Skip to content

Include hidden TypeScript integrations in CodeQL scanning - #240

Draft
bluet with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
copilot/fix-analyze-javascript-job
Draft

bluet with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
copilot/fix-analyze-javascript-job

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CodeQL’s JavaScript analysis failed because the extractor skipped source under .pi/ and .opencode/, leaving no processable TypeScript files.

  • Scan paths: Add explicit roots while retaining repository-wide coverage:
    paths:
      - '**'
      - .opencode
      - .pi
  • Setup: GitHub’s managed default setup must be configured to use .github/codeql/codeql-config.yml; it does not discover the file automatically.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Repository UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 58f649d9-5056-40d3-a18f-08b0d708037d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

Co-authored-by: bluet <51141+bluet@users.noreply.github.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix failing GitHub Actions job Analyze (javascript) Include hidden TypeScript integrations in CodeQL scanning Oct 31, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from bluet October 31, 2026 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants