan/tasks (do NOT hallucinate)
+
+5. **Load feature context**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - spec.md: Feature requirements and scope
+   - plan.md (if exists): Technical details, dependencies
+   - tasks.md (if exists): Implementation tasks
+
+   **Context Loading Strategy**:
+   - Load only necessary portions relevant to active focus areas (avoid full-file dumping)
+   - Prefer summarizing long sections into concise scenario/requirement bullets
+   - Use progressive disclosure: add follow-on retrieval only if gaps detected
+   - If source docs are large, generate interim summary items instead of embedding raw text
+
+6. **Generate checklist** - Use TEMPLATE_CONTENT as the structural template and create "Unit Tests for Requirements":
+   - Create `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/` directory if it doesn't exist
+   - Generate unique checklist filename:
+     - Use short, descriptive name based on domain (e.g., `ux.md`, `api.md`, `security.md`)
+     - Format: `[domain].md`
+   - File handling behavior:
+     - If file does NOT exist: Create new file and number items starting from CHK001
+     - If file exists: Append new items to existing file, continuing from the last CHK ID (e.g., if last item is CHK015, start new items at CHK016)
+   - Never delete or replace existing checklist content - always preserve and append
+   - Leave every newly generated item unchecked (`[ ]`); checkbox state belongs to the reviewer
+
+   **CORE PRINCIPLE - Test the Requirements, Not the Implementation**:
+   Every checklist item MUST evaluate the REQUIREMENTS THEMSELVES for:
+   - **Completeness**: Are all necessary requirements present?
+   - **Clarity**: Are requirements unambiguous and specific?
+   - **Consistency**: Do requirements align with each other?
+   - **Measurability**: Can requirements be objectively verified?
+   - **Coverage**: Are all scenarios/edge cases addressed?
+
+   **Category Structure** - Group items by requirement quality dimensions:
+   - **Requirement Completeness** (Are all necessary requirements documented?)
+   - **Requirement Clarity** (Are requirements specific and unambiguous?)
+   - **Requirement Consistency** (Do requirements align without conflicts?)
+   - **Acceptance Criteria Quality** (Are success criteria measurable?)
+   - **Scenario Coverage** (Are all flows/cases addressed?)
+   - **Edge Case Coverage** (Are boundary conditions defined?)
+   - **Non-Functional Requirements** (Performance, Security, Accessibility, etc. - are they specified?)
+   - **Dependencies & Assumptions** (Are they documented and validated?)
+   - **Ambiguities & Conflicts** (What needs clarification?)
+
+   **HOW TO WRITE CHECKLIST ITEMS - "Unit Tests for English"**:
+
+   ❌ **WRONG** (Testing implementation):
+   - "Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards"
+   - "Test hover states work on desktop"
+   - "Confirm logo click navigates home"
+
+   ✅ **CORRECT** (Testing requirements quality):
+   - "Are the exact number and layout of featured episodes specified?" [Completeness]
+   - "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" [Clarity]
+   - "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" [Consistency]
+   - "Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for all interactive UI?" [Coverage]
+   - "Is the fallback behavior specified when logo image fails to load?" [Edge Cases]
+   - "Are loading states defined for asynchronous episode data?" [Completeness]
+   - "Does the spec define visual hierarchy for competing UI elements?" [Clarity]
+
+   **ITEM STRUCTURE**:
+   Each item should follow this pattern:
+   - Question format asking about requirement quality
+   - Focus on what's WRITTEN (or not written) in the spec/plan
+   - Include quality dimension in brackets [Completeness/Clarity/Consistency/etc.]
+   - Reference spec section `[Spec §X.Y]` when checking existing requirements
+   - Use `[Gap]` marker when checking for missing requirements
+
+   **EXAMPLES BY QUALITY DIMENSION**:
+
+   Completeness:
+   - "Are error handling requirements defined for all API failure modes? [Gap]"
+   - "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Completeness]"
+   - "Are mobile breakpoint requirements defined for responsive layouts? [Gap]"
+
+   Clarity:
+   - "Is 'fast loading' quantified with specific timing thresholds? [Clarity, Spec §NFR-2]"
+   - "Are 'related episodes' selection criteria explicitly defined? [Clarity, Spec §FR-5]"
+   - "Is 'prominent' defined with measurable visual properties? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-4]"
+
+   Consistency:
+   - "Do navigation requirements align across all pages? [Consistency, Spec §FR-10]"
+   - "Are card component requirements consistent between landing and detail pages? [Consistency]"
+
+   Coverage:
+   - "Are requirements defined for zero-state scenarios (no episodes)? [Coverage, Edge Case]"
+   - "Are concurrent user interaction scenarios addressed? [Coverage, Gap]"
+   - "Are requirements specified for partial data loading failures? [Coverage, Exception Flow]"
+
+   Measurability:
+   - "Are visual hierarchy requirements measurable/testable? [Acceptance Criteria, Spec §FR-1]"
+   - "Can 'balanced visual weight' be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §FR-2]"
+
+   **Scenario Classification & Coverage** (Requirements Quality Focus):
+   - Check if requirements exist for: Primary, Alternate, Exception/Error, Recovery, Non-Functional scenarios
+   - For each scenario class, ask: "Are [scenario type] requirements complete, clear, and consistent?"
+   - If scenario class missing: "Are [scenario type] requirements intentionally excluded or missing? [Gap]"
+   - Include resilience/rollback when state mutation occurs: "Are rollback requirements defined for migration failures? [Gap]"
+
+   **Traceability Requirements**:
+   - MINIMUM: ≥80% of items MUST include at least one traceability reference
+   - Each item should reference: spec section `[Spec §X.Y]`, or use markers: `[Gap]`, `[Ambiguity]`, `[Conflict]`, `[Assumption]`
+   - If no ID system exists: "Is a requirement & acceptance criteria ID scheme established? [Traceability]"
+
+   **Surface & Resolve Issues** (Requirements Quality Problems):
+   Ask questions about the requirements themselves:
+   - Ambiguities: "Is the term 'fast' quantified with specific metrics? [Ambiguity, Spec §NFR-1]"
+   - Conflicts: "Do navigation requirements conflict between §FR-10 and §FR-10a? [Conflict]"
+   - Assumptions: "Is the assumption of 'always available podcast API' validated? [Assumption]"
+   - Dependencies: "Are external podcast API requirements documented? [Dependency, Gap]"
+   - Missing definitions: "Is 'visual hierarchy' defined with measurable criteria? [Gap]"
+
+   **Content Consolidation**:
+   - Soft cap: If raw candidate items > 40, prioritize by risk/impact
+   - Merge near-duplicates checking the same requirement aspect
+   - If >5 low-impact edge cases, create one item: "Are edge cases X, Y, Z addressed in requirements? [Coverage]"
+
+   **🚫 ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED** - These make it an implementation test, not a requirements test:
+   - ❌ Any item starting with "Verify", "Test", "Confirm", "Check" + implementation behavior
+   - ❌ References to code execution, user actions, system behavior
+   - ❌ "Displays correctly", "works properly", "functions as expected"
+   - ❌ "Click", "navigate", "render", "load", "execute"
+   - ❌ Test cases, test plans, QA procedures
+   - ❌ Implementation details (frameworks, APIs, algorithms)
+
+   **✅ REQUIRED PATTERNS** - These test requirements quality:
+   - ✅ "Are [requirement type] defined/specified/documented for [scenario]?"
+   - ✅ "Is [vague term] quantified/clarified with specific criteria?"
+   - ✅ "Are requirements consistent between [section A] and [section B]?"
+   - ✅ "Can [requirement] be objectively measured/verified?"
+   - ✅ "Are [edge cases/scenarios] addressed in requirements?"
+   - ✅ "Does the spec define [missing aspect]?"
+
+7. **Structure Reference**: Generate the checklist following the canonical template in `.specify/templates/checklist-template.md` for title, meta section, category headings, ownership note, notes section, and ID formatting. If template is unavailable, use: H1 title, purpose/created meta lines, an ownership note explaining that `[x]` means reviewer approval of requirements quality, `##` category sections containing `- [ ] CHK### <requirement item>` lines with globally incrementing IDs starting at CHK001, and notes that `/speckit-implement` reads checklist state but does not modify markers.
+
+8. **Report**: Output full path to checklist file, item count, and summarize whether the run created a new file or appended to an existing one. Summarize:
+   - Focus areas selected
+   - Depth level
+   - Actor/timing
+   - Any explicit user-specified must-have items incorporated
+
+**Important**: Each `/speckit-checklist` command invocation uses a short, descriptive checklist filename and either creates a new file or appends to an existing one. This allows:
+
+- Multiple checklists of different types (e.g., `ux.md`, `test.md`, `security.md`)
+- Simple, memorable filenames that indicate checklist purpose
+- Easy identification and navigation in the `checklists/` folder
+
+To avoid clutter, use descriptive types and clean up obsolete checklists when done.
+
+## Example Checklist Types & Sample Items
+
+**UX Requirements Quality:** `ux.md`
+
+Sample items (testing the requirements, NOT the implementation):
+
+- "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined with measurable criteria? [Clarity, Spec §FR-1]"
+- "Is the number and positioning of UI elements explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-1]"
+- "Are interaction state requirements (hover, focus, active) consistently defined? [Consistency]"
+- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Coverage, Gap]"
+- "Is fallback behavior defined when images fail to load? [Edge Case, Gap]"
+- "Can 'prominent display' be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-4]"
+
+**API Requirements Quality:** `api.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are error response formats specified for all failure scenarios? [Completeness]"
+- "Are rate limiting requirements quantified with specific thresholds? [Clarity]"
+- "Are authentication requirements consistent across all endpoints? [Consistency]"
+- "Are retry/timeout requirements defined for external dependencies? [Coverage, Gap]"
+- "Is versioning strategy documented in requirements? [Gap]"
+
+**Performance Requirements Quality:** `performance.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are performance requirements quantified with specific metrics? [Clarity]"
+- "Are performance targets defined for all critical user journeys? [Coverage]"
+- "Are performance requirements under different load conditions specified? [Completeness]"
+- "Can performance requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability]"
+- "Are degradation requirements defined for high-load scenarios? [Edge Case, Gap]"
+
+**Security Requirements Quality:** `security.md`
+
+Sample items:
+
+- "Are authentication requirements specified for all protected resources? [Coverage]"
+- "Are data protection requirements defined for sensitive information? [Completeness]"
+- "Is the threat model documented and requirements aligned to it? [Traceability]"
+- "Are security requirements consistent with compliance obligations? [Consistency]"
+- "Are security failure/breach response requirements defined? [Gap, Exception Flow]"
+
+## Anti-Examples: What NOT To Do
+
+**❌ WRONG - These test implementation, not requirements:**
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] CHK001 - Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards [Spec §FR-001]
+- [ ] CHK002 - Test hover states work correctly on desktop [Spec §FR-003]
+- [ ] CHK003 - Confirm logo click navigates to home page [Spec §FR-010]
+- [ ] CHK004 - Check that related episodes section shows 3-5 items [Spec §FR-005]
+```
+
+**✅ CORRECT - These test requirements quality:**
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] CHK001 - Are the number and layout of featured episodes explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001]
+- [ ] CHK002 - Are hover state requirements consistently defined for all interactive elements? [Consistency, Spec §FR-003]
+- [ ] CHK003 - Are navigation requirements clear for all clickable brand elements? [Clarity, Spec §FR-010]
+- [ ] CHK004 - Is the selection criteria for related episodes documented? [Gap, Spec §FR-005]
+- [ ] CHK005 - Are loading state requirements defined for asynchronous episode data? [Gap]
+- [ ] CHK006 - Can "visual hierarchy" requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-001]
+```
+
+**Key Differences:**
+
+- Wrong: Tests if the system works correctly
+- Correct: Tests if the requirements are written correctly
+- Wrong: Verification of behavior
+- Correct: Validation of requirement quality
+- Wrong: "Does it do X?"
+- Correct: "Is X clearly specified?"
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after checklist generation)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_checklist` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..df5f93d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-clarify"
+description: "Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/clarify.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before clarification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_clarify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly in the spec file.
+
+Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking `/speckit-plan`. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
+
+Execution steps:
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -PathsOnly` from repo root **once** (combined `--json --paths-only` mode / `-Json -PathsOnly`). Parse minimal JSON payload fields:
+   - `FEATURE_DIR`
+   - `FEATURE_SPEC`
+   - (Optionally capture `IMPL_PLAN`, `TASKS` for future chained flows.)
+   - If JSON parsing fails, abort and instruct user to re-run `/speckit-specify` or verify feature branch environment.
+   - For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+
+3. Load the current spec file. Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
+
+   Functional Scope & Behavior:
+   - Core user goals & success criteria
+   - Explicit out-of-scope declarations
+   - User roles / personas differentiation
+
+   Domain & Data Model:
+   - Entities, attributes, relationships
+   - Identity & uniqueness rules
+   - Lifecycle/state transitions
+   - Data volume / scale assumptions
+
+   Interaction & UX Flow:
+   - Critical user journeys / sequences
+   - Error/empty/loading states
+   - Accessibility or localization notes
+
+   Non-Functional Quality Attributes:
+   - Performance (latency, throughput targets)
+   - Scalability (horizontal/vertical, limits)
+   - Reliability & availability (uptime, recovery expectations)
+   - Observability (logging, metrics, tracing signals)
+   - Security & privacy (authN/Z, data protection, threat assumptions)
+   - Compliance / regulatory constraints (if any)
+
+   Integration & External Dependencies:
+   - External services/APIs and failure modes
+   - Data import/export formats
+   - Protocol/versioning assumptions
+
+   Edge Cases & Failure Handling:
+   - Negative scenarios
+   - Rate limiting / throttling
+   - Conflict resolution (e.g., concurrent edits)
+
+   Constraints & Tradeoffs:
+   - Technical constraints (language, storage, hosting)
+   - Explicit tradeoffs or rejected alternatives
+
+   Terminology & Consistency:
+   - Canonical glossary terms
+   - Avoided synonyms / deprecated terms
+
+   Completion Signals:
+   - Acceptance criteria testability
+   - Measurable Definition of Done style indicators
+
+   Misc / Placeholders:
+   - TODO markers / unresolved decisions
+   - Ambiguous adjectives ("robust", "intuitive") lacking quantification
+
+   For each category with Partial or Missing status, add a candidate question opportunity unless:
+   - Clarification would not materially change implementation or validation strategy
+   - Information is better deferred to planning phase (note internally)
+
+4. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
+    - Maximum of 5 total questions across the whole session.
+    - Each question must be answerable with EITHER:
+       - A short multiple‑choice selection (2–5 distinct, mutually exclusive options), OR
+       - A one-word / short‑phrase answer (explicitly constrain: "Answer in <=5 words").
+    - Only include questions whose answers materially impact architecture, data modeling, task decomposition, test design, UX behavior, operational readiness, or compliance validation.
+    - Ensure category coverage balance: attempt to cover the highest impact unresolved categories first; avoid asking two low-impact questions when a single high-impact area (e.g., security posture) is unresolved.
+    - Exclude questions already answered, trivial stylistic preferences, or plan-level execution details (unless blocking correctness).
+    - Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk or prevent misaligned acceptance tests.
+    - If more than 5 categories remain unresolved, select the top 5 by (Impact * Uncertainty) heuristic.
+
+5. Sequential questioning loop (interactive):
+    - Present EXACTLY ONE question at a time.
+    - **Question writing quality (applies to every question, MC or short-answer):**
+       - Lead with `**Question:**` followed by a full interrogative that ends with `?`. The question text before the `?` must make sense on its own.
+       - NEVER use a topic label, section heading, or requirement id as the question itself. For example, `Acceptance device/runtime matrix (FR-023)` is INVALID — it is a label, not a question.
+       - After the `?`, the only permitted suffix is an optional parenthesized requirement/question id. Exact format: `**Question:** <interrogative>?` or `**Question:** <interrogative>? (FR-023)`. Never put the id before the `?`, and never use the id (alone or with a topic label) as the whole prompt.
+       - Immediately after the question line, add one plain-language "Why it matters" sentence (the stake for acceptance or shipping) before the recommendation/options.
+       - Use everyday wording; introduce jargon only if defined in the same sentence. Self-check: a reader who does not know Spec Kit must be able to answer from the Question line alone. Terse is fine; cryptic labels are not.
+    - For multiple‑choice questions:
+       - **Analyze all options** and determine the **most suitable option** based on:
+          - Best practices for the project type
+          - Common patterns in similar implementations
+          - Risk reduction (security, performance, maintainability)
+          - Alignment with any explicit project goals or constraints visible in the spec
+       - Present your **recommended option prominently** at the top with clear reasoning (1-2 sentences explaining why this is the best choice).
+       - Format as: `**Recommended:** Option [X] - <reasoning>`
+       - Then render all options as a Markdown table:
+
+       | Option | Description |
+       |--------|-------------|
+       | A | <Option A description> |
+       | B | <Option B description> |
+       | C | <Option C description> (add D/E as needed up to 5) |
+       | Short | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words) (Include only if free-form alternative is appropriate) |
+
+       - After the table, add: `You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.`
+    - For short‑answer style (no meaningful discrete options):
+       - Provide your **suggested answer** based on best practices and context.
+       - Format as: `**Suggested:** <your proposed answer> - <brief reasoning>`
+       - Then output: `Format: Short answer (<=5 words). You can accept the suggestion by saying "yes" or "suggested", or provide your own answer.`
+    - After the user answers:
+       - If the user replies with "yes", "recommended", or "suggested", use your previously stated recommendation/suggestion as the answer.
+       - Otherwise, validate the answer maps to one option or fits the <=5 word constraint.
+       - If ambiguous, ask for a quick disambiguation (count still belongs to same question; do not advance).
+       - Once satisfactory, record it in working memory (do not yet write to disk) and move to the next queued question.
+    - Stop asking further questions when:
+       - All critical ambiguities resolved early (remaining queued items become unnecessary), OR
+       - User signals completion ("done", "good", "no more"), OR
+       - You reach 5 asked questions.
+    - Never reveal future queued questions in advance.
+    - If no valid questions exist at start, immediately report no critical ambiguities.
+
+6. Integration after EACH accepted answer (incremental update approach):
+    - Maintain in-memory representation of the spec (loaded once at start) plus the raw file contents.
+    - For the first integrated answer in this session:
+       - Ensure a `## Clarifications` section exists (create it just after the highest-level contextual/overview section per the spec template if missing).
+       - Under it, create (if not present) a `### Session YYYY-MM-DD` subheading for today.
+    - Append a bullet line immediately after acceptance: `- Q: <question> → A: <final answer>`.
+    - Then immediately apply the clarification to the most appropriate section(s):
+       - Functional ambiguity → Update or add a bullet in Functional Requirements.
+       - User interaction / actor distinction → Update User Stories or Actors subsection (if present) with clarified role, constraint, or scenario.
+       - Data shape / entities → Update Data Model (add fields, types, relationships) preserving ordering; note added constraints succinctly.
+       - Non-functional constraint → Add/modify measurable criteria in Success Criteria > Measurable Outcomes (convert vague adjective to metric or explicit target).
+       - Edge case / negative flow → Add a new bullet under Edge Cases / Error Handling (or create such subsection if template provides placeholder for it).
+       - Terminology conflict → Normalize term across spec; retain original only if necessary by adding `(formerly referred to as "X")` once.
+    - If the clarification invalidates an earlier ambiguous statement, replace that statement instead of duplicating; leave no obsolete contradictory text.
+    - Save the spec file AFTER each integration to minimize risk of context loss (atomic overwrite).
+    - Preserve formatting: do not reorder unrelated sections; keep heading hierarchy intact.
+    - Keep each inserted clarification minimal and testable (avoid narrative drift).
+
+7. Validation (performed after EACH write plus final pass):
+   - Clarifications session contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer (no duplicates).
+   - Total asked (accepted) questions ≤ 5.
+   - Updated sections contain no lingering vague placeholders the new answer was meant to resolve.
+   - No contradictory earlier statement remains (scan for now-invalid alternative choices removed).
+   - Markdown structure valid; only allowed new headings: `## Clarifications`, `### Session YYYY-MM-DD`.
+   - Terminology consistency: same canonical term used across all updated sections.
+
+8. Write the updated spec back to `FEATURE_SPEC`.
+
+9. **Re-validate Spec Quality Checklist** (if it exists):
+   - Check if `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` exists.
+   - If it does NOT exist, skip this step silently.
+   - If it exists:
+     1. Read the checklist file.
+     2. Identify all GitHub task-list checkbox lines — lines matching `- [ ]`, `- [x]`, or `- [X]` (case-insensitive, tolerant of leading whitespace for nested items) outside of code fences. Ignore all other content (headings, notes, non-checkbox bullets, metadata).
+     3. For each checkbox line, record its current marker state (checked or unchecked) and item text into a before-snapshot list.
+     4. Re-evaluate each checkbox item against the **updated** spec (the version just saved in step 7).
+     5. For each checkbox item, update only if the checked/unchecked state actually changes:
+        - If the item now passes and was unchecked: change `[ ]` to `[x]`.
+        - If the item now fails and was checked: change `[x]`/`[X]` to `[ ]`.
+        - If the state is unchanged: leave the marker as-is (preserve existing case to avoid cosmetic diffs).
+     6. Save the updated checklist file. **Only toggle the `[ ]`/`[x]` marker portion of checkbox lines whose state changed.** All other file content — headings, metadata, notes, line ordering, whitespace — must remain unchanged to avoid noisy diffs.
+     7. Compare the before-snapshot with the current state to compute three lists for the Completion Report:
+        - **Newly passing**: items that changed from unchecked to checked.
+        - **Regressions**: items that changed from checked to unchecked.
+        - **Still unchecked**: items that remain unchecked.
+     8. Record the before/after pass counts as checked/total checkbox items (e.g., "12/16 → 15/16 items passing").
+
+Behavior rules:
+
+- If no meaningful ambiguities found (or all potential questions would be low-impact), respond: "No critical ambiguities detected worth formal clarification." and suggest proceeding.
+- If spec file missing, instruct user to run `/speckit-specify` first (do not create a new spec here).
+- Never exceed 5 total asked questions (clarification retries for a single question do not count as new questions).
+- Avoid speculative tech stack questions unless the absence blocks functional clarity.
+- Respect user early termination signals ("stop", "done", "proceed").
+- If no questions asked due to full coverage, output a compact coverage summary (all categories Clear) then suggest advancing.
+- If quota reached with unresolved high-impact categories remaining, explicitly flag them under Deferred with rationale.
+
+Context for prioritization: $ARGUMENTS
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_clarify`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_clarify` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Report completion (after questioning loop ends or early termination):
+- Number of questions asked & answered.
+- Path to updated spec.
+- Sections touched (list names).
+- Spec quality checklist status (if `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` was re-validated): show before/after pass counts (e.g., "Spec Quality Checklist: 12/16 → 15/16 items passing") and list any items that changed state — both newly checked (unchecked → checked) and any regressions (checked → unchecked). If any items remain unchecked, list them as areas needing attention.
+- Coverage summary table listing each taxonomy category with Status: Resolved (was Partial/Missing and addressed), Deferred (exceeds question quota or better suited for planning), Clear (already sufficient), Outstanding (still Partial/Missing but low impact).
+- If any Outstanding or Deferred remain, recommend whether to proceed to `/speckit-plan` or run `/speckit-clarify` again later post-plan.
+- Suggested next command.
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] Spec ambiguities identified and clarifications integrated into spec file
+- [ ] Spec quality checklist re-validated against updated spec (if `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` exists)
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with questions answered, sections touched, checklist status, and coverage summary
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c6cfa4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-constitution"
+description: "Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/constitution.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Scope Guard
+
+This command's own work is limited to updating the project constitution itself. Dependent templates
+and commands read the constitution at runtime and are not modified here.
+
+- Classify every part of the user input as either constitution content or a separate,
+  non-governance intent.
+- If the input includes feature implementation, code generation, refactoring, building, or
+  deployment requests, you **MUST NOT** execute them. Extract them as deferred intents instead.
+- You **MUST NOT** create, modify, or delete application source files, feature routes,
+  components, tests, deployment files, or other artifacts unrelated to the constitution
+  workflow.
+- If it is unclear whether an instruction is constitution content, ask for clarification before
+  making changes.
+- After completing the constitution update, include a `Next Actions` section for each deferred
+  intent. List the original intent and suggest the appropriate follow-up Spec Kit command, such
+  as `/speckit-specify`, without invoking it.
+- If there are no non-governance intents, omit the `Next Actions` section.
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before constitution update)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_constitution` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. The active
+constitution scaffold is resolved at command time from `constitution-template` through the Spec Kit
+preset/template resolution stack.
+
+Follow this execution flow:
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1 constitution-template -Json` from the repository root and parse `TEMPLATE_CONTENT` as the active template.
+   - The shared resolver applies project overrides, composing preset layers, and extension layers
+     before the core template fallback. It MUST succeed before continuing.
+   - If it fails, stop and report the resolution error; do not continue with only one contributing
+     template layer.
+   - If `.specify/memory/constitution.md` exists, load it as the source of current project-specific
+     values and amendments. Preserve information that is still applicable when applying the newly
+     resolved scaffold.
+   - If it does not exist, use the resolved template as the initial document.
+   - Do not write back to any versioned template layer.
+   - Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
+   **IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
+
+2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
+   - If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
+   - Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
+   - For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
+   - `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
+     - MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
+     - MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
+     - PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
+   - If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
+
+3. Draft the updated constitution content using the resolved template as the required structure:
+   - Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
+   - Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
+   - Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing non‑negotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
+   - Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
+
+4. Produce a Sync Impact Report as an HTML comment at the top of the constitution file after update.
+   This report is temporary scratch material for human review of the amendment, not governance
+   content; it is expected to be removed before the amended constitution file is committed.
+   - Version change: old → new
+   - List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
+   - Added sections
+   - Removed sections
+   - Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
+
+5. Validation before final output:
+   - No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
+   - Version line matches report.
+   - Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
+   - Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
+
+6. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
+
+7. Output a final summary to the user with:
+   - New version and bump rationale.
+   - Any TODO placeholders or deferred items requiring manual follow-up.
+   - Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
+   - A `Next Actions` section for any deferred non-governance intents.
+
+Formatting & Style Requirements:
+
+- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
+- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
+- Keep a single blank line between sections.
+- Avoid trailing whitespace.
+
+If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
+
+If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
+
+Write only `.specify/memory/constitution.md`; do not create or modify template source files.
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after constitution update)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_constitution` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c643cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-converge"
+description: "Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/converge.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before convergence)**:
+
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_converge` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Goal
+
+Close the gap between what a feature's specification, plan, and tasks call for and what the
+codebase currently implements. Read `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` as the **sole
+source of intent** (with the constitution as governing constraints), assess the current
+state of the code, determine which requirements, acceptance criteria, plan decisions, and
+existing tasks are unmet, incomplete, or only partially satisfied, and **append each piece
+of remaining work as a new, traceable task** at the bottom of `tasks.md` so that
+`/speckit-implement` can complete it. This command MUST run only after
+`/speckit-implement` has run on the current `tasks.md`, and after `/speckit-tasks` has produced a complete `tasks.md`.
+
+This is **not** a diff tool and does **not** track changes. It assesses the present state
+of the code relative to the feature's artifacts — no git, no branch comparison, no history.
+
+## Operating Constraints
+
+**APPEND-ONLY, NEVER REWRITE**: The command's **only** write is appending a new
+`## Phase N: Convergence` section to `tasks.md`. It MUST NOT:
+
+- modify `spec.md` or `plan.md` in any way;
+- rewrite, renumber, reorder, or delete any existing task (including tasks from a prior
+  Convergence phase);
+- modify, create, or delete any application code — completing the appended tasks is the
+  job of `/speckit-implement`.
+
+When the codebase already satisfies everything, the command MUST leave `tasks.md`
+**byte-for-byte unchanged** (no empty Convergence header) and report a clean result.
+
+**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is
+**non-negotiable**. Code that violates a MUST principle is the highest-severity finding and
+produces a corresponding remediation task. If the constitution is an unfilled template,
+skip constitution checks gracefully rather than failing.
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### 1. Initialize Convergence Context
+
+Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireSpec -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
+
+- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
+- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
+- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
+- CONSTITUTION = `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (if present)
+If `spec.md`, `plan.md`, or `tasks.md` is missing, STOP with a clear, actionable message naming the
+prerequisite command to run (`/speckit-specify` for a missing spec, `/speckit-plan` for a missing plan,
+`/speckit-tasks` for missing tasks). Do not produce partial output.
+For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
+
+Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
+
+**From spec.md:**
+
+- Functional Requirements (FR-###)
+- Success Criteria (SC-###) — include only items requiring buildable work; exclude
+  post-launch outcome metrics and business KPIs
+- User Stories and their Acceptance Scenarios
+- Edge Cases (if present)
+
+**From plan.md:**
+
+- Architecture/stack choices and technical decisions
+- Data Model references
+- Phases and named touch-points (files/components the plan says will be created or edited)
+- Technical constraints
+
+**From tasks.md:**
+
+- Task IDs (to compute the next ID and next phase number)
+- Descriptions, phase grouping, and referenced file paths
+
+**From constitution (if not an unfilled template):**
+
+- Principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
+
+### 3. Build the Intent Inventory
+
+Create an internal model (do not echo raw artifacts):
+
+- **Requirements inventory**: one stable key per FR-### / SC-### / user-story acceptance
+  scenario (e.g. `US1/AC2`), plus the plan decisions and constitution principles that
+  impose buildable obligations.
+- **Code-scope map**: from the file paths named in `plan.md` and `tasks.md`, plus a keyword
+  search for the concepts each requirement describes, derive the set of source files and
+  components in scope for assessment. Bound the assessment to these — do **not** infer
+  scope beyond what the artifacts define.
+
+### 4. Assess the Codebase and Classify Findings
+
+For each item in the intent inventory, inspect the current code in scope and produce a
+`Finding` only where there is a gap. Classify every finding by **gap type**:
+
+- **`missing`**: the required work is absent from the code entirely.
+- **`partial`**: the work exists but does not yet fully satisfy the requirement /
+  acceptance criterion / plan decision.
+- **`contradicts`**: the code does something that conflicts with stated intent or a
+  constitution MUST principle.
+- **`unrequested`**: the code contains work not called for by the spec, plan, or tasks
+  (surfaced for awareness — converge does **not** delete code, it only appends a task to
+  review/justify or remove it).
+
+Each `Finding` records: a stable id, the `source-ref` it traces to, the `gap-type`, a
+severity, and a short human-readable description with the evidence (the file/area observed).
+
+**Edge cases:**
+
+- **Little or no code yet**: treat the entire specified scope as `missing` remaining work
+  rather than failing.
+- **Nothing remains**: produce zero findings and follow the converged branch in Step 7.
+
+### 5. Assign Severity
+
+- **CRITICAL**: violates a constitution MUST principle, or a `missing`/`contradicts` gap
+  that blocks baseline functionality of a P1 user story.
+- **HIGH**: a `missing` or `partial` gap on a core functional requirement or acceptance
+  criterion.
+- **MEDIUM**: a `partial` gap on a secondary requirement, or an `unrequested` addition with
+  unclear justification.
+- **LOW**: minor partial gaps, polish, or low-risk `unrequested` additions.
+
+### 6. Present the In-Session Findings Summary
+
+Before appending anything, output a compact, severity-graded summary (no file writes yet):
+
+## Convergence Findings
+
+| ID | Gap Type | Severity | Source | Evidence | Remaining Work |
+|----|----------|----------|--------|----------|----------------|
+| F1 | missing  | HIGH     | FR-008 | Example: no append-only guard detected in path/to/module.py when writing tasks.md | Add append-only enforcement |
+
+**Summary metrics:**
+
+- Requirements / acceptance criteria checked
+- Plan decisions checked
+- Constitution principles checked (or "skipped — template")
+- Findings by gap type (missing / partial / contradicts / unrequested)
+- Findings by severity
+
+### 7. Append Convergence Tasks (or report converged)
+
+**If there are one or more actionable findings** (`tasks_appended` outcome):
+
+Append to the **end** of `tasks.md`, per the append contract:
+
+1. Scan all existing task IDs; let `M` be the maximum. Determine the next phase number `N`
+   (highest existing phase + 1).
+2. Write a single new section header `## Phase N: Convergence`.
+3. Emit one checklist item per actionable finding, ordered CRITICAL/HIGH first, assigning
+   zero-padded IDs `T{M+1:03d}, T{M+2:03d}, …`:
+
+   ```markdown
+   - [ ] T042 <imperative description> per <source-ref> (<gap-type>)
+   ```
+
+   `<source-ref>` traces the task to its origin: e.g. `FR-003`, `SC-002`,
+   `US1/AC2`, `plan: storage decision`, `Constitution II`.
+
+   `<gap-type>` is one of `missing`, `partial`, `contradicts`, `unrequested`.
+
+   Constitution-violation tasks MUST be emitted first and described as
+   `CRITICAL`.
+4. Never reuse or renumber existing IDs. If a prior Convergence phase exists, add a new,
+   separately-numbered one below it — do not touch the old one.
+
+**If there are no actionable findings** (`converged` outcome):
+
+- Do **not** modify `tasks.md` at all — no empty phase header.
+- Report: **"✅ Converged — the implementation satisfies the spec, plan, and tasks."**
+- Include the summary counts of what was checked.
+
+### 8. Provide Next Actions (Handoff)
+
+- On `tasks_appended`: state how many tasks were appended under which phase, and recommend
+  running `/speckit-implement` to complete them; note that a follow-up converge
+  run will find fewer or no remaining items.
+- On `converged`: recommend proceeding to review / opening a PR. No further implement pass
+  is needed for this feature's specified scope.
+
+### 9. Check for extension hooks
+
+After producing the result, check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_converge` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- Report the convergence outcome (`converged` or `tasks_appended`) in-session before listing
+  any hooks, so users can decide whether to run optional follow-up commands.
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+
+    ```text
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5331174
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-implement"
+description: "Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md"
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/implement.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before implementation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_implement` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Check checklists status** (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
+   - Treat checklist markers as a read-only gate: scan checkbox state, report status, and ask before proceeding when needed; do NOT modify checklist files or markers
+   - `checklists/requirements.md` is the built-in spec-quality checklist maintained by `/speckit-specify` and `/speckit-clarify`; custom checklists generated by `/speckit-checklist` are reviewer-owned requirements-quality review artifacts
+   - For custom checklists, `[x]` means the reviewer determined the requirements-quality criterion is satisfied; it does NOT mean implementation work is complete
+   - Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
+   - For each checklist, count:
+     - Total items: All lines matching `- [ ]` or `- [X]` or `- [x]`
+     - Checked items: Lines matching `- [X]` or `- [x]`
+     - Unchecked items: Lines matching `- [ ]`
+   - Create a status table:
+
+     ```text
+     | Checklist | Total | Checked | Unchecked | Status |
+     |-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
+     | ux.md     | 12    | 12      | 0         | ✓ PASS |
+     | test.md   | 8     | 5       | 3         | ✗ FAIL |
+     | security.md | 6   | 6       | 0         | ✓ PASS |
+     ```
+
+   - Calculate overall status:
+     - **PASS**: All checklists have 0 unchecked items
+     - **FAIL**: One or more checklists have unchecked items
+
+   - **If any checklist has unchecked items**:
+     - Display the table with unchecked item counts
+     - **STOP** and ask: "Some checklists have unchecked items. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
+     - Wait for user response before continuing
+     - If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
+     - If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
+
+   - **If all checklists are checked**:
+     - Display the table showing all checklists passed
+     - Automatically proceed to step 3
+
+3. Load and analyze the implementation context:
+   - **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
+   - **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read .specify/memory/constitution.md for governance constraints
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
+
+4. **Project Setup Verification**:
+   - **REQUIRED**: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:
+
+   **Detection & Creation Logic**:
+   - Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):
+
+     ```sh
+     git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null
+     ```
+
+   - Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore
+   - Check if .eslintrc* exists → create/verify .eslintignore
+   - Check if eslint.config.* exists → ensure the config's `ignores` entries cover required patterns
+   - Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore
+   - Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)
+   - Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore
+   - Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore
+
+   **If ignore file already exists**: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only
+   **If ignore file missing**: Create with full pattern set for detected technology
+
+   **Common Patterns by Technology** (from plan.md tech stack):
+   - **Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Python**: `__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`, `.venv/`, `venv/`, `dist/`, `*.egg-info/`
+   - **Java**: `target/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `.gradle/`, `build/`
+   - **C#/.NET**: `bin/`, `obj/`, `*.user`, `*.suo`, `packages/`
+   - **Go**: `*.exe`, `*.test`, `vendor/`, `*.out`
+   - **Ruby**: `.bundle/`, `log/`, `tmp/`, `*.gem`, `vendor/bundle/`
+   - **PHP**: `vendor/`, `*.log`, `*.cache`, `*.env`
+   - **Rust**: `target/`, `debug/`, `release/`, `*.rs.bk`, `*.rlib`, `*.prof*`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Kotlin**: `build/`, `out/`, `.gradle/`, `.idea/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `*.iml`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **C++**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.so`, `*.a`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **C**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.a`, `*.so`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `autom4te.cache/`, `config.status`, `config.log`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
+   - **Swift**: `.build/`, `DerivedData/`, `*.swiftpm/`, `Packages/`
+   - **R**: `.Rproj.user/`, `.Rhistory`, `.RData`, `.Ruserdata`, `*.Rproj`, `packrat/`, `renv/`
+   - **Universal**: `.DS_Store`, `Thumbs.db`, `*.tmp`, `*.swp`, `.vscode/`, `.idea/`
+
+   **Tool-Specific Patterns**:
+   - **Docker**: `node_modules/`, `.git/`, `Dockerfile*`, `.dockerignore`, `*.log*`, `.env*`, `coverage/`
+   - **ESLint**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `*.min.js`
+   - **Prettier**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `package-lock.json`, `yarn.lock`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`
+   - **Terraform**: `.terraform/`, `*.tfstate*`, `*.tfvars`, `.terraform.lock.hcl`
+   - **Kubernetes/k8s**: `*.secret.yaml`, `secrets/`, `.kube/`, `kubeconfig*`, `*.key`, `*.crt`
+
+5. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
+   - **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
+   - **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
+   - **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
+   - **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
+
+6. Execute implementation following the task plan:
+   - **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
+   - **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
+   - **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
+   - **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
+   - **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
+
+7. Implementation execution rules:
+   - **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
+   - **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
+   - **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
+   - **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
+   - **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
+
+8. Progress tracking and error handling:
+   - Report progress after each completed task
+   - Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
+   - For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
+   - Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
+   - Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
+   - **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
+
+9. Completion validation:
+   - Verify all required tasks are completed
+   - Check that implemented features match the original specification
+   - Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
+   - Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
+
+Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/speckit-tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_implement`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_implement` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Report final status with summary of completed work.
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] All tasks in tasks.md completed and marked `[X]`
+- [ ] Implementation validated against specification, plan, and test coverage
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with summary of completed work
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9666af3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-plan"
+description: "Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/plan.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before planning)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_plan` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1 -Json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, FEATURE_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
+
+3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
+   - Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
+   - Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
+   - Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
+   - Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
+   - Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
+   - Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_plan`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_plan` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Command ends after Phase 1 design. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
+
+## Phases
+
+### Phase 0: Outline & Research
+
+1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
+   - For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
+   - For each dependency → best practices task
+   - For each integration → patterns task
+
+2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
+
+   ```text
+   For each unknown in Technical Context:
+     Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
+   For each technology choice:
+     Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
+   ```
+
+3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
+   - Decision: [what was chosen]
+   - Rationale: [why chosen]
+   - Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
+
+**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
+
+### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
+
+**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
+
+1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
+   - Entity name, fields, relationships
+   - Validation rules from requirements
+   - State transitions if applicable
+
+2. **Define interface contracts** (if project has external interfaces) → `/contracts/`:
+   - Identify what interfaces the project exposes to users or other systems
+   - Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
+   - Examples: public APIs for libraries, command schemas for CLI tools, endpoints for web services, grammars for parsers, UI contracts for applications
+   - Skip if project is purely internal (build scripts, one-off tools, etc.)
+
+3. **Create quickstart validation guide** → `quickstart.md`:
+   - Document runnable validation scenarios that prove the feature works end-to-end
+   - Include prerequisites, setup commands, test/run commands, and expected outcomes
+   - Use links or references to contracts and data model details instead of duplicating them
+   - Do not include full implementation code, model/service/controller bodies, migrations, or complete test suites
+   - Keep this artifact as a validation/run guide; implementation details belong in `tasks.md` and the implementation phase
+
+**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md
+
+## Key rules
+
+- Use absolute paths for filesystem operations; use project-relative paths for references in documentation
+- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] Plan workflow executed and design artifacts generated
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with branch, plan path, and generated artifacts
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e904f64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-specify"
+description: "Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/specify.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before specification)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_specify` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+The text the user typed after `/speckit-specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
+
+Given that feature description, do this:
+
+1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the feature:
+   - Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
+   - Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
+   - Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
+   - Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
+   - Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
+   - Examples:
+     - "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
+     - "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
+     - "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
+     - "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
+
+2. **Branch creation** (optional, via hook):
+
+   If a `before_specify` hook ran successfully in the Pre-Execution Checks above, it will have created/switched to a git branch and output JSON containing `BRANCH_NAME` and `FEATURE_NUM`. Note these values for reference, but the branch name does **not** dictate the spec directory name.
+
+   If the user explicitly provided `GIT_BRANCH_NAME`, pass it through to the hook so the branch script uses the exact value as the branch name (bypassing all prefix/suffix generation).
+
+3. **Create the spec feature directory**:
+
+   Specs live under the default `specs/` directory unless the user explicitly provides `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
+
+   **Resolution order for `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`**:
+   1. If the user explicitly provided `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` (e.g., via environment variable, argument, or configuration), use it as-is
+   2. Otherwise, auto-generate it under `specs/`:
+      - Check `.specify/init-options.json` for `feature_numbering` (preferred) or `branch_numbering` (deprecated, migration only — will be removed in a future release)
+      - If `"timestamp"`: prefix is `YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS` (current timestamp)
+      - If `"sequential"` or absent: prefix is `NNN` (next available 3-digit number after scanning existing directories in `specs/`)
+      - Construct the directory name: `<prefix>-<short-name>` (e.g., `003-user-auth` or `20260319-143022-user-auth`)
+      - Set `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` to `specs/<directory-name>`
+      - If `branch_numbering` was used (and `feature_numbering` was absent), emit a one-line warning: "⚠️ `branch_numbering` in init-options.json is deprecated. Rename to `feature_numbering`."
+
+   **Create the directory and spec file**:
+   - `mkdir -p SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`
+   - Resolve the active `spec-template` through the Spec Kit preset/template resolution stack (equivalent to `specify preset resolve spec-template`)
+   - Copy the resolved `spec-template` file to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md` as the starting point
+   - Set `SPEC_FILE` to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md`
+   - Persist the resolved path to `.specify/feature.json`:
+     ```json
+     {
+       "feature_directory": "<resolved feature dir>"
+     }
+     ```
+     Write the actual resolved directory path value (for example, `specs/003-user-auth`), not the literal string `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`.
+     This allows downstream commands (`/speckit-plan`, `/speckit-tasks`, etc.) to locate the feature directory without relying on git branch name conventions.
+
+   **IMPORTANT**:
+   - You must only create one feature per `/speckit-specify` invocation
+   - The spec directory name and the git branch name are independent — they may be the same but that is the user's choice
+   - The spec directory and file are always created by this command, never by the hook
+
+4. Load the resolved active `spec-template` file to understand required sections.
+
+5. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+
+6. Follow this execution flow:
+    1. Parse user description from arguments
+       If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
+    2. Extract key concepts from description
+       Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
+    3. For unclear aspects:
+       - Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
+       - Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
+         - The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
+         - Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
+         - No reasonable default exists
+       - **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
+       - Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+    4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
+       If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
+    5. Generate Functional Requirements
+       Each requirement must be testable
+       Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
+    6. Define Success Criteria
+       Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
+       Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
+       Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
+    7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
+    8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
+
+7. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
+
+8. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
+
+   a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
+
+      ```markdown
+      # Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+      **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+      **Created**: [DATE]
+      **Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
+
+      ## Content Quality
+
+      - [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+      - [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
+      - [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+      - [ ] All mandatory sections completed
+
+      ## Requirement Completeness
+
+      - [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+      - [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+      - [ ] Success criteria are measurable
+      - [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+      - [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+      - [ ] Edge cases are identified
+      - [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
+      - [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+
+      ## Feature Readiness
+
+      - [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+      - [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
+      - [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+      - [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
+
+      ## Notes
+
+      - Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`
+      ```
+
+   b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
+      - For each item, determine if it passes or fails
+      - Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
+
+   c. **Handle Validation Results**:
+
+      - **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to the Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks section
+
+      - **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
+        1. List the failing items and specific issues
+        2. Update the spec to address each issue
+        3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
+        4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
+
+      - **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
+        1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
+        2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
+        3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
+
+           ```markdown
+           ## Question [N]: [Topic]
+
+           **Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
+
+           **What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
+
+           **Suggested Answers**:
+
+           | Option | Answer | Implications |
+           |--------|--------|--------------|
+           | A      | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | B      | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | C      | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
+           | Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
+
+           **Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
+           ```
+
+        4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
+           - Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
+           - Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
+           - Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
+           - Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
+        5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
+        6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
+        7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
+        8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
+        9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
+
+   d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_specify`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_specify` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Report completion to the user with:
+- `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` — the feature directory path
+- `SPEC_FILE` — the spec file path
+- Checklist results summary
+- Readiness for the next phase (`/speckit-clarify` or `/speckit-plan`)
+
+**NOTE:** Branch creation is handled by the `before_specify` hook (git extension). Spec directory and file creation are always handled by this core command.
+
+## Quick Guidelines
+
+- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
+- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
+- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
+- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
+
+### Section Requirements
+
+- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
+- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
+- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
+
+### For AI Generation
+
+When creating this spec from a user prompt:
+
+1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
+2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
+3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
+   - Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
+   - Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
+   - Lack any reasonable default
+4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
+5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
+6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
+   - Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
+   - User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
+   - Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
+
+**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
+
+- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
+- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
+- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
+- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
+- Integration patterns: Use project-appropriate patterns (REST/GraphQL for web services, function calls for libraries, CLI args for tools, etc.)
+
+### Success Criteria Guidelines
+
+Success criteria must be:
+
+1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
+2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
+3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
+4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
+
+**Good examples**:
+
+- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
+- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
+- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
+- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
+
+**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
+
+- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
+- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
+- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
+- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] Specification written to `SPEC_FILE` and validated against quality checklist
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with feature directory, spec file path, and checklist results
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9abd12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-tasks"
+description: "Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/tasks.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_tasks` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1 -Json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR, TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT, TASKS_TEMPLATE, and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. `FEATURE_DIR` and `TASKS_TEMPLATE` must be absolute paths when provided. `AVAILABLE_DOCS` is a list of document names/relative paths available under `FEATURE_DIR` (for example `research.md` or `contracts/`). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+
+2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
+   - **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
+   - **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
+   - **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints
+   - Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
+
+3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
+   - Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
+   - Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
+   - If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
+   - If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
+   - If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
+   - Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
+   - Create parallel execution examples per user story
+   - Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
+
+4. **Generate tasks.md**: Use TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT (from the JSON output above) as the structure. For compatibility with older setup scripts that omit TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT, read TASKS_TEMPLATE instead. Fill with:
+   - Correct feature name from plan.md
+   - Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
+   - Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
+   - Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
+   - Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
+   - Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
+   - All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
+   - Clear file paths for each task
+   - Dependencies section showing story completion order
+   - Parallel execution examples per story
+   - Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
+
+## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
+
+**You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.**
+
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under `hooks.after_tasks`, skip to the Completion Report.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_tasks` key.
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue to the Completion Report.
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`) — **You MUST emit `EXECUTE_COMMAND:` for each mandatory hook**:
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+
+## Completion Report
+
+Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
+- Total task count
+- Task count per user story
+- Parallel opportunities identified
+- Independent test criteria for each story
+- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
+- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
+
+Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
+
+The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
+
+## Task Generation Rules
+
+**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
+
+**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
+
+### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
+
+Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
+
+```text
+- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
+```
+
+**Format Components**:
+
+1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
+2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
+3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
+4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
+   - Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
+   - Setup phase: NO story label
+   - Foundational phase: NO story label
+   - User Story phases: MUST have story label
+   - Polish phase: NO story label
+5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
+
+**Examples**:
+
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
+- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
+- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
+- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
+
+### Task Organization
+
+1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
+   - Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
+   - Map all related components to their story:
+     - Models needed for that story
+     - Services needed for that story
+     - Interfaces/UI needed for that story
+     - If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
+   - Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
+
+2. **From Contracts**:
+   - Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
+   - If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
+
+3. **From Data Model**:
+   - Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
+   - If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
+   - Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
+   - For each field with constraints in data-model.md (max length, nullable/required, enum values, validation rules), quote the constraint verbatim in the task description so it is not left to implementation-time discretion
+
+4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
+   - Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
+   - Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
+   - Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
+
+### Phase Structure
+
+- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
+- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
+- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
+  - Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
+  - Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
+- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
+
+## Done When
+
+- [ ] tasks.md generated with all phases, task IDs, and file paths
+- [ ] Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
+- [ ] Completion reported to user with task count, story breakdown, and MVP scope
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c69275
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+---
+name: "speckit-taskstoissues"
+description: "Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts."
+compatibility: "Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory"
+metadata:
+  author: "github-spec-kit"
+  source: "templates/commands/taskstoissues.md"
+---
+
+
+## User Input
+
+```text
+$ARGUMENTS
+```
+
+You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
+
+## Pre-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (before tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
+- Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.before_taskstoissues` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+
+    Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
+
+## Outline
+
+1. Run `.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
+1. **IF EXISTS**: Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for project principles and governance constraints.
+1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
+1. Get the Git remote by running:
+
+```bash
+git config --get remote.origin.url
+```
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
+
+1. **Fetch existing issues for deduplication**: Before creating anything, build the set of task IDs you are about to process from `tasks.md` (each is a `T` followed by **at least** three digits, e.g. `T001` — `/speckit-converge` assigns new IDs with `T{M+1:03d}`, which is a floor rather than a cap, so once a file has more than 999 tasks the IDs are four digits or longer). Then use the GitHub MCP server's `list_issues` tool to look for issues that already cover those IDs. Do not pass a `state` value, since omitting it makes the tool return both open and closed issues. Request `perPage: 100` to keep the number of calls down, and since the tool uses cursor-based pagination, request pages with the `after` parameter (using the `endCursor` from the previous response). For each issue title, match it against the task ID pattern `\bT\d{3,}\b` (the `{3,}` accepts four-digit and longer IDs — with `\d{3}` a title containing `T1000` would not match at all, because the trailing `\b` cannot fall between two digits, so that task would be silently neither deduplicated nor created; word boundaries still stop a token like `ST001` from matching, and force the whole digit run to be consumed so `T100` can never match inside `T1000`; this also recognises titles written as `T001 ...`, `T001: ...` or `[T001] ...`) and, when it matches one of your task IDs, mark that ID as already having an issue. Stop paginating as soon as every task ID has been matched, or when there are no more pages, so you do not keep fetching the whole repository's issue history once all task IDs are accounted for. This bounds the number of calls on repos with large issue histories and still prevents duplicates when the command is re-run after `tasks.md` is regenerated or the skill is re-invoked.
+1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote. Task lines in `tasks.md` start with a markdown checkbox, so first strip the leading `- [ ]` (and any `[P]` / `[US#]` markers) to recover the task ID and its description. Create the issue with a single canonical title of the form `T001: <description>`, with the ID written once followed by the task description (for example, the line `- [ ] T001 Create project structure` becomes the title `T001: Create project structure`).
+   - **Skip** any task whose ID is already present in the set of existing issues from the previous step, and report it (for example, `T001 already has an issue, skipping`).
+   - Only create issues for tasks that do not yet have a matching issue.
+
+> [!CAUTION]
+> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
+
+## Post-Execution Checks
+
+**Check for extension hooks (after tasks-to-issues conversion)**:
+Check if `.specify/extensions.yml` exists in the project root.
+- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the `hooks.after_taskstoissues` key
+- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, do not skip silently: tell the user that `.specify/extensions.yml` could not be read (include the parser error) and that no hooks were checked, including any mandatory (`optional: false`) hooks registered there, then continue normally
+- Filter out hooks where `enabled` is explicitly `false`. Treat hooks without an `enabled` field as enabled by default.
+- For each remaining hook, do **not** attempt to interpret or evaluate hook `condition` expressions:
+  - If the hook has no `condition` field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
+  - If the hook defines a non-empty `condition`, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
+- When constructing command invocations from hook command names, replace dots (`.`) with hyphens (`-`). For example, `speckit.git.commit` → `/speckit-git-commit`.
+- For each executable hook, output the following based on its `optional` flag:
+  - **Optional hook** (`optional: true`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Optional Hook**: {extension}
+    Command: `/{command}`
+    Description: {description}
+
+    Prompt: {prompt}
+    To execute: `/{command}`
+    ```
+  - **Mandatory hook** (`optional: false`):
+    ```
+    ## Extension Hooks
+
+    **Automatic Hook**: {extension}
+    Executing: `/{command}`
+    EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
+    ```
+    After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal `{command}` id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as `/skill:speckit-...` or `$speckit-...`). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
+- If no hooks are registered or `.specify/extensions.yml` does not exist, skip silently
diff --git a/.specify/.gitignore b/.specify/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e314fc2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Machine-local Spec Kit state — not meant to be shared.
+# Managed by the Specify CLI; safe to edit (your changes are preserved on refresh).
+
+# Local pointer to the current feature directory. Rewritten every time you
+# switch features, so it is per-checkout state rather than something to share.
+feature.json
+
+# Per-machine extension config overrides.
+extensions/*/local-config.yml
diff --git a/.specify/init-options.json b/.specify/init-options.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6e44f91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/init-options.json
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "ai": "copilot",
+  "ai_skills": true,
+  "feature_numbering": "sequential",
+  "here": true,
+  "integration": "copilot",
+  "script": "ps",
+  "speckit_version": "1.0.7.dev0"
+}
diff --git a/.specify/integration.json b/.specify/integration.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13b6eac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/integration.json
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "version": "1.0.7.dev0",
+  "integration_state_schema": 1,
+  "installed_integrations": [
+    "copilot"
+  ],
+  "integration_settings": {
+    "copilot": {
+      "script": "ps",
+      "invoke_separator": "-"
+    }
+  },
+  "integration": "copilot",
+  "default_integration": "copilot"
+}
diff --git a/.specify/integrations/claude.manifest.json b/.specify/integrations/claude.manifest.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3622cea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/integrations/claude.manifest.json
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "integration": "claude",
+  "version": "1.0.7.dev0",
+  "installed_at": "2026-09-14T13:44:39.419023+00:00",
+  "files": {
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md": "299d136fbc16ff71592dc8e7b765914d55d571b9cd95ddd378593619a9b5fe5d",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md": "fee9397b18bf8d1f04c662d430202fd865c7e01146a578185c30a6169e82739a",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md": "fcac0fbd9c99c987abcaab97df79eaf54f106f5aa16f6dd2b4b7f5324221877c",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md": "d8822195af8c04155179c914cc67323cbe4228cda75c8bff0b3b3e209abf4941",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md": "6405083f4944886ef4f8ce29bb2794fe48033c43ead87a4af15959cbf8bb1ad5",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md": "db4fd9659ecd7b42843d56961607e26dc66439fffec92c733027fb016f83e679",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md": "bd6eaf7623befcad231f8ee8bf6ae3f03bb49ee6264887fbe13c5102ce417aa4",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md": "d4d93f2444355136e78bb533988aa2dd560dc4b258f4923f67b1a437e7de38f8",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md": "78f32c4d6892f19e8249fbc319e0c5cf2e15c2339e3f50baf0cecb0358de695e",
+    ".claude/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md": "341be56e99263d77fdc974489675499576b3cd96ca7ec55cf27fb681c5b0ab9f"
+  }
+}
diff --git a/.specify/integrations/copilot.manifest.json b/.specify/integrations/copilot.manifest.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..900639c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/integrations/copilot.manifest.json
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "integration": "copilot",
+  "version": "1.0.7.dev0",
+  "installed_at": "2026-09-14T13:46:24.454200+00:00",
+  "files": {
+    ".github/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md": "bc5c24e6bbadf90f58e52d351c9ea22d502257ffb584694a9a46cf592dd78033",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-clarify/SKILL.md": "a122fc9e074f7a9db4bc8d8060a7c79fa0b97b70a6c9b4de9f65e819595a2581",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-constitution/SKILL.md": "9ba37cfc2ad0d64dcaf4816f85405376f9e671ef485220dbcbb8ed002aa93036",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-implement/SKILL.md": "47bfb14d191d970e63b1acd362a9570baadea947daa1b3b747c3305aa0bd85cc",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-converge/SKILL.md": "3c3292ea616ac6bd94812100365456a41329c2d5d0e3325547b246bcddce1614",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-plan/SKILL.md": "cef8c4f2cdecc92b2069ba9e0cc3f921d0f87915caa1d8bc023dbc665e02904f",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-checklist/SKILL.md": "f846c702c2a83777ab6806decbfaecb9d7f48b15f48bebb2db1d5f06bc6775dc",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md": "342dd2173103ce701b2bae2f489b462da19fc7369d920c93df10754be2216be8",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-tasks/SKILL.md": "2236ce1193fc122ee791c4f646aac11a341096670f1ea9aa5424b78148d9b44a",
+    ".github/skills/speckit-taskstoissues/SKILL.md": "e9fc87913e298b884217e021ae08dd4045c8b360e8020359f6cec6582e5ae5c2"
+  }
+}
diff --git a/.specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json b/.specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e2f918b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/integrations/speckit.manifest.json
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+{
+  "integration": "speckit",
+  "version": "1.0.7.dev0",
+  "installed_at": "2026-09-14T13:44:39.584492+00:00",
+  "files": {
+    ".specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1": "af4b8f5e8d373827726b79532cf57c567b1538c0494058d8095683c7fe107c49",
+    ".specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1": "434faa822de5b4e717960b005c875e90ea8559f6b75520fab7cbf4b88403a9c3",
+    ".specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1": "4b6e1ed5f2e95d8890bfba4f03264e6cb3df01c620f80781c91803bc9e7534e4",
+    ".specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1": "e49c565a09902e4ebd4b5a51c4e014d5067fdee5b1592f15cb44ef31f430d745",
+    ".specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1": "3b8173f1553bbf67ae021af949a29e2d3e3bb35805be95e4ba8d0ab83173c66f",
+    ".specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1": "57cd05e12bd472c60ac0554ad61b89770c278d50c48e484fb824196f44f75076",
+    ".specify/templates/checklist-template.md": "856532b3cb66171c662cc16f16b31a5856e4655a8666aad1e545bbfc7f603ca1",
+    ".specify/templates/constitution-template.md": "ce7549540fa45543cca797a150201d868e64495fdff39dc38246fb17bd4024b3",
+    ".specify/templates/plan-template.md": "7e637502d41eccf0ca672496636365691fdca62ef37b27ec07fcb412dbfa90d4",
+    ".specify/templates/spec-template.md": "3945437fc35cd30a5b2bf7beea680337c3516826d3efa5a6b92c4a7eca1ba28e",
+    ".specify/templates/tasks-template.md": "fc29a233f6f5a27ca31f1aa46b596af6500c627441c6e62b2bc4a1d721525842",
+    ".specify/.gitignore": "8c908410d177a1ef3d0dee16d7ad55f2ac3333df3104c4d4adee1c9b82f1dbc1"
+  }
+}
diff --git a/.specify/memory/.constitution-template.json b/.specify/memory/.constitution-template.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2fe4dee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/memory/.constitution-template.json
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+{
+  "sha256": "ce7549540fa45543cca797a150201d868e64495fdff39dc38246fb17bd4024b3",
+  "source": "core"
+}
diff --git a/.specify/memory/constitution.md b/.specify/memory/constitution.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..766f314
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/memory/constitution.md
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+<!--
+SYNC IMPACT REPORT
+Version change: [TEMPLATE] → 1.0.0 (initial ratification)
+Modified principles: n/a — first ratification, all principles newly defined from AGENTS.md
+Added sections: Core Principles (I–VII), Site Identity & Scope Constraints,
+  Spec-Driven Workflow & Branching, Governance
+Removed sections: none
+Templates requiring updates: none — plan/spec/tasks templates reference the constitution
+  generically and need no direct edits
+Follow-up TODOs: none
+This report is scratch material for human review; remove it once the amendment is reviewed.
+-->
+
+# Spotlight Theme 2026 Constitution
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### I. Theme-First Architecture
+`theme.json` is the primary source of truth for colour, typography, spacing, and layout —
+prefer it over PHP or CSS for anything it can express. `functions.php` MUST stay minimal:
+only block-support registration, asset enqueuing, or editor styles belong there. `inc/` is
+for genuine PHP logic that does not fit `functions.php`; it MUST NOT grow into a plugin-like
+architecture. Do not invent PHP mechanisms that `theme.json` already handles natively.
+
+### II. PHP Minimalism
+Keep PHP surface area as small as sensibly possible. Prefer WordPress core hooks and filters
+over custom implementations. Do not add features that belong in a plugin rather than a theme.
+
+### III. Accessibility as a Baseline, Not an Add-On
+All templates and patterns MUST use semantic HTML with correct heading hierarchy (no skipped
+levels). Images MUST carry descriptive `alt` text. Interactive elements MUST be keyboard
+accessible. WCAG 2.1 AA is the minimum bar for every new template, pattern, or style
+variation. ARIA attributes are used only where genuinely needed — never as decoration, never
+as a substitute for semantic markup. Focus styles MUST NOT be removed.
+
+### IV. Security by Default
+Every PHP `echo` MUST use the correct escaping function (`esc_html()`, `esc_attr()`,
+`esc_url()`, `wp_kses_post()`). All external input MUST be sanitised (`sanitize_text_field()`,
+`absint()`, etc.) and validated before use. `eval()` is forbidden. Raw output of `$_GET`,
+`$_POST`, or similar superglobals is forbidden. Direct database queries MUST use
+`$wpdb->prepare()`. `patterns/*.php`, `inc/**/*.php`, and `functions.php` receive extra review
+scrutiny because they are the theme's most common source of escaping defects.
+
+### V. Small Diffs and Dependency Discipline
+Changes MUST be minimal and targeted — do not rewrite files that do not need rewriting. Do
+not add npm or Composer dependencies without clear justification. Do not introduce a build
+pipeline (Webpack, Vite, or similar) unless it is explicitly and deliberately added as its own
+decision, never as a side effect of another task. Do not add abstractions, feature flags, or
+speculative generality beyond what the current task requires.
+
+### VI. Verify WordPress Core Behavior Before Implementing
+WordPress core mechanics that silently no-op on a wrong assumption (layout types, `blockGap`
+and margin handling, attribute serialization, DB template overrides shadowing file edits) MUST
+be verified against actual core source (`wp-includes/block-supports/*.php`, a block's own
+`block.json`) or against `.agents/skills/wp-block-pattern-gotchas/SKILL.md` before being
+implemented. Do not guess at core behavior from memory when the source is one read away.
+
+### VII. Conventions Have a Fixed Home
+Reports go in `.github/reports/`. Task lists live in `.github/tasks/` and are kept current as
+work starts, progresses, and completes. Reusable AI skills live in `.agents/skills/`. Agent
+persona definitions live in `.agents/agents/`. Copilot prompt files live in `.github/prompts/`.
+End-user documentation lives in `docs/` and stays human-readable — developer reports do not
+belong there. `CHANGELOG.md` (Keep a Changelog / SemVer) is updated under `## [Unreleased]`
+for every meaningful change and moved to a versioned section on release.
+
+## Site Identity & Scope Constraints
+
+Spotlight is a specific WordPress block theme for a specific client site
+(spotlightnsp.co.za) — not a reusable starter or a WordPress.org submission. Its identity
+(`spotlight-theme-2026` slug and text domain, theme name, author, URIs) is final, not a
+placeholder awaiting replacement; keep it consistent across `style.css`, `theme.json`,
+`composer.json`, and `package.json`. Do not reintroduce `{{...}}`-style placeholder tokens —
+those belong to the starter theme this project was bootstrapped from. Do not flag real,
+hard-coded, site-specific values (a navigation menu `ref`, real asset paths, real content) as
+portability gaps; they are correct for this site. Do not add WordPress.org-specific
+bureaucracy unless it has clear, concrete value.
+
+## Spec-Driven Workflow & Branching
+
+This project uses GitHub Spec Kit (`/speckit-*` skills, artifacts under `specs/`) as its
+active spec-driven workflow for all feature work from 2026-09-14 onward: `/speckit-specify` →
+`/speckit-clarify` (recommended) → `/speckit-plan` → `/speckit-tasks` → `/speckit-checklist`
+and/or `/speckit-analyze` (optional) → `/speckit-implement` → `/speckit-converge` (optional).
+Do not skip `spec.md` and go straight to `/speckit-plan`. Prefer running `/speckit-clarify`
+before `/speckit-plan`, not after. If scope changes mid-feature, update `spec.md` first and
+re-run `/speckit-plan` and `/speckit-tasks` so downstream artifacts stay consistent — they do
+not auto-update.
+
+`openspec/` is a **frozen historical record** of work already designed and shipped before this
+constitution's ratification (`base-styles`, `design-tokens`, `pattern-library`,
+`template-parts`, `templates`, and their archived change proposals). It MUST NOT be edited,
+extended, or treated as active guidance going forward; it exists purely so past decisions and
+their rationale remain traceable.
+
+Create or switch to the feature's branch before running any `/speckit-*` command — specs are
+written against the current branch/feature directory. Feature branches for spec work branch
+off `develop`, never `main`, matching this repository's existing branching convention. Before
+a spec's tasks are considered complete, the validation commands in `AGENTS.md` (`npm run
+lint`, `schema:validate`, `theme:validate`, `patterns:escape`, `security:scan`, `composer run
+phpcs`) MUST pass.
+
+## Governance
+
+`AGENTS.md` remains the canonical, day-to-day contributor and AI-agent guidance document for
+this repository; this constitution is derived from it and governs how Spec Kit artifacts
+(`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) are checked for compliance. When a change to deep
+engineering rules is needed, amend `AGENTS.md` first, then sync the corresponding principle
+here — this constitution should never drift ahead of `AGENTS.md` as the source of truth.
+
+Amendments require: a documented reason for the change, a version bump under the rules below,
+and an updated `Last Amended` date. Every `/speckit-plan` and `/speckit-tasks` output SHOULD be
+checked against these principles before `/speckit-implement` runs; `/speckit-analyze` is the
+recommended tool for that cross-artifact check.
+
+Versioning follows semantic versioning: MAJOR for backward-incompatible principle removals or
+redefinitions, MINOR for a new principle or materially expanded guidance, PATCH for wording or
+clarification-only edits.
+
+**Version**: 1.0.0 | **Ratified**: 2026-09-14 | **Last Amended**: 2026-09-14
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bee3a62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
+
+# Consolidated prerequisite checking script (PowerShell)
+#
+# This script provides unified prerequisite checking for Spec-Driven Development workflow.
+# It replaces the functionality previously spread across multiple scripts.
+#
+# Usage: ./check-prerequisites.ps1 [OPTIONS]
+#
+# OPTIONS:
+#   -Json               Output in JSON format
+#   -RequireSpec        Require spec.md to exist (for analysis phase)
+#   -RequireTasks       Require tasks.md to exist (for implementation phase)
+#   -IncludeTasks       Include tasks.md in AVAILABLE_DOCS list
+#   -PathsOnly          Only output path variables (no validation)
+#   -Template NAME      Include composed template content in JSON output
+#   -Help, -h           Show help message
+
+[CmdletBinding()]
+param(
+    [switch]$Json,
+    [switch]$RequireSpec,
+    [switch]$RequireTasks,
+    [switch]$IncludeTasks,
+    [switch]$PathsOnly,
+    [string]$Template,
+    [switch]$Help
+)
+
+$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
+
+# Show help if requested
+if ($Help) {
+    Write-Output @"
+Usage: check-prerequisites.ps1 [OPTIONS]
+
+Consolidated prerequisite checking for Spec-Driven Development workflow.
+
+OPTIONS:
+  -Json               Output in JSON format
+  -RequireSpec        Require spec.md to exist (for analysis phase)
+  -RequireTasks       Require tasks.md to exist (for implementation phase)
+  -IncludeTasks       Include tasks.md in AVAILABLE_DOCS list
+  -PathsOnly          Only output path variables (no prerequisite validation)
+  -Template NAME      Include composed template content in JSON output
+  -Help, -h           Show this help message
+
+EXAMPLES:
+  # Check task prerequisites (plan.md required)
+  .\check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json
+
+  # Check implementation prerequisites (plan.md + tasks.md required)
+  .\check-prerequisites.ps1 -Json -RequireTasks -IncludeTasks
+
+  # Get feature paths only (no validation)
+  .\check-prerequisites.ps1 -PathsOnly
+
+"@
+    exit 0
+}
+
+# Source common functions
+. "$PSScriptRoot/common.ps1"
+
+# Get feature paths.
+# In -PathsOnly mode this is pure resolution, so pass -NoPersist to opt out of
+# the feature.json write side effect (issue #3025).
+if ($PathsOnly) {
+    $paths = Get-FeaturePathsEnv -NoPersist
+} else {
+    $paths = Get-FeaturePathsEnv
+}
+
+# If paths-only mode, output paths and exit (no validation)
+if ($PathsOnly) {
+    if ($Json) {
+        [PSCustomObject]@{
+            REPO_ROOT    = $paths.REPO_ROOT
+            BRANCH       = $paths.CURRENT_BRANCH
+            FEATURE_DIR  = $paths.FEATURE_DIR
+            FEATURE_SPEC = $paths.FEATURE_SPEC
+            IMPL_PLAN    = $paths.IMPL_PLAN
+            TASKS        = $paths.TASKS
+        } | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+    } else {
+        Write-Output "REPO_ROOT: $($paths.REPO_ROOT)"
+        Write-Output "BRANCH: $($paths.CURRENT_BRANCH)"
+        Write-Output "FEATURE_DIR: $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)"
+        Write-Output "FEATURE_SPEC: $($paths.FEATURE_SPEC)"
+        Write-Output "IMPL_PLAN: $($paths.IMPL_PLAN)"
+        Write-Output "TASKS: $($paths.TASKS)"
+    }
+    exit 0
+}
+
+# Validate required directories and files
+if (-not (Test-Path $paths.FEATURE_DIR -PathType Container)) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Feature directory not found: $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)")
+    $specifyCommand = '/speckit-specify'
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Run $specifyCommand first to create the feature structure.")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+if (-not (Test-Path $paths.IMPL_PLAN -PathType Leaf)) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: plan.md not found in $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)")
+    $planCommand = '/speckit-plan'
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Run $planCommand first to create the implementation plan.")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Check for spec.md if required
+if ($RequireSpec -and -not (Test-Path $paths.FEATURE_SPEC -PathType Leaf)) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: spec.md not found in $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)")
+    $specifyCommand = '/speckit-specify'
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Run $specifyCommand first to create the feature specification.")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Check for tasks.md if required
+if ($RequireTasks -and -not (Test-Path $paths.TASKS -PathType Leaf)) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: tasks.md not found in $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)")
+    $tasksCommand = '/speckit-tasks'
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Run $tasksCommand first to create the task list.")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Build list of available documents
+$docs = @()
+
+# Always check these optional docs
+if (Test-Path $paths.RESEARCH) { $docs += 'research.md' }
+if (Test-Path $paths.DATA_MODEL) { $docs += 'data-model.md' }
+
+# Check contracts directory (only if it exists and has files)
+if ((Test-Path $paths.CONTRACTS_DIR) -and (Get-ChildItem -Path $paths.CONTRACTS_DIR -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object -First 1)) {
+    $docs += 'contracts/'
+}
+
+if (Test-Path $paths.QUICKSTART) { $docs += 'quickstart.md' }
+
+# Include tasks.md if requested and it exists
+if ($IncludeTasks -and (Test-Path $paths.TASKS)) {
+    $docs += 'tasks.md'
+}
+
+$templateContent = $null
+if ($Template) {
+    $templateContent = Resolve-TemplateContent -TemplateName $Template -RepoRoot $paths.REPO_ROOT
+    if ($null -eq $templateContent) {
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Could not resolve required $Template from the template override stack for $($paths.REPO_ROOT)")
+        exit 1
+    }
+}
+
+# Output results
+if ($Json) {
+    # JSON output
+    $result = [ordered]@{
+        FEATURE_DIR = $paths.FEATURE_DIR
+        AVAILABLE_DOCS = $docs
+    }
+    if ($Template) {
+        $result.TEMPLATE_CONTENT = $templateContent
+    }
+    [PSCustomObject]$result | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+} else {
+    # Text output
+    Write-Output "FEATURE_DIR:$($paths.FEATURE_DIR)"
+    Write-Output "AVAILABLE_DOCS:"
+
+    # Show status of each potential document.
+    # These helpers report their line with Write-Output and ALSO return a
+    # bool, both on the Success stream, so 'Out-Null' discarded the report
+    # line along with the return value and left AVAILABLE_DOCS empty. Drop
+    # only the boolean so the per-document lines reach stdout like the
+    # bash and Python twins.
+    Test-FileExists -Path $paths.RESEARCH -Description 'research.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    Test-FileExists -Path $paths.DATA_MODEL -Description 'data-model.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    Test-DirHasFiles -Path $paths.CONTRACTS_DIR -Description 'contracts/' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    Test-FileExists -Path $paths.QUICKSTART -Description 'quickstart.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+
+    if ($IncludeTasks) {
+        Test-FileExists -Path $paths.TASKS -Description 'tasks.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    }
+}
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bb61f62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
@@ -0,0 +1,796 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
+# Common PowerShell functions analogous to common.sh
+
+# Find repository root by searching upward for .specify directory
+# This is the primary marker for spec-kit projects
+function Find-SpecifyRoot {
+    param([string]$StartDir = (Get-Location).Path)
+
+    # Normalize to absolute path to prevent issues with relative paths
+    # Use -LiteralPath to handle paths with wildcard characters ([, ], *, ?)
+    $resolved = Resolve-Path -LiteralPath $StartDir -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
+    $current = if ($resolved) { $resolved.Path } else { $null }
+    if (-not $current) { return $null }
+
+    while ($true) {
+        if (Test-Path -LiteralPath (Join-Path $current ".specify") -PathType Container) {
+            return $current
+        }
+        $parent = Split-Path $current -Parent
+        if ([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($parent) -or $parent -eq $current) {
+            return $null
+        }
+        $current = $parent
+    }
+}
+
+# Resolve an explicit SPECIFY_INIT_DIR project override (the directory that
+# *contains* .specify/), for non-interactive / CI use -- e.g. running a Spec Kit
+# command against a member project from a monorepo root without cd.
+#
+# Precondition: $env:SPECIFY_INIT_DIR is set. Returns the validated project root,
+# or writes an error and exits 1 unless -ReturnNullOnError is set. Strict by
+# design: the path must exist and
+# contain .specify/, with no silent fallback. (An empty string is falsy, so the
+# caller's `if ($env:SPECIFY_INIT_DIR)` guard treats empty as unset.)
+#
+# This is the single resolver: bundled extensions inherit it by sourcing core
+# (e.g. the git extension's create-new-feature-branch) rather than duplicating it.
+function Resolve-SpecifyInitDir {
+    param([switch]$ReturnNullOnError)
+
+    $initDir = $env:SPECIFY_INIT_DIR
+    # Normalize: relative paths resolve against the current directory.
+    if (-not [System.IO.Path]::IsPathRooted($initDir)) {
+        $initDir = Join-Path (Get-Location).Path $initDir
+    }
+    $resolved = Resolve-Path -LiteralPath $initDir -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
+    # Resolve-Path also succeeds for files, so check the resolved path is a
+    # directory; otherwise a file value would slip through to the less accurate
+    # "not a Spec Kit project" error below.
+    if (-not $resolved -or -not (Test-Path -LiteralPath $resolved.Path -PathType Container)) {
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: SPECIFY_INIT_DIR does not point to an existing directory: $($env:SPECIFY_INIT_DIR)")
+        if ($ReturnNullOnError) { return $null }
+        exit 1
+    }
+    # Resolve-Path echoes back any trailing separator from the input; trim it so
+    # the returned root matches the bash resolver, whose `cd && pwd` never yields
+    # one. TrimEnd (not [Path]::TrimEndingDirectorySeparator, which is .NET Core
+    # only) keeps this working on Windows PowerShell 5.1 / .NET Framework, as
+    # Get-FeaturePathsEnv already does below. Unlike a bare TrimEnd, the
+    # GetPathRoot check preserves a path that *is* its own root ('C:\' must not
+    # become 'C:', which every later API re-resolves against the current
+    # directory instead of the drive root). No-op on a path with no trailing
+    # separator.
+    $initRoot = $resolved.Path.TrimEnd('/', '\')
+    if ($initRoot.Length -lt [System.IO.Path]::GetPathRoot($resolved.Path).Length) {
+        $initRoot = $resolved.Path
+    }
+    if (-not (Test-Path -LiteralPath (Join-Path $initRoot '.specify') -PathType Container)) {
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: SPECIFY_INIT_DIR is not a Spec Kit project (no .specify/ directory): $initRoot")
+        if ($ReturnNullOnError) { return $null }
+        exit 1
+    }
+    return $initRoot
+}
+
+# Get repository root, prioritizing .specify directory
+# This prevents using a parent repository when spec-kit is initialized in a subdirectory
+function Get-RepoRoot {
+    param([switch]$ReturnNullOnError)
+
+    # Explicit project override wins (see Resolve-SpecifyInitDir).
+    if ($env:SPECIFY_INIT_DIR) {
+        return (Resolve-SpecifyInitDir -ReturnNullOnError:$ReturnNullOnError)
+    }
+
+    # First, look for .specify directory (spec-kit's own marker)
+    $specifyRoot = Find-SpecifyRoot
+    if ($specifyRoot) {
+        return $specifyRoot
+    }
+
+    # Final fallback to script location
+    # Use -LiteralPath to handle paths with wildcard characters
+    return (Resolve-Path -LiteralPath (Join-Path $PSScriptRoot "../../..")).Path
+}
+
+function Get-CurrentBranch {
+    # Return feature name from explicit state only.
+    # Feature state is set by SPECIFY_FEATURE (from create-new-feature or
+    # the git extension) or implicitly via .specify/feature.json.
+    if ($env:SPECIFY_FEATURE) {
+        return $env:SPECIFY_FEATURE
+    }
+
+    # No explicit feature set - return empty to signal "unknown".
+    return ""
+}
+
+
+
+# Persist a feature_directory value to .specify/feature.json.
+# Writes only when the file is missing or the value differs from what's stored.
+function Save-FeatureJson {
+    param(
+        [Parameter(Mandatory = $true)][string]$RepoRoot,
+        [Parameter(Mandatory = $true)][string]$FeatureDirectory
+    )
+
+    # Strip repo root prefix if the value is absolute and under repo root.
+    # Use case-insensitive comparison on Windows only (case-sensitive filesystems elsewhere).
+    $prefix = $RepoRoot + [System.IO.Path]::DirectorySeparatorChar
+    if ($null -ne $IsWindows) { $onWin = $IsWindows } else { $onWin = $true }
+    if ($onWin) {
+        $cmp = [System.StringComparison]::OrdinalIgnoreCase
+    } else {
+        $cmp = [System.StringComparison]::Ordinal
+    }
+    if ($FeatureDirectory.StartsWith($prefix, $cmp)) {
+        $FeatureDirectory = $FeatureDirectory.Substring($prefix.Length)
+    }
+
+    $fjPath = Join-Path (Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify') 'feature.json'
+
+    # Read current value and skip write when unchanged
+    if (Test-Path -LiteralPath $fjPath -PathType Leaf) {
+        try {
+            $raw = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($fjPath, [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8)
+            $cfg = $raw | ConvertFrom-Json
+            if ($cfg.feature_directory -eq $FeatureDirectory) {
+                return
+            }
+        } catch {
+            # File is corrupt or unreadable - overwrite it
+        }
+    }
+
+    # Ensure .specify/ directory exists
+    $specifyDir = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify'
+    if (-not (Test-Path -LiteralPath $specifyDir -PathType Container)) {
+        New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path $specifyDir -Force | Out-Null
+    }
+
+    # Write feature.json
+    $json = @{ feature_directory = $FeatureDirectory } | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+    $utf8NoBom = New-Object System.Text.UTF8Encoding($false)
+    [System.IO.File]::WriteAllText($fjPath, $json, $utf8NoBom)
+}
+
+function Get-FeaturePathsEnv {
+    # Read-only callers (e.g. check-prerequisites.ps1 -PathsOnly) pass -NoPersist
+    # so pure path resolution never writes .specify/feature.json, which would
+    # dirty the working tree or overwrite a pinned value (issue #3025).
+    param(
+        [switch]$NoPersist,
+        [switch]$ReturnNullOnError
+    )
+
+    $repoRoot = Get-RepoRoot -ReturnNullOnError:$ReturnNullOnError
+    if (-not $repoRoot) { return $null }
+    $currentBranch = Get-CurrentBranch
+
+    # Resolve feature directory.  Priority:
+    #   1. SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY env var (explicit override)
+    #   2. .specify/feature.json "feature_directory" key (persisted by specify command)
+    #   3. Error - no feature context available
+    $featureJson = Join-Path $repoRoot '.specify/feature.json'
+    if ($env:SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY) {
+        $featureDir = $env:SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY
+        # Normalize relative paths to absolute under repo root
+        if (-not [System.IO.Path]::IsPathRooted($featureDir)) {
+            $featureDir = Join-Path $repoRoot $featureDir
+        }
+        # Persist to feature.json so future sessions without the env var still
+        # work - unless the caller opted out for read-only resolution (#3025).
+        if (-not $NoPersist) {
+            Save-FeatureJson -RepoRoot $repoRoot -FeatureDirectory $env:SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY
+        }
+    } elseif (Test-Path $featureJson) {
+        $featureJsonRaw = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($featureJson, [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8)
+        try {
+            $featureConfig = $featureJsonRaw | ConvertFrom-Json
+        } catch {
+            [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Feature directory not found. Set SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY or ensure .specify/feature.json contains feature_directory.")
+            if ($ReturnNullOnError) { return $null }
+            exit 1
+        }
+        if ($featureConfig.feature_directory) {
+            $featureDir = $featureConfig.feature_directory
+            # Normalize relative paths to absolute under repo root
+            if (-not [System.IO.Path]::IsPathRooted($featureDir)) {
+                $featureDir = Join-Path $repoRoot $featureDir
+            }
+        } else {
+            [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Feature directory not found. Set SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY or ensure .specify/feature.json contains feature_directory.")
+            if ($ReturnNullOnError) { return $null }
+            exit 1
+        }
+    } else {
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Feature directory not found. Set SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY or run the specify command to create .specify/feature.json.")
+        if ($ReturnNullOnError) { return $null }
+        exit 1
+    }
+
+    # When no branch context exists (no SPECIFY_FEATURE, feature resolved via
+    # SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY or feature.json), fall back to the feature
+    # directory basename so CURRENT_BRANCH is a usable identifier rather than
+    # an empty, misleading value (issue #3026).
+    if (-not $currentBranch) {
+        # TrimEnd (not [Path]::TrimEndingDirectorySeparator, which is .NET Core
+        # only) keeps this working on Windows PowerShell 5.1 / .NET Framework.
+        $featureDirTrimmed = $featureDir.TrimEnd('/', '\')
+        $currentBranch = Split-Path -Leaf $featureDirTrimmed
+    }
+
+    [PSCustomObject]@{
+        REPO_ROOT     = $repoRoot
+        CURRENT_BRANCH = $currentBranch
+        FEATURE_DIR   = $featureDir
+        FEATURE_SPEC  = Join-Path $featureDir 'spec.md'
+        IMPL_PLAN     = Join-Path $featureDir 'plan.md'
+        TASKS         = Join-Path $featureDir 'tasks.md'
+        RESEARCH      = Join-Path $featureDir 'research.md'
+        DATA_MODEL    = Join-Path $featureDir 'data-model.md'
+        QUICKSTART    = Join-Path $featureDir 'quickstart.md'
+        CONTRACTS_DIR = Join-Path $featureDir 'contracts'
+    }
+}
+
+function Test-FileExists {
+    param([string]$Path, [string]$Description)
+    if (Test-Path -Path $Path -PathType Leaf) {
+        Write-Output "  [OK] $Description"
+        return $true
+    } else {
+        Write-Output "  [FAIL] $Description"
+        return $false
+    }
+}
+
+function Test-DirHasFiles {
+    param([string]$Path, [string]$Description)
+    # A directory counts as non-empty when Get-ChildItem returns any entry
+    # (files or subdirectories) -- matching the JSON contracts checks in
+    # check-prerequisites.ps1 / setup-tasks.ps1, and treating a directory whose
+    # only contents are subdirectories (e.g. contracts/v1/openapi.yaml) as
+    # non-empty like bash check_dir. Filtering out subdirectories would
+    # mis-report such a directory as empty.
+    if ((Test-Path -Path $Path -PathType Container) -and (Get-ChildItem -Path $Path -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object -First 1)) {
+        Write-Output "  [OK] $Description"
+        return $true
+    } else {
+        Write-Output "  [FAIL] $Description"
+        return $false
+    }
+}
+
+function Get-InvokeSeparator {
+    param([string]$RepoRoot = (Get-RepoRoot))
+
+    if ($null -eq $script:SpecKitInvokeSeparatorCache) {
+        $script:SpecKitInvokeSeparatorCache = @{}
+    }
+    if ($script:SpecKitInvokeSeparatorCache.ContainsKey($RepoRoot)) {
+        return $script:SpecKitInvokeSeparatorCache[$RepoRoot]
+    }
+
+    $separator = '.'
+    $integrationJson = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/integration.json'
+    if (Test-Path -LiteralPath $integrationJson -PathType Leaf) {
+        try {
+            $state = Get-Content -LiteralPath $integrationJson -Raw | ConvertFrom-Json
+            $key = if ($state.default_integration) { [string]$state.default_integration } elseif ($state.integration) { [string]$state.integration } else { '' }
+            if ($key -and $state.integration_settings) {
+                $settingProperty = $state.integration_settings.PSObject.Properties[$key]
+                if ($settingProperty) {
+                    $setting = $settingProperty.Value
+                    if ($setting -and ($setting.invoke_separator -eq '.' -or $setting.invoke_separator -eq '-')) {
+                        $separator = [string]$setting.invoke_separator
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        } catch {
+            $separator = '.'
+        }
+    }
+
+    $script:SpecKitInvokeSeparatorCache[$RepoRoot] = $separator
+    return $separator
+}
+
+function Format-SpecKitCommand {
+    param(
+        [Parameter(Mandatory = $true)][string]$CommandName,
+        [string]$RepoRoot = (Get-RepoRoot)
+    )
+
+    $separator = Get-InvokeSeparator -RepoRoot $RepoRoot
+    $name = $CommandName.TrimStart('/')
+    if ($name.StartsWith('speckit.')) {
+        $name = $name.Substring(8)
+    } elseif ($name.StartsWith('speckit-')) {
+        $name = $name.Substring(8)
+    }
+    $name = $name -replace '\.', $separator
+
+    return "/speckit$separator$name"
+}
+
+# Find a usable Python 3 executable (python3, python, or py -3).
+# Returns the command/arguments as an array, or $null if none found.
+function Get-Python3Command {
+    if (Get-Command python3 -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) { return @('python3') }
+    if (Get-Command python -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) {
+        $ver = & python --version 2>&1
+        if ($ver -match 'Python 3') { return @('python') }
+    }
+    if (Get-Command py -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) {
+        $ver = & py -3 --version 2>&1
+        if ($ver -match 'Python 3') { return @('py', '-3') }
+    }
+    return $null
+}
+
+function Get-NormalizedPriority {
+    param($Value)
+
+    if ($Value -is [bool]) { return 10 }
+    if ($Value -is [string]) {
+        $integerText = $Value.Trim()
+        if ($integerText -cnotmatch '^[+-]?[0-9]+(?:_[0-9]+)*$') { return 10 }
+        $Value = $integerText.Replace('_', '')
+    }
+    try {
+        $parsedPriority = [System.Numerics.BigInteger]$Value
+    } catch {
+        return 10
+    }
+    return $(if ($parsedPriority -ge 1) { $parsedPriority } else { 10 })
+}
+
+function Get-SortedExtensionIds {
+    param([Parameter(Mandatory=$true)][string]$ExtensionsDir)
+
+    $registeredNames = @()
+    $ranked = @()
+    $registryFile = Join-Path $ExtensionsDir '.registry'
+    # Detect any filesystem entry at the registry path without following symlinks.
+    # Test-Path follows links and reports $false for a dangling symlink, so a
+    # broken .registry symlink would otherwise bypass this guard and let the
+    # directory scan below enable every on-disk extension. Enumerating the parent
+    # directory still observes a broken symlink as an entry.
+    $registryEntry = Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath $ExtensionsDir -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
+        Where-Object { $_.Name -eq '.registry' } |
+        Select-Object -First 1
+    if ($registryEntry) {
+        if (-not (Test-Path -LiteralPath $registryFile -PathType Leaf)) {
+            throw "Invalid extension registry ${registryFile}: not a regular file"
+        }
+        try {
+            $data = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($registryFile, [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8) | ConvertFrom-Json
+        } catch {
+            throw "Invalid extension registry ${registryFile}: $($_.Exception.Message)"
+        }
+        if ($null -eq $data -or $data -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+            throw "Invalid extension registry ${registryFile}: root must be a mapping"
+        }
+        $extensionsProperty = $data.PSObject.Properties['extensions']
+        if ($extensionsProperty) {
+            if ($extensionsProperty.Value -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+                throw "Invalid extension registry ${registryFile}: 'extensions' must be a mapping"
+            }
+            $extensions = $extensionsProperty.Value
+        } else {
+            $extensions = [PSCustomObject]@{}
+        }
+        $registeredNames = @($extensions.PSObject.Properties | ForEach-Object { $_.Name })
+        foreach ($entry in $extensions.PSObject.Properties) {
+            if ($entry.Name -cnotmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$' -or $entry.Value -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+                continue
+            }
+            $enabledProperty = $entry.Value.PSObject.Properties['enabled']
+            if ($enabledProperty -and -not [bool]$enabledProperty.Value) { continue }
+            $priority = 10
+            $priorityProperty = $entry.Value.PSObject.Properties['priority']
+            if ($priorityProperty) {
+                $priority = Get-NormalizedPriority -Value $priorityProperty.Value
+            }
+            $ranked += [PSCustomObject]@{ Priority = $priority; Id = $entry.Name }
+        }
+    }
+
+    foreach ($directory in Get-ChildItem -Path $ExtensionsDir -Directory -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue) {
+        if ($directory.Name -cmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$' -and $directory.Name -cnotin $registeredNames) {
+            $ranked += [PSCustomObject]@{ Priority = 10; Id = $directory.Name }
+        }
+    }
+    return $ranked | Sort-Object Priority, Id | ForEach-Object { $_.Id }
+}
+
+# Resolve a template name to a file path using the priority stack:
+#   1. .specify/templates/overrides/
+#   2. .specify/presets/<preset-id>/templates/ (sorted by priority from .registry)
+#   3. .specify/extensions/<ext-id>/templates/
+#   4. .specify/templates/ (core)
+function Resolve-Template {
+    param(
+        [Parameter(Mandatory=$true)][string]$TemplateName,
+        [Parameter(Mandatory=$true)][string]$RepoRoot
+    )
+
+    if ($TemplateName -cnotmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$') { return $null }
+
+    $base = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/templates'
+
+    # Priority 1: Project overrides
+    $override = Join-Path $base "overrides/$TemplateName.md"
+    if (Test-Path $override) { return $override }
+
+    # Priority 2: Installed presets (sorted by priority from .registry)
+    $presetsDir = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/presets'
+    if (Test-Path $presetsDir) {
+        $registryFile = Join-Path $presetsDir '.registry'
+        $sortedPresets = @()
+        $registryParsed = $false
+        if (Test-Path $registryFile) {
+            try {
+                $registryData = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($registryFile, [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8) | ConvertFrom-Json
+                if ($null -eq $registryData -or $registryData -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+                    throw 'Registry root must be an object'
+                }
+                $presetsProperty = $registryData.PSObject.Properties['presets']
+                if ($presetsProperty) {
+                    $presets = $presetsProperty.Value
+                    if ($null -eq $presets -or $presets -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+                        throw 'Registry presets must be an object'
+                    }
+                    $presetEntries = @($presets.PSObject.Properties)
+                    $priorityFor = {
+                        param($Entry)
+                        if ($Entry.Value -is [PSCustomObject]) {
+                            $priorityProperty = $Entry.Value.PSObject.Properties['priority']
+                            if ($priorityProperty) {
+                                return Get-NormalizedPriority -Value $priorityProperty.Value
+                            }
+                        }
+                        return 10
+                    }
+                    $sortedPresets = $presetEntries |
+                        Where-Object { $_.Value -is [PSCustomObject] } |
+                        Where-Object {
+                            $enabled = $_.Value.PSObject.Properties['enabled']
+                            -not $enabled -or [bool]$enabled.Value
+                        } |
+                        Where-Object { $_.Name -cmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$' } |
+                        Sort-Object @{ Expression = { & $priorityFor $_ } }, @{ Expression = { $_.Name } } |
+                        ForEach-Object { $_.Name }
+                }
+                $registryParsed = $true
+            } catch {
+                $registryParsed = $false
+            }
+        }
+
+        if ($registryParsed) {
+            foreach ($presetId in $sortedPresets) {
+                $candidate = Join-Path $presetsDir "$presetId/templates/$TemplateName.md"
+                if (Test-Path $candidate) { return $candidate }
+                $candidate = Join-Path $presetsDir "$presetId/$TemplateName.md"
+                if (Test-Path $candidate) { return $candidate }
+            }
+        } else {
+            # Fallback: alphabetical directory order
+            foreach ($preset in Get-ChildItem -Path $presetsDir -Directory -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Where-Object { $_.Name -notlike '.*' } | Sort-Object Name) {
+                $candidate = Join-Path $preset.FullName "templates/$TemplateName.md"
+                if (Test-Path $candidate) { return $candidate }
+                $candidate = Join-Path $preset.FullName "$TemplateName.md"
+                if (Test-Path $candidate) { return $candidate }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    # Priority 3: Extension-provided templates
+    $extDir = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/extensions'
+    if (Test-Path $extDir) {
+        foreach ($extensionId in Get-SortedExtensionIds -ExtensionsDir $extDir) {
+            $candidate = Join-Path $extDir "$extensionId/templates/$TemplateName.md"
+            if (-not (Test-Path $candidate)) {
+                $candidate = Join-Path $extDir "$extensionId/$TemplateName.md"
+            }
+            if (Test-Path $candidate) { return $candidate }
+        }
+    }
+
+    # Priority 4: Core templates
+    $core = Join-Path $base "$TemplateName.md"
+    if (Test-Path $core) { return $core }
+
+    return $null
+}
+
+# Resolve a template name to composed content using composition strategies.
+# Reads strategy metadata from preset manifests and composes content
+# from multiple layers using prepend, append, or wrap strategies.
+function Resolve-TemplateContent {
+    param(
+        [Parameter(Mandatory=$true)][string]$TemplateName,
+        [Parameter(Mandatory=$true)][string]$RepoRoot
+    )
+
+    if ($TemplateName -cnotmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$') {
+        return $null
+    }
+
+    $base = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/templates'
+
+    # Collect all layers (highest priority first)
+    $layerPaths = @()
+    $layerStrategies = @()
+
+    # Priority 1: Project overrides (always "replace")
+    $override = Join-Path $base "overrides/$TemplateName.md"
+    if (Test-Path $override) {
+        return [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(
+            $override,
+            [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8
+        )
+    }
+
+    $effectiveBaseFound = $false
+
+    # Priority 2: Installed presets (sorted by priority from .registry)
+    $presetsDir = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/presets'
+    if (Test-Path $presetsDir) {
+        $registryFile = Join-Path $presetsDir '.registry'
+        $sortedPresets = @()
+        $registryParsed = $false
+        if (Test-Path $registryFile) {
+            try {
+                $registryData = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($registryFile, [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8) | ConvertFrom-Json
+                if ($null -eq $registryData -or $registryData -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+                    throw 'Registry root must be an object'
+                }
+                $presetsProperty = $registryData.PSObject.Properties['presets']
+                if ($presetsProperty) {
+                    $presets = $presetsProperty.Value
+                    if ($null -eq $presets -or $presets -isnot [PSCustomObject]) {
+                        throw 'Registry presets must be an object'
+                    }
+                    $presetEntries = @($presets.PSObject.Properties)
+                    $priorityFor = {
+                        param($Entry)
+                        if ($Entry.Value -is [PSCustomObject]) {
+                            $priorityProperty = $Entry.Value.PSObject.Properties['priority']
+                            if ($priorityProperty) {
+                                return Get-NormalizedPriority -Value $priorityProperty.Value
+                            }
+                        }
+                        return 10
+                    }
+                    $sortedPresets = $presetEntries |
+                        Where-Object { $_.Value -is [PSCustomObject] } |
+                        Where-Object {
+                            $enabled = $_.Value.PSObject.Properties['enabled']
+                            -not $enabled -or [bool]$enabled.Value
+                        } |
+                        Where-Object { $_.Name -cmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$' } |
+                        Sort-Object @{ Expression = { & $priorityFor $_ } }, @{ Expression = { $_.Name } } |
+                        ForEach-Object { $_.Name }
+                }
+                $registryParsed = $true
+            } catch {
+                $registryParsed = $false
+            }
+        }
+
+        if (-not $registryParsed) {
+            $sortedPresets = Get-ChildItem -Path $presetsDir -Directory -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
+                Where-Object { $_.Name -cmatch '^[a-z0-9-]+$' } |
+                Sort-Object Name |
+                ForEach-Object { $_.Name }
+        }
+
+        $pyCmd = @(Get-Python3Command)
+        foreach ($presetId in $sortedPresets) {
+                # Read strategy and file path from preset manifest
+                $strategy = 'replace'
+                $manifestFilePath = ''
+                $manifestDeclared = $false
+                $manifest = Join-Path $presetsDir "$presetId/preset.yml"
+                if ((Test-Path $manifest) -and -not $pyCmd) {
+                    throw "Python 3 and PyYAML are required to resolve preset template composition"
+                }
+                if (Test-Path $manifest) {
+                    try {
+                        # Use Python to parse YAML manifest for strategy and file path
+                        $pyArgs = if ($pyCmd.Count -gt 1) { $pyCmd[1..($pyCmd.Count-1)] } else { @() }
+                        $pyStderrFile = [System.IO.Path]::GetTempFileName()
+                        $stratResult = & $pyCmd[0] @pyArgs -c @"
+import sys
+try:
+    import yaml
+except ImportError:
+    print('yaml_missing', file=sys.stderr)
+    sys.exit(2)
+try:
+    with open(sys.argv[1], encoding='utf-8') as f:
+        data = yaml.safe_load(f)
+    if not isinstance(data, dict):
+        raise ValueError('manifest root must be a mapping')
+    if 'provides' not in data:
+        raise ValueError('manifest missing provides section')
+    provides = data['provides']
+    if not isinstance(provides, dict):
+        raise ValueError('manifest provides must be a mapping')
+    if 'templates' not in provides:
+        raise ValueError('manifest provides missing templates')
+    templates = provides['templates']
+    if not isinstance(templates, list):
+        raise ValueError('manifest templates must be a list')
+    if not templates:
+        raise ValueError('manifest must provide at least one template')
+    valid_types = ('template', 'command', 'script')
+    valid_strategies = ('replace', 'prepend', 'append', 'wrap')
+    for t in templates:
+        if not isinstance(t, dict):
+            raise ValueError('manifest template entries must be mappings')
+        if 'type' not in t or 'name' not in t or 'file' not in t:
+            raise ValueError('manifest template entry missing type, name, or file')
+        for field in ('type', 'name', 'file'):
+            if not isinstance(t[field], str):
+                raise ValueError('manifest template ' + field + ' must be a string')
+        if t['type'] not in valid_types:
+            raise ValueError('invalid manifest template type')
+        strategy = t.get('strategy', 'replace')
+        if not isinstance(strategy, str):
+            raise ValueError('manifest template strategy must be a string')
+        strategy = strategy.lower()
+        if strategy not in valid_strategies:
+            raise ValueError('invalid manifest template strategy')
+        if t['type'] == 'script' and strategy not in ('replace', 'wrap'):
+            raise ValueError('invalid manifest script strategy')
+    for t in templates:
+        if t.get('name') == sys.argv[2] and t.get('type', 'template') == 'template':
+            file_value = t.get('file', '')
+            strategy = t.get('strategy', 'replace')
+            print('found\t' + strategy + '\t' + file_value)
+            sys.exit(0)
+    print('absent\treplace\t')
+except Exception as exc:
+    print(f'manifest_invalid: {exc}', file=sys.stderr)
+    sys.exit(3)
+"@ $manifest $TemplateName 2>$pyStderrFile
+                        if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) {
+                            if ($LASTEXITCODE -eq 2) {
+                                throw "PyYAML is required to resolve preset template composition"
+                            }
+                            throw "Invalid preset manifest $manifest"
+        }
+                        if ($stratResult) {
+                            $parts = $stratResult.Trim() -split "`t", 3
+                            $manifestDeclared = $parts[0] -eq 'found'
+                            $strategy = $parts[1].ToLowerInvariant()
+                            if ($parts.Count -gt 2 -and $parts[2]) { $manifestFilePath = $parts[2] }
+                        }
+                        Remove-Item $pyStderrFile -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
+                    } catch {
+                        if ($pyStderrFile) { Remove-Item $pyStderrFile -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue }
+                        throw
+                    }
+                }
+                # Try manifest file path first, then convention path
+                $candidate = $null
+                if ($manifestFilePath) {
+                    # Reject absolute paths and parent traversal
+                    if ([System.IO.Path]::IsPathRooted($manifestFilePath) -or $manifestFilePath -match '\.\.[\\/]') {
+                        $manifestFilePath = ''
+                    }
+                }
+                if ($manifestFilePath) {
+                    $mf = Join-Path $presetsDir "$presetId/$manifestFilePath"
+                    if (Test-Path $mf) { $candidate = $mf }
+                }
+                if (-not $candidate -and -not $manifestDeclared) {
+                    $cf = Join-Path $presetsDir "$presetId/templates/$TemplateName.md"
+                    if (Test-Path $cf) { $candidate = $cf }
+                    if (-not $candidate) {
+                        $cf = Join-Path $presetsDir "$presetId/$TemplateName.md"
+                        if (Test-Path $cf) { $candidate = $cf }
+                    }
+                }
+                if ($candidate) {
+                    $layerPaths += $candidate
+                    $layerStrategies += $strategy
+                    if ($strategy -eq 'replace') {
+                        $effectiveBaseFound = $true
+                        break
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+    }
+
+    # Priority 3: Extension-provided templates (always "replace")
+    $extDir = Join-Path $RepoRoot '.specify/extensions'
+    if (-not $effectiveBaseFound -and (Test-Path $extDir)) {
+        foreach ($extensionId in Get-SortedExtensionIds -ExtensionsDir $extDir) {
+            $candidate = Join-Path $extDir "$extensionId/templates/$TemplateName.md"
+            if (-not (Test-Path $candidate)) {
+                $candidate = Join-Path $extDir "$extensionId/$TemplateName.md"
+            }
+            if (Test-Path $candidate) {
+                $layerPaths += $candidate
+                $layerStrategies += 'replace'
+                $effectiveBaseFound = $true
+                break
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    # Priority 4: Core templates (always "replace")
+    $core = Join-Path $base "$TemplateName.md"
+    if (-not $effectiveBaseFound -and (Test-Path $core)) {
+        $layerPaths += $core
+        $layerStrategies += 'replace'
+    }
+
+    if ($layerPaths.Count -eq 0) { return $null }
+
+    # If the top (highest-priority) layer is replace, it wins entirely --
+    # lower layers are irrelevant regardless of their strategies.
+    if ($layerStrategies[0] -eq 'replace') {
+        return [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($layerPaths[0], [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8)
+    }
+
+    # Check if any layer uses a non-replace strategy
+    $hasComposition = $false
+    foreach ($s in $layerStrategies) {
+        if ($s -ne 'replace') { $hasComposition = $true; break }
+    }
+
+    if (-not $hasComposition) {
+        return [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText($layerPaths[0], [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8)
+    }
+
+    # Find the effective base: scan from highest priority (index 0) downward
+    # to find the nearest replace layer. Only compose layers above that base.
+    $baseIdx = -1
+    for ($i = 0; $i -lt $layerPaths.Count; $i++) {
+        if ($layerStrategies[$i] -eq 'replace') {
+            $baseIdx = $i
+            break
+        }
+    }
+    if ($baseIdx -lt 0) {
+        throw "Template '$TemplateName' has composing layers but no replace base"
+    }
+
+    $content = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(
+        $layerPaths[$baseIdx],
+        [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8
+    )
+
+    for ($i = $baseIdx - 1; $i -ge 0; $i--) {
+        $path = $layerPaths[$i]
+        $strat = $layerStrategies[$i]
+        $layerContent = [System.IO.File]::ReadAllText(
+            $path,
+            [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8
+        )
+
+        switch ($strat) {
+            'replace' { $content = $layerContent }
+            'prepend' { $content = "$layerContent`n`n$content" }
+            'append'  { $content = "$content`n`n$layerContent" }
+            'wrap'    {
+                if (-not $layerContent.Contains('{CORE_TEMPLATE}')) {
+                    throw "Wrap strategy missing {CORE_TEMPLATE} placeholder"
+                }
+                $content = $layerContent.Replace('{CORE_TEMPLATE}', $content)
+            }
+            default { throw "Unknown strategy: $strat" }
+        }
+    }
+
+    return $content
+}
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9ce2c67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/create-new-feature.ps1
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
+# Create a new feature
+[CmdletBinding()]
+param(
+    [switch]$Json,
+    [switch]$AllowExistingBranch,
+    [switch]$DryRun,
+    [string]$ShortName,
+    [Parameter()]
+    [string]$Number = '',
+    [switch]$Timestamp,
+    [switch]$Help,
+    [Parameter(Position = 0, ValueFromRemainingArguments = $true)]
+    [string[]]$FeatureDescription
+)
+$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
+$maxBranchLength = 244
+
+# Show help if requested
+if ($Help) {
+    Write-Host "Usage: ./create-new-feature.ps1 [-Json] [-DryRun] [-AllowExistingBranch] [-ShortName <name>] [-Number N] [-Timestamp] <feature description>"
+    Write-Host ""
+    Write-Host "Options:"
+    Write-Host "  -Json               Output in JSON format"
+    Write-Host "  -DryRun             Compute feature name and paths without creating directories or files"
+    Write-Host "  -AllowExistingBranch  Reuse an existing feature directory if it already exists"
+    Write-Host "  -ShortName <name>   Provide a custom short name (2-4 words) for the feature"
+    Write-Host "  -Number N           Prefer a feature number (auto-corrected if its specs prefix exists)"
+    Write-Host "  -Timestamp          Use timestamp prefix (YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS) instead of sequential numbering"
+    Write-Host "  -Help               Show this help message"
+    Write-Host ""
+    Write-Host "Examples:"
+    Write-Host "  ./create-new-feature.ps1 'Add user authentication system' -ShortName 'user-auth'"
+    Write-Host "  ./create-new-feature.ps1 'Implement OAuth2 integration for API'"
+    Write-Host "  ./create-new-feature.ps1 -Timestamp -ShortName 'user-auth' 'Add user authentication'"
+    exit 0
+}
+
+# Check if feature description provided
+if (-not $FeatureDescription -or $FeatureDescription.Count -eq 0) {
+    Write-Error "Usage: ./create-new-feature.ps1 [-Json] [-DryRun] [-AllowExistingBranch] [-ShortName <name>] [-Number N] [-Timestamp] <feature description>"
+    exit 1
+}
+
+$featureDesc = ($FeatureDescription -join ' ').Trim()
+
+# Validate description is not empty after trimming (e.g., user passed only whitespace)
+if ([string]::IsNullOrWhiteSpace($featureDesc)) {
+    Write-Error "Error: Feature description cannot be empty or contain only whitespace"
+    exit 1
+}
+
+function Get-HighestNumberFromSpecs {
+    param([string]$SpecsDir)
+
+    [long]$highest = 0
+    if (Test-Path $SpecsDir) {
+        Get-ChildItem -Path $SpecsDir -Directory | ForEach-Object {
+            # Match sequential prefixes (>=3 digits), but skip timestamp dirs.
+            if ($_.Name -match '^(\d{3,})-' -and $_.Name -notmatch '^\d{8}-\d{6}-') {
+                [long]$num = 0
+                if ([long]::TryParse($matches[1], [ref]$num) -and $num -gt $highest) {
+                    $highest = $num
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    return $highest
+}
+
+function Test-SpecPrefixInUse {
+    param(
+        [string]$SpecsDir,
+        [string]$FeatureNum
+    )
+
+    if (-not (Test-Path -LiteralPath $SpecsDir -PathType Container)) {
+        return $false
+    }
+
+    return $null -ne (Get-ChildItem -LiteralPath $SpecsDir -Directory -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
+        Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$FeatureNum-*" } |
+        Select-Object -First 1)
+}
+
+function ConvertTo-CleanBranchName {
+    param([string]$Name)
+
+    return $Name.ToLower() -replace '[^a-z0-9]', '-' -replace '-{2,}', '-' -replace '^-', '' -replace '-$', ''
+}
+
+function Get-FittedBranchName {
+    param(
+        [string]$FeatureNum,
+        [string]$BranchSuffix
+    )
+
+    $fittedName = "$FeatureNum-$BranchSuffix"
+    if ($fittedName.Length -gt $maxBranchLength) {
+        $prefixLength = $FeatureNum.Length + 1
+        $maxSuffixLength = $maxBranchLength - $prefixLength
+        $truncatedSuffix = $BranchSuffix.Substring(0, [Math]::Min($BranchSuffix.Length, $maxSuffixLength))
+        $truncatedSuffix = $truncatedSuffix -replace '-$', ''
+        $fittedName = "$FeatureNum-$truncatedSuffix"
+    }
+
+    return $fittedName
+}
+# Load common functions (includes Get-RepoRoot and Resolve-Template)
+. "$PSScriptRoot/common.ps1"
+
+# Use common.ps1 functions which prioritize .specify
+$repoRoot = Get-RepoRoot
+
+Set-Location $repoRoot
+
+$specsDir = Join-Path $repoRoot 'specs'
+if (-not $DryRun) {
+    New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path $specsDir -Force | Out-Null
+}
+
+# Function to generate branch name with stop word filtering and length filtering
+function Get-BranchName {
+    param([string]$Description)
+
+    # Common stop words to filter out
+    $stopWords = @(
+        'i', 'a', 'an', 'the', 'to', 'for', 'of', 'in', 'on', 'at', 'by', 'with', 'from',
+        'is', 'are', 'was', 'were', 'be', 'been', 'being', 'have', 'has', 'had',
+        'do', 'does', 'did', 'will', 'would', 'should', 'could', 'can', 'may', 'might', 'must', 'shall',
+        'this', 'that', 'these', 'those', 'my', 'your', 'our', 'their',
+        'want', 'need', 'add', 'get', 'set'
+    )
+
+    # Convert to lowercase and extract words (alphanumeric only)
+    $cleanName = $Description.ToLower() -replace '[^a-z0-9\s]', ' '
+    $words = $cleanName -split '\s+' | Where-Object { $_ }
+
+    # Filter words: remove stop words and words shorter than 3 chars (unless they're uppercase acronyms in original)
+    $meaningfulWords = @()
+    foreach ($word in $words) {
+        # Skip stop words
+        if ($stopWords -contains $word) { continue }
+
+        # Keep words that are length >= 3 OR appear as uppercase in original (likely acronyms)
+        if ($word.Length -ge 3) {
+            $meaningfulWords += $word
+        } elseif ($Description -cmatch "(?<![0-9A-Za-z_])$($word.ToUpper())(?![0-9A-Za-z_])") {
+            # Keep short words only if they appear as uppercase in original (likely
+            # acronyms). Use -cmatch so the comparison is case-sensitive, matching the
+            # bash script's case-sensitive grep; -match would be case-insensitive and
+            # would keep every short word. The boundaries are spelled out as ASCII
+            # because .NET's \b is Unicode-aware, so an accented letter next to the
+            # acronym would suppress the match that bash's LC_ALL=C grep still makes.
+            $meaningfulWords += $word
+        }
+    }
+
+    # If we have meaningful words, use first 3-4 of them
+    if ($meaningfulWords.Count -gt 0) {
+        $maxWords = if ($meaningfulWords.Count -eq 4) { 4 } else { 3 }
+        $result = ($meaningfulWords | Select-Object -First $maxWords) -join '-'
+        return $result
+    } else {
+        # Fallback to original logic if no meaningful words found
+        $result = ConvertTo-CleanBranchName -Name $Description
+        # @() keeps this an array. ConvertTo-CleanBranchName blanks every
+        # non-[a-z0-9] character, so a description written in a non-Latin script
+        # (or made only of punctuation) leaves nothing for the pipeline to
+        # emit -- it yields $null, and [string]::Join on $null throws
+        # ArgumentNullException. With $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop' that is
+        # terminating, so the script died with a .NET stack trace and exit 1
+        # where the bash and Python twins both return an empty suffix.
+        $fallbackWords = @(($result -split '-') | Where-Object { $_ } | Select-Object -First 3)
+        return [string]::Join('-', $fallbackWords)
+    }
+}
+
+# Generate branch name
+if ($ShortName) {
+    # Use provided short name, just clean it up
+    $branchSuffix = ConvertTo-CleanBranchName -Name $ShortName
+} else {
+    # Generate from description with smart filtering
+    $branchSuffix = Get-BranchName -Description $featureDesc
+}
+
+# Treat an explicit empty string as omitted, matching the bash and Python twins.
+$hasNumber = $PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('Number') -and $Number -ne ''
+
+# Warn if -Number and -Timestamp are both specified.
+if ($Timestamp -and $hasNumber) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("[specify] Warning: -Number is ignored when -Timestamp is used")
+    $Number = ''
+}
+
+# Determine branch prefix
+if ($Timestamp) {
+    $featureNum = Get-Date -Format 'yyyyMMdd-HHmmss'
+    $branchName = "$featureNum-$branchSuffix"
+} else {
+    # Determine branch number from existing feature directories. Auto-detect only
+    # when -Number was not supplied; an explicit value (including 0) is honored,
+    # matching the bash twin's `[ -z "$BRANCH_NUMBER" ]` check.
+    [long]$resolvedNumber = 0
+    if (-not $hasNumber) {
+        $highestNumber = Get-HighestNumberFromSpecs -SpecsDir $specsDir
+        if ($highestNumber -eq [long]::MaxValue) {
+            Write-Error "Error: feature number must be between 0 and $([long]::MaxValue), got '9223372036854775808'"
+            exit 1
+        }
+        $resolvedNumber = $highestNumber + 1
+    } elseif ($Number -notmatch '^[0-9]+$') {
+        Write-Error "Error: -Number must be an unsigned integer, got '$Number'"
+        exit 1
+    } elseif (-not [long]::TryParse($Number, [ref]$resolvedNumber)) {
+        Write-Error "Error: -Number must be between 0 and $([long]::MaxValue), got '$Number'"
+        exit 1
+    }
+
+    $featureNum = ('{0:000}' -f $resolvedNumber)
+
+    # Treat an explicit number as a preference when its prefix is already used
+    # by a feature directory. Auto-detected numbers are already conflict-free.
+    $specConflict = $false
+    if ($hasNumber -and (Test-Path -LiteralPath $specsDir -PathType Container)) {
+        $requestedBranchName = Get-FittedBranchName -FeatureNum $featureNum -BranchSuffix $branchSuffix
+        $requestedDir = Join-Path $specsDir $requestedBranchName
+        if (-not $AllowExistingBranch -or -not (Test-Path -LiteralPath $requestedDir -PathType Container)) {
+            $specConflict = Test-SpecPrefixInUse -SpecsDir $specsDir -FeatureNum $featureNum
+        }
+    }
+
+    if ($specConflict) {
+        $requestedNum = $featureNum
+        $highestNumber = Get-HighestNumberFromSpecs -SpecsDir $specsDir
+        $resolvedNumber = $highestNumber
+        do {
+            if ($resolvedNumber -eq [long]::MaxValue) {
+                Write-Error "Error: feature number must be between 0 and $([long]::MaxValue), got '9223372036854775808'"
+                exit 1
+            }
+            $resolvedNumber++
+            $featureNum = ('{0:000}' -f $resolvedNumber)
+        } while (Test-SpecPrefixInUse -SpecsDir $specsDir -FeatureNum $featureNum)
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("[specify] Warning: -Number $requestedNum conflicts with an existing spec directory; using $featureNum instead")
+    }
+
+}
+
+# GitHub enforces a 244-byte limit on branch names
+# Validate and truncate if necessary
+$originalBranchName = "$featureNum-$branchSuffix"
+$branchName = Get-FittedBranchName -FeatureNum $featureNum -BranchSuffix $branchSuffix
+if ($branchName -ne $originalBranchName) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("[specify] Warning: Branch name exceeded GitHub's 244-byte limit")
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("[specify] Original: $originalBranchName ($($originalBranchName.Length) bytes)")
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("[specify] Truncated to: $branchName ($($branchName.Length) bytes)")
+}
+
+$featureDir = Join-Path $specsDir $branchName
+$specFile = Join-Path $featureDir 'spec.md'
+
+if (-not $DryRun) {
+    if ((Test-Path -LiteralPath $featureDir -PathType Container) -and -not $AllowExistingBranch) {
+        if ($Timestamp) {
+            Write-Error "Error: Feature directory '$featureDir' already exists. Rerun to get a new timestamp or use a different -ShortName."
+        } else {
+            Write-Error "Error: Feature directory '$featureDir' already exists. Please use a different feature name or specify a different number with -Number."
+        }
+        exit 1
+    }
+
+    $needsSpec = -not (Test-Path -PathType Leaf $specFile)
+    $content = $null
+    if ($needsSpec) {
+        $content = Resolve-TemplateContent -TemplateName 'spec-template' -RepoRoot $repoRoot
+    }
+
+    New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path $featureDir -Force | Out-Null
+
+    if ($needsSpec) {
+        if ($null -ne $content) {
+            $utf8NoBom = New-Object System.Text.UTF8Encoding($false)
+            [System.IO.File]::WriteAllText($specFile, $content, $utf8NoBom)
+        } else {
+            # Match the bash twin (create-new-feature.sh): warn on stderr that no
+            # spec template was found before creating an empty spec file, so the
+            # missing-template signal is not silently swallowed on Windows.
+            [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Warning: Spec template not found; created empty spec file")
+            New-Item -ItemType File -Path $specFile -Force | Out-Null
+        }
+    }
+
+    # Persist to .specify/feature.json so downstream commands can find the feature
+    Save-FeatureJson -RepoRoot $repoRoot -FeatureDirectory $featureDir
+
+    # Set environment variables for the current session
+    $env:SPECIFY_FEATURE = $branchName
+    $env:SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY = $featureDir
+
+    $quotedBranchName = "'" + $branchName.Replace("'", "''") + "'"
+    $quotedFeatureDir = "'" + $featureDir.Replace("'", "''") + "'"
+    $featureAssignment = '$env:SPECIFY_FEATURE = ' + $quotedBranchName
+    $directoryAssignment = '$env:SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY = ' + $quotedFeatureDir
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("# To persist: $featureAssignment")
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("#              $directoryAssignment")
+}
+
+if ($Json) {
+    $obj = [PSCustomObject]@{
+        BRANCH_NAME = $branchName
+        SPEC_FILE = $specFile
+        FEATURE_NUM = $featureNum
+    }
+    if ($DryRun) {
+        $obj | Add-Member -NotePropertyName 'DRY_RUN' -NotePropertyValue $true
+    }
+    $obj | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+} else {
+    Write-Output "BRANCH_NAME: $branchName"
+    Write-Output "SPEC_FILE: $specFile"
+    Write-Output "FEATURE_NUM: $featureNum"
+    if (-not $DryRun) {
+        Write-Output "# To persist in your shell: $featureAssignment"
+        Write-Output "#                           $directoryAssignment"
+    }
+}
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..70aee0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/resolve-template.ps1
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
+
+param(
+    [Parameter(Position=0)]
+    [string]$TemplateName,
+    [switch]$Json,
+    [switch]$Help
+)
+
+$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
+
+if ($Help) {
+    Write-Output "Usage: resolve-template.ps1 <template-name> [-Json]"
+    exit 0
+}
+
+if (-not $TemplateName) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Template name is required")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+. "$PSScriptRoot/common.ps1"
+
+$repoRoot = Get-RepoRoot
+$templateContent = Resolve-TemplateContent -TemplateName $TemplateName -RepoRoot $repoRoot
+if ($null -eq $templateContent) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Could not resolve required $TemplateName from the template override stack for $repoRoot")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+if ($Json) {
+    [PSCustomObject]@{
+        TEMPLATE_NAME = $TemplateName
+        TEMPLATE_CONTENT = $templateContent
+    } | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+} else {
+    [Console]::Out.Write($templateContent)
+}
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..036a54e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-plan.ps1
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
+# Setup implementation plan for a feature
+
+[CmdletBinding()]
+param(
+    [switch]$Json,
+    [switch]$Help,
+    # Capture extra positional arguments to match Bash/Python behavior.
+    [Parameter(ValueFromRemainingArguments = $true)]
+    [string[]]$RemainingArgs
+)
+
+$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
+
+# Show help if requested
+if ($Help) {
+    Write-Output "Usage: ./setup-plan.ps1 [-Json] [-Help]"
+    Write-Output "  -Json     Output results in JSON format"
+    Write-Output "  -Help     Show this help message"
+    exit 0
+}
+
+if ($RemainingArgs.Count -gt 0) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Unknown option '$($RemainingArgs[0])'")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Load common functions
+. "$PSScriptRoot/common.ps1"
+
+# Get all paths and variables from common functions
+$paths = Get-FeaturePathsEnv -ReturnNullOnError
+if (-not $paths) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Failed to resolve feature paths")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Ensure the feature directory exists
+New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path $paths.FEATURE_DIR -Force | Out-Null
+
+# Copy plan template if plan doesn't already exist
+if (Test-Path $paths.IMPL_PLAN -PathType Leaf) {
+    if ($Json) {
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Plan already exists at $($paths.IMPL_PLAN), skipping template copy")
+    } else {
+        Write-Output "Plan already exists at $($paths.IMPL_PLAN), skipping template copy"
+    }
+} else {
+    $content = Resolve-TemplateContent -TemplateName 'plan-template' -RepoRoot $paths.REPO_ROOT
+    if ($null -ne $content) {
+        $utf8NoBom = New-Object System.Text.UTF8Encoding($false)
+        [System.IO.File]::WriteAllText($paths.IMPL_PLAN, $content, $utf8NoBom)
+        # Emit the copy status like the bash twin (setup-plan.sh); route to stderr
+        # in -Json mode so stdout stays pure JSON, matching the sibling messages.
+        if ($Json) {
+            [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Copied plan template to $($paths.IMPL_PLAN)")
+        } else {
+            Write-Output "Copied plan template to $($paths.IMPL_PLAN)"
+        }
+    } else {
+        # Match the bash twin's wording and stream routing (stderr in -Json so
+        # stdout stays pure JSON, stdout otherwise), consistent with the sibling
+        # "Copied plan template" message above.
+        if ($Json) {
+            [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Warning: Plan template not found")
+        } else {
+            Write-Output "Warning: Plan template not found"
+        }
+        # Create a basic plan file if template doesn't exist
+        New-Item -ItemType File -Path $paths.IMPL_PLAN -Force | Out-Null
+    }
+}
+
+# Output results
+if ($Json) {
+    $result = [PSCustomObject]@{
+        FEATURE_SPEC = $paths.FEATURE_SPEC
+        IMPL_PLAN = $paths.IMPL_PLAN
+        FEATURE_DIR = $paths.FEATURE_DIR
+        BRANCH = $paths.CURRENT_BRANCH
+    }
+    $result | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+} else {
+    Write-Output "FEATURE_SPEC: $($paths.FEATURE_SPEC)"
+    Write-Output "IMPL_PLAN: $($paths.IMPL_PLAN)"
+    Write-Output "FEATURE_DIR: $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)"
+    Write-Output "BRANCH: $($paths.CURRENT_BRANCH)"
+}
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..46b1bf9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/setup-tasks.ps1
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env pwsh
+
+[CmdletBinding()]
+param(
+    [switch]$Json,
+    [switch]$Help,
+    [Parameter(ValueFromRemainingArguments = $true)]
+    [string[]]$RemainingArgs
+)
+
+$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop'
+
+# Help wins over unknown-argument validation to match the Bash/Python
+# variants, which stop at --help and exit 0.
+if ($Help) {
+    Write-Output "Usage: setup-tasks.ps1 [-Json] [-Help]"
+    exit 0
+}
+
+if ($RemainingArgs.Count -gt 0) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Unknown option '$($RemainingArgs[0])'")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Source common functions
+. "$PSScriptRoot/common.ps1"
+
+# Get feature paths
+$paths = Get-FeaturePathsEnv -ReturnNullOnError
+if (-not $paths) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Failed to resolve feature paths")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+if (-not (Test-Path $paths.IMPL_PLAN -PathType Leaf)) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: plan.md not found in $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)")
+    $planCommand = '/speckit-plan'
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Run $planCommand first to create the implementation plan.")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+if (-not (Test-Path $paths.FEATURE_SPEC -PathType Leaf)) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: spec.md not found in $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)")
+    $specifyCommand = '/speckit-specify'
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Run $specifyCommand first to create the feature structure.")
+    exit 1
+}
+
+# Build available docs list
+$docs = @()
+if (Test-Path $paths.RESEARCH) { $docs += 'research.md' }
+if (Test-Path $paths.DATA_MODEL) { $docs += 'data-model.md' }
+if ((Test-Path $paths.CONTRACTS_DIR) -and (Get-ChildItem -Path $paths.CONTRACTS_DIR -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object -First 1)) {
+    $docs += 'contracts/'
+}
+if (Test-Path $paths.QUICKSTART) { $docs += 'quickstart.md' }
+
+# Resolve tasks template through override stack
+$tasksTemplate = Resolve-Template -TemplateName 'tasks-template' -RepoRoot $paths.REPO_ROOT
+$tasksTemplateContent = Resolve-TemplateContent -TemplateName 'tasks-template' -RepoRoot $paths.REPO_ROOT
+if ($null -eq $tasksTemplateContent) {
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Could not resolve required tasks-template from the template override stack for $($paths.REPO_ROOT)")
+    [Console]::Error.WriteLine("Template 'tasks-template' was not found in any supported location (overrides, presets, extensions, or shared core). Add an override at .specify/templates/overrides/tasks-template.md, or run 'specify init' / reinstall shared infra to restore the core .specify/templates/tasks-template.md template.")
+    exit 1
+}
+if ($tasksTemplate -and (Test-Path -LiteralPath $tasksTemplate -PathType Leaf)) {
+    $tasksTemplate = (Resolve-Path -LiteralPath $tasksTemplate).Path
+} else {
+    $tasksTemplate = ''
+}
+
+# Output results
+if ($Json) {
+    [PSCustomObject]@{
