[safe-output-health] Safe Output Health Report - 2026-04-06 #24892
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Safe Output Health Monitor. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #25096. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Overall system health: HEALTHY — fourth consecutive day with zero hard failures.
Safe Output Job Statistics
create_discussioncreate_issueadd_labelsset_issue_typesubmit_pull_request_reviewcreate_pull_request_review_commentObservations
Non-Fatal Warning:
submit_pull_request_reviewon Scheduled Run##[warning]No review context set - cannot submit reviewsubmit_pull_request_reviewmessage was processed successfully (message 3 ✓), but at finalization, there was no active PR context to submit the review body to. The system correctly counted this asFailed: 0and emitted a warning rather than an error.Runs Where Safe Outputs Were Skipped (Infrastructure Failures)
These are not safe output failures. Safe outputs were correctly gated by the
needs.detection.result == 'success'condition.View Skipped Runs Detail
##[error]Bad credentialson side-repo checkout##[error]Bad credentialson side-repo checkoutFailed to save project registry)Note on Cross-Repo Smoke Tests: Both
Smoke Create Cross-Repo PRandSmoke Update Cross-Repo PRfailed withBad credentialswhen checking outgithubnext/gh-aw-side-repo. This is an infrastructure/credentials issue outside the scope of safe output health, but worth monitoring as a recurring pattern.Note on Smoke Gemini: Exit code 41 with a file system error (
rename .tmp -> projects.json) suggests a transient file system condition in the Gemini CLI. Not a safe output concern.Successful Safe Output Runs
View Successful Runs Detail
Smoke Copilot (§24032487186)
smoke-copilotkeyConstraint Solving — Problem of the Day (§24032484822)
create_discussion: success — closed 🧩 Constraint Solving POTD:Knapsack Problem — Packing & Cutting #24733, applied labelsconstraint-solving,problem-of-the-dayAuto-Triage Issues (§24032251288)
add_labels: successcreate_discussion: success — closed [Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Report — 2026-04-06 #24839, created new triage reportPR Triage Agent (§24031918046)
create_issue: success — created #24880, closed [PR Triage Report] PR Triage Report - 2026-04-06 #24797GitHub MCP Structural Analysis (§24031162917)
create_discussion: success — created #24878Historical Context
View 7-Day Trend
Trend: Four consecutive days of zero hard failures. Warnings are minor and expected (validation limits, context mismatches on schedule triggers).
Recurring patterns not seen today:
push_to_pull_request_branch_files_outside_allowed_list(last: 2026-04-02)add_labels_no_issue_number(last: 2026-03-30)api_rate_limit_concurrent_burst(last: 2026-04-02)Recommendations
No critical issues requiring immediate action.
Low Priority:
submit_pull_request_reviewin Non-PR ContextThe Smoke Copilot workflow tests
submit_pull_request_reviewon a scheduled run, which produces a non-fatal warning at finalization. Consider either:submit_pull_request_reviewwhen triggered by a PR eventMonitor: Cross-Repo Smoke Test Credential Failures
Two cross-repo smoke tests (
Smoke Create Cross-Repo PR,Smoke Update Cross-Repo PR) both showedBad credentialson side-repo checkout. This has appeared before. If it becomes persistent, the side-repo token/credentials should be rotated or re-scoped.Metrics
create_discussion,create_issue(100%)submit_pull_request_reviewfinalization in non-PR contextReferences:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions