Repository navigation
scalability/scalability #944
Replies: 0 comments 6 replies
|
The parties that are over the 200 limit - are they determined by creation-date? Meaning, there is no chance that an already working party, under the 200 limit, will be after the limit as more parties are added due to some other sorting mechanism (say alphabetical) ? |
|
Did I understand correctly, if we use directly |
|
Curious how does it work under the hood and why does |
|
We investigated this limitation on one of our devnet nodes. We created ~500 parties and onboarded them to the Wallet, which resulted in the creation of the After that, we noticed that every attempt to connect to the Canton participant failed with the following error: This happened because the Validator itself overloaded the Participant with connections to By offboarding, we mean removing the To resolve this, we wrote a script that manually archived the Even then, we couldn’t connect to the participant, so we temporarily shut down our Validator node. We then ran the script, which archived the Aftermath: The devnet now works relatively well. The only missing part is that the devnet Validator, which was a Featured App Party, no longer receives the Featured App Rewards. We are currently investigating this. It seems the party still receives the |
|
2026-01-05 Update on party scaling on the global synchronizer (gsync)
The Canton Foundation coordinates the per-wallet party onboarding cap between the Canton engineering team and the Validator node operators; reach out to operations - at - canton.foundation to learn more. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
scalability/scalability
https://hyperledger-labs.github.io/splice/scalability/scalability.html
All reactions