+        FEATURE_DIR    = $paths.FEATURE_DIR
+        AVAILABLE_DOCS = $docs
+        TASKS_TEMPLATE = $tasksTemplate
+        TASKS_TEMPLATE_CONTENT = $tasksTemplateContent
+    } | ConvertTo-Json -Compress
+} else {
+    Write-Output "FEATURE_DIR: $($paths.FEATURE_DIR)"
+    Write-Output "TASKS_TEMPLATE: $(if ($tasksTemplate) { $tasksTemplate } else { 'not found' })"
+    Write-Output "AVAILABLE_DOCS:"
+    # These helpers report their line with Write-Output and ALSO return a
+    # bool, both on the Success stream, so 'Out-Null' discarded the report
+    # line along with the return value and left AVAILABLE_DOCS empty. Drop
+    # only the boolean so the per-document lines reach stdout like the
+    # bash and Python twins.
+    Test-FileExists -Path $paths.RESEARCH -Description 'research.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    Test-FileExists -Path $paths.DATA_MODEL -Description 'data-model.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    Test-DirHasFiles -Path $paths.CONTRACTS_DIR -Description 'contracts/' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+    Test-FileExists -Path $paths.QUICKSTART -Description 'quickstart.md' | Where-Object { $_ -isnot [bool] }
+}
diff --git a/.specify/templates/checklist-template.md b/.specify/templates/checklist-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c4c4ffb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/templates/checklist-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# [CHECKLIST TYPE] Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+**Purpose**: [Brief description of what this checklist covers]
+**Created**: [DATE]
+**Feature**: [Link to spec.md or relevant documentation]
+
+**Note**: This custom checklist is generated by the `/speckit-checklist` command based on feature context and requirements.
+**Review Ownership**: This checklist is a reviewer-owned requirements-quality review artifact. Mark an item `[x]` only when the reviewer determines the requirements-quality criterion is satisfied.
+**Marker Semantics**: `[x]` means the criterion has been reviewed and satisfied for requirements quality. It does not mean implementation work is complete.
+
+<!--
+  ============================================================================
+  IMPORTANT: The checklist items below are SAMPLE ITEMS for illustration only.
+
+  The /speckit-checklist command MUST replace these with actual items based on:
+  - User's specific checklist request
+  - Feature requirements from spec.md
+  - Technical context from plan.md
+  - Implementation details from tasks.md
+
+  DO NOT keep these sample items in the generated checklist file.
+  ============================================================================
+-->
+
+## [Category 1]
+
+- [ ] CHK001 First checklist item with clear action
+- [ ] CHK002 Second checklist item
+- [ ] CHK003 Third checklist item
+
+## [Category 2]
+
+- [ ] CHK004 Another category item
+- [ ] CHK005 Item with specific criteria
+- [ ] CHK006 Final item in this category
+
+## Notes
+
+- Mark items `[x]` only after review confirms the requirement-quality criterion is satisfied
+- Leave items unchecked when they still require clarification, correction, or reviewer evaluation
+- `/speckit-implement` reads checklist checkbox state as a gate and must not modify markers
+- `checklists/requirements.md` has a separate built-in lifecycle maintained by `/speckit-specify` and `/speckit-clarify`
+- Add comments or findings inline
+- Link to relevant resources or documentation
+- Items are numbered sequentially for easy reference
diff --git a/.specify/templates/constitution-template.md b/.specify/templates/constitution-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a4670ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/templates/constitution-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# [PROJECT_NAME] Constitution
+<!-- Example: Spec Constitution, TaskFlow Constitution, etc. -->
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]
+<!-- Example: I. Library-First -->
+[PRINCIPLE_1_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Every feature starts as a standalone library; Libraries must be self-contained, independently testable, documented; Clear purpose required - no organizational-only libraries -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_2_NAME]
+<!-- Example: II. CLI Interface -->
+[PRINCIPLE_2_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Every library exposes functionality via CLI; Text in/out protocol: stdin/args → stdout, errors → stderr; Support JSON + human-readable formats -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_3_NAME]
+<!-- Example: III. Test-First (NON-NEGOTIABLE) -->
+[PRINCIPLE_3_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: TDD mandatory: Tests written → User approved → Tests fail → Then implement; Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly enforced -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_4_NAME]
+<!-- Example: IV. Integration Testing -->
+[PRINCIPLE_4_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Focus areas requiring integration tests: New library contract tests, Contract changes, Inter-service communication, Shared schemas -->
+
+### [PRINCIPLE_5_NAME]
+<!-- Example: V. Observability, VI. Versioning & Breaking Changes, VII. Simplicity -->
+[PRINCIPLE_5_DESCRIPTION]
+<!-- Example: Text I/O ensures debuggability; Structured logging required; Or: MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD format; Or: Start simple, YAGNI principles -->
+
+## [SECTION_2_NAME]
+<!-- Example: Additional Constraints, Security Requirements, Performance Standards, etc. -->
+
+[SECTION_2_CONTENT]
+<!-- Example: Technology stack requirements, compliance standards, deployment policies, etc. -->
+
+## [SECTION_3_NAME]
+<!-- Example: Development Workflow, Review Process, Quality Gates, etc. -->
+
+[SECTION_3_CONTENT]
+<!-- Example: Code review requirements, testing gates, deployment approval process, etc. -->
+
+## Governance
+<!-- Example: Constitution supersedes all other practices; Amendments require documentation, approval, migration plan -->
+
+[GOVERNANCE_RULES]
+<!-- Example: All PRs/reviews must verify compliance; Complexity must be justified; Use [GUIDANCE_FILE] for runtime development guidance -->
+
+**Version**: [CONSTITUTION_VERSION] | **Ratified**: [RATIFICATION_DATE] | **Last Amended**: [LAST_AMENDED_DATE]
+<!-- Example: Version: 2.1.1 | Ratified: 2025-06-13 | Last Amended: 2025-07-16 -->
diff --git a/.specify/templates/plan-template.md b/.specify/templates/plan-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..be1aa88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/templates/plan-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
+
+**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
+
+**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
+
+**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit-plan` command; its definition describes the execution workflow.
+
+## Summary
+
+[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
+
+## Technical Context
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
+  for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
+  the iteration process.
+-->
+
+**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
+
+**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Project Type**: [e.g., library/cli/web-service/mobile-app/compiler/desktop-app or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
+
+## Constitution Check
+
+*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
+
+[Gates determined based on constitution file]
+
+## Project Structure
+
+### Documentation (this feature)
+
+```text
+specs/[###-feature]/
+├── plan.md              # This file (/speckit-plan command output)
+├── research.md          # Phase 0 output (/speckit-plan command)
+├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit-plan command)
+├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit-plan command)
+├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output (/speckit-plan command)
+└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit-tasks command - NOT created by /speckit-plan)
+```
+
+### Source Code (repository root)
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
+  for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
+  real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
+  not include Option labels.
+-->
+
+```text
+# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
+src/
+├── models/
+├── services/
+├── cli/
+└── lib/
+
+tests/
+├── contract/
+├── integration/
+└── unit/
+
+# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
+backend/
+├── src/
+│   ├── models/
+│   ├── services/
+│   └── api/
+└── tests/
+
+frontend/
+├── src/
+│   ├── components/
+│   ├── pages/
+│   └── services/
+└── tests/
+
+# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
+api/
+└── [same as backend above]
+
+ios/ or android/
+└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
+```
+
+**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
+directories captured above]
+
+## Complexity Tracking
+
+> **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified**
+
+| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
+|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
+| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
+| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |
diff --git a/.specify/templates/spec-template.md b/.specify/templates/spec-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ceb2877
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/templates/spec-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
+
+**Created**: [DATE]
+
+**Status**: Draft
+
+**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
+
+## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
+  Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
+  you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
+
+  Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
+  Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
+  - Developed independently
+  - Tested independently
+  - Deployed independently
+  - Demonstrated to users independently
+-->
+
+### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
+
+[Describe this user journey in plain language]
+
+**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
+
+**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+
+---
+
+### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
+
+[Describe this user journey in plain language]
+
+**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
+
+**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+
+---
+
+### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
+
+[Describe this user journey in plain language]
+
+**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
+
+**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
+
+---
+
+[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
+
+### Edge Cases
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
+  Fill them out with the right edge cases.
+-->
+
+- What happens when [boundary condition]?
+- How does system handle [error scenario]?
+
+## Requirements *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
+  Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
+-->
+
+### Functional Requirements
+
+- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
+- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
+- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
+- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
+- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
+
+*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
+
+- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
+- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
+
+### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
+
+- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
+- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
+
+## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
+  These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
+-->
+
+### Measurable Outcomes
+
+- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
+- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
+- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
+- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
+
+## Assumptions
+
+<!--
+  ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
+  Fill them out with the right assumptions based on reasonable defaults
+  chosen when the feature description did not specify certain details.
+-->
+
+- [Assumption about target users, e.g., "Users have stable internet connectivity"]
+- [Assumption about scope boundaries, e.g., "Mobile support is out of scope for v1"]
+- [Assumption about data/environment, e.g., "Existing authentication system will be reused"]
+- [Dependency on existing system/service, e.g., "Requires access to the existing user profile API"]
diff --git a/.specify/templates/tasks-template.md b/.specify/templates/tasks-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d46a1f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/templates/tasks-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+---
+
+description: "Task list template for feature implementation"
+---
+
+# Tasks: [FEATURE NAME]
+
+**Input**: Design documents from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/`
+
+**Prerequisites**: plan.md (required), spec.md (required for user stories), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
+
+**Tests**: The examples below include test tasks. Tests are OPTIONAL - only include them if explicitly requested in the feature specification.
+
+**Organization**: Tasks are grouped by user story to enable independent implementation and testing of each story.
+
+## Format: `[ID] [P?] [Story] Description`
+
+- **[P]**: Can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)
+- **[Story]**: Which user story this task belongs to (e.g., US1, US2, US3)
+- Include exact file paths in descriptions
+
+## Path Conventions
+
+- **Single project**: `src/`, `tests/` at repository root
+- **Web app**: `backend/src/`, `frontend/src/`
+- **Mobile**: `api/src/`, `ios/src/` or `android/src/`
+- Paths shown below assume single project - adjust based on plan.md structure
+
+<!--
+  ============================================================================
+  IMPORTANT: The tasks below are SAMPLE TASKS for illustration purposes only.
+
+  The /speckit-tasks command MUST replace these with actual tasks based on:
+  - User stories from spec.md (with their priorities P1, P2, P3...)
+  - Feature requirements from plan.md
+  - Entities from data-model.md
+  - Endpoints from contracts/
+
+  Tasks MUST be organized by user story so each story can be:
+  - Implemented independently
+  - Tested independently
+  - Delivered as an MVP increment
+
+  DO NOT keep these sample tasks in the generated tasks.md file.
+  ============================================================================
+-->
+
+## Phase 1: Setup (Shared Infrastructure)
+
+**Purpose**: Project initialization and basic structure
+
+- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan
+- [ ] T002 Initialize [language] project with [framework] dependencies
+- [ ] T003 [P] Configure linting and formatting tools
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: Foundational (Blocking Prerequisites)
+
+**Purpose**: Core infrastructure that MUST be complete before ANY user story can be implemented
+
+**⚠️ CRITICAL**: No user story work can begin until this phase is complete
+
+Examples of foundational tasks (adjust based on your project):
+
+- [ ] T004 Setup database schema and migrations framework
+- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication/authorization framework
+- [ ] T006 [P] Setup API routing and middleware structure
+- [ ] T007 Create base models/entities that all stories depend on
+- [ ] T008 Configure error handling and logging infrastructure
+- [ ] T009 Setup environment configuration management
+
+**Checkpoint**: Foundation ready - user story implementation can now begin in parallel
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: User Story 1 - [Title] (Priority: P1) 🎯 MVP
+
+**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
+
+**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
+
+### Tests for User Story 1 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
+
+> **NOTE: Write these tests FIRST, ensure they FAIL before implementation**
+
+- [ ] T010 [P] [US1] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
+- [ ] T011 [P] [US1] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
+
+### Implementation for User Story 1
+
+- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py
+- [ ] T013 [P] [US1] Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py
+- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py (depends on T012, T013)
+- [ ] T015 [US1] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
+- [ ] T016 [US1] Add validation and error handling
+- [ ] T017 [US1] Add logging for user story 1 operations
+
+**Checkpoint**: At this point, User Story 1 should be fully functional and testable independently
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: User Story 2 - [Title] (Priority: P2)
+
+**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
+
+**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
+
+### Tests for User Story 2 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
+
+- [ ] T018 [P] [US2] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
+- [ ] T019 [P] [US2] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
+
+### Implementation for User Story 2
+
+- [ ] T020 [P] [US2] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
+- [ ] T021 [US2] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
+- [ ] T022 [US2] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
+- [ ] T023 [US2] Integrate with User Story 1 components (if needed)
+
+**Checkpoint**: At this point, User Stories 1 AND 2 should both work independently
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: User Story 3 - [Title] (Priority: P3)
+
+**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
+
+**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
+
+### Tests for User Story 3 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
+
+- [ ] T024 [P] [US3] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
+- [ ] T025 [P] [US3] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
+
+### Implementation for User Story 3
+
+- [ ] T026 [P] [US3] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
+- [ ] T027 [US3] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
+- [ ] T028 [US3] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
+
+**Checkpoint**: All user stories should now be independently functional
+
+---
+
+[Add more user story phases as needed, following the same pattern]
+
+---
+
+## Phase N: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
+
+**Purpose**: Improvements that affect multiple user stories
+
+- [ ] TXXX [P] Documentation updates in docs/
+- [ ] TXXX Code cleanup and refactoring
+- [ ] TXXX Performance optimization across all stories
+- [ ] TXXX [P] Additional unit tests (if requested) in tests/unit/
+- [ ] TXXX Security hardening
+- [ ] TXXX Run quickstart.md validation
+
+---
+
+## Dependencies & Execution Order
+
+### Phase Dependencies
+
+- **Setup (Phase 1)**: No dependencies - can start immediately
+- **Foundational (Phase 2)**: Depends on Setup completion - BLOCKS all user stories
+- **User Stories (Phase 3+)**: All depend on Foundational phase completion
+  - User stories can then proceed in parallel (if staffed)
+  - Or sequentially in priority order (P1 → P2 → P3)
+- **Polish (Final Phase)**: Depends on all desired user stories being complete
+
+### User Story Dependencies
+
+- **User Story 1 (P1)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - No dependencies on other stories
+- **User Story 2 (P2)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1 but should be independently testable
+- **User Story 3 (P3)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1/US2 but should be independently testable
+
+### Within Each User Story
+
+- Tests (if included) MUST be written and FAIL before implementation
+- Models before services
+- Services before endpoints
+- Core implementation before integration
+- Story complete before moving to next priority
+
+### Parallel Opportunities
+
+- All Setup tasks marked [P] can run in parallel
+- All Foundational tasks marked [P] can run in parallel (within Phase 2)
+- Once Foundational phase completes, all user stories can start in parallel (if team capacity allows)
+- All tests for a user story marked [P] can run in parallel
+- Models within a story marked [P] can run in parallel
+- Different user stories can be worked on in parallel by different team members
+
+---
+
+## Parallel Example: User Story 1
+
+```bash
+# Launch all tests for User Story 1 together (if tests requested):
+Task: "Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py"
+Task: "Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py"
+
+# Launch all models for User Story 1 together:
+Task: "Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py"
+Task: "Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py"
+```
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Strategy
+
+### MVP First (User Story 1 Only)
+
+1. Complete Phase 1: Setup
+2. Complete Phase 2: Foundational (CRITICAL - blocks all stories)
+3. Complete Phase 3: User Story 1
+4. **STOP and VALIDATE**: Test User Story 1 independently
+5. Deploy/demo if ready
+
+### Incremental Delivery
+
+1. Complete Setup + Foundational → Foundation ready
+2. Add User Story 1 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo (MVP!)
+3. Add User Story 2 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
+4. Add User Story 3 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
+5. Each story adds value without breaking previous stories
+
+### Parallel Team Strategy
+
+With multiple developers:
+
+1. Team completes Setup + Foundational together
+2. Once Foundational is done:
+   - Developer A: User Story 1
+   - Developer B: User Story 2
+   - Developer C: User Story 3
+3. Stories complete and integrate independently
+
+---
+
+## Notes
+
+- [P] tasks = different files, no dependencies
+- [Story] label maps task to specific user story for traceability
+- Each user story should be independently completable and testable
+- Verify tests fail before implementing
+- Commit after each task or logical group
+- Stop at any checkpoint to validate story independently
+- Avoid: vague tasks, same file conflicts, cross-story dependencies that break independence
diff --git a/.specify/workflows/speckit/workflow.yml b/.specify/workflows/speckit/workflow.yml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..571318a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/workflows/speckit/workflow.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+schema_version: "1.0"
+workflow:
+  id: "speckit"
+  name: "Full SDD Cycle"
+  version: "1.0.1"
+  author: "GitHub"
+  description: "Runs specify → plan → tasks → implement with review gates"
+
+requires:
+  # 0.8.5 is the first release with engine-side resolution of the
+  # ``integration: "auto"`` default. Older versions would treat "auto"
+  # as a literal integration key and fail at dispatch.
+  speckit_version: ">=0.8.5"
+  integrations:
+    # The four commands below (specify, plan, tasks, implement) are core
+    # spec-kit commands provided by every integration. The list here is an
+    # advisory, non-exhaustive compatibility hint following the documented
+    # ``any: [...]`` schema -- it is NOT a closed set. The workflow runs
+    # against any integration the project was initialized with, including
+    # ones not listed below, as long as that integration provides the four
+    # core commands referenced in ``steps``.
+    any:
+      - "alquimia"
+      - "claude"
+      - "copilot"
+      - "gemini"
+      - "opencode"
+
+inputs:
+  spec:
+    type: string
+    required: true
+    prompt: "Describe what you want to build"
+  integration:
+    type: string
+    default: "auto"
+    prompt: "Integration to use (e.g. claude, copilot, gemini; 'auto' uses the project's initialized integration)"
+
+steps:
+  - id: specify
+    command: speckit.specify
+    integration: "{{ inputs.integration }}"
+    input:
+      args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
+
+  - id: review-spec
+    type: gate
+    message: "Review the generated spec before planning."
+    options: [approve, reject]
+    on_reject: abort
+
+  - id: plan
+    command: speckit.plan
+    integration: "{{ inputs.integration }}"
+    input:
+      args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
+
+  - id: review-plan
+    type: gate
+    message: "Review the plan before generating tasks."
+    options: [approve, reject]
+    on_reject: abort
+
+  - id: tasks
+    command: speckit.tasks
+    integration: "{{ inputs.integration }}"
+    input:
+      args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
+
+  - id: implement
+    command: speckit.implement
+    integration: "{{ inputs.integration }}"
+    input:
+      args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
diff --git a/.specify/workflows/workflow-registry.json b/.specify/workflows/workflow-registry.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..77d16ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.specify/workflows/workflow-registry.json
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "1.0",
+  "workflows": {
+    "speckit": {
+      "name": "Full SDD Cycle",
+      "version": "1.0.1",
+      "description": "Runs specify \u2192 plan \u2192 tasks \u2192 implement with review gates",
+      "source": "bundled",
+      "installed_at": "2026-09-14T13:44:39.665834+00:00",
+      "updated_at": "2026-09-14T13:44:39.665865+00:00"
+    }
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md
index 8dfd8c3..ed30c60 100644
--- a/AGENTS.md
+++ b/AGENTS.md
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ Do not add WordPress.org-specific bureaucracy unless there is clear value.
 ├── package.json
 ├── composer.json
 ├── theme-utils.mjs            # Validation and utility script
+├── .specify/                  # Spec Kit config, templates, constitution (active spec workflow)
+├── specs/                     # Spec Kit feature specs (spec.md/plan.md/tasks.md per feature)
+├── openspec/                  # Frozen historical record — do not edit, see Spec-Driven Workflow
+├── .claude/                   # Claude Code skills installed by Spec Kit
 ├── assets/
 │   ├── fonts/                 # Binary font assets (.woff2 etc.)
 │   ├── icons/
@@ -227,16 +231,41 @@ composer run lint:php
 
 ---
 
+## Spec-Driven Workflow
+
+This repo uses [GitHub Spec Kit](https://github.com/github/spec-kit) as its **active** spec-driven
+workflow for all feature work going forward. Run these skills in order, once per feature:
+`/speckit-specify` → `/speckit-clarify` (recommended) → `/speckit-plan` → `/speckit-tasks` →
+`/speckit-checklist`/`/speckit-analyze` (optional) → `/speckit-implement` → `/speckit-converge`
+(optional). Each feature's artifacts live in `specs/<NNN-feature-name>/`. Project principles live
+in `.specify/memory/constitution.md` — it is derived from this file (`AGENTS.md`); if the two ever
+disagree, update `AGENTS.md` first and sync the constitution afterward, never the reverse.
+
+Create or switch to the feature branch **before** running any `/speckit-*` command — specs are
+written against the current branch. Feature branches come off `develop`, not `main`, per this
+repo's existing branching convention.
+
+`openspec/` is a **frozen historical record** of work designed and shipped before Spec Kit was
+adopted (2026-09-14) — `base-styles`, `design-tokens`, `pattern-library`, `template-parts`,
+`templates`, and their archived change proposals. Do not edit, extend, or archive new changes into
+it; it exists only so past decisions and their rationale stay traceable. Treat it as read-only
+reference, not as active guidance.
+
+---
+
 ## AI Folder Expectations
 
-| Folder                  | Purpose                                      |
-|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
-| `.github/prompts/`      | Reusable GitHub Copilot prompt files         |
-| `.github/reports/`      | Developer and AI-generated reports           |
-| `.github/tasks/`        | Task lists and AI-maintained work tracking   |
-| `.github/instructions/` | Copilot instruction files per file type      |
-| `.agents/skills/`       | Portable, reusable AI skills                 |
-| `.agents/agents/`       | Agent persona definitions                    |
+| Folder                  | Purpose                                    |
+|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
+| `.github/prompts/`      | Reusable GitHub Copilot prompt files       |
+| `.github/reports/`      | Developer and AI-generated reports         |
+| `.github/tasks/`        | Task lists and AI-maintained work tracking |
+| `.github/instructions/` | Copilot instruction files per file type    |
+| `.agents/skills/`       | Portable, reusable AI skills               |
+| `.agents/agents/`       | Agent persona definitions                  |
+| `.specify/`             | Spec Kit config, templates, constitution   |
+| `specs/`                | Spec Kit feature specs (active workflow)   |
+| `openspec/`             | Frozen historical record (do not edit)     |
 
 ---
 
@@ -260,3 +289,5 @@ composer run lint:php
 16. **Do not flag site-specific hard-coded values as portability gaps.** This is a specific client theme, not a starter template — a real navigation menu `ref`, real asset paths, and real content are correct here, not something to generalize.
 17. **Read `.agents/skills/wp-block-pattern-gotchas/SKILL.md` before writing or debugging `patterns/*.php`, `templates/*.html`, or `parts/*.html`.** It documents known WordPress core behaviors that fail silently — see "Pattern and Template Development" above.
 18. **Verify a WordPress core mechanism against its actual source before implementing it** — `wp-includes/block-supports/*.php` for layout/spacing, a block's `block.json` for its real attributes/supports — rather than assuming from memory. Do not guess at layout types, attribute serialization, or spacing behavior.
+19. **Use Spec Kit (`specs/`, `.specify/`) for all new feature work.** Do not edit or extend `openspec/` — it is a frozen historical record, not an active workflow. See "Spec-Driven Workflow" above.
+20. **Create/switch to the feature branch before running any `/speckit-*` command**, and branch it off `develop`, not `main`.
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index c96bfc7..2912c2c 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 - Three named `core/button` block-style variations — `styles/blocks/button/primary.json`, `dark.json`, `dark-pill.json` — matching the dashboard CTA, article action, and header nav CTA button treatments confirmed in Figma dev-mode frames.
 - `openspec/specs/base-styles/` capability spec, documenting the base element/block styling requirements this change adds.
 - `openspec/changes/archive/2026-08-05-spotlight-global-styles-and-block-rules/` proposal, design, and task artifacts for LS-1711.
+- GitHub Spec Kit (`/speckit-*`) as the repo's active spec-driven workflow: `.specify/` (config, templates, `memory/constitution.md` ratified v1.0.0 from `AGENTS.md`) plus Claude Code and GitHub Copilot skills (`.claude/skills/speckit-*/`, `.github/skills/speckit-*/`). `AGENTS.md` documents the new workflow and folder conventions (see LS-4126).
 
 ### Changed
 
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 ### Removed
 
 - `assets/css/template-parts.css` and its `wp_enqueue_style()` call in `functions.php` — its one remaining rule (the header search-button's outline-circle border) was removed per design feedback; the trust-bar and FAIR-badge rules it used to carry were already superseded earlier. Nothing left in the file to keep it around for (see `docs/foundation-exceptions.md`).
+- OpenSpec's active tooling, superseded by Spec Kit: `.github/prompts/opsx-*.prompt.md`, `.claude/skills/openspec-*/`, `.github/skills/openspec-*/`, `.claude/commands/opsx/*.md`. `openspec/` itself (specs and archived changes) is untouched and kept as a frozen historical record (see LS-4126).
 
 ### Fixed
 

From 8e2a9eeed403f2a06504d85ddcf711127d3bc79e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose Abreu <josearmandoabreu.85@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:57:50 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Address Copilot review feedback on PR #20

Fix a path-containment gap in .specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1:
Get-FeaturePathsEnv resolved SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY (env var or
feature.json) without checking the result stayed inside the repo,
so a "../.." value or an absolute path elsewhere would be used as-is
for reads/writes. Canonicalises the path and rejects anything outside
$repoRoot, mirroring the existing Resolve-SpecifyInitDir pattern.
Verified: a traversal value is now rejected, a legitimate relative
path still resolves correctly.

Also: drop the leftover Sync Impact Report scratch comment from
constitution.md (was left in by mistake), correct its validation
commands to the exact runnable npm/composer scripts and add the
missing composer run lint:php (v1.0.0 -> v1.0.1); document the
PowerShell 7 (pwsh) prerequisite in AGENTS.md for every /speckit-*
command; and persist claude alongside copilot in
.specify/integration.json's installed_integrations, which only
recorded the most recently installed agent.
---
 .specify/integration.json              |  5 +++++
 .specify/memory/constitution.md        | 21 ++++-----------------
 .specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1 | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 AGENTS.md                              |  3 +++
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.specify/integration.json b/.specify/integration.json
index 13b6eac..03d5679 100644
--- a/.specify/integration.json
+++ b/.specify/integration.json
@@ -2,9 +2,14 @@
   "version": "1.0.7.dev0",
   "integration_state_schema": 1,
   "installed_integrations": [
+    "claude",
     "copilot"
   ],
   "integration_settings": {
+    "claude": {
+      "script": "ps",
+      "invoke_separator": "-"
+    },
     "copilot": {
       "script": "ps",
       "invoke_separator": "-"
diff --git a/.specify/memory/constitution.md b/.specify/memory/constitution.md
index 766f314..0e65ae6 100644
--- a/.specify/memory/constitution.md
+++ b/.specify/memory/constitution.md
@@ -1,16 +1,3 @@
-<!--
-SYNC IMPACT REPORT
-Version change: [TEMPLATE] → 1.0.0 (initial ratification)
-Modified principles: n/a — first ratification, all principles newly defined from AGENTS.md
-Added sections: Core Principles (I–VII), Site Identity & Scope Constraints,
-  Spec-Driven Workflow & Branching, Governance
-Removed sections: none
-Templates requiring updates: none — plan/spec/tasks templates reference the constitution
-  generically and need no direct edits
-Follow-up TODOs: none
-This report is scratch material for human review; remove it once the amendment is reviewed.
--->
-
 # Spotlight Theme 2026 Constitution
 
 ## Core Principles
@@ -95,9 +82,9 @@ their rationale remain traceable.
 Create or switch to the feature's branch before running any `/speckit-*` command — specs are
 written against the current branch/feature directory. Feature branches for spec work branch
 off `develop`, never `main`, matching this repository's existing branching convention. Before
-a spec's tasks are considered complete, the validation commands in `AGENTS.md` (`npm run
-lint`, `schema:validate`, `theme:validate`, `patterns:escape`, `security:scan`, `composer run
-phpcs`) MUST pass.
+a spec's tasks are considered complete, the validation commands in `AGENTS.md` (`npm run lint`,
+`npm run schema:validate`, `npm run theme:validate`, `npm run patterns:escape`, `npm run
+security:scan`, `composer run phpcs`, `composer run lint:php`) MUST pass.
 
 ## Governance
 
@@ -116,4 +103,4 @@ Versioning follows semantic versioning: MAJOR for backward-incompatible principl
 redefinitions, MINOR for a new principle or materially expanded guidance, PATCH for wording or
 clarification-only edits.
 
-**Version**: 1.0.0 | **Ratified**: 2026-09-14 | **Last Amended**: 2026-09-14
+**Version**: 1.0.1 | **Ratified**: 2026-09-14 | **Last Amended**: 2026-09-14
diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
index bb61f62..33ef451 100644
--- a/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
@@ -212,6 +212,27 @@ function Get-FeaturePathsEnv {
         exit 1
     }
 
+    # Guard against SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY / feature.json resolving outside the
+    # repo (via a "../.." traversal or an absolute path elsewhere) before any
+    # caller uses $featureDir for reads or writes. GetFullPath canonicalises "."
+    # and ".." lexically without requiring the path to exist yet (unlike
+    # Resolve-Path, since a brand-new feature directory may not exist yet).
+    $repoRootFull = (Resolve-Path -LiteralPath $repoRoot).Path.TrimEnd('/', '\')
+    $featureDirFull = [System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath($featureDir).TrimEnd('/', '\')
+    if ($null -ne $IsWindows) { $onWin = $IsWindows } else { $onWin = $true }
+    if ($onWin) {
+        $cmp = [System.StringComparison]::OrdinalIgnoreCase
+    } else {
+        $cmp = [System.StringComparison]::Ordinal
+    }
+    $isContained = ($featureDirFull -eq $repoRootFull) -or $featureDirFull.StartsWith($repoRootFull + [System.IO.Path]::DirectorySeparatorChar, $cmp)
+    if (-not $isContained) {
+        [Console]::Error.WriteLine("ERROR: Resolved feature directory is outside the repository root: $featureDirFull")
+        if ($ReturnNullOnError) { return $null }
+        exit 1
+    }
+    $featureDir = $featureDirFull
+
     # When no branch context exists (no SPECIFY_FEATURE, feature resolved via
     # SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY or feature.json), fall back to the feature
     # directory basename so CURRENT_BRANCH is a usable identifier rather than
diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md
index ed30c60..c246e1d 100644
--- a/AGENTS.md
+++ b/AGENTS.md
@@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ workflow for all feature work going forward. Run these skills in order, once per
 in `.specify/memory/constitution.md` — it is derived from this file (`AGENTS.md`); if the two ever
 disagree, update `AGENTS.md` first and sync the constitution afterward, never the reverse.
 
+Every `/speckit-*` command shells out to a PowerShell script in `.specify/scripts/powershell/`.
+PowerShell 7+ (`pwsh`) must be installed and on `PATH`, or these commands fail outright.
+
 Create or switch to the feature branch **before** running any `/speckit-*` command — specs are
 written against the current branch. Feature branches come off `develop`, not `main`, per this
 repo's existing branching convention.

From 7478eef94406eceef8eded25880925899a10e51b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose Abreu <josearmandoabreu.85@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:22:23 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Fix path-containment gap in speckit-specify's own
 instructions

common.ps1's fix didn't cover this: the /speckit-specify skill's
prose instructions tell the agent to take SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY
"as-is" and mkdir/write into it directly, with no containment check
of their own, for both the Claude and Copilot copies of the skill.
Adds the same validate-before-create step in both.
---
 .claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md | 1 +
 .github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
index 25daab1..bcf9061 100644
--- a/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
+++ b/.claude/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ Given that feature description, do this:
       - If `branch_numbering` was used (and `feature_numbering` was absent), emit a one-line warning: "⚠️ `branch_numbering` in init-options.json is deprecated. Rename to `feature_numbering`."
 
    **Create the directory and spec file**:
+   - **Validate containment first**: resolve `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` to an absolute path and confirm it stays within the repository root before creating anything. If it escapes the repo (via a `../` traversal or an absolute path elsewhere), stop with an error instead of creating a directory or writing any file.
    - `mkdir -p SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`
    - Resolve the active `spec-template` through the Spec Kit preset/template resolution stack (equivalent to `specify preset resolve spec-template`)
    - Copy the resolved `spec-template` file to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md` as the starting point
diff --git a/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
index e904f64..1c4239e 100644
--- a/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
+++ b/.github/skills/speckit-specify/SKILL.md
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ Given that feature description, do this:
       - If `branch_numbering` was used (and `feature_numbering` was absent), emit a one-line warning: "⚠️ `branch_numbering` in init-options.json is deprecated. Rename to `feature_numbering`."
 
    **Create the directory and spec file**:
+   - **Validate containment first**: resolve `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY` to an absolute path and confirm it stays within the repository root before creating anything. If it escapes the repo (via a `../` traversal or an absolute path elsewhere), stop with an error instead of creating a directory or writing any file.
    - `mkdir -p SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`
    - Resolve the active `spec-template` through the Spec Kit preset/template resolution stack (equivalent to `specify preset resolve spec-template`)
    - Copy the resolved `spec-template` file to `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY/spec.md` as the starting point

From f3b313106b2b7a245f8989b82bc0469d8a9e1355 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose Abreu <josearmandoabreu.85@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:49:57 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Address second round of Copilot review feedback on PR #20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

- CHANGELOG.md: fix a stale "ratified v1.0.0" reference — the
  security-fix commit already bumped the constitution to v1.0.1.
- AGENTS.md: add the missing .github/skills/ entry to the repo tree
  and the AI Folder Expectations table (only .claude/ was documented
  before), plus a .claude/skills/ row for the same reason.
- common.ps1: document the known, accepted limitation that the
  containment check is a lexical path comparison, not symlink/junction
  -aware. Not fixing further: this tool only runs against a trusted
  local checkout, and exploiting it needs a symlink someone already
  planted on their own machine — no external input reaches this path.
---
 .specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1 | 5 +++++
 AGENTS.md                              | 3 +++
 CHANGELOG.md                           | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1 b/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
index 33ef451..4e01e87 100644
--- a/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
+++ b/.specify/scripts/powershell/common.ps1
@@ -217,6 +217,11 @@ function Get-FeaturePathsEnv {
     # caller uses $featureDir for reads or writes. GetFullPath canonicalises "."
     # and ".." lexically without requiring the path to exist yet (unlike
     # Resolve-Path, since a brand-new feature directory may not exist yet).
+    # Known accepted limitation: this is a string comparison on the lexical path,
+    # not a symlink/junction-aware resolution -- an existing reparse point inside
+    # specs/ pointing outside the repo would still pass. Accepted for now: this
+    # tool only runs against a trusted local checkout, never external input, and
+    # exploiting it requires a symlink someone already planted on their own machine.
     $repoRootFull = (Resolve-Path -LiteralPath $repoRoot).Path.TrimEnd('/', '\')
     $featureDirFull = [System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath($featureDir).TrimEnd('/', '\')
     if ($null -ne $IsWindows) { $onWin = $IsWindows } else { $onWin = $true }
diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md
index c246e1d..926be1f 100644
--- a/AGENTS.md
+++ b/AGENTS.md
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ Do not add WordPress.org-specific bureaucracy unless there is clear value.
 │   ├── copilot-instructions.md
 │   ├── instructions/
 │   ├── prompts/
+│   ├── skills/                # Copilot skills installed by Spec Kit
 │   ├── reports/
 │   ├── tasks/
 │   └── workflows/
@@ -264,8 +265,10 @@ reference, not as active guidance.
 | `.github/reports/`      | Developer and AI-generated reports         |
 | `.github/tasks/`        | Task lists and AI-maintained work tracking |
 | `.github/instructions/` | Copilot instruction files per file type    |
+| `.github/skills/`       | Copilot skills installed by Spec Kit       |
 | `.agents/skills/`       | Portable, reusable AI skills               |
 | `.agents/agents/`       | Agent persona definitions                  |
+| `.claude/skills/`       | Claude Code skills installed by Spec Kit   |
 | `.specify/`             | Spec Kit config, templates, constitution   |
 | `specs/`                | Spec Kit feature specs (active workflow)   |
 | `openspec/`             | Frozen historical record (do not edit)     |
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 2912c2c..43b0344 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 - Three named `core/button` block-style variations — `styles/blocks/button/primary.json`, `dark.json`, `dark-pill.json` — matching the dashboard CTA, article action, and header nav CTA button treatments confirmed in Figma dev-mode frames.
 - `openspec/specs/base-styles/` capability spec, documenting the base element/block styling requirements this change adds.
 - `openspec/changes/archive/2026-08-05-spotlight-global-styles-and-block-rules/` proposal, design, and task artifacts for LS-1711.
-- GitHub Spec Kit (`/speckit-*`) as the repo's active spec-driven workflow: `.specify/` (config, templates, `memory/constitution.md` ratified v1.0.0 from `AGENTS.md`) plus Claude Code and GitHub Copilot skills (`.claude/skills/speckit-*/`, `.github/skills/speckit-*/`). `AGENTS.md` documents the new workflow and folder conventions (see LS-4126).
+- GitHub Spec Kit (`/speckit-*`) as the repo's active spec-driven workflow: `.specify/` (config, templates, `memory/constitution.md` ratified v1.0.1 from `AGENTS.md`) plus Claude Code and GitHub Copilot skills (`.claude/skills/speckit-*/`, `.github/skills/speckit-*/`). `AGENTS.md` documents the new workflow and folder conventions (see LS-4126).
 
 ### Changed